Slap MessageBoards

Skateboarding => USELESS WOODEN TOY BANTER => Topic started by: Tear Up a Trick on February 29, 2024, 08:55:32 AM

Title: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Tear Up a Trick on February 29, 2024, 08:55:32 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/29/nyregion/skatepark-brooklyn-park-tony-hawk.html

A Tony Hawk foundation and the city want to pour concrete over a section of Mount Prospect Park to create one of the biggest skate parks on the East Coast.

The city has construction plans for Mount Prospect Park, once the site of a lookout station for George Washington’s army. About 40,000 square feet of the 7.79-acre park are to be turned into one of the largest skateboarding spots on the East Coast.

Some nearby residents are fighting the plan. Their gripes are not about the potential influx of skateboarders or the ollies, kick flips and tic-tacs. They say the poured-concrete skateboarding facility would take up precious green space in a city that does not have enough of it.

“Pouring concrete is Stone Age,” said Hayley Gorenberg, a co-chair of Friends of Mount Prospect Park, a group formed less than a month ago, after Mayor Eric Adams referred to the project in his State of the City address.

The new skating spot in Mount Prospect Park, to be called the Brooklyn Skate Garden, would be the largest of four in a $24.8 million project that the mayor mentioned. Another skateboarding area will take shape in Brower Park in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, and two more will go up in the Bronx.

The four skating areas will take shape under a public-private partnership between the city and the Skatepark Project, a nonprofit foundation started by the professional skateboarding star Tony Hawk, the first to land a 900, which is to his sport what the four-minute mile is to running. In a high-profile career, he has cracked ribs, survived concussions, lost a handful of teeth and broken a femur (last year, on a 540-degree aerial rotation).

The Skatepark Project has arranged grants for nearly 700 skate parks across the country and would contribute design consultation and “project management support” for the four parks in New York, said Benjamin Anderson Bashein, its executive director. The Skatepark Project says the design costs will probably amount to more than $100,000 per park.

The skateboarding infrastructure
The Skatepark Project said the four new facilities would be fast-tracked so they could open in three years and would “elevate New York City ’s status as the East Coast skateboarding capital.”

The opponents said that city officials had not publicized the project or sought comments. Gorenberg and Benjamin Lowe, the other co-chair of Friends of Mount Prospect Park, are to meet with Crystal Hudson, the City Council member whose district includes the park, this afternoon. They wrote to her on Feb. 5, saying other options needed to be considered, including putting the skateboarding facility somewhere else. The letter suggested Grand Army Plaza, which the city’s Department of Transportation is looking into redesigning.

Their letter raised questions about safety, saying that skateboarders could try their moves outside the park, creating hazards on nearby steps and access ramps. The stone steps from the highest point in the park are only one “tempting skate challenge,” the letter said.

The letter said that the site for the skateboarding facility is already highly vulnerable to flooding and that a skate park would only make that problem worse.

Bashein noted that “the design hasn’t even happened yet.” He said the Skatepark Project would work with the city to see that the four skating areas were “well designed and well constructed.”

He said the installation in Mount Prospect Park would cover only about 12 percent of the park and that the paved area would be only a part of that. And Hudson said that “everything the park is currently used for will remain” once the skate park is built.

“There’s still access to the green lawn,” she said. “There’s a children’s playground. Nothing will happen to that.”

The park was created in the 1940s as the Brooklyn Public Library was being built. The Department of Parks and Recreation says that Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux intended it to be a part of Prospect Park, which they designed in the 19th century. But they eventually redrew the borders, leaving Prospect Park on one side of Flatbush Avenue and Mount Prospect Park on the other. The city operated a reservoir there from the 1850s until the 1930s.

As a place for skateboarding, said Gorenberg, of Friends of Mount Prospect Park, “The site is a problem. Paving green space isn’t acceptable to the community, and it’s not the way for New York City to look forward to a more resilient future. It’s backwards thinking.”
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Mandatory Reload on February 29, 2024, 09:05:29 AM
all i know is that Brower Park redesign can't come soon enough. one of my least favorite places to skate in nyc, the ground is essentially unskateable. horrid
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: ToySanta on February 29, 2024, 09:24:40 AM
“Pouring concrete is Stone Age,” said Hayley Gorenberg, a co-chair of Friends of Mount Prospect Park

Love it.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Cool Ceith on February 29, 2024, 09:25:55 AM
Big gnar for pasting the full article! Fuck a paywall.  :D
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Tear Up a Trick on February 29, 2024, 09:26:44 AM
Some NYTimes reader comments:


M. Snow
Brooklyn
24m ago
As a local resident who frequents Mount Prospect Park, I am against the plan to sacrifice scarce open space for a concrete skate park.

Call me a NIMBY if you must.

It just really seems like the overwhelming share of people who use this park - the dog-walkers, parents, runners, children, loungers - oppose this development and have been given the run-around by its proponents. Where is the community engagement, transparency, or democratic input?

Reply1 RecommendShareFlag
Ethan Allen commented 1 hour ago
E
Ethan Allen
Brooklyn
1h ago
This seems like classic municipal laziness. Instead of finding a new space, or building a new space, they just want to take a part of the tiny sliver the public does have.

I also can’t help but notice that since it’s become an Olympic “sport,” there’s been a sudden interest in building skate parks. Poor kids are not going to the Olympics for skateboarding. But rich parents can take over public parks so their kids can!

Reply2 RecommendShareFlag
1 REPLY
Preston commented 24 minutes ago
P
Preston
Brooklyn
24m ago
@Ethan Allen

I basically agree with what you are saying here, but I must point out that children and teens in every income bracket enjoy skateboarding. I have yet to meet a skateboarder in NYC who mentioned the Olympics.

Reply2 RecommendShareFlag
Vanyali commented 2 hours ago
V
Vanyali
Brooklyn/Raleigh
2h ago
With all the already-paved lots around, why attack a park for this?  There really isn’t any other spot in the whole of Brooklyn to put this?

Reply4 RecommendShareFlag
A commented 2 hours ago
A
A
Brooklyn
2h ago
Opponents to this effort are being intentionally obtuse. All they have to say is that they’re concerned about green space when it’s been made clear, repeatedly, that both green space and current park functionality will be uninterrupted before and after construction. This PUBLIC skatepark will be a public good, whether you skate or not.

