I asked about updates on how this guy was doing. But since so many of you felt compelled to voice your condescending opinions on his practice, I'll take the bait. How exactly is destroying property through the act of skateboarding any different than through the act of deknobbing? Sure there may be differences of degrees of vandalism or whatever, and it does sound gnarlier to take an angle grinder to a rail instead of a board. But, objectively, grinding a freshly poured and painted concrete structure or cracking a marble slab with your awkwardly popped crook attempt will probably result in higher monetary damage. The only difference is in how normalized one is vs the other. Same goes for graffiti or really ANY kind of subversive public/urban practice. Until it becomes established, everybody has a smart opinion on how stupid and self-incriminating the early practitioners are.
Where are all you grandpas when GX publishes an entire video full of "self-snitching", putting even their full names on an act that is highly illegalized in the city they're doing it in?
Why not paint Grafitti in the most undercover and under the radar places possible? Why, instead, do it in the most exposed ones and publish entire photo-books and leave a corroborating trail of identity through tagging? Bla bla etc etc.
Subversive acts are done to resonate with a public audience that needs reminding that there is NO valid reason why non-human corporations and "governments" should own 99% of the public spaces we move in and determine what is ok and not ok to be done in them.
I'm aware I may be putting a whole bunch of words in knob-buster's mouth but the fact that he did exhibitions indicates to me that he did in fact see himself as more than just a bro who wanted to score clout and brownie points with his favourite pros.
I think he should be honoured for certainly being more of a badass than any of us who feel entitled to an opinion on an activity that 99% would never have the balls to partake in. Whats the word - "armchair experts"?