Author Topic: best tre's  (Read 19364 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Farger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
  • Rep: -2
Re: best tre's
« Reply #60 on: January 17, 2008, 03:33:41 PM »


Get the fuck out with that shit. No way does he have the best 360 flip

FAUSTO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Rep: 1
Re: best tre's
« Reply #61 on: January 21, 2008, 05:31:28 PM »
stephan janoski and josh kalis for sure

Beautiful

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
  • Rep: -18
Re: best tre's
« Reply #62 on: January 21, 2008, 06:43:28 PM »
ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. MEME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME. ME

somekid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1569
  • Rep: -57
Re: best tre's
« Reply #63 on: January 21, 2008, 07:03:53 PM »
how the fuck is it possible for a girl to perform autofellatio?

StokedTaco

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2160
  • Rep: -180
Re: best tre's
« Reply #64 on: January 21, 2008, 09:12:03 PM »

GonZo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
  • Rep: -55
  • "I have, everyone has, they love it"
Re: best tre's
« Reply #65 on: January 22, 2008, 02:28:53 AM »
furby

FAUSTO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Rep: 1
Re: best tre's
« Reply #66 on: January 22, 2008, 05:29:31 PM »
Kalis for sure
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cAumIyVHKJE
Just doesn't get any better
Runner up on Kalis is without a doubt...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-ITrIDrHx1I

that for sure is a runner up he caught that bolts perfict

whitemanjazz

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2994
  • Rep: 417
Re: best tre's
« Reply #67 on: January 22, 2008, 10:31:13 PM »
even his switch ones look ridiculous

http://youtube.com/watch?v=fQvhls9c6UY&feature=related
if the mods were wu-tang, dean would be cappadonna

skaterdavid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2638
  • Rep: 193
Re: best tre's
« Reply #68 on: January 24, 2008, 04:50:21 PM »


StokedTaco

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2160
  • Rep: -180
Re: best tre's
« Reply #69 on: January 24, 2008, 04:54:33 PM »

skaterdavid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2638
  • Rep: 193
Re: best tre's
« Reply #70 on: January 24, 2008, 04:57:43 PM »

StokedTaco

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2160
  • Rep: -180
Re: best tre's
« Reply #71 on: January 24, 2008, 05:21:32 PM »


no way.

no way as in he doesn't have a good tre or no way as in its sick?
both. it's sick for sure. but i don't think that one is the best.

skaterdavid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2638
  • Rep: 193
Re: best tre's
« Reply #72 on: January 24, 2008, 05:35:08 PM »


no way.

no way as in he doesn't have a good tre or no way as in its sick?
both. it's sick for sure. but i don't think that one is the best.

yeah, not the best but i didn't know where else to post it

StokedTaco

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2160
  • Rep: -180
Re: best tre's
« Reply #73 on: January 24, 2008, 05:35:59 PM »


no way.

no way as in he doesn't have a good tre or no way as in its sick?
both. it's sick for sure. but i don't think that one
is the best.

yeah, not the best but i didn't know where else to post it
yeah it's sick for sure. he's got that back foot steez.

skaterdavid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2638
  • Rep: 193
Re: best tre's
« Reply #74 on: January 24, 2008, 06:19:58 PM »

yeah it's sick for sure. he's got that back foot steez.

for sure

Tuna

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4997
  • Rep: 94
Re: best tre's
« Reply #75 on: January 24, 2008, 07:59:46 PM »
i've always liked rowleys 360 flips

malemodel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Rep: 1
  • yep
Re: best tre's
« Reply #76 on: January 26, 2008, 07:17:17 PM »
brandon getty and asian steve
and thats the end of that chapter

SKATEBOARDING !

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Rep: 6
  • mariano tre's
Re: best tre's
« Reply #77 on: January 27, 2008, 08:16:22 PM »
has Mariano been mentioned?

art hellman

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 6009
  • Rep: 491
Re: best tre's
« Reply #78 on: January 27, 2008, 11:25:07 PM »
kalis
hardly art, hardly starving


GonZo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
  • Rep: -55
  • "I have, everyone has, they love it"
Re: best tre's
« Reply #79 on: January 28, 2008, 05:51:57 AM »
has Mariano been mentioned?

switch tres mmmmmmmm  :)

StokedTaco

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2160
  • Rep: -180
Re: best tre's
« Reply #80 on: January 28, 2008, 07:40:46 AM »

Alex Blanchard

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Rep: -2
  • skate blank
Re: best tre's
« Reply #81 on: January 28, 2008, 10:03:23 PM »
herman all the way

skaterdavid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2638
  • Rep: 193
Re: best tre's
« Reply #82 on: January 29, 2008, 02:23:23 PM »
i was messing around with windows movie maker and made this...

red curb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 515
  • Rep: -5
Re: best tre's
« Reply #83 on: January 30, 2008, 01:33:47 AM »
I used to have a good one, but I'm out of practice.

Kalis has the best one.

thisistom

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 238
  • Rep: 32
Re: best tre's
« Reply #84 on: February 04, 2008, 03:32:47 PM »
bobby worrest switch nollie fakie any of them there all amazing

and althoughi like to admit it      1:02

Combs

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Rep: 10
Re: best tre's
« Reply #85 on: February 05, 2008, 12:45:19 PM »
Paul Shier

The one he does on the bank to fakie in that big push clip was too good!

skaterdavid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2638
  • Rep: 193
Re: best tre's
« Reply #86 on: February 05, 2008, 04:38:40 PM »


wacky tobacky

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Rep: 5
Re: best tre's
« Reply #87 on: February 06, 2008, 07:56:03 PM »
john mottas last one in pvwhl is glorious

SPAM DOCTOR

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Rep: -1
Re: best tre's
« Reply #88 on: February 07, 2008, 05:50:27 AM »

frisco

  • Guest
Re: best tre's
« Reply #89 on: February 07, 2008, 06:17:53 AM »