Reply4 RecommendShareFlag
1 REPLY
Ethan Allen commented 1 hour ago
E
Ethan Allen
Brooklyn
1h ago
@a it’s not “obtuse” to oppose a skatepark. Some people don’t want to pave over green space. Proponents of the park seem don’t really have a solid reason as to why it needs to be there. A PUBLIC squash court isn’t much use to the PUBLIC if they don’t play squash, and I wouldn’t put on on a cemetery

Reply3 RecommendShareFlag
Ethan&Leah commented 3 hours ago
E
Ethan&Leah
Brooklyn
3h ago
This is a very one-sided take, I would say to the point of journalistic irresponsibility. To my eye this is just a twist on the long-standing discrimination that skaters have always faced.

Mount Prospect is a lovely park - but it is also one in need of maintenance. The other unspoken issue here is that it's become an unofficial dog park, where dogs go unleashed well outside of the official hours - the lawn has also become a dust bowl, which I believe is in part due to the volume of dog waste. Not to mention that it makes the park unusable to dog-phobic children.

What this article doesn't say is that there is a large community of people who would make wholesome use of a skate park like this. Many are teenagers, and the skating community is more diverse than ever - their interests should also be considered.

Reply7 RecommendShareFlag
1 REPLY
Preston commented 12 minutes ago
P
Preston
Brooklyn
12m ago
@Ethan&Leah

I agree. I would only ask to hear what other locations nearby were considered.

I know that park well and you are right that it needs TLC. Leash laws also need enforcement by NYC Parks. Those realities do not necessarily call for a skate park at that location. But, again, we'd need to know where the alternatives would be.

ReplyRecommendShareFlag
Rebecca G commented 3 hours ago
R
Rebecca G
NYC
3h ago
They paved paradise and put up a…skate park? Mount Prospect Park is a rare, tranquil, green escape in our concrete-filled city, and Eric Adams and Tony Hawk (seriously?) want to destroy it. The flooding and safety concerns are legitimate. Not to mention the noise pollution this will bring to the Brooklyn Botanical Garden, which borders Mount Prospect Park on two sides. There are plenty of other good options in the area for a skate park… Mount Prospect Park should not be on the short list.

Reply8 RecommendShareFlag
Margo Channing commented 3 hours ago
Margo Channing
Margo Channing
NY
3h ago
Come take a look at Eisenhower Park in East Meadow Long Island to see what politicians do. Bruce Blakeman under the cover of night approved a "temporary" cricket stadium to be erected on an enormous field in the once beautiful park. They got rid of 3 baseball fields to do this. I don't see how this will be a temporary thing it's a gigantic eyesore that has no place being in a park. But we are at the mercy of very shortsided politicians who think this is a good idea. It isn't.

Reply5 RecommendShareFlag
Jason commented 5 hours ago
J
Jason
Brooklyn
5h ago
Mount Prospect Park is the best of the city’s small magical parks (I include Fort Greene Park and Owl Head Park), a space that’s almost magical, sun or rain. It is also a great place for pickup soccer matches, birthday parties, and casual jogging, among many many other activities. Sacrificing it to a concrete skate park would be a huge mistake. Off the top of my head, I can think of ten other nearby sites for a skate park. This isn’t needed housing we’re talking about.

Reply16 RecommendShareFlag
1 REPLY
Jack commented 2 hours ago
J
Jack
And Jill
2h ago
@jason We don't have a housing crisis, we have an illegal migrant crisis.  For legal residents, there is a housing surplus.  That surplus is completely eliminated by people with no legal right to be here.

Reply3 RecommendShareFlag
Gale The Grower commented 5 hours ago
G
Gale The Grower
Below Radar
5h ago
We are laughing uncontrollably at the plight of government weed stores run by forgiven felons.  We grow.  And we distribute to a discerning and select clientele.  No taxes, no ads, no cameras, no IDs, no hassles.  Business is booming.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Ninj2 on February 29, 2024, 09:33:19 AM
NYC needs a giant skatepark. Total lack of street spots  out there.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: GardenSkater77 on February 29, 2024, 09:54:55 AM
Aren’t we as a skate society over large skate parks? They are like the big box stores of the 2000s. I think it would be cooler to designate underutilized areas and allow the skaters to make their own obstacles. Once a mega park is built people get sick of it so fast. The only good parks are the ones that organically grow over time.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: ratking on February 29, 2024, 09:59:50 AM
540-degree aerial rotation....haha
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: jakeumms on February 29, 2024, 10:50:29 AM
Oh they got NIMBYs in Brooklyn too
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Shrinedescender on February 29, 2024, 10:54:49 AM
Unfortunately this fits into the longtime effort to parkify NYC skating. You talk to kids in the metro area today about trips they've taken into the city and 9/10 of them will tell you it was to skate some park all day.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Lhotse’s Pit of Death on February 29, 2024, 10:58:35 AM
Living in nyc for over 10 years now, and I think Ive been to 3 skateparks. It always seems really weird to skate in an artificial space with really limited obstacles when famous spots, every kind of curb, ledge, rail…etc is just beyond the skatepark gates. Unless it has huge vert sections for those that want are into that or indoor parks for the winter, skateparks don’t make much sense for anyone over the age of 12 in NYC.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: dr.prestige on February 29, 2024, 11:34:08 AM
As a place for skateboarding, said Gorenberg, of Friends of Mount Prospect Park, “The site is a problem. Paving green space isn’t acceptable to the community, and it’s not the way for New York City to look forward to a more resilient future. It’s backwards thinking.”

bro doesn't really care about the environment he just wants his property value to stay high

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143622813002427

Oh they got NIMBYs in Brooklyn too
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: thehogsniper on February 29, 2024, 11:51:34 AM
All this bitching about green space, couldn't you just put green dye in the concrete lmao. kill two birds with one stone.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: TheDraught on February 29, 2024, 12:15:51 PM
Only thing they're really worried about are the prices of their houses. 
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: kook1234 on February 29, 2024, 12:20:34 PM
live in the Concrete Jungle, be upset there is concrete
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: fuck_that_guy on February 29, 2024, 12:27:10 PM
fuck that guy
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: CossRooper on February 29, 2024, 12:47:26 PM
Conflicted on this. While I do think those people in the articles are just NIMBYs, honestly I would prefer to keep Prospect as green as possible and use a shittier/already less green public space for a park (there are many around the city).  The strength of Prospect is that it's big and green and dense. I would say the same thing if they were proposing 8 new basketball courts or whatever. Just keep the trees.

