I don’t think enough people here realize you cannot use a photo of someone for commercial purposes without them signing off on it. If this was an editorial that would be fair game, but using an image of a person for an AD is not fair game, legally speaking, and Adidas of all corporate entities should’ve known better. Is it offensive? Not to me. Should it have happened? Ehhhh anyone who isn’t lying to themselves knows this would not have been published if the people weren’t in the shot. Back noseblunt on what looks like a skatepark rail wouldn’t have been an ad 10 years ago, let alone today. It’s a cool shot in my opinion but should not have been used to promote a brand. Deleting it without comment was a bad look.