Author Topic: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover  (Read 8749 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
  • Rep: -17
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« on: September 17, 2007, 02:37:58 PM »
http://secure.thrashermagazine.com/images/content/c6255.jpg
That is crazy as fuck, I have a poster of it on my wall. It's the only one on that wall, because anything else is unsuperior. Was this already in a video or is it gonna be in an upcoming video? Hell, I dont even know if it was filmed.

skatebored

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1038
  • Rep: -13
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2007, 02:45:39 PM »
Rumor has it that there were some pretty exaggerated camera angles and the bank isnt that steep. Of course, Im sure its still one of the gnarliest things done, Rowley never disappoints. Its crazy that in all his years hes really only had a couple full parts. Im stoked to see the new Flip video, which is what I assume this trick will be in.

(_)_)////////////D-------

  • Guest
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2007, 03:04:52 PM »
No matter what that was sick as shit,Def something going on with the angles though

jrock

  • Guest
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2007, 03:06:36 PM »
everytime that spot is shown, its always at some weird angle so you can't really tell what's going on.  I wish they'd just show it normal for once.

darko

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Rep: 0
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2007, 03:58:48 PM »
so who all has done stuff on this? if its the one im thinking of, arto kickfliped into it and jordan hoffart did a varial heel? other than that i cant think of anyone else. hasn't rowley had a bunch of pics of him for vans that havn't released the footage? i was hoping it was gonna be in their video but since thats not gonna happen im glad that they can use it for the flip vid.

gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
  • Rep: -17
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2007, 05:58:05 PM »
As far as I know Rowley got a front heel and a back 360 into it. I can't wait to see the footage to see whats really up with that spot.

darko

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Rep: 0
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2007, 06:04:57 PM »
^^^half cab heel

A-Bo

  • Guest
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2007, 07:13:10 PM »
is that the same ditch where Dylan Rieder did those crazy wallrides in in a time to shine? if so, then rowley dropped in on it to from liek the srtait up wall, im probably wrong about the spot though

mikefork

  • Guest
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2007, 07:47:43 PM »
everytime that spot is shown, its always at some weird angle so you can't really tell what's going on.  I wish they'd just show it normal for once.
lewis marnell skates that spot in lets live. they film the spot straight on and parts of it look as steep as it does in the rowley angle

A-Bo

  • Guest
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2007, 09:16:58 PM »
does anyone know where it is?

Raw!!!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1896
  • Rep: 60
  • ackrite
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2007, 10:21:43 PM »
is that the same ditch where Dylan Rieder did those crazy wallrides in in a time to shine? if so, then rowley dropped in on it to from liek the srtait up wall, im probably wrong about the spot though
Im pretty sure it wasnt Rowley that dropped in on it. I dont know if its the same one but Anthony Shultz did it in Back in Black.

MEOW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1057
  • Rep: 42
    • Stardust Skate Shop avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2007, 11:39:16 PM »
if its the same one as anthony schultz' drop in from back to black, that spots never been filmed from an angle where you can tell whats really going on... dylan reiders run up the wall ride? and didnt anthony schultz also do a bs kickflip on it? which, if it was a real wall, would be a wallride kickflip to wallride? it makes for interesting footage but i reeeeally feel like i'm getting taken advantage of and i don't like it

Tuna

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5367
  • Rep: 224
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2007, 12:03:50 AM »
if its the same one as anthony schultz' drop in from back to black, that spots never been filmed from an angle where you can tell whats really going on... dylan reiders run up the wall ride? and didnt anthony schultz also do a bs kickflip on it? which, if it was a real wall, would be a wallride kickflip to wallride? it makes for interesting footage but i reeeeally feel like i'm getting taken advantage of and i don't like it

looks like the same spot as the one youre talking about, not the one hoffart varial heeled into.

what makes the run up and backside flip possible is that the "wall" is kinda slanted.

seems like rowley 360d into this particular bank.

stagefright

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3110
  • Rep: -47
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2007, 12:17:35 AM »
whoa i never knew about this thanks guys
we toked a marley and i split back to the park, minding my own busineess when a rollerblader mean mugs..i let it go.

Sleazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 17242
  • Rep: 254
  • tiger style
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2007, 04:44:50 AM »
isn't that the same spot that slash nollie flipped into?

Tuna

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5367
  • Rep: 224
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2007, 09:42:22 PM »
isn't that the same spot that slash nollie flipped into?

maybe?

Sleazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 17242
  • Rep: 254
  • tiger style
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #16 on: September 19, 2007, 08:44:52 AM »
Expand Quote
isn't that the same spot that slash nollie flipped into?
[close]

maybe?

here's the part, check the ender, i think it's the same spot

[youtube=425,350]QGMcDqgI7CE[/youtube]

ahlee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 8723
  • Rep: 481
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2007, 08:53:01 AM »
wow, thats WAY smaller than i though. dude musta had a game genie hooked up to his cam

Sleazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 17242
  • Rep: 254
  • tiger style
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2007, 12:18:30 PM »
yeah, tilted camera aside, the size of rowley makes it seem huge in the picture. If it's the same spot, it's way less gnarly looking in Slashes part.

MEOW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1057
  • Rep: 42
    • Stardust Skate Shop avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2007, 04:36:14 PM »
that's going to be soooo disappointing if it is the same spot when/if i ever get to see the rowley footage. i guess i should get myself ready for a letdown, it looks the same

defiantnate

  • Guest
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2007, 08:34:27 PM »
Yeah, looks the same to me...  :'(

Sleazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 17242
  • Rep: 254
  • tiger style
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #21 on: September 20, 2007, 11:42:41 AM »
almost looks like they shrunk rowley down in the photo to make the setup look bigger. not saying they did, because rowley's tight as fuck and I could never imagine him being involved in something like that. but it looks that way a bit.

ReidVaeth

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
  • Rep: -180
  • i'm here.
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #22 on: September 20, 2007, 03:39:42 PM »
That Slash nollie flip isn't the same spot,
The Rowley back 3 spot is much gnarlier.
jammage.

jrock

  • Guest
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2007, 04:24:24 PM »
i think the Slash thing could be the same spot, but maybe a different part of the spot.  you could tell there are a lot of other banks at that place.

heckler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 6170
  • Rep: 475
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
    Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #24 on: September 20, 2007, 05:18:58 PM »
i think the Slash thing could be the same spot, but maybe a different part of the spot.  you could tell there are a lot of other banks at that place.
I'm thinking the same thing. Is that the same spot that's been used as a wallride a lot, too?
Ha SLAP's resident libtard and NY pro cocksucker.

somekid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1558
  • Rep: -57
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #25 on: September 20, 2007, 05:26:20 PM »
there are a shitload of spots that look like that all over the southwest.
most, if not all of the spots mentioned in this thread are different.

Star Whores Episode I: The Fellatio Menace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3479
  • Rep: 223
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #26 on: September 20, 2007, 07:03:01 PM »
note the white spots about 6 feet from the bottom in the video and picture
if post- retirement duke nukem bagged that azz i have a chance too

Guile

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 8236
  • Rep: 368
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
    Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #27 on: September 20, 2007, 07:31:07 PM »
note the white spots about 6 feet from the bottom in the video and picture

racist.
               DGK
              SOME
              TIMES

Star Whores Episode I: The Fellatio Menace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3479
  • Rep: 223
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #28 on: September 20, 2007, 09:23:06 PM »
Expand Quote
note the white spots about 6 feet from the bottom in the video and picture
[close]

racist.

Edit: Note the Caucasian American (though no different and should have equal opportunity as the black spots) spots about 6 ft. from the bottom in the video and picture.

Thanks for the P.C. alert
if post- retirement duke nukem bagged that azz i have a chance too

Sleazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 17242
  • Rep: 254
  • tiger style
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: 2005 Rowley Thrasher cover
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2007, 05:31:33 AM »
note the white spots about 6 feet from the bottom in the video and picture

that's what was making me think it's the same spot too. that and the way the top where the start from is the same.