Author Topic: Sheldon Meleshinski  (Read 6094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

happenstance

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4913
  • Rep: 690
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Sheldon Meleshinski
« Reply #30 on: June 12, 2013, 10:02:21 PM »
sheldon rips, he inspired me to start skating again and pushing myself after a car accident left me 90% blind in my right eye

if not for him i'd be fat and bro-ing out hard
If I'm not mistaken, Dan Murphy is also mostly blind in one eye. You now have two heroes!

Rad you kept skating.

UgolinoTheSignificant

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
  • Rep: 15
  • fuck your ottoman.
Re: Sheldon Meleshinski
« Reply #31 on: June 13, 2013, 08:25:09 AM »
Expand Quote
sheldon rips, he inspired me to start skating again and pushing myself after a car accident left me 90% blind in my right eye

if not for him i'd be fat and bro-ing out hard
[close]
If I'm not mistaken, Dan Murphy is also mostly blind in one eye. You now have two heroes!

Rad you kept skating.
that's crazy i had no idea, whats even crazier is that dude jumps down giant shit all the time, I feel like one of the difficulties of skating with one eye is real bad depth perception. I pretty much avoid jumping down shit cause its hard for me to tell when I'm gonna hit the ground unless I do it enough times to get used to it....crazy
You should never trust a man who claims he doesn't know about free internet porn.

D. Bag

  • Guest
Re: Sheldon Meleshinski
« Reply #32 on: June 13, 2013, 11:34:08 AM »
Quote from: D. Bag  link=topic=70890.msg1933049#msg1933049 date=1371018594
Expand Quote
I'm pretty sure that he said in an old interview that he had a cancerous growth on his eye, and that it had to be taken out to keep that shit from spreading.  Not DEFIANTLY sure, but pretty damned sure if memory serves correct.
[close]

He sure was defiant. DEFINITELY was.

C'mon, man, why you gotta get in the way of my work to make "defiantly" the new "of"?