And like @Mandatory Reload said... just do Brower first. That place has a huge community of skaters around it that need it so bad.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: headtowall on February 29, 2024, 01:07:18 PM
Prospect park is fuckign huge get over it, build the fuckign park, we have dog shit parks overall here
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: JM on February 29, 2024, 01:18:25 PM
“ The other unspoken issue here is that it's become an unofficial dog park, where dogs go unleashed well outside of the official hours - the lawn has also become a dust bowl, which I believe is in part due to the volume of dog waste. Not to mention that it makes the park unusable to dog-phobic children. ”

They should know better than to mess with people and their precious shnookums.

But, skateparks can have proper, responsible “green” drainage solutions, and incorporate the natural within it.

A good case study is The Gathering Place in Tulsa.


(https://i.ibb.co/f1PZpXx/IMG-4669.webp) (https://ibb.co/f1PZpXx)
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on February 29, 2024, 01:40:15 PM
just redo the dogshit park at 5th and 5th instead
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: JM on February 29, 2024, 01:41:38 PM
just redo the dogshit park at 5th and 5th instead
Side note: is that Bob Odenkirk in a porno on your icon?
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: newspaperparty on February 29, 2024, 05:21:13 PM
Conflicted on this. While I do think those people in the articles are just NIMBYs, honestly I would prefer to keep Prospect as green as possible and use a shittier/already less green public space for a park (there are many around the city).  The strength of Prospect is that it's big and green and dense. I would say the same thing if they were proposing 8 new basketball courts or whatever. Just keep the trees.

And like @Mandatory Reload said... just do Brower first. That place has a huge community of skaters around it that need it so bad.

Agree with all of this. In a city already suffering from urban heat island effect, we shouldn’t be taking out green space (and should be adding green space in underserved communities). The city has been spending so much money on skateparks, sometimes very close together, when what we really need is more plaza space. If they want to build something in this area, it would make a lot more sense to build a little plaza for both skating and the public at Grand Army Plaza. There’s tons of unused space there and I think the DOT is planning a redesign anyways.

Also adding my support for Brower first. Was my local for a bit and while it has its charm, it is in desperate need of a revamp.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Meathook on February 29, 2024, 05:42:21 PM
Expand Quote
Conflicted on this. While I do think those people in the articles are just NIMBYs, honestly I would prefer to keep Prospect as green as possible and use a shittier/already less green public space for a park (there are many around the city).  The strength of Prospect is that it's big and green and dense. I would say the same thing if they were proposing 8 new basketball courts or whatever. Just keep the trees.

And like @Mandatory Reload said... just do Brower first. That place has a huge community of skaters around it that need it so bad.
[close]

Agree with all of this. In a city already suffering from urban heat island effect, we shouldn’t be taking out green space (and should be adding green space in underserved communities). The city has been spending so much money on skateparks, sometimes very close together, when what we really need is more plaza space. If they want to build something in this area, it would make a lot more sense to build a little plaza for both skating and the public at Grand Army Plaza. There’s tons of unused space there and I think the DOT is planning a redesign anyways.

Also adding my support for Brower first. Was my local for a bit and while it has its charm, it is in desperate need of a revamp.

Yeah I agree about Brower Park.  Bedstuy/Crown Heights could use a proper skatepark and the space is already there.  Last summer I skated there and met the kid who pours concrete on the ground and skreets it to make it more skateable. 

There’s no reason to remove what little green space we already have at Prospect Park.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on February 29, 2024, 05:45:23 PM
Expand Quote
just redo the dogshit park at 5th and 5th instead
[close]
Side note: is that Bob Odenkirk in a porno on your icon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhsJQCOKxjw
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: MareVitals on February 29, 2024, 06:50:01 PM
all i know is that Brower Park redesign can't come soon enough. one of my least favorite places to skate in nyc, the ground is essentially unskateable. horrid

I don't know when you last went but somebody DIYd it. It's still bad but now it's plaster over cheese grater instead of just cheese grater. Fine to skate with some big wheels but I also like shitty parks.

The comments in this article about mount prospect don't surprise me but are dumb. Mount Prospect Park is not some scenic nature oasis. It's mostly a flat grass lawn. Nobody goes there and it's underutilized space by NYC standards. It's not like the wooded areas of actual prospect park, those are dope.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: ChuckRamone on February 29, 2024, 07:19:23 PM
I'm gonna be that person and correct everyone's spelling: Brouwer with a 'u.'
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: RoaryMcTwang on February 29, 2024, 11:48:39 PM
One argument I haven’t read here yet is that you shouldn’t seal the ground at all, for reasons of ecological preservation, ground water conservation etc. That’s what killed the skatepark that was briefly on the table in my German suburb in ca 2000. They wanted to build a skatepark but couldnt get a permit to cover up the random field where it was to be. The last suggestion before the project died was to put a pyramid in the middle and have four narrow strips of brick run towards the four sides of it.

Guess every country has their own set of concerns.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: mj23 on March 01, 2024, 08:18:05 AM
i hate to say it but i agree with the NIMBYs on this one. new york needs to hold on to what little green space it has.

there are already plenty of underutilized places where pavement already exists and skaters would love to have a small spot/plaza/park.

in my neighborhood alone there are at least 3 different parks with big ass paved areas that have no clear purpose. throw a few obstacles in and call it a day.

look at american playground, thomas payne, blue park, or k bridge. just put some ledges, curbs, and a quarter pipe on some tennis court that nobody uses and we'll be psyched. those spots all get skated a lot.

let pat smith or alexis sablone design it because they have a proven track record designing spots like that, and they actually understand what makes skating in NYC unique.

but our current mayor eric adams is literally brain damaged and thinks he hears voices telling him to do stupid shit like this
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: CossRooper on March 01, 2024, 09:15:49 AM
in my neighborhood alone there are at least 3 different parks with big ass paved areas that have no clear purpose. throw a few obstacles in and call it a day.

exactly this. these bizarre concrete prairies are all over the place in the outer boroughs. i have no idea who is asking for a giant McPark on a big patch of grass, it's certainly not any skaters i know.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Mandatory Reload on March 01, 2024, 09:28:12 AM
Expand Quote
all i know is that Brower Park redesign can't come soon enough. one of my least favorite places to skate in nyc, the ground is essentially unskateable. horrid
[close]

I don't know when you last went but somebody DIYd it. It's still bad but now it's plaster over cheese grater instead of just cheese grater. Fine to skate with some big wheels but I also like shitty parks.

