Expand Quote
Expand Quote
It's weird why steep versus mellow concave does not cause this same sort of divide....it's preference and they all have purpose....right now I have an 8 and an 8.5...some tricks are easier in one the other.....
Funny you mention that about concave J Soy, I agree with you. Not to sound like a gear nerd, but Art Hellman and I have had this exact conversation...the older I get, I am preferring more mellow boards. I totally understand the science behind popping higher with steeper concave (more load) but I also feel like I'm working doubly hard. And I need to conserve my energy. BBS/Gen boards seem to be the best for me.
I'm the opposite needing concave as leverage to compensate for no concept of flick.....
ahaha same here! i use to ride the 7.75/7.8 enjoi/dwindle full concaves because the deep shape helped me get such good pop, nice smooth fast flips and made it easier to tre flip and all but as i stranded from being that person who only rides the same stuff and i got just ass quality most of the time, except for REAL, they had a nice deep and contoured Popsicle i loved. made it too easy to do everything. santa cruz were a nice shape but kinda medium to flat, anti heros varied but most were deep, krooked was mellow, dgk were nice medium deep, baker was flat and just terrible, girl is alright for a flat/mellow, zero was very mellow, got a dwindle flat and medium shape once and they were just why dwindle had a bad rep they were just nasty shapes for the kind of wood dwindle uses
on the subject though i really believe that most cases the right board size depends on the shoe size but it feels like a 50 that to 50 being preference. i mean you got guys with 10 and up shoes riding 7.5-7.78 sometimes and dudes with size 8 shoes riding 8.4
i think bigger boards require higher trucks too and smaller boards are best with lows, but then again you got luan riding indy stage 11 standards on a 7.75