Slap MessageBoards

Skateboarding => USELESS WOODEN TOY BANTER => Topic started by: tommyjohn on March 06, 2012, 10:33:45 PM

Title: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: tommyjohn on March 06, 2012, 10:33:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV-qq9caA-A

At 2:50
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: ticklefingers on March 06, 2012, 10:40:16 PM
Even his dad thinks he's gay.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: cornholio on March 06, 2012, 10:43:35 PM
^ Hahaha
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: ivegotlevitation on March 06, 2012, 10:47:54 PM
this is a fucking done deal. it's not even up for speculation anymore. he's on.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: escapistfool on March 06, 2012, 10:48:54 PM
Hey Eric Koston left eS?! I wonder where he'll go!
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: apad88 on March 06, 2012, 10:53:53 PM
naw you think ya stupid ass.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Bubblegum Tate on March 06, 2012, 11:09:17 PM
That explains why he was in China with the Nike SB team  :-X
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: TomTom on March 06, 2012, 11:47:59 PM
That explains why he was in China with the Nike SB team  :-X

yeah that totally caught us all off guard,... ;)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: relevant to my intrests on March 07, 2012, 01:00:20 AM
that photo they chose there is funny.  the board is 3 feet below him.  get that paper alex.


if alex being on nike means that we see more of him skating, then i embrace it
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: BarcelonaCEO on March 07, 2012, 06:57:10 AM
Nike has a skate team?!

I wouldn't call it a skate team "per se", but what I'm sure of is that they employed poor kids in the past that had to work more than 8 hours a day just for a few dollars, and sure they werent rocking jordans to work, more like barefoot
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Pillowphile on March 07, 2012, 07:03:44 AM
As long as he keeps taking levatating board shots in all white clothing
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: trannies and mannies on March 07, 2012, 09:48:45 AM
how many people are on nike? like 30?
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: smellyfart on March 07, 2012, 06:49:59 PM
hahaha that photo is sick
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Useless Wooden Bench on March 07, 2012, 07:31:32 PM
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: foureyedjim on March 07, 2012, 08:05:11 PM
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?

is this like a double flip or something?  Looks off for a kickflip / heelflip lol
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: icybear187 on March 07, 2012, 08:23:22 PM
Expand Quote
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?
[close]

is this like a double flip or something?  Looks off for a kickflip / heelflip lol

Nollie heelflip, faggot.  lol
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: superslopp on March 07, 2012, 08:47:52 PM
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?

hahahahaha!
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: jRoy2000 on March 07, 2012, 08:58:28 PM
he talked weird in that
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: StabMasterArson on March 08, 2012, 12:10:27 AM
Expand Quote
Nike has a skate team?!
[close]

I wouldn't call it a skate team "per se", but what I'm sure of is that they employed poor kids in the past that had to work more than 8 hours a day just for a few dollars, and sure they werent rocking jordans to work, more like barefoot

Shut up. Most things you love come from unfit labor.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: apad88 on March 08, 2012, 12:31:27 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?
[close]

is this like a double flip or something?  Looks off for a kickflip / heelflip lol
[close]

Nollie heelflip, faggot.  lol
I doubt you actually "laughed out loud"
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Chocolaterain on March 08, 2012, 12:44:53 AM
Expand Quote
That explains why he was in China with the Nike SB team  :-X
[close]

yeah that totally caught us all off guard,... ;)

I went to the demo in China, he wasnt there...
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Kristi Yamaguchi on March 08, 2012, 01:31:04 AM
I like this dude but wasn't he talking so much shit about Nike like a year ago? What's up the hypocrisy of these people? First Koston shitted on P Rod for leaving ?s for Nike and now this. I guess all that money is pretty persuasive.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: GAY on March 08, 2012, 09:51:29 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?
[close]

is this like a double flip or something?  Looks off for a kickflip / heelflip lol
[close]

Nollie heelflip, faggot.  lol
[close]
I doubt you actually "laughed out loud"

Fucking hilarious.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Rutger Hauer on March 08, 2012, 10:53:31 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?
[close]

is this like a double flip or something?  Looks off for a kickflip / heelflip lol
[close]