The comments in this article about mount prospect don't surprise me but are dumb. Mount Prospect Park is not some scenic nature oasis. It's mostly a flat grass lawn. Nobody goes there and it's underutilized space by NYC standards. It's not like the wooded areas of actual prospect park, those are dope.

skated it like 3 days ago haha tbf i guess i skate wheels on the smaller side (i think i'm on 54s right now?). i just moved and it's now the closest place to my apartment to skate. the cracks are bad, that's one thing for sure but the fact that it's surrounded by trees that hang over it means that it's basically always littered with twigs/acorns/etc. maybe i'll just go to home depot and grab a push broom to leave there, that would probably improve the situation considerably although I'm sure it would get stolen or destroyed at some point

even just a repave of Brower would do wonders, especially if the city could somehow provide a broom that couldn't be stolen (connected to a rope or something? idk) that people could use to clear the debris from the trees overhead.

when i go there i usually end up getting fed up after getting tossed like 4 times just riding around and go up to skate the ledges by the basketball courts instead lol really nice ground and the ledges slide pretty well although the beveled edges aren't ideal for locking into grind tricks and if it's nice out that area is pretty poppin with people playing basketball and hanging out.

at least the new broadway junction and ocean hill parks are a quick bike ride away. as someone mentioned, it's a little confusing that the city is building so many bigger parks so close together in certain areas. while we're at it, is it really that hard for the city to turn the lights on at Broadway Junction every day when it gets dark? so annoying to be there in the dark just waiting for the lights to turn on and half the time they just don't come on or don't come on for hours after it gets dark
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: headtowall on March 01, 2024, 10:14:37 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Conflicted on this. While I do think those people in the articles are just NIMBYs, honestly I would prefer to keep Prospect as green as possible and use a shittier/already less green public space for a park (there are many around the city).  The strength of Prospect is that it's big and green and dense. I would say the same thing if they were proposing 8 new basketball courts or whatever. Just keep the trees.

And like @Mandatory Reload said... just do Brower first. That place has a huge community of skaters around it that need it so bad.
[close]

Agree with all of this. In a city already suffering from urban heat island effect, we shouldn’t be taking out green space (and should be adding green space in underserved communities). The city has been spending so much money on skateparks, sometimes very close together, when what we really need is more plaza space. If they want to build something in this area, it would make a lot more sense to build a little plaza for both skating and the public at Grand Army Plaza. There’s tons of unused space there and I think the DOT is planning a redesign anyways.

Also adding my support for Brower first. Was my local for a bit and while it has its charm, it is in desperate need of a revamp.
[close]

Yeah I agree about Brower Park.  Bedstuy/Crown Heights could use a proper skatepark and the space is already there.  Last summer I skated there and met the kid who pours concrete on the ground and skreets it to make it more skateable. 

There’s no reason to remove what little green space we already have at Prospect Park.
am i losing my fucking mind? pospect park is fucking 526 arces with so much green space, taking a portion on the north side of the park thats already busy is a loss to who?
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: TheDraught on March 01, 2024, 10:20:44 AM
One argument I haven’t read here yet is that you shouldn’t seal the ground at all, for reasons of ecological preservation, ground water conservation etc. That’s what killed the skatepark that was briefly on the table in my German suburb in ca 2000. They wanted to build a skatepark but couldnt get a permit to cover up the random field where it was to be. The last suggestion before the project died was to put a pyramid in the middle and have four narrow strips of brick run towards the four sides of it.

Guess every country has their own set of concerns.

Basically you could design an ecofriendly skatepark, for instance:

- collect rain water with special drains in bowls and recycle it to water the rest of the park during heat waves. You can even make it into an obstacle like the drain in the fountain at Flushing Meadows

- paint everything white so it will reflect almost all the heat back instead of absorbing it (like tarmac does i.e). This will not be easy on the eyes on sunny days, but great at night as you will need less lights, kind of like a full moon night

- incorporate as much grass, plants and trees as possible. Think of a Carlsbad High grass gap instead of stairs, or a tree next to a hip you can wallie it or something

- All sitting space could be grass too with some benches.

- Use solar power with batteries to power lights at night. Solar panels can be installed above some areas of the park. In theory you could even create a small covered/rainproof part. This will also reduce the reflection of the area.
 

Would be cool if someone designed a park like this. Since skateboarding is a CO2-neutral sport it could actually reduce the ecological footprint of (part of) a park, especially compared to a grassy field full of dog feces.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: newspaperparty on March 01, 2024, 10:35:48 AM
i hate to say it but i agree with the NIMBYs on this one. new york needs to hold on to what little green space it has.

there are already plenty of underutilized places where pavement already exists and skaters would love to have a small spot/plaza/park.

in my neighborhood alone there are at least 3 different parks with big ass paved areas that have no clear purpose. throw a few obstacles in and call it a day.

look at american playground, thomas payne, blue park, or k bridge. just put some ledges, curbs, and a quarter pipe on some tennis court that nobody uses and we'll be psyched. those spots all get skated a lot.

let pat smith or alexis sablone design it because they have a proven track record designing spots like that, and they actually understand what makes skating in NYC unique.

but our current mayor eric adams is literally brain damaged and thinks he hears voices telling him to do stupid shit like this

