Slap MessageBoards

Skateboarding => USELESS WOODEN TOY BANTER => Topic started by: Biancapal on April 20, 2021, 06:41:36 PM

Title: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Biancapal on April 20, 2021, 06:41:36 PM
Not sure if anyone else here shelled out the $20 to see it, but I did and man do I regret it. Only kinda cool think about it was seeing Tyshawn, Reynolds, Louie, and even a small cameo from Kader, but the plot didn’t really make sense/land and the whole conflict is about how the main character just lies to his friends about skating with pros. Should be on some streaming platform in May and then it will get the full review from everyone, but Mikey Alfred should just stop trying to hype these things up because it bummed me out...
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fakie butt drop on April 20, 2021, 08:29:58 PM
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Star Whores Episode I: The Fellatio Menace on April 20, 2021, 08:32:53 PM
Is this a common thing with regards to becoming a pro skater? Your friends getting mad at you because you are skating with pros instead of them?

From everything I've seen, people in real life still regularly skate with their non-sponsored friends after turning am or pro for a company. Hell, who do you think films all their insta clips?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fakie butt drop on April 20, 2021, 09:09:43 PM
if jonah hill isnt shown doing a kickflip, idgaf
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: doublesteveburger on April 20, 2021, 09:11:46 PM
You could’ve eaten Taco Bell for a month for $20
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Some dude on April 20, 2021, 09:17:35 PM
20 bucks...yikes. If it was free to watch..nevermind...fuck that too. I’m still disappointed I wasted 85 minutes watching mid 90’s..or 88 minutes watching Street Dreams..shit..maybe I will end up watching it..I know it’ll be a waste of time...how long is it?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: lk130 on April 20, 2021, 09:26:46 PM
I know.
Watch a doc to makeup for it or maybe we'll shout u out in the next Stylin' On You
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: brucewillis on April 20, 2021, 10:22:36 PM
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: TurdyBird on April 20, 2021, 10:29:39 PM
Nah man, Gleaming the Cube.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: FatGuy92 on April 20, 2021, 11:06:53 PM
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage

Minding the Gap was good one as well imo
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DaleSr on April 20, 2021, 11:38:31 PM
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...


(https://i.ibb.co/55fcMkN/CABC6-E42-D0-CB-4-E2-F-B2-E9-4-D6-D40-BB6666.jpg) (https://ibb.co/55fcMkN)


He's no Frank the Nose
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Welpok on April 20, 2021, 11:42:05 PM
20 bucks...yikes. If it was free to watch..nevermind...fuck that too. I’m still disappointed I wasted 85 minutes watching mid 90’s..or 88 minutes watching Street Dreams..shit..maybe I will end up watching it..I know it’ll be a waste of time...how long is it?
We could always watch grind instead haha. But on a real note, I'm with you on this one.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: jakeumms on April 21, 2021, 12:22:49 AM
Horny for a hate watch
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: EdLawndale on April 21, 2021, 01:18:47 AM
I've never even heard of this movie. I live in LA but have only been to North Hollywood like twice. It's Nowheresville.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Double Thick Filbert on April 21, 2021, 01:24:18 AM
You expected something that mikey alfred did to be good? Shame on you
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: backside_reacharound on April 21, 2021, 02:04:23 AM
You mean to tell me that THIS guy made a bad movie about skateboarding?? Color me shocked.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: dallou on April 21, 2021, 03:18:25 AM
Expand Quote
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage
[close]

Minding the Gap was good one as well imo

The one about germany and skating post ww2 was really good too. It aint California or something like that. But yes those 2 above are great
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: dallou on April 21, 2021, 03:20:34 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage
[close]

Minding the Gap was good one as well imo
[close]

The one about germany and skating post ww2 was really good too. It aint California or something like that. But yes those 2 above are great. Also not a doc but ken park and Paranoid park are also really good. Not ABOUT skating but still
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: baaaaaaguette on April 21, 2021, 03:52:25 AM
if jonah hill isnt shown doing a kickflip, idgaf

Let’s start with a simple ollie then well move on the the advanced manœuvres
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: IpathCats on April 21, 2021, 04:28:42 AM
Dang, I'll still probably check it out though. I'm a sucker for skate movies. They're never really good, but usually pretty funny  idk. I own a copy of grind, I'll throw that shit on sometimes when people are over, usually gets a laugh.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Reed Richards on April 21, 2021, 04:50:49 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/W3gs2wr/IMG-7920.png)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: SHAQUEEFA on April 21, 2021, 05:06:25 AM
The Grind doesn't even bother me, its supposed to be corny. I like that kind of humor for skateboarding. Haven't watched North Hollywood, but mid 90's was very average.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: anal drill on April 21, 2021, 05:23:42 AM
best movie is planb true.flip in flip out dang dang dang banger after banger after banger!!!  haters gonna hate  8) 8)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Beeda Weeda on April 21, 2021, 05:31:38 AM
http://youtu.be/PgCbWAvzWYA

This movie is awesome.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jean-Ralphio Zaperstein on April 21, 2021, 05:36:35 AM
Expand Quote
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...
[close]


(https://i.ibb.co/55fcMkN/CABC6-E42-D0-CB-4-E2-F-B2-E9-4-D6-D40-BB6666.jpg) (https://ibb.co/55fcMkN)


He's no Frank the Nose

Machotaildrop = best skate movie
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Murge on April 21, 2021, 05:42:41 AM
You could’ve eaten Taco Bell for a month for $20

Damn that’s like an order for me ha
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jewel Runner on April 21, 2021, 06:15:50 AM
Haven't seen it yet I'm waiting for it to be free so I can watch it. I don't know what to expect so we'll see.