Nollie heelflip, faggot.  lol
[close]
I doubt you actually "laughed out loud"
This is the Slap why I come lurking here.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: victor333 on March 08, 2012, 11:01:21 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
(http://sportlockerdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/alexolson_expo_rp.jpg)

edit: The caption from the site (http://sport-locker.net/2012/02/24/la-silhouette-blanche-by-nike-as-seen-by-boris-diaw/) the picture is from reads "French skateboarding star Alex Olson demonstrates his skills..."
Olson off America?
[close]

is this like a double flip or something?  Looks off for a kickflip / heelflip lol
[close]

Nollie heelflip, faggot.  lol

I don't think you can technically nollie while standing still, faggot
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: bentmode on March 08, 2012, 11:13:12 AM
i think its a 360 flip.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: shouldn't on March 08, 2012, 01:59:25 PM
lincoln assassinated in theater?
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: dickie ickies on March 09, 2012, 07:55:48 PM
i know that studio...
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: snowman600 on March 10, 2012, 12:33:23 PM
(http://streetontv.com/data/geditor/0904/2083592889_97e9fdba_Stevie+Williams+-+Switch+HeelFlip.JPG)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: foureyedjim on March 10, 2012, 05:43:23 PM
(http://streetontv.com/data/geditor/0904/2083592889_97e9fdba_Stevie+Williams+-+Switch+HeelFlip.JPG)

haha nice.  This actually resembles a trick because his feet aren't unreasonably far from his board, which you can tell is rotating.  I'm still confused as to what trick Alex is doing haha
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: jhskates84 on March 10, 2012, 06:15:22 PM
New issue of the Skateboard mag confirms malto and Olson's transition to Nike SB, haha
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: apad88 on March 11, 2012, 07:54:24 AM
(http://streetontv.com/data/geditor/0904/2083592889_97e9fdba_Stevie+Williams+-+Switch+HeelFlip.JPG)
that's a beaut.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: GershonSweaty on March 11, 2012, 12:48:48 PM
I like this dude but wasn't he talking so much shit about Nike like a year ago? What's up the hypocrisy of these people? First Koston shitted on P Rod for leaving ?s for Nike and now this. I guess all that money is pretty persuasive.

Money?
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Laban Fetus on March 11, 2012, 02:59:24 PM
Is Nike just gonna use him as a male model for their ad campaigns? I love the guy but he doesn't seem to give a fuck about filming anything. It's a shame
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Barry Dingle on March 11, 2012, 04:01:32 PM
Is Nike just gonna use him as a male model for their ad campaigns? I love the guy but he doesn't seem to give a fuck about filming anything. It's a shame

disregard females skating, acquire currency
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: foureyedjim on March 11, 2012, 05:08:04 PM
Expand Quote
Is Nike just gonna use him as a male model for their ad campaigns? I love the guy but he doesn't seem to give a fuck about filming anything. It's a shame
[close]

disregard females skating, acquire currency

I like your sig.  That is all.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: The Math Professor on March 16, 2012, 12:30:59 PM
New issue of the Skateboard mag confirms malto and Olson's transition to Nike SB, haha

(http://www.skatedaily.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/olson_nikesb_print.jpg)

Skate photo > Lifestyle shot
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: weaselhead on March 16, 2012, 12:52:58 PM
That ad reminded me of this...Waldo The Movie - Official Trailer [HD] (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hGMrc3ozMhs#ws)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Phil on March 16, 2012, 01:06:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENgJZlmgI6U
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: GershonSweaty on March 16, 2012, 03:41:20 PM
I guess that answers the question of Nike using him as a male model or not. Beautiful bastard though.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: MaryhillVibe on March 16, 2012, 03:47:42 PM
Seriously, his welcom to the team AD and not only is he not skating but he is sitting down!