All of this. It's a shame that this wasn't on my radar sooner or I would've showed up to community meetings for this and tried to pitch my two cents. Seems like the funding has gone through but it's not like they've broken ground or anything so I'm wondering if there may still be time to change someones' mind and point this is a better direction.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Maurice46 on March 01, 2024, 11:06:40 AM
Expand Quote
i hate to say it but i agree with the NIMBYs on this one. new york needs to hold on to what little green space it has.

there are already plenty of underutilized places where pavement already exists and skaters would love to have a small spot/plaza/park.

in my neighborhood alone there are at least 3 different parks with big ass paved areas that have no clear purpose. throw a few obstacles in and call it a day.

look at american playground, thomas payne, blue park, or k bridge. just put some ledges, curbs, and a quarter pipe on some tennis court that nobody uses and we'll be psyched. those spots all get skated a lot.

let pat smith or alexis sablone design it because they have a proven track record designing spots like that, and they actually understand what makes skating in NYC unique.

but our current mayor eric adams is literally brain damaged and thinks he hears voices telling him to do stupid shit like this
[close]

All of this. It's a shame that this wasn't on my radar sooner or I would've showed up to community meetings for this and tried to pitch my two cents. Seems like the funding has gone through but it's not like they've broken ground or anything so I'm wondering if there may still be time to change someones' mind and point this is a better direction.

This project uses 12% of an 8-acre site. Minimal impact on green space. Also, there aren't many unused paved areas in New York City parks. These places often have sports like softball, pickleball, and kickball, even if you don't see them happening. I enjoy simpler, DIY-ish parks for skating, but this project has a different purpose and scope, which is a good thing and adds to the diversity of skate options in the city. Seems odd and arbitrary to me that anyone would have an issue with this.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: MareVitals on March 01, 2024, 12:10:05 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Conflicted on this. While I do think those people in the articles are just NIMBYs, honestly I would prefer to keep Prospect as green as possible and use a shittier/already less green public space for a park (there are many around the city).  The strength of Prospect is that it's big and green and dense. I would say the same thing if they were proposing 8 new basketball courts or whatever. Just keep the trees.

And like @Mandatory Reload said... just do Brower first. That place has a huge community of skaters around it that need it so bad.
[close]

Agree with all of this. In a city already suffering from urban heat island effect, we shouldn’t be taking out green space (and should be adding green space in underserved communities). The city has been spending so much money on skateparks, sometimes very close together, when what we really need is more plaza space. If they want to build something in this area, it would make a lot more sense to build a little plaza for both skating and the public at Grand Army Plaza. There’s tons of unused space there and I think the DOT is planning a redesign anyways.

Also adding my support for Brower first. Was my local for a bit and while it has its charm, it is in desperate need of a revamp.
[close]

Yeah I agree about Brower Park.  Bedstuy/Crown Heights could use a proper skatepark and the space is already there.  Last summer I skated there and met the kid who pours concrete on the ground and skreets it to make it more skateable. 

There’s no reason to remove what little green space we already have at Prospect Park.
[close]
am i losing my fucking mind? pospect park is fucking 526 arces with so much green space, taking a portion on the north side of the park thats already busy is a loss to who?

I guarantee you everyone saying this has not been to mount prospect. There is nothing there. It is an empty field at the top of some stairs. I have explored every inch of prospect Park on my bike. It's funny nobody has a problem putting in a dog park and concert area by the zoo in there, where there is actually stuff resembling wooded trails, but paving over an already flat field is a no go.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: TheDraught on March 01, 2024, 12:23:18 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i hate to say it but i agree with the NIMBYs on this one. new york needs to hold on to what little green space it has.

there are already plenty of underutilized places where pavement already exists and skaters would love to have a small spot/plaza/park.

in my neighborhood alone there are at least 3 different parks with big ass paved areas that have no clear purpose. throw a few obstacles in and call it a day.

look at american playground, thomas payne, blue park, or k bridge. just put some ledges, curbs, and a quarter pipe on some tennis court that nobody uses and we'll be psyched. those spots all get skated a lot.

let pat smith or alexis sablone design it because they have a proven track record designing spots like that, and they actually understand what makes skating in NYC unique.

but our current mayor eric adams is literally brain damaged and thinks he hears voices telling him to do stupid shit like this
[close]

All of this. It's a shame that this wasn't on my radar sooner or I would've showed up to community meetings for this and tried to pitch my two cents. Seems like the funding has gone through but it's not like they've broken ground or anything so I'm wondering if there may still be time to change someones' mind and point this is a better direction.
[close]

This project uses 12% of an 8-acre site. Minimal impact on green space. Also, there aren't many unused paved areas in New York City parks. These places often have sports like softball, pickleball, and kickball, even if you don't see them happening. I enjoy simpler, DIY-ish parks for skating, but this project has a different purpose and scope, which is a good thing and adds to the diversity of skate options in the city. Seems odd and arbitrary to me that anyone would have an issue with this.

Skateboarding is a very space efficient sport. I don't know much about golfing but that's probably the least efficient. 

But if you take for example tennis, four courts can be used by 16 people at once playing doubles.

In the same space you could build a skatepark that 50 skaters can easily use at the same time, or even a 100 skaters with and a bit more time between tricks.

Iirc this is also one of the reasons why some Scandinavian cities promote skateboarding and build big parks, also because it's more multicultural (and less expensive) than traditional European sports like soccer, field hockey, swimming and athletics. 
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: newspaperparty on March 01, 2024, 12:43:59 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Conflicted on this. While I do think those people in the articles are just NIMBYs, honestly I would prefer to keep Prospect as green as possible and use a shittier/already less green public space for a park (there are many around the city).  The strength of Prospect is that it's big and green and dense. I would say the same thing if they were proposing 8 new basketball courts or whatever. Just keep the trees.

And like @Mandatory Reload said... just do Brower first. That place has a huge community of skaters around it that need it so bad.
[close]

Agree with all of this. In a city already suffering from urban heat island effect, we shouldn’t be taking out green space (and should be adding green space in underserved communities). The city has been spending so much money on skateparks, sometimes very close together, when what we really need is more plaza space. If they want to build something in this area, it would make a lot more sense to build a little plaza for both skating and the public at Grand Army Plaza. There’s tons of unused space there and I think the DOT is planning a redesign anyways.