I might check some of the movies mentioned previously too
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: GuessAgain? on April 21, 2021, 06:40:58 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...
[close]


(https://i.ibb.co/55fcMkN/CABC6-E42-D0-CB-4-E2-F-B2-E9-4-D6-D40-BB6666.jpg) (https://ibb.co/55fcMkN)


He's no Frank the Nose
[close]

Machotaildrop = best skate movie

It’s the best because it’s so self aware and ridiculous, I completely did not believe such a film could have existed until I saw it last year. Mccrank and Rattray who’d have thought it.

Also I believe you can’t make a good/cool movie about skateboarding. People should stop trying to prove that wrong. A good/unique story with skateboarding/youth culture as the backdrop can work if done right.

A skate movie with Donald Trump’s pal Vince Vaughn and Miranda Cosgrove, what the fuck was the casting director smoking? I understand bigger names help the movie to get picked up by distributors but damn, what a monumental flop. In the process Mikey has been shown up by Davonte Jolly at doing his own thing.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Dorje Drolo on April 21, 2021, 07:34:25 AM
http://youtu.be/PgCbWAvzWYA

This movie is awesome.

Hands down the greatest skate movie ever made.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Theme For A Jackal on April 21, 2021, 07:35:52 AM
Not sure if anyone else here shelled out the $20 to see it, but I did and man do I regret it. Only kinda cool think about it was seeing Tyshawn, Reynolds, Louie, and even a small cameo from Kader, but the plot didn’t really make sense/land and the whole conflict is about how the main character just lies to his friends about skating with pros. Should be on some streaming platform in May and then it will get the full review from everyone, but Mikey Alfred should just stop trying to hype these things up because it bummed me out...

Not trying to be a cool guy here but I don't think I'd watch it if it was free, also if you let Mikey Alfred trick you into thinking anything he does is cool then that's on you
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Beeda Weeda on April 21, 2021, 07:36:57 AM
Expand Quote
http://youtu.be/PgCbWAvzWYA

This movie is awesome.
[close]

Hands down the greatest skate movie ever made.
thank you, it really checks all the boxes.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Star Whores Episode I: The Fellatio Menace on April 21, 2021, 07:37:15 AM
The Grind doesn't even bother me, its supposed to be corny. I like that kind of humor for skateboarding. Haven't watched North Hollywood, but mid 90's was very average.

Agreed. It bums me out to see people get all extended on Sweet Lou and Grind. It was meant to be a silly stoner comedy about skateboarding. Street Dreams on the other hand had Prod trying to win an oscar for doing the ugliest 360 flip crooked grind on a rail at Tampa.

(https://y.yarn.co/dee00d13-79ac-4bb8-8cbc-e0bac4936516_screenshot.jpg)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: This Charming Bat on April 21, 2021, 07:39:46 AM
I watched it with a couple of buddies, mostly to see how bad it was. It was almost like watching an alien transmission. The main character calls his dad “Pops” and then says it at the end of every sentence. At one point they dress up like they are characters in Happy Days. It’s really bad when Jason Dill is one of the best actors in your movie.

It was borderline unwatchable at times. Cant wait for this to be released to the general public to see how much it gets roasted here. I’m hoping Bobby didn’t  spend his time on this movie instead of getting clips for the Krooked video.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DaleSr on April 21, 2021, 07:47:53 AM
Machotaildrop is the best, hands down. It also spawned the manwolfs which is a lovely little joke that so few people are in on. Also thrashin is a masterpeece
I thought mid90s was nice enough. Not the best movie ever but i liked it.
I'll probably see North Hollywood when it doesn't have a $20 price tag on it.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Pete on April 21, 2021, 08:02:40 AM
llegal civ/ mickey alfredo really sucks. atleast theyre keeping it real by embracing the fact theyre just a bunch of spoiled rich LA kids.  idk anyone whos into that shit besides jonah hill

gotta love when idiots act all "if you just keep trying, and keep your eyes on your goal, with jesus on your side you can do anything! look i even made a movie all by myself!" when in reality the only reason these kids have accomplished anything is the connections to hollywood they have via parents.

does anyone outside of their dickriding fanbase even care? cant imagine any kid at any shop anywhere needing a board and looking at a wall of deluxe, quasi, etc and buying a "jumpmanblanco" board lmao


someone put my avatar on a board so i can go pro and listen to mickey alfred talk to me about investments at skatespots in LA


PS always thought the whole "Mid 90s" shit was whack because most these dudes were born in like 94-96. they wasnt there.



free max b

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: BluffsideTank on April 21, 2021, 08:47:30 AM
St. Charles Borromeo represent!
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Utopos on April 21, 2021, 08:50:43 AM
Expand Quote
Not sure if anyone else here shelled out the $20 to see it, but I did and man do I regret it. Only kinda cool think about it was seeing Tyshawn, Reynolds, Louie, and even a small cameo from Kader, but the plot didn’t really make sense/land and the whole conflict is about how the main character just lies to his friends about skating with pros. Should be on some streaming platform in May and then it will get the full review from everyone, but Mikey Alfred should just stop trying to hype these things up because it bummed me out...
[close]