what the fuck.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: BarcelonaCEO on March 16, 2012, 04:18:33 PM
I think the ad is extremely thought, I mean alex olson and most of pro skateboarders have become just models, brand managing has become into just image related issues, look at hubba wheels for instance. Skateboarding is a scheme! But dont be fooled by nike sb. They are postmodernists, powered by money and greed.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: MaryhillVibe on March 16, 2012, 04:59:23 PM
Steve Rodriguez was right.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: saucy ragu on March 16, 2012, 05:08:24 PM
Do they even list the shoes he's wearing in the caption? They list the t-shirt and pants, but even with the glare I don't think they list the shoes.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: cringe. on March 16, 2012, 05:15:18 PM
Would You Fuck Me? I'd Fuck Me... (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9am7P9pWo8#)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: cobo on March 16, 2012, 05:46:51 PM
I wonder when i will go to my skateshop and have to choose between either skating some DC's or skating some Nike's.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: foureyedjim on March 16, 2012, 08:33:19 PM
Expand Quote
New issue of the Skateboard mag confirms malto and Olson's transition to Nike SB, haha
[close]

(http://www.skatedaily.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/olson_nikesb_print.jpg)

Skate photo > Lifestyle shot


photo looks retro as fuck yo. tighhhtttttt.

And Alex looks really happy and innocent in there for some reason haha
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: nino brown on March 16, 2012, 10:29:41 PM
Seriously, his welcom to the team AD and not only is he not skating but he is sitting down!

what the fuck.
skateboarding is fucked
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: macgruber on March 16, 2012, 10:51:52 PM
Expand Quote
Seriously, his welcom to the team AD and not only is he not skating but he is sitting down!

what the fuck.
[close]
skateboarding is fucked

a lifestyle ad came out. skateboarding is ruined forever.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: nino brown on March 16, 2012, 11:23:56 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Seriously, his welcom to the team AD and not only is he not skating but he is sitting down!

what the fuck.
[close]
skateboarding is fucked
[close]

a lifestyle ad came out. skateboarding is ruined forever.
i didnt say anything about the ad fool, assuming makes a ass outta you and me. olson joining/leaving all theses companys based off his dad and one shitty video part isnt cutting it
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: escapistfool on March 17, 2012, 12:49:43 PM
Shitty video part? Who the hell do you only watch, P.Rod and Shane O'Neill? Although that's his only legitimate video part, that part did not suck. His part is actually one of my favorite parts from Fully Flared. He has power and style.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: nino brown on March 17, 2012, 01:42:07 PM
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: escapistfool on March 17, 2012, 02:38:18 PM
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.

Im 21, dingleberry.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: GershonSweaty on March 19, 2012, 10:59:49 AM
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: trannies and mannies on March 19, 2012, 11:20:25 AM
Olson is very fortunate. One video part 4 years ago has gotten him far.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: The Ghost of Lenny Kirk on March 19, 2012, 11:33:20 AM
it's awesome that this guy doesn't believe in anything other than cash. I think I'm just gonna start buying p.rod decks now because I can't really tell the difference anymore.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: MINDFIELD on March 20, 2012, 12:16:44 AM
i hate when people bring up the one video part thing, i like that, its gonna make seeing his next part that much better, im not the biggest fan of seeing so much web content, and if olson was actually slacking he wouldnt be getting checks from nike, or girl.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: apad88 on March 20, 2012, 01:23:15 AM
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
you must like P-rod.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: L33Tg33k on March 20, 2012, 03:45:40 AM
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Jack Klompis on March 20, 2012, 07:56:02 AM
you must like P-rod.

i mean he's a good skater and a nice guy, but i don't like him

(http://www.thechicksters.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/3401_by_paul-rodriguez-jr01.jpg)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: macgruber on March 20, 2012, 10:30:30 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Seriously, his welcom to the team AD and not only is he not skating but he is sitting down!

what the fuck.
[close]
skateboarding is fucked
[close]

a lifestyle ad came out. skateboarding is ruined forever.
[close]
i didnt say anything about the ad fool, assuming makes a ass outta you and me. olson joining/leaving all theses companys based off his dad and one shitty video part isnt cutting it

you quoted someone talking about the AD.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: GershonSweaty on March 20, 2012, 05:24:54 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
[close]

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.