Also adding my support for Brower first. Was my local for a bit and while it has its charm, it is in desperate need of a revamp.
[close]

Yeah I agree about Brower Park.  Bedstuy/Crown Heights could use a proper skatepark and the space is already there.  Last summer I skated there and met the kid who pours concrete on the ground and skreets it to make it more skateable. 

There’s no reason to remove what little green space we already have at Prospect Park.
[close]
am i losing my fucking mind? pospect park is fucking 526 arces with so much green space, taking a portion on the north side of the park thats already busy is a loss to who?
[close]

I guarantee you everyone saying this has not been to mount prospect. There is nothing there. It is an empty field at the top of some stairs. I have explored every inch of prospect Park on my bike. It's funny nobody has a problem putting in a dog park and concert area by the zoo in there, where there is actually stuff resembling wooded trails, but paving over an already flat field is a no go.

I get that mount prospect is a nothing space, but I still think we need to preserve greenery/permeable surfacing where we can.

I also think that the type of project they are proposing is not what skateboarding needs in New York City. Just my opinion, but I think we could benefit more from a street-accessible plaza to skate at Grand Army Plaza rather then a traditional skatepark at the top of a hill in a park.

Regardless though it's impossible to please everyone when it comes to public works. If the skatepark was built somewhere else, people would be upset about the other location too. If they do build this in mount prospect, I'll go occasionally and probably enjoy it, just not as much as I would enjoy a potential alternative.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Maurice46 on March 01, 2024, 12:52:08 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Conflicted on this. While I do think those people in the articles are just NIMBYs, honestly I would prefer to keep Prospect as green as possible and use a shittier/already less green public space for a park (there are many around the city).  The strength of Prospect is that it's big and green and dense. I would say the same thing if they were proposing 8 new basketball courts or whatever. Just keep the trees.

And like @Mandatory Reload said... just do Brower first. That place has a huge community of skaters around it that need it so bad.
[close]

Agree with all of this. In a city already suffering from urban heat island effect, we shouldn’t be taking out green space (and should be adding green space in underserved communities). The city has been spending so much money on skateparks, sometimes very close together, when what we really need is more plaza space. If they want to build something in this area, it would make a lot more sense to build a little plaza for both skating and the public at Grand Army Plaza. There’s tons of unused space there and I think the DOT is planning a redesign anyways.

Also adding my support for Brower first. Was my local for a bit and while it has its charm, it is in desperate need of a revamp.
[close]

Yeah I agree about Brower Park.  Bedstuy/Crown Heights could use a proper skatepark and the space is already there.  Last summer I skated there and met the kid who pours concrete on the ground and skreets it to make it more skateable. 

There’s no reason to remove what little green space we already have at Prospect Park.
[close]
am i losing my fucking mind? pospect park is fucking 526 arces with so much green space, taking a portion on the north side of the park thats already busy is a loss to who?
[close]

I guarantee you everyone saying this has not been to mount prospect. There is nothing there. It is an empty field at the top of some stairs. I have explored every inch of prospect Park on my bike. It's funny nobody has a problem putting in a dog park and concert area by the zoo in there, where there is actually stuff resembling wooded trails, but paving over an already flat field is a no go.
[close]

I get that mount prospect is a nothing space, but I still think we need to preserve greenery/permeable surfacing where we can.

I also think that the type of project they are proposing is not what skateboarding needs in New York City. Just my opinion, but I think we could benefit more from a street-accessible plaza to skate at Grand Army Plaza rather then a traditional skatepark at the top of a hill in a park.

Regardless though it's impossible to please everyone when it comes to public works. If the skatepark was built somewhere else, people would be upset about the other location too. If they do build this in mount prospect, I'll go occasionally and probably enjoy it, just not as much as I would enjoy a potential alternative.

The idea of mixed-use spaces is commonly understood, likely by many in this discussion. However, in New York City parks, spaces are usually designated for specific purposes, not mixed use. The focus here is on the actual practices in constructing park infrastructure, not on theoretical possibilities. The current proposal is reasonable. It doesn't significantly reduce green spaces or cause other major issues that some have suggested. The key point remains: the proposed changes have a minimal effect on the existing park area, making the opposition to it somewhat puzzling.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: mj23 on March 01, 2024, 01:12:51 PM
if we're going to do construction on a massive patch of grass we should be planting trees to reduce the urban heat island effect, provide cleaner air, add shade, and recover rainwater into the ground. we should not be adding concrete to make it worse.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: headtowall on March 01, 2024, 01:21:47 PM
if we're going to do construction on a massive patch of grass we should be planting trees to reduce the urban heat island effect, provide cleaner air, add shade, and recover rainwater into the ground. we should not be adding concrete to make it worse.
there is over 500 acres of greenspace next door, i think it will be aight
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: MareVitals on March 01, 2024, 02:27:02 PM
I get that mount prospect is a nothing space, but I still think we need to preserve greenery/permeable surfacing where we can.

I also think that the type of project they are proposing is not what skateboarding needs in New York City. Just my opinion, but I think we could benefit more from a street-accessible plaza to skate at Grand Army Plaza rather then a traditional skatepark at the top of a hill in a park.

Regardless though it's impossible to please everyone when it comes to public works. If the skatepark was built somewhere else, people would be upset about the other location too. If they do build this in mount prospect, I'll go occasionally and probably enjoy it, just not as much as I would enjoy a potential alternative.

I totally get the desire to preserve green space but in this instance, I think it's worth it. The area is a skateboarding wasteland and I frequently see kids skating the Abraham Lincoln statue out of desperation. This would push kids out of the park to a nice tucked-away area where they won't bother anyone. I don't really like skateparks either, my favorite place to skate is under the k but it is literally a toxic dump. It would be nice if kids didn't have to endure that and I have no doubt Mount Prospect will see more use with a skatepark.
(https://i.postimg.cc/9f5k8HPq/Screen-Shot-2024-03-01-at-5-24-21-PM.png)

Mount Prospect is really being used as a dog park as it stands. They currently plan to renovate the vale section of actual Prospect Park to make...essentially another dog park. The only reason this is getting any kind of pushback is NIMBYism. A dog park increases property values. A skatepark does not.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: j....soy..... on March 01, 2024, 04:34:26 PM
why not sprinkle spots around the city? 