Not trying to be a cool guy here but I don't think I'd watch it if it was free, also if you let Mikey Alfred trick you into thinking anything he does is cool then that's on you

This
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Rubbrick on April 21, 2021, 09:20:19 AM
Expand Quote
Not sure if anyone else here shelled out the $20 to see it, but I did and man do I regret it. Only kinda cool think about it was seeing Tyshawn, Reynolds, Louie, and even a small cameo from Kader, but the plot didn’t really make sense/land and the whole conflict is about how the main character just lies to his friends about skating with pros. Should be on some streaming platform in May and then it will get the full review from everyone, but Mikey Alfred should just stop trying to hype these things up because it bummed me out...
[close]

Not trying to be a cool guy here but I don't think I'd watch it if it was free, also if you let Mikey Alfred trick you into thinking anything he does is cool then that's on you

So this isn’t cool?!?!
(https://i.ibb.co/zG1S1HD/C9-B682-D0-93-D3-42-E0-A94-B-CED891-A713-A9.jpg)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jean-Ralphio Zaperstein on April 21, 2021, 09:24:37 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Not sure if anyone else here shelled out the $20 to see it, but I did and man do I regret it. Only kinda cool think about it was seeing Tyshawn, Reynolds, Louie, and even a small cameo from Kader, but the plot didn’t really make sense/land and the whole conflict is about how the main character just lies to his friends about skating with pros. Should be on some streaming platform in May and then it will get the full review from everyone, but Mikey Alfred should just stop trying to hype these things up because it bummed me out...
[close]

Not trying to be a cool guy here but I don't think I'd watch it if it was free, also if you let Mikey Alfred trick you into thinking anything he does is cool then that's on you
[close]

So this isn’t cool?!?!
(https://i.ibb.co/zG1S1HD/C9-B682-D0-93-D3-42-E0-A94-B-CED891-A713-A9.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/8Owe9fn.png)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DanCorteseFromMTVSports on April 21, 2021, 09:57:27 AM
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Biancapal on April 21, 2021, 10:11:05 AM
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0


Lord have mercy, this fucked up my whole day
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Rubbrick on April 21, 2021, 10:14:01 AM
*charges $20 to watch it*

(https://i.ibb.co/rpMvQCY/1-D5-B9960-7450-4-A81-9519-BF2-AF863-CCF7.jpg)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lenny the Fatface on April 21, 2021, 10:32:13 AM
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lowcalcium on April 21, 2021, 10:32:32 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
http://youtu.be/PgCbWAvzWYA

This movie is awesome.
[close]

Hands down the greatest skate movie ever made.
[close]
thank you, it really checks all the boxes.

Not exclusively about skateboarding, but there's a few pro skateboarders sprinkled throughout the movie and I believe Telly and Casper were both skaters who got picked up to be in the movie because "they were the real deal" according to Larry Clark and Harmony Korine...

Also, all of the skateboarders facing sexual assault and rape charge shouldn't have taken this movie to heart, but then again, I think the directors were trying to show how some Kids (young skateboarders in NYC were behaving in the mid 90's)


First time I watched this movie, I crept into my parents living room and turned on HBO at midnight and Kids was playing, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. RIP Justin Pierce and Harold Hunter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yf6dN4S0zU

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Sizzla on April 21, 2021, 10:41:07 AM
Dang, I'll still probably check it out though. I'm a sucker for skate movies. They're never really good, but usually pretty funny  idk. I own a copy of grind, I'll throw that shit on sometimes when people are over, usually gets a laugh.

Totally
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: one-off on April 21, 2021, 10:48:47 AM
Expand Quote
Dang, I'll still probably check it out though. I'm a sucker for skate movies. They're never really good, but usually pretty funny  idk. I own a copy of grind, I'll throw that shit on sometimes when people are over, usually gets a laugh.
[close]

Totally

Try "Skateboard or Die" if you really want to scrape the bottom of this barrel
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Easy Slider on April 21, 2021, 10:56:55 AM
In a discussion about skate movies or movies with a skate theme or even movies featuring skaters as a sideshow we should mention Gleaming The Cube and Police Academy 4.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: drewdown on April 21, 2021, 11:44:24 AM
In a discussion about skate movies or movies with a skate theme or even movies featuring skaters as a sideshow we should mention Gleaming The Cube and Police Academy 4.

Hell yeah Citizens on Patrol was tight.  Gleaming the Cube has my vote for best skate film, yeah it had some corny shit in it but it had some legitimate skating and pros as well.  Christian Slater could do no wrong back then too.   That and RAD for BMX were the jams back in the day.  Something about the RAD soundtrack just gets me amped even after all this time. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fs180 on April 21, 2021, 11:46:04 AM
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.

This. Imagine a movie about a lazy alcoholic pro skater being loved by the kids but actually being a miserable person. Skate version of hanckock. Much more realistic and much more interesting to see someone after all of the hollywood pro skater imagination. If skaters would love the storyline of street dreams theyd be so hyped to hear jagger eaton talk about his life and i doubt anyone of us wonders how that happened.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: smellsdead on April 21, 2021, 11:53:52 AM
yeah what about hollywood skateboards though?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: too fakie on April 21, 2021, 12:39:17 PM
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]


Lord have mercy, this fucked up my whole day

The definition of apex is the uppermost point, so to say that Illegal Civ is at their apex and that they’re about to take off is 100% incorrect use of the word.