It is possible this was a weak argument, the idea that something is good but " he was injured/was just an am/ just got on had 2 weeks to film blah. Blah. Blah" is ridiculous. But by you're admission everyone given a part in a video is open to critique against anyone else in that video. Surely that hypothesis creates null arguments when comparing someone who has skated for 20 years against he who has skated for 5.  In short (and as an example) comparing Yaje Popson against  say Guy Mariano is possible but isn't necessary or going to produce any real topic for discussion.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: The Ghost of Lenny Kirk on March 20, 2012, 05:37:59 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
[close]

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.

his fully flared part is mediocre but he's become a way better skater since that part.

anyways

p.rod > olson
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Phil on March 20, 2012, 08:35:44 PM
Expand Quote
you must like P-rod.
[close]

i mean he's a good skater and a nice guy, but i don't like him

(http://www.thechicksters.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/3401_by_paul-rodriguez-jr01.jpg)

Seinfeld reference number two in this thread. YES!
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: L33Tg33k on March 20, 2012, 08:48:06 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
[close]

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.
[close]

It is possible this was a weak argument, the idea that something is good but " he was injured/was just an am/ just got on had 2 weeks to film blah. Blah. Blah" is ridiculous. But by you're admission everyone given a part in a video is open to critique against anyone else in that video. Surely that hypothesis creates null arguments when comparing someone who has skated for 20 years against he who has skated for 5.� In short (and as an example) comparing Yaje Popson against� say Guy Mariano is possible but isn't necessary or going to produce any real topic for discussion.

Let's continue to use Guy Mariano for an example. All of his parts from the beginning have been excellent by anyone's standards. Nobody ever said, "That Guy Mariano kid's really good for his age", or, "That was only Guy Mariano's first part so I understand why it wasn't as good as the other parts in the video". Nobody ever said that (or at least nobody with any sense said that) about Hawk, Way, P-Rod, Nyjah, Sheckler, or a large amount of others and that's the way it should be. This is one of the reason why Flip got so much shit. They put kids on their team that could be good in the future instead of putting kids on the team that were setting standards from the moment they got put on. To be sure, lots of companies have prematurely put kids on their team and banked on them becoming something special before they were anything special. That doesn't mean I should keep that in mind when I'm watching their video parts. Don't get me wrong, if you feel like Alex Olson brought something special to the table then by all means that part was good enough, but the moment you start talking about how it was okay considering it was his first part is the same moment I disregard that opinion. Unless injury or something else that effectively stops a skater from filming, how many video parts, whether he's am or pro, or what he had for breakfast, will not dictate the quality of a part for me.

And yes, I'm going to hold Yaje Popson to a higher standard when he puts out a major video part than when he was just putting out clips with his friends.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: GershonSweaty on March 21, 2012, 02:53:18 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
[close]

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.
[close]

It is possible this was a weak argument, the idea that something is good but " he was injured/was just an am/ just got on had 2 weeks to film blah. Blah. Blah" is ridiculous. But by you're admission everyone given a part in a video is open to critique against anyone else in that video. Surely that hypothesis creates null arguments when comparing someone who has skated for 20 years against he who has skated for 5.� In short (and as an example) comparing Yaje Popson against� say Guy Mariano is possible but isn't necessary or going to produce any real topic for discussion.
[close]

Let's continue to use Guy Mariano for an example. All of his parts from the beginning have been excellent by anyone's standards. Nobody ever said, "That Guy Mariano kid's really good for his age", or, "That was only Guy Mariano's first part so I understand why it wasn't as good as the other parts in the video". Nobody ever said that (or at least nobody with any sense said that) about Hawk, Way, P-Rod, Nyjah, Sheckler, or a large amount of others and that's the way it should be. This is one of the reason why Flip got so much shit. They put kids on their team that could be good in the future instead of putting kids on the team that were setting standards from the moment they got put on. To be sure, lots of companies have prematurely put kids on their team and banked on them becoming something special before they were anything special. That doesn't mean I should keep that in mind when I'm watching their video parts. Don't get me wrong, if you feel like Alex Olson brought something special to the table then by all means that part was good enough, but the moment you start talking about how it was okay considering it was his first part is the same moment I disregard that opinion. Unless injury or something else that effectively stops a skater from filming, how many video parts, whether he's am or pro, or what he had for breakfast, will not dictate the quality of a part for me.

