Here's another fact: If gun ownership were restricted there is a much higher chance this thread wouldn't even exist because a clearly mentally unstable and aggressive person wouldn't have easy access to a gun that would allow him to murder someone.
People who commit crimes are not born into a separate sub group (except maybe a socioeconomic one) that somehow ensures gun ownership and bad behavior - how people act in society is extremely environmental. You give people access to a tool that allows them to threaten people's lives, and they're more likely to exploit that tool than if it were unavailable or difficult to obtain.
[/quote]
I do agree that the environment does play a role in behavior, no doubt...but we also have to look at another perspective, the cognitive psychology part of it. Now, my knowledge of this subject is limited but I do know the frontal lobe area plays a huge role in how we think out situations. If your frontal lobe is damaged or not developed you'll have, for the lack of better words, animal like behavior. It's a sad thing, but some people are born to be crimials because of their brain. There may be other parts of the brain that play into this, but like I mention before my knowledge is limited on this subject.
As for gun control, it will stay. I would be against gun control but this world isn't peaceful and never will be. Since that is the case, I'm for gun control. Good citizens like myself wouldn't harm another for a stupid reason like what happened to this good man (RIP). I would only own a gun to protect may family in case of a break in into my home. Yes I do wish to protect my possessions (cars, computers, CD collection, etc) but my family is far more important that any material item. My family cannot be replaced. And if someone has the balls to break in a house, I'm all for the home owner to shot them, whether they, the criminal, gets injured or dies. And I am aware that my opinion is probably in the minority here.