Couldn’t pass that one up. One of my favorite things is when people fuck up trying to sound smarter than everyone. Especially when they have the whole kit to boot.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Beeda Weeda on April 21, 2021, 12:57:22 PM
just thinking about Mikey Alfred gives me a headache. worst dude ever.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jean-Ralphio Zaperstein on April 21, 2021, 12:59:54 PM
*charges $20 to watch it*
(https://i.ibb.co/rpMvQCY/1-D5-B9960-7450-4-A81-9519-BF2-AF863-CCF7.jpg)

someone gnar this guy for me
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: d0rk on April 21, 2021, 01:14:16 PM
It amazes me that people take Mikey Alfred and utter bullshit seriously. He's such a clown.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 21, 2021, 01:17:03 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...
[close]


(https://i.ibb.co/55fcMkN/CABC6-E42-D0-CB-4-E2-F-B2-E9-4-D6-D40-BB6666.jpg) (https://ibb.co/55fcMkN)


He's no Frank the Nose
[close]

Machotaildrop = best skate movie
[close]

A skate movie with Donald Trump’s pal Vince Vaughn and Miranda Cosgrove, what the fuck was the casting director smoking? I understand bigger names help the movie to get picked up by distributors but damn, what a monumental flop. In the process Mikey has been shown up by Davonte Jolly at doing his own thing.


Miranda Cosgrove isn’t a Name.  We know her name, but that isn’t driving ticket sales.  I think I read in an interview that those guys all have a weird obsession with her and she was probably pretty easy to get (same with Vince Vaughn).  Actors like this aren’t tough to get because actors like to work and I’m guessing (will not watch) VV probably worked a few days on the whole shoot (which likely wasn’t more than 30 days itself)


It’s funny/telling that no ones has mentioned Lords of Dogtown as a skate movie.   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: TurdyBird on April 21, 2021, 01:34:02 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...
[close]


(https://i.ibb.co/55fcMkN/CABC6-E42-D0-CB-4-E2-F-B2-E9-4-D6-D40-BB6666.jpg) (https://ibb.co/55fcMkN)


He's no Frank the Nose
[close]

Machotaildrop = best skate movie
[close]

A skate movie with Donald Trump’s pal Vince Vaughn and Miranda Cosgrove, what the fuck was the casting director smoking? I understand bigger names help the movie to get picked up by distributors but damn, what a monumental flop. In the process Mikey has been shown up by Davonte Jolly at doing his own thing.
[close]


Miranda Cosgrove isn’t a Name.  We know her name, but that isn’t driving ticket sales.  I think I read in an interview that those guys all have a weird obsession with her and she was probably pretty easy to get (same with Vince Vaughn).  Actors like this aren’t tough to get because actors like to work and I’m guessing (will not watch) VV probably worked a few days on the whole shoot (which likely wasn’t more than 30 days itself)


It’s funny/telling that no ones has mentioned Lords of Dogtown as a skate movie.

“You think the politicians that run my country and your country don’t have guns in the schools their kids go to? They do. And we should be allowed the same rights.” -Vince Vaughn.

Wonder if he has the same coke guy as Don Jr.

Kind of crazy of Mikey to use that dude. Must of been a scratch my back, scratch yours. Good look for Vince to have a chance of looking cool again, and Mikey gets more traction for his movie with Vince's celebrity, or whatever celebrity he has left.

Love KB's recent stories about people being fake friends with other people. Wonder if this has anything to do with those guys in North Hollywood.

Anyways, might watch it if it's free and see how long I can endure the cringe. It will have to be a day where I'm hella bored tho. Like...it's gonna be a deathly hot summer and I can't do shit on my day off bored
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: jamersonbass on April 21, 2021, 01:46:07 PM
Back when Vice was less cringeworthy, they produced a documentary called Dragonslayer.  It was similar to, but harsher than Minding the Gap imo.

I liked Godspeed ok, back Kevin White, but Mikey Alfred is a kook.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: babs on April 21, 2021, 02:30:47 PM
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0

this is so goddamn hilarious, his fits are so funny i could watch it on mute and still laugh.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: formula420 on April 21, 2021, 03:25:12 PM
I actually like the nine club and listen to pretty much every one. Couldnt make it through his episode.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: conqueso on April 21, 2021, 03:34:25 PM
you could do some much more with 20 dollars than waste it on this bozo
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fortunecattlesteakhouse on April 21, 2021, 04:52:45 PM
did they talk about ig in the movie too. another riveting bloodshot weedbref camera moment for kader
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: backside_reacharound on April 21, 2021, 10:19:14 PM
http://youtu.be/zi-f_J6hV-g

I mean this is the best skate movie

one of the best documentaries ever. this one is also excellent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4pFat3VTkI
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: cherry on April 22, 2021, 05:24:08 AM
I will never watch anything by this group of people. Boo to Bobby for being in this, Nike money changed that man.

Imagine wearing a redbull hat with a golf shirt to film a slight variation of a trick at a spot the gonz skated 25 years ago. And that’s the stand out trick in your video?!?

Everyone knows back 180 to fakie would’ve been 5,000,000 times harder. 270 in is the safety spin. Kickflip is gnarlier, hell I would say gonz ollie is gnarlier because it was in the rain no? Not to mention he saw the spot and had the idea lil dick riders
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: AssMountain on April 22, 2021, 06:19:04 AM
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Billy Bitchcakes on April 22, 2021, 06:26:41 AM
I actually like the nine club and listen to pretty much every one. Couldnt make it through his episode.

