Expand Quote
Expand Quote
The shoulder bag.
It is less functional than a backpack, blatantly states one's peacock factor, and usually is adorned with a horrible taste in pants. Why? Someone on here that runs these dorky things give me some logic. Please. I'll listen open minded on it.
are you talking about messenger bags, or those stupid trendy fanny packs that go over your shoulder?
Yeah, I need to know. Post a pic.
I think he means bags similar to these:
I'm not too into those above but I have one of these, which is similar but has a larger volume capacity than most of those pseudo waist-bags that 75% of NYers that aren't filmers rock:
Pabst, my reason for owning this: A backpack is too big for the things I usually take out skating or even if I'm going out for a bit. This bag fits a water bottle, a tool, a book, a snack, and a portable charger or P&S camera. I usually have a thin, easily tucked away tote bag in there too in case I pick up other stuff throughout the day. Also, a backpack's coverage causes me to sweat easily while this smaller bag is less prone to do that. You don't know me but I'm not one to flaunt & my pants aren't wild, just your average blue or brown chinos and blue jeans.