And yes, I'm going to hold Yaje Popson to a higher standard when he puts out a major video part than when he was just putting out clips with his friends.


I understand what you're saying, I'm just a little confused. I mean I totally agree with and get what you say about Flip. Do you think most am's are not worthy of their positions ? And how do you feel about quick turn around pros I.E Ishod Wair.
I do however think that it's unfair you've decided to compare like that, once again as an example Olson definitely looks up to Carroll. Without those few greats we wouldn't have the skaters we do now furthermore we could go into style over substance. Olson and MikeMo both went pro together both for their own merits I love watching them both and yes MikeMo did change the standard in fully flared but Olson produced a part that personally makes. Me want to skate.

Another question might be who would be on you're fictious team? Who would be good enough to be Am ? Beyond that Pro?
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: kamltoe on March 21, 2012, 05:34:41 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
[close]

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.
[close]

It is possible this was a weak argument, the idea that something is good but " he was injured/was just an am/ just got on had 2 weeks to film blah. Blah. Blah" is ridiculous. But by you're admission everyone given a part in a video is open to critique against anyone else in that video. Surely that hypothesis creates null arguments when comparing someone who has skated for 20 years against he who has skated for 5.� In short (and as an example) comparing Yaje Popson against� say Guy Mariano is possible but isn't necessary or going to produce any real topic for discussion.
[close]

Let's continue to use Guy Mariano for an example. All of his parts from the beginning have been excellent by anyone's standards. Nobody ever said, "That Guy Mariano kid's really good for his age", or, "That was only Guy Mariano's first part so I understand why it wasn't as good as the other parts in the video". Nobody ever said that (or at least nobody with any sense said that) about Hawk, Way, P-Rod, Nyjah, Sheckler, or a large amount of others and that's the way it should be. This is one of the reason why Flip got so much shit. They put kids on their team that could be good in the future instead of putting kids on the team that were setting standards from the moment they got put on. To be sure, lots of companies have prematurely put kids on their team and banked on them becoming something special before they were anything special. That doesn't mean I should keep that in mind when I'm watching their video parts. Don't get me wrong, if you feel like Alex Olson brought something special to the table then by all means that part was good enough, but the moment you start talking about how it was okay considering it was his first part is the same moment I disregard that opinion. Unless injury or something else that effectively stops a skater from filming, how many video parts, whether he's am or pro, or what he had for breakfast, will not dictate the quality of a part for me.

And yes, I'm going to hold Yaje Popson to a higher standard when he puts out a major video part than when he was just putting out clips with his friends.

you're an idiot. there is a reason that pro's and ams are ranked differently. it's because pro's have been doing it longer and have matured as skaters. am's have less pay and more to prove strictly because they haven't proven their worth via multiple trips/parts/ads/etc. according to your logic, there should be no difference between the presentation of a pro or an am in the same video? so i guess just roll the dice to see who gets last part right? FOH with that bullshit. if you're an am and it's your first part, i'd be doing you an extreme disservice by saying, "your part was only mediocre because...well...did you see carrolls part? did you see MJ's ender? yeah, no bigs." see how stupid that looks? right, that's your whole argument in a single quote. stoops.

**also, some dudes just come in as power ams and are maybe as good trickwise as current pro's, but... take luan for example. i think anyone who has seen him skate for the last 5 yrs or so has seen his style mature into a beastly thing while his tricks were already ridiculous when he came on the radar. there's a reason.

k
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: sebastian on March 21, 2012, 05:56:38 AM
for me it's a question of either enjoying the footage or not enjoying it... and of course a part of that is you thinking, "there's no fucking way I could do that shit."
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: victor333 on March 21, 2012, 08:55:43 AM
for me it's a question of either enjoying the footage or not enjoying it... and of course a part of that is you thinking, "there's no fucking way I could do that shit."

This.

Half of the time I don't even know who has just gone pro, who's been pro, or who's retiring...I'm exaggerating for sure, but you get my point, no?