I remember listening to that thinking who is this dude and someone phoned in and was crying because he was so overwhelmed talking to him? Like how can you buy into this nonsense so hard
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Willie on April 22, 2021, 06:37:09 AM
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]


Lord have mercy, this fucked up my whole day


Holy fuck. I knew society was headed for a collapse but I thought we had more time.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: urbneathme on April 22, 2021, 06:38:17 AM
you people just don’t understand being a savage, bro.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: JANUS on April 22, 2021, 06:49:03 AM
(http://static.wikia.nocookie.net/heroes-and-villians/images/d/d5/44bcc04bb15ffd2d30cb4dbfa8f0fc48.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20180916040536)
Mikey Alfred, eat your heart out.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Masshole on April 22, 2021, 07:02:18 AM
http://youtu.be/zi-f_J6hV-g

I mean this is the best skate movie

every time I watch this I get so hyped to skate fast and be reckless
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on April 22, 2021, 07:04:08 AM
This dude tries way too hard between the clothing and trying to force his way into being some sort of movie mogul. I remember reading he was using all his celebrity friend clout to get distribution for this movie or something, because no one wanted it.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: nickpaolucci on April 22, 2021, 07:09:29 AM
I will never watch anything by this group of people. Boo to Bobby for being in this, Nike money changed that man.

Imagine wearing a redbull hat with a golf shirt to film a slight variation of a trick at a spot the gonz skated 25 years ago. And that’s the stand out trick in your video?!?

Everyone knows back 180 to fakie would’ve been 5,000,000 times harder. 270 in is the safety spin. Kickflip is gnarlier, hell I would say gonz ollie is gnarlier because it was in the rain no? Not to mention he saw the spot and had the idea lil dick riders

chuck core back 180'd into it in 2000 and you are derailing this thread.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ungzilla on April 22, 2021, 07:24:18 AM
someone needs to a youtube comments deep dive to see what other legendary hammers chuck core has thrown down
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Tear Up a Trick on April 22, 2021, 08:12:11 AM
Several good skate documentaries out there.  I like the one about Steve Caballero, in and out of prison for drugs, now he's a pastor and still ripping.  Go Cab!  He's the trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFuziI-O2yM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFuziI-O2yM)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: cherry on April 22, 2021, 08:36:23 AM
Expand Quote
I will never watch anything by this group of people. Boo to Bobby for being in this, Nike money changed that man.

Imagine wearing a redbull hat with a golf shirt to film a slight variation of a trick at a spot the gonz skated 25 years ago. And that’s the stand out trick in your video?!?

Everyone knows back 180 to fakie would’ve been 5,000,000 times harder. 270 in is the safety spin. Kickflip is gnarlier, hell I would say gonz ollie is gnarlier because it was in the rain no? Not to mention he saw the spot and had the idea lil dick riders
[close]

chuck core back 180'd into it in 2000 and you are derailing this thread.

I’m about to derail a fat line of meth and go on a posting spree
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mike Oxwelling on April 22, 2021, 08:40:20 AM
I wonder if he regrets talking shit on Spike Jonze?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ManimalChin on April 22, 2021, 08:51:16 AM
I've never even heard of this movie. I live in LA but have only been to North Hollywood like twice. It's Nowheresville.

They had that shootout in the 90s
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: exlurker on April 22, 2021, 09:05:23 AM
I remember thinking Paranoid Park incorporated skating in a way that felt genuine and not cringey. Wonder if Gus Van Sant can kickturn
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Tear Up a Trick on April 22, 2021, 09:48:19 AM
I remember thinking Paranoid Park incorporated skating in a way that felt genuine and not cringey. Wonder if Gus Van Sant can kickturn

Skating plays a role in this GVS movie too:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BwxeOzSx8A (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BwxeOzSx8A)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ballintoohard on April 22, 2021, 10:15:47 AM
really confused as to why you'd expect it to be anything but gutter trash.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: jakeumms on April 22, 2021, 10:19:38 AM
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ihatejulio on April 22, 2021, 10:31:34 AM
Expand Quote
I remember thinking Paranoid Park incorporated skating in a way that felt genuine and not cringey. Wonder if Gus Van Sant can kickturn
[close]

Skating plays a role in this GVS movie too:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BwxeOzSx8A (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BwxeOzSx8A)

He was also an executive producer on Kids. Love me some GVS.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ThisFuckingDude on April 22, 2021, 10:45:05 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I will never watch anything by this group of people. Boo to Bobby for being in this, Nike money changed that man.

Imagine wearing a redbull hat with a golf shirt to film a slight variation of a trick at a spot the gonz skated 25 years ago. And that’s the stand out trick in your video?!?

Everyone knows back 180 to fakie would’ve been 5,000,000 times harder. 270 in is the safety spin. Kickflip is gnarlier, hell I would say gonz ollie is gnarlier because it was in the rain no? Not to mention he saw the spot and had the idea lil dick riders
[close]

chuck core back 180'd into it in 2000 and you are derailing this thread.
[close]

I’m about to derail a fat line of meth and go on a posting spree
Shit up dude and put some respect on Chuck Cores name. Chuck was the ganrliest skater ever that didn’t know anyone that could afford a camera
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on April 22, 2021, 10:49:02 AM
I will never watch anything by this group of people. Boo to Bobby for being in this, Nike money changed that man.

Imagine wearing a redbull hat with a golf shirt to film a slight variation of a trick at a spot the gonz skated 25 years ago. And that’s the stand out trick in your video?!?

