Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
No they didn't. He has said it himself several times. One of them was on the bunt. Go listen to it.
You're right, my bad. I will still argue that nike saw the success a shoes with someones name on it had, and then stopped giving pro models and moved on to colorways. which maybe doesnt fall under "nike mad at janoski" but I would say its in the same train of thought.
Why would they be upset at that? I guarantee they make more off of that shoe than the $5-$10 he makes off each one.
Nike royalties are way closer to .25 .50 per shoes, which may seem like dirt, but in a season or two that can easily add up to 10,000+. Nike does make more money, but they could just pay someone a couple thousand one time for one color. Shoe companies are petty, its the same reason blazer lows/vans/most shoes now dont come with extra laces. .10 on every shoe adds up quick.
doesnt really matter, im not even nike just wanted to point out shoe companies want to keep the money they make wherever they can.
I was just basing it off of pro colorways cost 5 dollars more than regular ones. Where did you hear that little?
They also get a base salary, in addition to royalties, if they’re fully on.
Nike has always been picky about giving people pro-models. Other than Michael Jordan and Lebron, I can only think of Anthony Carmelo (whose shoes were through Jordan).
They’re looking for people who can bring in customers internationally. They pay the top guys well who also get to go on nice trips and make the company look good. Then, they can get away with giving flow boxes and photo incentives to dudes in South America. Omar is the only exception for pro shoes on Nike, but he was killing it in the years surrounding Mindfield. Him having a pro shoe probably didn’t increase revenue from South American countries, so they picked up Luan a couple years later. Considering he had a Toyota sponsorship, I wouldn’t be surprised if Omar low-key had an agent for negotiating sponsorships.