I don't really hold anyone to a standard per se, maybe themselves. I guess I only want to see that a person is progressing, doing new tricks, and not just doing the same stuff they did in their last part. And as long as it gets me hyped to skate, what more could I ask for?
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: TMKF on March 21, 2012, 09:18:08 AM
Expand Quote
New issue of the Skateboard mag confirms malto and Olson's transition to Nike SB, haha
[close]

(http://www.skatedaily.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/olson_nikesb_print.jpg)

Skate photo > Lifestyle shot


If Alex Olsen isn't gay he's passing up a good chance...
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: able on March 21, 2012, 09:50:43 AM
someone earlier said something about 'Grace'
Alex Olson with a warm up session at the Venice park. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkK95R1EnPg#ws)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: kamltoe on March 21, 2012, 11:38:00 AM
Expand Quote
for me it's a question of either enjoying the footage or not enjoying it... and of course a part of that is you thinking, "there's no fucking way I could do that shit."
[close]

This.

Half of the time I don't even know who has just gone pro, who's been pro, or who's retiring...I'm exaggerating for sure, but you get my point, no?

I don't really hold anyone to a standard per se, maybe themselves. I guess I only want to see that a person is progressing, doing new tricks, and not just doing the same stuff they did in their last part. And as long as it gets me hyped to skate, what more could I ask for?

exactly. skating is as self referential as it gets. though you might compare different tricks and other shit for the sake of nerding out, the fact remains that what we love to see is someone/anyone ripping and getting better at ripping. and that makes us want to rip and get better. period. to say that one skaters part was worse because it wasn't up to the standards of the others in the vid is just stoops. skateboarding and standards don't even mix on a conceptual level.

k
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: life support on March 21, 2012, 12:56:10 PM
That ad is for nike apparel, not for nike sb the shoe part.
just saying.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: L33Tg33k on March 21, 2012, 02:51:03 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
[close]

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.
[close]

It is possible this was a weak argument, the idea that something is good but " he was injured/was just an am/ just got on had 2 weeks to film blah. Blah. Blah" is ridiculous. But by you're admission everyone given a part in a video is open to critique against anyone else in that video. Surely that hypothesis creates null arguments when comparing someone who has skated for 20 years against he who has skated for 5.� In short (and as an example) comparing Yaje Popson against� say Guy Mariano is possible but isn't necessary or going to produce any real topic for discussion.
[close]

Let's continue to use Guy Mariano for an example. All of his parts from the beginning have been excellent by anyone's standards. Nobody ever said, "That Guy Mariano kid's really good for his age", or, "That was only Guy Mariano's first part so I understand why it wasn't as good as the other parts in the video". Nobody ever said that (or at least nobody with any sense said that) about Hawk, Way, P-Rod, Nyjah, Sheckler, or a large amount of others and that's the way it should be. This is one of the reason why Flip got so much shit. They put kids on their team that could be good in the future instead of putting kids on the team that were setting standards from the moment they got put on. To be sure, lots of companies have prematurely put kids on their team and banked on them becoming something special before they were anything special. That doesn't mean I should keep that in mind when I'm watching their video parts. Don't get me wrong, if you feel like Alex Olson brought something special to the table then by all means that part was good enough, but the moment you start talking about how it was okay considering it was his first part is the same moment I disregard that opinion. Unless injury or something else that effectively stops a skater from filming, how many video parts, whether he's am or pro, or what he had for breakfast, will not dictate the quality of a part for me.

And yes, I'm going to hold Yaje Popson to a higher standard when he puts out a major video part than when he was just putting out clips with his friends.
[close]

you're an idiot. there is a reason that pro's and ams are ranked differently. it's because pro's have been doing it longer and have matured as skaters. am's have less pay and more to prove strictly because they haven't proven their worth via multiple trips/parts/ads/etc. according to your logic, there should be no difference between the presentation of a pro or an am in the same video? so i guess just roll the dice to see who gets last part right? FOH with that bullshit. if you're an am and it's your first part, i'd be doing you an extreme disservice by saying, "your part was only mediocre because...well...did you see carrolls part? did you see MJ's ender? yeah, no bigs." see how stupid that looks? right, that's your whole argument in a single quote. stoops.

