Slap MessageBoards

Skateboarding => USELESS WOODEN TOY BANTER => Topic started by: ... on May 24, 2017, 09:40:19 AM

Title: Impossibles
Post by: ... on May 24, 2017, 09:40:19 AM
Me and my friend were having an argument about this, and what better way to settle it than to see what the most knowledgeable, in-touch internet skate community thinks.
Here are 2 impossibles.

A full foot wrap from Dylan:
(http://media.giphy.com/media/lDcgLS03SUPAY/giphy.gif)

and a 360 shove toe wrap style one from Ty Peterson:
(http://media.giphy.com/media/dllcZOOBh6Wqc/giphy.gif)

So, what do you guys think? Do the 3shuv ones get a pass? Is a 3shuv one even equally as good as a full wrap?? The world wants to know
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: datura on May 24, 2017, 09:48:33 AM
full wrap is definitely superior since it looks way more "impossible" i guess
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Betaphenylethylalamine on May 24, 2017, 09:49:14 AM
Two different tricks

I wish people would realize
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: FS-OverKOOK on May 24, 2017, 09:54:05 AM
two different tricks
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Ronald Wilson Reagan on May 24, 2017, 09:56:12 AM
The shove it looking one is still an impossible, its just not as cool of one. Its got a kind of wrap, its just more of a horizontal wrap than vertical one. Obviously the more vertical the better though.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: pointandclick on May 24, 2017, 09:56:54 AM
second version is known as a "hipster flip"
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Betaphenylethylalamine on May 24, 2017, 10:04:15 AM
The shove it looking one is still an impossible, its just not as cool of one. Its got a kind of wrap, its just more of a horizontal wrap than vertical one. Obviously the more vertical the better though.

No it's not

Otherwise I guess Shane O'Neill has the best impossible ever
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: thespacewolf on May 24, 2017, 10:05:12 AM
It's kind of like when you don't fully pop a trick.

Yeah you did the trick, but cmon.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Madam, I'm Adam on May 24, 2017, 10:35:12 AM
Full wrap for it to be a real impossible. I'm in the long process of learning this trick and if I don't see my graphic when I wrap my board, then I don't see it as improvement. It's hard to wrap it every single time, but them's the breaks.

It's kind of like when you don't fully pop a trick.

Yeah you did the trick, but cmon.
That's a good way of putting it. Also similar when you do a rock n' roll and don't deck it. That's just my opinion though, and we all take shortcuts with tricks sometimes.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: StabMasterArson on May 24, 2017, 10:37:25 AM
Expand Quote
The shove it looking one is still an impossible, its just not as cool of one. Its got a kind of wrap, its just more of a horizontal wrap than vertical one. Obviously the more vertical the better though.
[close]

No it's not

Otherwise I guess ED TEMPLETON has the best impossible ever
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: poowizard on May 24, 2017, 11:08:03 AM
you gotta keep em separated...fred gall
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: h00man on May 24, 2017, 11:14:32 AM
Gotta see a full wrap. If back leg/foot is not touching the board, its a 3 shove.

Fuck I wish I could have them as consistent as Dylan though.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Lame_Nigga on May 24, 2017, 11:22:28 AM
You callthe horizontal one an impossible if you want... But youre wrong
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: doomstation55 on May 24, 2017, 11:24:44 AM
It's unfair to compare anyone's impossible to Dylan, his were that good.

I vote fred gall.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: headtowall on May 24, 2017, 11:32:01 AM
full wrap
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: sharkin on May 24, 2017, 11:38:20 AM


I can't do impossibles, and neither can the kids that call 360 pop shuvs impossibles
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: MintySandwhich on May 24, 2017, 11:38:54 AM
It's unfair to compare anyone's impossible to Dylan, his were that good.

I vote fred gall.

1. Dylan
2. Jon Goeman
3. Jon Rob Moore
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Ronald Wilson Reagan on May 24, 2017, 11:47:34 AM
Expand Quote
It's unfair to compare anyone's impossible to Dylan, his were that good.

