0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I must say, those are some classy boards.
Quote from: SR Junky on April 06, 2008, 12:23:03 AMExpand QuoteI must say, those are some classy boards.[close]Wall boards.
I must say, those are some classy boards.[close]
ah ha. but most people put those filters on strictly for protective purposes: so that you only ever have to clean the filter rather than the lens surface, and so that one day the $15 filter might 'take a bullet' for the $1000 lens...
Quote from: sebastian toombs on April 06, 2008, 09:54:23 PMExpand Quoteah ha. but most people put those filters on strictly for protective purposes: so that you only ever have to clean the filter rather than the lens surface, and so that one day the $15 filter might 'take a bullet' for the $1000 lens...[close]But that just changes the quality of you $1000 lens to that of the $15 ones.
ah ha. but most people put those filters on strictly for protective purposes: so that you only ever have to clean the filter rather than the lens surface, and so that one day the $15 filter might 'take a bullet' for the $1000 lens...[close]
Quote from: GhostBusters on April 08, 2008, 02:29:56 AMExpand QuoteQuote from: sebastian toombs on April 06, 2008, 09:54:23 PMExpand Quoteah ha. but most people put those filters on strictly for protective purposes: so that you only ever have to clean the filter rather than the lens surface, and so that one day the $15 filter might 'take a bullet' for the $1000 lens...[close]But that just changes the quality of you $1000 lens to that of the $15 ones.[close] that is an argument some people make but i dont agree. a skylight or UV filter with a very 'light' touch should barely affect colours, and would have no affect on contrast, edge sharpness, bokeh, etc.
Quote from: sebastian toombs on April 06, 2008, 09:54:23 PMExpand Quoteah ha. but most people put those filters on strictly for protective purposes: so that you only ever have to clean the filter rather than the lens surface, and so that one day the $15 filter might 'take a bullet' for the $1000 lens...[close]But that just changes the quality of you $1000 lens to that of the $15 ones.[close]
Quote from: sebastian toombs on April 08, 2008, 07:19:00 AMExpand QuoteQuote from: GhostBusters on April 08, 2008, 02:29:56 AMExpand QuoteQuote from: sebastian toombs on April 06, 2008, 09:54:23 PMExpand Quoteah ha. but most people put those filters on strictly for protective purposes: so that you only ever have to clean the filter rather than the lens surface, and so that one day the $15 filter might 'take a bullet' for the $1000 lens...[close]But that just changes the quality of you $1000 lens to that of the $15 ones.[close] that is an argument some people make but i dont agree. a skylight or UV filter with a very 'light' touch should barely affect colours, and would have no affect on contrast, edge sharpness, bokeh, etc.[close]the effect is hardly noticable with pictures(my 35mm at least) but it really does make a big difference when you are using high-end 3CCD video cameras.
Quote from: GhostBusters on April 08, 2008, 02:29:56 AMExpand QuoteQuote from: sebastian toombs on April 06, 2008, 09:54:23 PMExpand Quoteah ha. but most people put those filters on strictly for protective purposes: so that you only ever have to clean the filter rather than the lens surface, and so that one day the $15 filter might 'take a bullet' for the $1000 lens...[close]But that just changes the quality of you $1000 lens to that of the $15 ones.[close] that is an argument some people make but i dont agree. a skylight or UV filter with a very 'light' touch should barely affect colours, and would have no affect on contrast, edge sharpness, bokeh, etc.[close]