Everyone knows back 180 to fakie would’ve been 5,000,000 times harder. 270 in is the safety spin. Kickflip is gnarlier, hell I would say gonz ollie is gnarlier because it was in the rain no? Not to mention he saw the spot and had the idea lil dick riders

this is kind of a weird take , i kinda get where you are coming from but idk. its still pretty gnar. cardiel was the first one to do in in anti hero 1998 and gonz ate shit on it trying it in the same session.

https://youtu.be/aATR2vf222k?t=509

doesnt look like its raining its just at night
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lloyd Braun on April 22, 2021, 11:55:27 AM
Haven’t watched this and probably won’t. If it’s anything like mid 90’s it’s going to be cringe.

Make a movie with a good story, that involves skating, but isn’t the focus. I think that’s the only way for it to not be corny IMO
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 22, 2021, 12:07:16 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mr Cheese Resurrection on April 22, 2021, 12:14:21 PM
South Hollywood was a way better movie hands down.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 22, 2021, 12:19:54 PM
South Hollywood was a way better movie hands down.

No such place.  North Hollywood and West Hollywood are cities.  East Hollywood is kind of a neighborhood that there’s some disagreement to where it is (I’m looking at you shitty bar off Western that dares put EaHo on its storefront).  Just wanted to shoot you down because you’re a bad faith idiot
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: bodegaboardercrew on April 22, 2021, 01:14:22 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]


Lord have mercy, this fucked up my whole day
[close]


Holy fuck. I knew society was headed for a collapse but I thought we had more time.

Minimalism is not about "taking away for the sake of taking away". Anyone would know that by studying a bit of design philosophy 101. Mikey is what happens when you give your kids participation trophies instead of educating them in the foundations of art and history.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: shouldn't on April 22, 2021, 01:41:32 PM
i haven’t seen it but, it’s hilarious that he named the main character after himself and then had him be play a dude that wants to hide how cool he is from his friends in order to spare their feelings... him and jonah should make out already and quit fighting over who is more smug/delusional.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 22, 2021, 02:04:16 PM
i haven’t seen it but, it’s hilarious that he named the main character after himself and then had him be play a dude that wants to hide how cool he is from his friends in order to spare their feelings... him and jonah should make out already and quit fighting over who is more smug/delusional.

Ah but poor Jonah was just acting out a fantasy of not being the fat kid and being able to skate well.  It is a masturbatory exercise, but emotionally, I feel for him
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: The Ghost of Lenny Kirk on April 22, 2021, 02:45:17 PM
theres a reason it didnt receive legit distribution.  the dude is a total kook and he's not doing his friends any favors by keeping up the act.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mr Cheese Resurrection on April 22, 2021, 05:11:01 PM
Expand Quote
South Hollywood was a way better movie hands down.
[close]

No such place.  North Hollywood and West Hollywood are cities.  East Hollywood is kind of a neighborhood that there’s some disagreement to where it is (I’m looking at you shitty bar off Western that dares put EaHo on its storefront).  Just wanted to shoot you down because you’re a bad faith idiot
Atiba you still mad everybody leaves you hanging on the high fives huh? And I don’t blame you, I pray for you. Here’s a song a song for you too

https://youtu.be/HU_4pf8BSQw
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: jakeumms on April 22, 2021, 07:44:45 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
[close]

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.
That's interesting. I had no idea Fincher was involved at one point. I kept thinking mid-production rescope while I was watching it but I didn't know that detail. Also crazy that Stacy Peralta gets sole writing credit since it's pretty uncommon for any movie to have just one writer credited.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 22, 2021, 08:21:44 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
[close]

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.
[close]
That's interesting. I had no idea Fincher was involved at one point. I kept thinking mid-production rescope while I was watching it but I didn't know that detail. Also crazy that Stacy Peralta gets sole writing credit since it's pretty uncommon for any movie to have just one writer credited.

For a writer to get credit, Writers Guild arbitration has to rule that an additional writer contributed 10% of original material to the script.  Script doctors and punch-up writers are rarely credited (I’m sure they mostly like to keep it that way because of the quality of things they are brought on to to sweeten) but they get good pay for like 4 weeks of work at a time.   The sweet gigs are the people brought in to punch up already shot movies.   They get paid a pretty penny just to watch the footage. 

It’s Stacy’s story and it’s based on true events so I’m sure he had some level of control about not bringing in a new writer and what not and since it’s a true story there aren’t the typical screenwriter shenanigans where they arbitrarily change the names of characters and things like that in order to have “created” more things.

Also, if anyone’s curious “&” means the writers wrote together while “and” means a new writer was brought on. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: veritas on April 22, 2021, 08:48:06 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Wty8VSi4Fs0

2003 version was better
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Nancy Chin The Manicurist on April 22, 2021, 08:55:26 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
[close]

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.
[close]
That's interesting. I had no idea Fincher was involved at one point. I kept thinking mid-production rescope while I was watching it but I didn't know that detail. Also crazy that Stacy Peralta gets sole writing credit since it's pretty uncommon for any movie to have just one writer credited.

 True story: Fincher’s version had Tony Trujillo as Tony Alva, and Alex Olson as Jay Adams.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Nancy Chin The Manicurist on April 22, 2021, 09:01:30 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I remember thinking Paranoid Park incorporated skating in a way that felt genuine and not cringey. Wonder if Gus Van Sant can kickturn
[close]

Skating plays a role in this GVS movie too:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BwxeOzSx8A (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BwxeOzSx8A)
[close]

He was also an executive producer on Kids. Love me some GVS.


