0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
JB.....thanks my man....even though I am the loner boner using digital. Haha. I really need to pick up another film camera. One with more of a lens and not a rangefinder type camera which is the only thing I have. I'd like to just see if I can apply the same things that I know with digital and do some long exposures and what not.
Quote from: Fongstarr. on April 07, 2014, 09:57:59 AMExpand QuoteJB.....thanks my man....even though I am the loner boner using digital. Haha. I really need to pick up another film camera. One with more of a lens and not a rangefinder type camera which is the only thing I have. I'd like to just see if I can apply the same things that I know with digital and do some long exposures and what not. [close]what digi are you using?
JB.....thanks my man....even though I am the loner boner using digital. Haha. I really need to pick up another film camera. One with more of a lens and not a rangefinder type camera which is the only thing I have. I'd like to just see if I can apply the same things that I know with digital and do some long exposures and what not. [close]
finally sold my last zoom lens and got a used canon 5d (the first model).goddamn, full frame is another world, would not have believed it. first test shot.
i likes skooterboarding.. be lets friends
Quote from: Cadillac Ranch Dressing on April 09, 2014, 01:52:04 PMExpand Quote[close]is that in dublin?
[close]
Quote from: Hercules Rockefeller on April 09, 2014, 10:15:22 AMExpand Quotefinally sold my last zoom lens and got a used canon 5d (the first model).goddamn, full frame is another world, would not have believed it. first test shot.*crappyshot*[close]Nice man. What lens are you using?
finally sold my last zoom lens and got a used canon 5d (the first model).goddamn, full frame is another world, would not have believed it. first test shot.*crappyshot*[close]
<<~<<{[((()))]}>>~>>
In the first image tag, put [img width=600] or whatever pixel size you want.
Who are you to judge what kinds of cocks he wants to suck?
You and the D00D have turned this thread into a horrible head-on-collision between a short bus full of regular kids and a van full of paraplegics.
new stuff. ive been shooting a ton ever since i got my camera and having a lot of fun. pretty stoked on photography right now. maybe someone can help me with this. when i first got my camera, i left it in jpeg mode just so i could get used to it. i was happy with the results so i decided that id switch it over to RAW hoping that the image quality would be a little bit better. everything ive shot in raw looks like shit even after ive edited it in lightroom. and i have to spend way more time processing than i did with the jpegs. ive never really shot in RAW before, so i dont really know much about it besides that its completely unprocessed, therefore should be a better quality image after you process it (i would imagine). i know im not shooting with a high quality camera, but i cant figure out why my jpegs were such better quailty than im getting from the RAW shots. it might just be that the camera (canon s110) has the best results in jpegs.
yo mike mo new age ape style high five with my reborn hand. 2008 psychedelic experience. thanks.
Quote from: JB on April 14, 2014, 08:51:10 AMExpand Quotenew stuff. ive been shooting a ton ever since i got my camera and having a lot of fun. pretty stoked on photography right now. maybe someone can help me with this. when i first got my camera, i left it in jpeg mode just so i could get used to it. i was happy with the results so i decided that id switch it over to RAW hoping that the image quality would be a little bit better. everything ive shot in raw looks like shit even after ive edited it in lightroom. and i have to spend way more time processing than i did with the jpegs. ive never really shot in RAW before, so i dont really know much about it besides that its completely unprocessed, therefore should be a better quality image after you process it (i would imagine). i know im not shooting with a high quality camera, but i cant figure out why my jpegs were such better quailty than im getting from the RAW shots. it might just be that the camera (canon s110) has the best results in jpegs. [close]I've been shooting raw the last couple years, as well as working as a photo editor; the main difference between jpeg and raw is that raw has much much more flexibility when it comes to post processing, there is more detail in dark areas, etc. I'm not really familiar with what you're describing though, if you shoot in jpeg+raw mode and post a comparison I'll get a better idea. good luck
new stuff. ive been shooting a ton ever since i got my camera and having a lot of fun. pretty stoked on photography right now. maybe someone can help me with this. when i first got my camera, i left it in jpeg mode just so i could get used to it. i was happy with the results so i decided that id switch it over to RAW hoping that the image quality would be a little bit better. everything ive shot in raw looks like shit even after ive edited it in lightroom. and i have to spend way more time processing than i did with the jpegs. ive never really shot in RAW before, so i dont really know much about it besides that its completely unprocessed, therefore should be a better quality image after you process it (i would imagine). i know im not shooting with a high quality camera, but i cant figure out why my jpegs were such better quailty than im getting from the RAW shots. it might just be that the camera (canon s110) has the best results in jpegs. [close]
Topic: the photography thread. (Read 716295 times)