**also, some dudes just come in as power ams and are maybe as good trickwise as current pro's, but... take luan for example. i think anyone who has seen him skate for the last 5 yrs or so has seen his style mature into a beastly thing while his tricks were already ridiculous when he came on the radar. there's a reason.

k

Being pro doesn't work that way no matter how much you want it to. Let's not forget that Crockett and Johnson just went pro after years of us bitching about it and that Dennis Durrant is still am. And then there are plenty of people like Tom Asta who went pro after a fucking nanosecond of being in the conscious of the skateboard world at large. The line of what makes someone am or pro is more blurred than ever before in every aspect. You are lying if you say otherwise. If you think you've discredited my argument in one sentence, you clearly didn't understand it in the first place.

Let me make this as clear as possible. How I feel about a part is derived on a highly individual basis and I thought I made that clear with this, "...if you feel like Alex Olson brought something special to the table then by all means that part was good...", but apparently you missed that. My whole spiel was about how lowered expectations are bullshit. If you're on a major skateboard company then I expect for your skating to be on par. What constitutes being on par is up for debate, but whether I give a damn how many parts you have, is not.

You and I usually agree on things, but I have to tell you, leaving a k at the end every one of your post is the lamest thing any poster has ever done.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: waltercronkite on March 21, 2012, 04:24:07 PM
this dude ollied a bench the long way style and power end of story
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Kristi Yamaguchi on March 21, 2012, 04:51:51 PM
this dude ollied a bench the long way style and power end of story
(http://www.girlskateboards.com/images/ad_alex_10_10.jpg)
/argument

This pretty motherfucker can coast by for the rest of his days as far as I'm concerned.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: wigs on March 21, 2012, 08:11:07 PM
Expand Quote
this dude ollied a bench the long way style and power end of story
[close]
(http://www.girlskateboards.com/images/ad_alex_10_10.jpg)
/argument

This pretty motherfucker can coast by for the rest of his days as far as I'm concerned.

haha, literally "bringing something new to the table". alex is dope as fuck, beyond his skating he genuinely seems like a cool dude.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: mongomaestro on March 21, 2012, 10:58:45 PM
daewon is my favorite skater.

and alex olson is dope.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: apad88 on March 22, 2012, 12:48:39 AM
daewon is my favorite skater.

okay?
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: mongomaestro on March 22, 2012, 01:19:59 AM
you forgot the rest.    ;D
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Murray Hewitt on March 22, 2012, 01:09:36 PM
Official, http://espn.go.com/action/skateboarding/blog/_/post/7722858/alex-olson-joins-nike-sb-team (http://espn.go.com/action/skateboarding/blog/_/post/7722858/alex-olson-joins-nike-sb-team)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Nancy Chin The Manicurist on March 22, 2012, 02:35:58 PM
Official, http://espn.go.com/action/skateboarding/blog/_/post/7722858/alex-olson-joins-nike-sb-team (http://espn.go.com/action/skateboarding/blog/_/post/7722858/alex-olson-joins-nike-sb-team)

AHAHA:

"Your first Nike ad... did you stick that first try? Or was that a couple tries?
No, that was first try.

Really?
Yeah.

Whoa. That's gnarly.
Haha. Yeah, it was no problem. "
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: Bubblegum Tate on March 27, 2012, 04:59:50 PM
so where's the ad
(http://digitalskateboarding.com/wp-content/uploads/news-large.jpg)
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: superslopp on March 27, 2012, 06:20:36 PM
alex.
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: escapistfool on March 27, 2012, 10:17:20 PM
The world needs a Dylan. and Alex. sex tape, not some stiff, crying, "first try" yelling boys
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: NowhereInLife on March 28, 2012, 05:48:43 AM
he's kind of a natural.   

girl and nike, not really trying. 
Title: Re: Alex Olson on Nike?
Post by: kamltoe on March 28, 2012, 06:57:42 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
i love when anyone says a mediocre skater sucks and the 1st 14 year old that see's replys with " you must like prod or nuggget lolololol" get the fuck outta here.
[close]