Way back in the day before he even started directing, Gus was a production assistant on one of those skate  movies that came out during the 1970s skate boom

It was either “Skateboard: The Movie” or “Skateboard Kings”

Gus is one of the all time greats for sure.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 22, 2021, 09:16:36 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
[close]

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.
[close]
That's interesting. I had no idea Fincher was involved at one point. I kept thinking mid-production rescope while I was watching it but I didn't know that detail. Also crazy that Stacy Peralta gets sole writing credit since it's pretty uncommon for any movie to have just one writer credited.
[close]

 True story: Fincher’s version had Tony Trujillo as Tony Alva, and Alex Olson as Jay Adams.

Hah That’s a big age disparity between those two.   Hopefully Baca would be Alva

Didn’t Nuge play Shogo Kubo?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Nancy Chin The Manicurist on April 22, 2021, 09:55:29 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
[close]

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.
[close]
That's interesting. I had no idea Fincher was involved at one point. I kept thinking mid-production rescope while I was watching it but I didn't know that detail. Also crazy that Stacy Peralta gets sole writing credit since it's pretty uncommon for any movie to have just one writer credited.
[close]

 True story: Fincher’s version had Tony Trujillo as Tony Alva, and Alex Olson as Jay Adams.
[close]

Hah That’s a big age disparity between those two.   Hopefully Baca would be Alva

Didn’t Nuge play Shogo Kubo?



pre Toy Machine flow / Girl AM Olson too. Still went by the name Alex Parker.

In Bloom era TNT

Ya Nuge played Shogo and made a ton of money. He shows up quite a bit in the film, so I’m sure those residual checks are pretty nice haha.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: EdLawndale on April 22, 2021, 10:17:26 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
[close]

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.
[close]
That's interesting. I had no idea Fincher was involved at one point. I kept thinking mid-production rescope while I was watching it but I didn't know that detail. Also crazy that Stacy Peralta gets sole writing credit since it's pretty uncommon for any movie to have just one writer credited.
[close]

For a writer to get credit, Writers Guild arbitration has to rule that an additional writer contributed 10% of original material to the script.  Script doctors and punch-up writers are rarely credited (I’m sure they mostly like to keep it that way because of the quality of things they are brought on to to sweeten) but they get good pay for like 4 weeks of work at a time.   The sweet gigs are the people brought in to punch up already shot movies.   They get paid a pretty penny just to watch the footage. 

It’s Stacy’s story and it’s based on true events so I’m sure he had some level of control about not bringing in a new writer and what not and since it’s a true story there aren’t the typical screenwriter shenanigans where they arbitrarily change the names of characters and things like that in order to have “created” more things.

Also, if anyone’s curious “&” means the writers wrote together while “and” means a new writer was brought on.

There's also a thing called "separation of rights" that is given writers who get "written by" or "story by" on theatrical productions ("created by" on tv productions) which accords them guild-mandated benefits and, often, contractually-obligated rights and monies (and it's obviously more lucrative to get sole separated rights than to share it).
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 22, 2021, 10:22:56 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Lords of Dogtown was absolute dog shit, but Heath Ledger's performance as a character who acts in that kind of manner is actually pretty good. As soon as he's out of the picture its awful, but yeah.
[close]
Just watched this again last night because I noticed it's on Prime for free. Heath is pretty much the reason to watch it even if it makes Skip Engblom look like an asshole. The skating is super anachronistic, which isn't a surprise, but the weirdest part of it is all the soundalike music. There's some music on the score that almost gets into Zep's Ramblin On put keeps pulling back. I woulda thought a big Hollywood production could pony up for the licensed tunes.
[close]

There’s an alternate universe where David Finches didn’t drop out of directing lords of Dogtown.    But there’s also another universe where his protege Fred Durst also didn’t.
[close]
That's interesting. I had no idea Fincher was involved at one point. I kept thinking mid-production rescope while I was watching it but I didn't know that detail. Also crazy that Stacy Peralta gets sole writing credit since it's pretty uncommon for any movie to have just one writer credited.
[close]

For a writer to get credit, Writers Guild arbitration has to rule that an additional writer contributed 10% of original material to the script.  Script doctors and punch-up writers are rarely credited (I’m sure they mostly like to keep it that way because of the quality of things they are brought on to to sweeten) but they get good pay for like 4 weeks of work at a time.   The sweet gigs are the people brought in to punch up already shot movies.   They get paid a pretty penny just to watch the footage. 

It’s Stacy’s story and it’s based on true events so I’m sure he had some level of control about not bringing in a new writer and what not and since it’s a true story there aren’t the typical screenwriter shenanigans where they arbitrarily change the names of characters and things like that in order to have “created” more things.

Also, if anyone’s curious “&” means the writers wrote together while “and” means a new writer was brought on.
[close]

There's also a thing called "separation of rights" that is given writers who get "written by" or "story by" on theatrical productions ("created by" on tv productions) which accords them guild-mandated benefits and, often, contractually-obligated rights and monies (and it's obviously more lucrative to get sole separated rights than to share it).

