Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Cry me a river, fuck your car, skate and destroy all fuckin' day.
I've never seen anybody here complain about the 30+ years of people skating people's fucking HOUSES in SF, but this happens and all of these losers who think a car is a valid substitute for a penis cry their fucking eyes out like the dude bashed a baby in the face with his trucks.
A rich dude with a fancy car can repair or replace his car with no real pain in his life, I'd feel much worse if it was a new KIA, because that guy doesn't have the money to replace a hood.
The fact that some of you can pretend all of the genuine destruction of property we do is totally excusable and that this isn't is complete hypocrisy
You are a fucking moron.
Apples to oranges. You need to put down the punk rock starter manual and grow up.
You probably think you had an argument in your collection of meaningless cliches, but you didn't.
Enjoy skating nothing but skateparks, you "mature" dork.
i agree with your point on hypocrisy; thrashing someones privately owned handrail or ledge in SF vs thrashing someones private property, a car.
but there are levels of severity there that have to be taken into account. A tossed cig on the ground doesn't equate to leaving a pile of human feces.
if you're willing to define private non-stationary motor vehicles as legitimate skate objects, make your case.
a stationary ledge, rail etc, is an established skateboard object that if scuffed/chipped, won't be making the cover of local news that "tampa skate context brings chaos, such as (queue video)" that further brings scrutiny to skating the streets.
where to draw that line is undefinable but in this case, the fuckboi was dead wrong.