I vote fred gall.
[close]

1. Dylan
2. Jon Goeman
3. Jon Rob Moore
-1 for not including Ed

It's kind of like when you don't fully pop a trick.

Yeah you did the trick, but cmon.
Yeah, exactly. Its the rocket mob flip of impossibles.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: bo golden on May 24, 2017, 11:49:42 AM
The shove it looking one is still an impossible, its just not as cool of one. Its got a kind of wrap, its just more of a horizontal wrap than vertical one. Obviously the more vertical the better though.


I know what you mean, but ????????????

two different tricks IMO
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: bo golden on May 24, 2017, 11:51:24 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
It's unfair to compare anyone's impossible to Dylan, his were that good.

I vote fred gall.
[close]

1. Dylan
2. Jon Goeman
3. Jon Rob Moore
[close]
-1 for not including Ed

Expand Quote
It's kind of like when you don't fully pop a trick.

Yeah you did the trick, but cmon.
[close]
Yeah, exactly. Its the rocket mob flip of impossibles.

I would gnar you if i could. 
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: MintySandwhich on May 24, 2017, 11:56:13 AM
1. Dylan
2. Jon Goeman
3. Jon Rob Moore
4. ed



zing
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: poowizard on May 24, 2017, 11:59:17 AM
I think Freds Impossibles are more of a 3 shuv style. Anyone back that up with footy?
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: stephop on May 24, 2017, 01:37:56 PM
I side with the inventor..he was doing them 29 years ago up stages  ???

(http://media.giphy.com/media/SWq2YLCIVccxy/giphy.gif)


Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Felo Romero on May 24, 2017, 02:18:00 PM
the only impossible that counts is Dylan's

the only option to vote is Fred Gall
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Fongstarr. on May 24, 2017, 02:23:51 PM
Silver Trucks Introduces Tiago Lemos (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r25ZkyyfYLM#)

Tiago has a super sick 3 shuv at the 1:50 mark. All helicoptered in the air.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: CRAILFISH TO REVERT on May 24, 2017, 03:14:47 PM

(http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/content/dam/mcdonaldsuk/item/live/mcdonalds-Crispy-Chicken-Wrap.png)
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: jomeara1 on May 24, 2017, 03:42:08 PM
I always thought the full wrap one was an impossible and the 3-shuv one was just a 3-shuv.  I've seen BATB games where one person would wrap and then the other person would shuv and get away with it, but if I were the ref I'm not sure if I would make him re-do it or not.  It's almost like when someone does a hardflip that goes straight up between their legs and you can't really tell if it really flipped or not and all along it was just a weirdly popped shuv-it or something. 

Dylan's impossibles are a thing of beauty and Fred Gall wins.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: badfomyhealth on May 24, 2017, 04:12:34 PM
second version is known as a "hipster flip"

lmao
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: shone237 on May 25, 2017, 09:10:34 AM
the second gif is a 360 pop shuv. If it don't wrap it is not an impossible.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Lonechicken on May 25, 2017, 09:20:42 AM
Cromer's got a couple of different ones. 3:32 and 3:52. He's had nicer, Dylan-like ones, but I can't remember the videos.

Brad Cromer Outliers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNg8uZi2saY#)
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: MexicanSpaniard on May 25, 2017, 09:24:29 AM
I side with the inventor..he was doing them 29 years ago up stages?  ???

(http://media.giphy.com/media/SWq2YLCIVccxy/giphy.gif)




my favorite person to argue about, fuck him, prove that he invented it or any other of the tricks he and they claim he invented.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Tracer on May 25, 2017, 10:55:38 AM
Moto Shibata does em on vert and they're glorious..
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: shit_for_brains on May 25, 2017, 11:20:21 AM
The difference between an impossible and a 3 shove are if it wraps. The difference between a good impossible and an okay/bad impossible is how good the wrap is. If it wraps, even a little bit on their toes, it's an impossible it's just a pretty shitty one. It's like a Greco kickflip vs a Reynolds kickflip. They're both kickflips but one sucks (in fairness to Jim mine looked like his for a long, long, long time).
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: HungUp on May 25, 2017, 11:26:17 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
It's unfair to compare anyone's impossible to Dylan, his were that good.

