Alien Workshop is like the mob . if they make you a offer you cant say no . In a good way

Would have been better to wait for strange world to drop then switch companys to get footage out , no ?

and Strike a Pose is a idiot

Come on Gipper you're an intelligent guy, "confederate products" do not equal racism you know that, that is a ridiculous allegation. I guess I don't know who the this 'open homophobe' is, just because someone is Christian doesn't mean they're homophobic.

You are bumming me out so much right now, Gipper. Not immediately recognizing Crockett's value and calling a kickflip fs nosegrind down a large hubba anticlimactic. I can't believe what I'm reading. It reminds me of the time you said you thought Guru Khalsa's part in Origins was weak. It wasn't the same level of wtf I'm feeling right now, but that was pretty bad too.

I response isn't emotional at all, I don't care about Zero whatsoever, I just don't like it when pussies try to label people as racist or homophobic when they are only guilty of lacking political correctness. I'm not fan of Josiah whatsoever, in fact I couldn't care less about his skateboarding or his career, I also haven't seen these statements people are speaking of, where he made 'homophobic' remarks. I will say that my original response was mainly on the fact that John Fitzgerald did not leave Zero because they supposedly represent "racism" or "homophobia". I'm sure his leaving was due to a better opportunity.

what the...did you get smarter or something strike a pose?  Or were you just playing some sort a persona before

cant believe i skimmed through 6 pages and didnt find......

how cool would it be if in his next interview he's all like


"i quit zero because i'm not down with that fagbasher"

My intelligence is not limited to a singular format!

noone ive ever known has ever bought any zero schwag.   

just groms and soccer moms.


realtalk.

i just bought this board, only cause it was like half price and a good size. the graphic doesn't even look anything like a zero. but i know what you mean.

The confederacy started as a response to the northern states refusing to return run away slaves, so how anyone in their right fucking mind can say it isn't racism is beyond me. Open fucking history book you dumb fuck!

John must have got into a fight, who quits a team before the video part? Only muska can do that.

his story or the real story?


the confederacy stood for more than slavery...  but that the details of that isnt in most textbooks...

lincoln was a tyrant who gave a fucc not about freeing the slaves...  that part was just an accepted collateral...     

Bull fucking shit. This is some serious factless revisionism. Lincoln was an abolitionist who was from a one issue party, that issue was abolitionism. He said a lot of things because he took a moderate approach to slavery and hoped to end it over time with a platform of no slavery in new established states. All sides knew that eventually the non slave states would eventually outnumber the slave states (there was an exact balance at the time), which would eventually lead to an end to slavery. That is why the south seceded, with the first secession occurring two months after his inauguration, specifically as a reaction to it. Lincoln fought the war to maintain the union, not fight slavery, which is why there are quotes floating around like "If I could save the union without freeing a single slave I would do it," because his number one goal was maintaining the union, as his new state policy was designed to work to end slavery without splitting the union, which was obviously already on the verge of happening. Of course  the whole quote includes him saying something along the lines of, "if I could save the union and free every slave I would do that too..."  When the union split his number one goal was to bring the union back together, even if that meant abandoning his abolitionist ambitions, but Lincoln WAS an abolitionist, and the south did secede to maintain slavery. In the end, Lincoln did push for abolition, even though it actually made reconstruction a far more contentious problem.
Let me decode all of the bullshit reasons people give for you....
"States rights"- States rights to do what? Oh, that's right, maintain slavery
"economic issues"- What was the economic engine of the south? Slavery, they feared with Lincoln in office their economic engine was endangered
"Tax issues"- Aside from the falsehood of this overall, southern states had actually written the most recent tariff laws, the south was scared that taxation would be used as an anti-slavery tactic, though it never was.
"Social differences"- The idea that the south had formed its own society which did not like its association to the north wouldn't have been an issue if the main institution holding the society together, slavery, did not appear to be threatened.

In the end, the main issue around the civil war is slavery, pure and simple. It was more than a moral issue, as genuine social, economic, and political differences arose as a result of slavery, but it should be clear, the south seceded to maintain slavery.

^ronald reagan knows his shit