A better question might be, who is above mediocre ? If Alex Olson is mediocre that is. I thought that part was rad considering he was Am and it was his first part.
[close]

This has nothing to do with anything. I don't care how you feel about Olson, if you're using a shitty qualifier like this, then you're doing it wrong. If you're going to have a part in a video with pro skaters, a skater should and will be judged by the same standards as everyone else in the video, notwithstanding injuries.
[close]

It is possible this was a weak argument, the idea that something is good but " he was injured/was just an am/ just got on had 2 weeks to film blah. Blah. Blah" is ridiculous. But by you're admission everyone given a part in a video is open to critique against anyone else in that video. Surely that hypothesis creates null arguments when comparing someone who has skated for 20 years against he who has skated for 5.� In short (and as an example) comparing Yaje Popson against� say Guy Mariano is possible but isn't necessary or going to produce any real topic for discussion.
[close]

Let's continue to use Guy Mariano for an example. All of his parts from the beginning have been excellent by anyone's standards. Nobody ever said, "That Guy Mariano kid's really good for his age", or, "That was only Guy Mariano's first part so I understand why it wasn't as good as the other parts in the video". Nobody ever said that (or at least nobody with any sense said that) about Hawk, Way, P-Rod, Nyjah, Sheckler, or a large amount of others and that's the way it should be. This is one of the reason why Flip got so much shit. They put kids on their team that could be good in the future instead of putting kids on the team that were setting standards from the moment they got put on. To be sure, lots of companies have prematurely put kids on their team and banked on them becoming something special before they were anything special. That doesn't mean I should keep that in mind when I'm watching their video parts. Don't get me wrong, if you feel like Alex Olson brought something special to the table then by all means that part was good enough, but the moment you start talking about how it was okay considering it was his first part is the same moment I disregard that opinion. Unless injury or something else that effectively stops a skater from filming, how many video parts, whether he's am or pro, or what he had for breakfast, will not dictate the quality of a part for me.

And yes, I'm going to hold Yaje Popson to a higher standard when he puts out a major video part than when he was just putting out clips with his friends.
[close]

you're an idiot. there is a reason that pro's and ams are ranked differently. it's because pro's have been doing it longer and have matured as skaters. am's have less pay and more to prove strictly because they haven't proven their worth via multiple trips/parts/ads/etc. according to your logic, there should be no difference between the presentation of a pro or an am in the same video? so i guess just roll the dice to see who gets last part right? FOH with that bullshit. if you're an am and it's your first part, i'd be doing you an extreme disservice by saying, "your part was only mediocre because...well...did you see carrolls part? did you see MJ's ender? yeah, no bigs." see how stupid that looks? right, that's your whole argument in a single quote. stoops.

**also, some dudes just come in as power ams and are maybe as good trickwise as current pro's, but... take luan for example. i think anyone who has seen him skate for the last 5 yrs or so has seen his style mature into a beastly thing while his tricks were already ridiculous when he came on the radar. there's a reason.

k
[close]

Being pro doesn't work that way no matter how much you want it to. Let's not forget that Crockett and Johnson just went pro after years of us bitching about it and that Dennis Durrant is still am. And then there are plenty of people like Tom Asta who went pro after a fucking nanosecond of being in the conscious of the skateboard world at large. The line of what makes someone am or pro is more blurred than ever before in every aspect. You are lying if you say otherwise. If you think you've discredited my argument in one sentence, you clearly didn't understand it in the first place.

Let me make this as clear as possible. How I feel about a part is derived on a highly individual basis and I thought I made that clear with this, "...if you feel like Alex Olson brought something special to the table then by all means that part was good...", but apparently you missed that. My whole spiel was about how lowered expectations are bullshit. If you're on a major skateboard company then I expect for your skating to be on par. What constitutes being on par is up for debate, but whether I give a damn how many parts you have, is not.

You and I usually agree on things, but I have to tell you, leaving a k at the end every one of your post is the lamest thing any poster has ever done.

sorry it took me so long to get back to you. i just spent 5 days killing tampa with my friends because skateboarding rules and if you keep quibbling about nothing, you'll never know the realness. take a break, or some acid and GO GET RAD!!!!!!!!

k