I vote fred gall.
[close]

1. Dylan
2. Jon Goeman
3. Jon Rob Moore
[close]
-1 for not including Ed

Expand Quote
It's kind of like when you don't fully pop a trick.

Yeah you did the trick, but cmon.
[close]
Yeah, exactly. Its the rocket mob flip of impossibles.
[close]

I would gnar you if i could. 
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Budo on May 25, 2017, 11:48:30 AM
Expand Quote
I side with the inventor..he was doing them 29 years ago up stages?  ???

(http://media.giphy.com/media/SWq2YLCIVccxy/giphy.gif)



[close]

my favorite person to argue about, fuck him, prove that he invented it or any other of the tricks he and they claim he invented.

Yowza, where did that come from?  I totally understand the reality that most pro's credited with "inventing" tricks probably didn't, but impossible is so weird I'd never doubt the Mutt made that up.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: MexicanSpaniard on May 25, 2017, 12:05:36 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I side with the inventor..he was doing them 29 years ago up stages??  ???

(http://media.giphy.com/media/SWq2YLCIVccxy/giphy.gif)



[close]

my favorite person to argue about, fuck him, prove that he invented it or any other of the tricks he and they claim he invented.
[close]

Yowza, where did that come from??  I totally understand the reality that most pro's credited with "inventing" tricks probably didn't, but impossible is so weird I'd never doubt the Mutt made that up.

hahaha, I've had a grudge with him since a demo in '94 or so, so I love to pick on/discredit him, that pigeon toed motherfucker
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: CRAILFISH TO REVERT on May 25, 2017, 12:12:56 PM
Moto Shibata does em on vert and they're glorious..

hell yea.
Bucky used to do them on vert to fakie in like 1990. I remember a thing in the mag about it.

googled it..guess he's still doing them (tail grab). 
Bucky Impossible Corner Bondi 2017 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQIS2HqovgU#)
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: RoaryMcTwang on May 25, 2017, 04:05:02 PM
Far as I can see they're totally different tricks, done differently. 360 shuv is done like a pop shove it, obviously. You don't pop an impossible, just take off the front foot and scoop it around. I'd say that even 360 shuvs where the foot sort of stays on the grip don't count as impossibles. Dylan and Ed do them properly. Especially with Ed it's easy to see the difference.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: the canadian suit on May 25, 2017, 04:17:05 PM
If you do them like the second one, we all know you aren't proud of yourself. Nobody is rushing in here like "HEY I DO THEM LIKE 360 SHUVITS THAT ARE SCOOPED HARD AND I LOVE IT"

As for me... I can't do legit impossibles, I can do hella scooped 360 shuvits that could be maybe played off as impossibles for some children, but I don't do them.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: fangen on May 25, 2017, 04:18:24 PM
Ollie Impossible > Dylan's pressure flip looking impossible > toe dangle 3 shuv
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Gray Imp Sausage Metal on May 25, 2017, 05:51:57 PM
my favorite person to argue about, fuck him, prove that he invented it or any other of the tricks he and they claim he invented.
you honestly think Rodney didn't invent all those tricks?
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: poowizard on May 25, 2017, 06:03:33 PM
Grecos answer to this thread...

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/ (https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/)
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: h00man on May 25, 2017, 06:10:05 PM
Grecos answer to this thread...

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/ (https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/)

I'm 95% sure Greco checks SLAP and wanted to make a point.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: CRAILFISH TO REVERT on May 25, 2017, 06:19:21 PM
Grecos answer to this thread...

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/ (https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/)

hard to hate on that. 
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Chavo on May 25, 2017, 07:56:06 PM
The second one could go either way. Spinning it more horizontally does not preclude it from being an impossible. It just looks like his back foot loses contact on the last few frames. And I don't see the scoop action. Vert impossibles have more leeway since they mostly fling it out and catch it anyway.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Betaphenylethylalamine on May 25, 2017, 08:41:30 PM
It's two different tricks.