Because it's a pain in the ass and will never happen.

Just take the massive park, it'll be enjoyed by everyone.  Never say no to the big park, you just will never see that much money or real estate ever......
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Ignatius J Reilly on March 01, 2024, 05:06:27 PM
Expand Quote
I get that mount prospect is a nothing space, but I still think we need to preserve greenery/permeable surfacing where we can.

I also think that the type of project they are proposing is not what skateboarding needs in New York City. Just my opinion, but I think we could benefit more from a street-accessible plaza to skate at Grand Army Plaza rather then a traditional skatepark at the top of a hill in a park.

Regardless though it's impossible to please everyone when it comes to public works. If the skatepark was built somewhere else, people would be upset about the other location too. If they do build this in mount prospect, I'll go occasionally and probably enjoy it, just not as much as I would enjoy a potential alternative.
[close]

I totally get the desire to preserve green space but in this instance, I think it's worth it. The area is a skateboarding wasteland and I frequently see kids skating the Abraham Lincoln statue out of desperation. This would push kids out of the park to a nice tucked-away area where they won't bother anyone. I don't really like skateparks either, my favorite place to skate is under the k but it is literally a toxic dump. It would be nice if kids didn't have to endure that and I have no doubt Mount Prospect will see more use with a skatepark.
(https://i.postimg.cc/9f5k8HPq/Screen-Shot-2024-03-01-at-5-24-21-PM.png)

Mount Prospect is really being used as a dog park as it stands. They currently plan to renovate the vale section of actual Prospect Park to make...essentially another dog park. The only reason this is getting any kind of pushback is NIMBYism. A dog park increases property values. A skatepark does not.
i don't think those kids would make their way from the total opposite side of the park to skate a skatepark instead of the statue spot + ledges it's a weird and unfriendly commute from opposite sides of the park

what brooklyn really needs is a proper skatepark anywhere between bay ridge and canarsie south of prospect park/the cemetery
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: MareVitals on March 01, 2024, 05:45:41 PM
i don't think those kids would make their way from the total opposite side of the park to skate a skatepark instead of the statue spot + ledges it's a weird and unfriendly commute from opposite sides of the park

what brooklyn really needs is a proper skatepark anywhere between bay ridge and canarsie south of prospect park/the cemetery
You say that but do you know how far you have to walk into the park to skate that shitty statue? Mount prospect is one stop on the train from the station closest to the statue. I don't think it would grab everybody but it would definitely help.

I agree though, it's sad there's a black hole with nothing between the park and owls head. That area needs it more but I think you just need to take what you can get.
Title: you can change the subject on these?
Post by: addie pray on March 01, 2024, 07:54:56 PM
more concrete? less concrete? who can say what the ideal NYC of the future is like
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Sicebox on March 01, 2024, 09:55:17 PM
There's so many other parks in need of a good fixing and maybe some expanding. D and D (Thomas Greene), Brower, it would be nice to see the city put money into that. The way I see it though, the city planners have no incentive to pick a spot to pave that is going to negatively impact the area. Adding a skatepark isn't going to add to nearby property values. So they must know that it's an underutilized space and want to fix that.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: GauchoAmigo on March 04, 2024, 06:32:06 PM
To everyone saying fix Brower instead - they are. Source:

https://www.archpaper.com/2024/01/tony-hawk-new-skateparks-brooklyn-bronx/

Prospect needs a park too. Hope it works out.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: mj23 on March 05, 2024, 07:47:00 AM
Expand Quote
if we're going to do construction on a massive patch of grass we should be planting trees to reduce the urban heat island effect, provide cleaner air, add shade, and recover rainwater into the ground. we should not be adding concrete to make it worse.
[close]
there is over 500 acres of greenspace next door, i think it will be aight
It’s thinking like yours that got us into this climate change mess in the first place
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: headtowall on March 05, 2024, 07:50:02 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
if we're going to do construction on a massive patch of grass we should be planting trees to reduce the urban heat island effect, provide cleaner air, add shade, and recover rainwater into the ground. we should not be adding concrete to make it worse.
[close]
there is over 500 acres of greenspace next door, i think it will be aight
[close]
It’s thinking like yours that got us into this climate change mess in the first place
lol ok
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: addie pray on March 05, 2024, 08:39:27 AM
nyc skaters are allergic to skating street and idk why
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Pete on March 09, 2024, 05:33:38 AM
We need more indoor 90s esq-wooden parks but with the current too many parks per neighborhood attitude.



Free max b
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Colin Robinson on March 09, 2024, 07:30:20 PM
Concrete of the Stone Age is my combination Pavement and Queens of the Stone Age cover band.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Pete on March 10, 2024, 12:17:49 PM
All these new parks are becoming that hollow concrete chicken wire spohn ranch type shit. That shit isn’t good for anybody at all except the city bc it’s so cheap to hire idiots that don’t know what’s going on.
They need to put the 5thpocket dudes that know what they’re doing to avoid that bullshit, and actually build some cool stuff.

And yeah there are so many spaces in Brooklyn alone not being used. Just sitting all derelique…no need to get rid of what little grassland is left. But as always the fuck do I know


Free max b

Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: pugmaster on March 10, 2024, 05:27:48 PM
uhhh... lemme get a bacon-egg-n-cheese-and skatepark the Ocky way
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: OGmike on March 11, 2024, 04:44:21 PM
a 40k square foot skatepark that wont have a straight regular ledge
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Tear Up a Trick on April 04, 2024, 05:29:30 PM
Brooklyn locals plan on jeering the birdman at his show in NYC over the skatepark plan in Mt Prospect Park:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/04/us-news/brooklyn-locals-plan-to-jeer-tony-hawk-over-skate-park-plans/ (https://nypost.com/2024/04/04/us-news/brooklyn-locals-plan-to-jeer-tony-hawk-over-skate-park-plans/)
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: frontshuv on April 04, 2024, 05:55:09 PM
Oh they got NIMBYs in Brooklyn too

they wrote the gd nimby handbook
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: 50mm on April 04, 2024, 06:01:40 PM
said Hayley Gorenberg, a co-chair of Friends of Mount Prospect Park, a group formed less than a month ago
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: frontsideNECKTIE on April 04, 2024, 08:36:38 PM
Being from the other side of the country in semi-rural PNW, I see both sides of the argument and I don't have much input on the best use of the space BUT