Quit debating this

Watch Ed, Rodney, Dylan, fuck even walker Ryan.

If it doesn't look like that it's a 360 shove it

Anyone arguing this can't do both, or you'd know just how different they are
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: oyolar on May 25, 2017, 09:07:55 PM
Ollie Impossible > Dylan's pressure flip looking impossible > toe dangle 3 shuv

? You have any examples?
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: MexicanSpaniard on May 26, 2017, 08:59:55 AM
Expand Quote
my favorite person to argue about, fuck him, prove that he invented it or any other of the tricks he and they claim he invented.
[close]
you honestly think Rodney didn't invent all those tricks?


Jed is the first person to have documented switch tres not Rodney, where's that stupid list from the plan b ad, just look at it, it's absurd to claim that list
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Ronald Wilson Reagan on May 26, 2017, 09:35:11 AM
Far as I can see they're totally different tricks, done differently. 360 shuv is done like a pop shove it, obviously. You don't pop an impossible, just take off the front foot and scoop it around. I'd say that even 360 shuvs where the foot sort of stays on the grip don't count as impossibles. Dylan and Ed do them properly. Especially with Ed it's easy to see the difference.
Got it. You've never even tried an impossible.
When you scoop an impossible, if you point your toe, rather than wrapping around your foot vertically, it wraps around your pointed toe, giving it a horizontal spin around the foot rather than the vertical one.  You can see the difference between an intended 360 shove it and what I'll call a "controversial impossible" by which foot is the axis of the spin. If the front foot stays over it, they meant to 360 shove it. If the back foot stays over/attached when it spins, the person doing it will claim impossible- though apparently many people here will say its not.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: im a girl on May 26, 2017, 09:42:36 AM
Girls are boys now shit doesn't matter anymore.

Kept your back foot on the board? You did an impossible but you fucking suck.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: CRAILFISH TO REVERT on May 26, 2017, 10:19:29 AM
if the top of your back shoe touches your griptape you get a cookie.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Hastings on May 26, 2017, 10:59:29 AM
It is like claiming a smith grind without touching the ledge/coping with your board, doesn't count. Try again.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: bo golden on May 26, 2017, 11:47:40 AM
Expand Quote
Far as I can see they're totally different tricks, done differently. 360 shuv is done like a pop shove it, obviously. You don't pop an impossible, just take off the front foot and scoop it around. I'd say that even 360 shuvs where the foot sort of stays on the grip don't count as impossibles. Dylan and Ed do them properly. Especially with Ed it's easy to see the difference.
[close]
Got it. You've never even tried an impossible.
When you scoop an impossible, if you point your toe, rather than wrapping around your foot vertically, it wraps around your pointed toe, giving it a horizontal spin around the foot rather than the vertical one.  You can see the difference between an intended 360 shove it and what I'll call a "controversial impossible" by which foot is the axis of the spin. If the front foot stays over it, they meant to 360 shove it. If the back foot stays over/attached when it spins, the person doing it will claim impossible- though apparently many people here will say its not.

new trick name:  the sucky impossible is now known as the "controverssible" 
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: madtragic on May 26, 2017, 12:53:19 PM
Grecos answer to this thread...

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/ (https://www.instagram.com/p/BUiLx6QgOQo/)

If it doesn't look like this, it's not an impossible.

Dylan's however were so good that they are another trick entirely, within the impossible family but meant only for saints and gods to accomplish.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: thebacker on May 26, 2017, 05:06:10 PM
Full wrap for it to be a real impossible. I'm in the long process of learning this trick and if I don't see my graphic when I wrap my board, then I don't see it as improvement. It's hard to wrap it every single time, but them's the breaks.

Expand Quote
It's kind of like when you don't fully pop a trick.

Yeah you did the trick, but cmon.
[close]
That's a good way of putting it. Also similar when you do a rock n' roll and don't deck it. That's just my opinion though, and we all take shortcuts with tricks sometimes.

Brother. Hang your toes off the edge of the pocket or tail and just scoop down then suck your feet  up
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: RoaryMcTwang on May 26, 2017, 10:29:29 PM
Expand Quote
Far as I can see they're totally different tricks, done differently. 360 shuv is done like a pop shove it, obviously. You don't pop an impossible, just take off the front foot and scoop it around. I'd say that even 360 shuvs where the foot sort of stays on the grip don't count as impossibles. Dylan and Ed do them properly. Especially with Ed it's easy to see the difference.
[close]
Got it. You've never even tried an impossible.
When you scoop an impossible, if you point your toe, rather than wrapping around your foot vertically, it wraps around your pointed toe, giving it a horizontal spin around the foot rather than the vertical one.  You can see the difference between an intended 360 shove it and what I'll call a "controversial impossible" by which foot is the axis of the spin. If the front foot stays over it, they meant to 360 shove it. If the back foot stays over/attached when it spins, the person doing it will claim impossible- though apparently many people here will say its not.

I have tried them quite a bit, actually, though with less success than I would have wished for. Anyways, I think that the kind of impossible that Ed or Greco or Rodney in the gif above does is the real deal. Granted, getting it to wrap vertically is rather difficult, so there's various gradations of sloppiness.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: HyenaChaser on May 27, 2017, 12:00:32 PM
If it looks like a 360 shuv, it's a 360 shuv
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Grind King Rims on May 27, 2017, 02:33:59 PM
hahaha, I've had a grudge with him since a demo in '94 or so, so I love to pick on/discredit him, that pigeon toed motherfucker

AHEM





Go on.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: MexicanSpaniard on May 27, 2017, 02:45:25 PM
Expand Quote
hahaha, I've had a grudge with him since a demo in '94 or so, so I love to pick on/discredit him, that pigeon toed motherfucker
[close]

AHEM





Go on.

st. ides had just released some flavored drinks so I was all teenage wasted on them and was feeling great since I had just got done meeting a childhood idol, Sal Barbier, anyway he didn't land a single trick and when I was yelling hey ridney at him he completely ignored me even after I quieted down and tried to say hello like a normal person
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Pretty Serious on May 27, 2017, 03:04:22 PM
#pressureflipimpossible confirms this is possible
https://www.instagram.com/p/yvxmH7RqcW/?tagged=pressureflipimpossible (https://www.instagram.com/p/yvxmH7RqcW/?tagged=pressureflipimpossible)
Expand Quote
Full wrap for it to be a real impossible. I'm in the long process of learning this trick and if I don't see my graphic when I wrap my board, then I don't see it as improvement. It's hard to wrap it every single time, but them's the breaks.

Expand Quote
It's kind of like when you don't fully pop a trick.

Yeah you did the trick, but cmon.
[close]
That's a good way of putting it. Also similar when you do a rock n' roll and don't deck it. That's just my opinion though, and we all take shortcuts with tricks sometimes.
[close]

Brother. Hang your toes off the edge of the pocket or tail and just scoop down then suck your feet  up
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: SodaJerk on May 28, 2017, 09:09:05 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
hahaha, I've had a grudge with him since a demo in '94 or so, so I love to pick on/discredit him, that pigeon toed motherfucker
[close]

AHEM





Go on.
[close]

st. ides had just released some flavored drinks so I was all teenage wasted on them and was feeling great since I had just got done meeting a childhood idol, Sal Barbier, anyway he didn't land a single trick and when I was yelling hey ridney at him he completely ignored me even after I quieted down and tried to say hello like a normal person
Count it
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: doomstation55 on May 28, 2017, 09:58:05 AM
Who would've thought that Sluggo would post a solid impossible back to riding Real decks in 2017?

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUnwNltFcZw/ (https://www.instagram.com/p/BUnwNltFcZw/)
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Ronald Wilson Reagan on May 28, 2017, 06:42:38 PM
Elijah Berle's name should be mentioned in this thread. There. I did it.
Title: Re: Impossibles
Post by: Burt Ward on May 28, 2017, 08:22:44 PM
Who would've thought that Sluggo would post a solid impossible back to riding Real decks in 2017?

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUnwNltFcZw/ (https://www.instagram.com/p/BUnwNltFcZw/)

YES!