If I lived in NYC I don't think a new giant skatepark would be on my Christmas list. I may be romanticizing skating in that city but I'm sure it's more interesting and fun to skate than the city closest to me (not talking about Seattle or PDX)
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: 50mm on April 04, 2024, 09:30:25 PM
Being from the other side of the country in semi-rural PNW, I see both sides of the argument and I don't have much input on the best use of the space BUT

If I lived in NYC I don't think a new giant skatepark would be on my Christmas list. I may be romanticizing skating in that city but I'm sure it's more interesting and fun to skate than the city closest to me (not talking about Seattle or PDX)
Yeah I get it. I work in land conservation in a rural area but the little cities we have have plenty of space for a skatepark. Never been to the east coast but I'd imagine a skate park wouldn't be as big of a joy to have in a big city.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Maurice46 on April 05, 2024, 11:59:53 AM
New York City is enormous. I've lived here nearly 30 years and there are loads of places in it I've yet to explore. This is all to say that the impact of this park on the cityscape is miniscule and will actually add lots of greenspace. The only reason the opposition to it exists is that they are pissed that the beaten down grassless neglected area of the park that they've taken upon themselves to use as an unsanctioned off leash dog park (totally illegal middle class shit by the way) will be partially used for this skatepark. Every superficial concern that they've raised has been addressed in the initial plan and they still won't take yes for an answer. At this point it simply comes down to the opponents just being obstinate.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: jakeumms on April 05, 2024, 12:12:04 PM
New York City is enormous. I've lived here nearly 30 years and there are loads of places in it I've yet to explore. This is all to say that the impact of this park on the cityscape is miniscule and will actually add lots of greenspace. The only reason the opposition to it exists is that they are pissed that the beaten down grassless neglected area of the park that they've taken upon themselves to use as an unsanctioned off leash dog park (totally illegal middle class shit by the way) will be partially used for this skatepark. Every superficial concern that they've raised has been addressed in the initial plan and they still won't take yes for an answer. At this point it simply comes down to the opponents just being obstinate.
Thanks for that. It's pretty telling when you've read more than one article and still can't figure out why the City's considerations and solutions still aren't good enough.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: MareVitals on April 05, 2024, 12:23:56 PM
New York City is enormous. I've lived here nearly 30 years and there are loads of places in it I've yet to explore. This is all to say that the impact of this park on the cityscape is miniscule and will actually add lots of greenspace. The only reason the opposition to it exists is that they are pissed that the beaten down grassless neglected area of the park that they've taken upon themselves to use as an unsanctioned off leash dog park (totally illegal middle class shit by the way) will be partially used for this skatepark. Every superficial concern that they've raised has been addressed in the initial plan and they still won't take yes for an answer. At this point it simply comes down to the opponents just being obstinate.
This is it. Apparently there were handful of "protestors" at the Tony and Rodney talk last night. Shit is embarrassing.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Sicebox on April 07, 2024, 11:11:21 PM
Expand Quote
Being from the other side of the country in semi-rural PNW, I see both sides of the argument and I don't have much input on the best use of the space BUT

If I lived in NYC I don't think a new giant skatepark would be on my Christmas list. I may be romanticizing skating in that city but I'm sure it's more interesting and fun to skate than the city closest to me (not talking about Seattle or PDX)
[close]
Yeah I get it. I work in land conservation in a rural area but the little cities we have have plenty of space for a skatepark. Never been to the east coast but I'd imagine a skate park wouldn't be as big of a joy to have in a big city.

I think it's more about ease of access to a skatepark. If you live in that area you'd have to travel at least an hour to get to the closest skatepark so it serves the community of that area.
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Pete on April 08, 2024, 04:16:20 AM
I can’t imagine anybody left actually from (like grew up there) that area gives a single fuck about a skatepark getting built or not. You gotta be a really rich person to move in over there at this point. Moving to brookyn to become a NIMBY is Fuckin crazy, you want grass move literally anywhere besides NY. there are so many places that aren’t NYC. But everyone there wants it to be their little slice of ohio Wisconsin Michigan etc. just go back there.


Free max b
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: bluntfullofmid on April 08, 2024, 07:22:01 AM
I can’t imagine anybody left actually from (like grew up there) that area gives a single fuck about a skatepark getting built or not. You gotta be a really rich person to move in over there at this point. Moving to brookyn to become a NIMBY is Fuckin crazy, you want grass move literally anywhere besides NY. there are so many places that aren’t NYC. But everyone there wants it to be their little slice of ohio Wisconsin Michigan etc. just go back there.


Free max b

this
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Sanka Coffie on April 08, 2024, 09:13:39 AM
Unfortunately this fits into the longtime effort to parkify NYC skating. You talk to kids in the metro area today about trips they've taken into the city and 9/10 of them will tell you it was to skate some park all day.

This 1000%

It's always been astounding to me that with living in this big of a city with endless things to skate people will choose to go to a fucking skatepark all day
Title: Re: NYTimes: In Brooklyn a Fight Over Paving Over Parkland for Skateboarding
Post by: Maurice46 on April 08, 2024, 01:44:14 PM
Expand Quote
Unfortunately this fits into the longtime effort to parkify NYC skating. You talk to kids in the metro area today about trips they've taken into the city and 9/10 of them will tell you it was to skate some park all day.
[close]

This 1000%

It's always been astounding to me that with living in this big of a city with endless things to skate people will choose to go to a fucking skatepark all day

It doesn't seem so astounding to me that folks would want variety. Here in New York City, it's rare to find someone spending the entire day at a skatepark. A skatepark is simply another option for a session, like backyard miniramps, DIY, local curbs, a friend's flatbar, or street spots. Most skaters I know prefer having a variety of options rather than being limited to spots where they are likely to be asked to leave, having to travel long distances (possibly then being asked to leave) or having only one option. If you're not a fan of skateparks, you don't have to visit them. Their presence in the city doesn't negatively impact the variety of sessions available. The choice to skate endless streetspots is always there.