Michael Crichton made so much money for “creating” ER.  The story is in that CAA book, but it basically was a pilot he wrote in the 80s that no one cared about.  Some agents in the 90s wanted to try again because he was Uber hot shit at the time and he agreed on the condition he wouldn’t do any work on it.  They agreed, found some people to clean it up and he made a many millions of pretty pennies
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ShyLow on April 22, 2021, 10:38:22 PM
On the one hand I don't trust the judgement of someone who paid to watch this, on the other hand of course it's terrible
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: EdLawndale on April 22, 2021, 10:46:54 PM
Yeah, Crichton did well for himself, that's for sure. Was probably set off his novels.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Chavo on April 23, 2021, 12:18:36 AM
From an objective point of view, the trailer looks promising. Don't really know what Illegal Civ is. I've tried watching a video and turned it off after 5 minutes of helmeted kids with a monotone narrator. I think I'm just too old and uncool to understand.

A few things look strange. It wonder how the mid-century aesthetic, which is clearly deliberate, fits into the plot. Also, kids this age can't possibly be high school. And if the story is autobiographical, the story would seem more compelling with a black protagonist.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: HeapsCool on April 23, 2021, 12:37:58 AM
Hey anyone got any more info on this Jonah Hill/Spike Jonze beef? I can't seem to find any info on either of their wikipedia pages. In fact, Mikey Alfred isn't mentioned on their wikipedias at all?!
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: EdLawndale on April 23, 2021, 12:50:33 AM
Hey anyone got any more info on this Jonah Hill/Spike Jonze beef? I can't seem to find any info on either of their wikipedia pages. In fact, Mikey Alfred isn't mentioned on their wikipedias at all?!

https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2019/10/mid90s-illegal-civ-mikey-alfred-jonah-hill-spike-jonze-not-fans

"That's a long story"

Sounds like some buster shit. I could only listen to this guy talk for, like, two minutes.

Edit: that doritos vid is hilarious. And his use of the word "apex" lol. I still kind of wish I'd never heard of him though.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: pbj on April 23, 2021, 04:29:13 AM
I'll pay someone $20 to send me a pirated link
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hevonen on April 23, 2021, 05:43:35 AM
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0

Legit thought this was satire until like half way through the video. What an insufferable human being.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Pango on April 23, 2021, 06:18:29 AM
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]

Legit thought this was satire until like half way through the video. What an insufferable human being.

Can this dude even kickflip tho?;?!
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Pete on April 23, 2021, 06:20:29 AM
no



free max b
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: nickpaolucci on April 23, 2021, 06:27:51 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]

Legit thought this was satire until like half way through the video. What an insufferable human being.
[close]

Can this dude even kickflip tho?;?!

no
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: baaaaaaguette on April 23, 2021, 06:42:13 AM
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0

Wow somehow we found a more insufferable human than blodney, impressive.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: radcunt on April 23, 2021, 07:30:46 AM
So the 'Carlton' of skateboarding has made a fan fic of himself as a white skater becoming pro? 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mike Oxwelling on April 23, 2021, 10:01:41 AM
Double...triple down on it.....

https://youtu.be/KbGb6hV-pvg


https://youtu.be/oJYp7er4-5A
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lou Strux on April 23, 2021, 10:18:53 AM
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]

Wow somehow we found a more insufferable human than blodney, impressive.
I mean... THAT’s really saying something, too.
Wasn’t this guy a major contender for SLAP’s KOTY honors last year?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: augustmoon on April 23, 2021, 10:21:51 AM
this dude is such a cornball and makes it hard to take anyone associated with Illegal Civ seriously, no matter how good of a skater they are.  Its like they're tainted.  This guy is just using skateboarding as a stepping stone onto something more lucrative.  Hustle culture + massive narcissism gave us this cancer. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: baaaaaaguette on April 23, 2021, 10:27:48 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]

Wow somehow we found a more insufferable human than blodney, impressive.
[close]
I mean... THAT’s really saying something, too.
Wasn’t this guy a major contender for SLAP’s KOTY honors last year?

I’d say it’s a tie
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on April 23, 2021, 10:42:33 AM
Expand Quote
Hey anyone got any more info on this Jonah Hill/Spike Jonze beef? I can't seem to find any info on either of their wikipedia pages. In fact, Mikey Alfred isn't mentioned on their wikipedias at all?!
[close]

https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2019/10/mid90s-illegal-civ-mikey-alfred-jonah-hill-spike-jonze-not-fans

"That's a long story"

Sounds like some buster shit. I could only listen to this guy talk for, like, two minutes.

Edit: that doritos vid is hilarious. And his use of the word "apex" lol. I still kind of wish I'd never heard of him though.

Many that's shitty, I knew he was involved in Mid 90's from a production standpoint and definitely assumed Jonah brought him on basically to help him break into the industry (which if i remember correctly his mother works for a major studio and he got an internship at like 16 with one) but what a prick. Not to defend jonah hill but he definitely did not need to do this dude any favors by giving him an opportunity. As if anyone in this movie wouldn't have taken the opportunity without Mikey Alfraud (copyright pending) doing the casting.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mr. Stinky on April 23, 2021, 11:11:31 AM
I just read this entire thread and I still don't know what it's about.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: TurdyBird on April 23, 2021, 11:42:43 AM
Mikey is pretty corny. Never seen anyone other than Mikey or the models in IC shoots wear that wack clothing. Maybe sometimes the riders do...but not really.

I get the impression Mikey thinks he knows better and is cooler than everyone. Thats likely the cause of his "beef" with Spike and Jonah. Guys let him shadow them, and then he got pissed probably when he was trying to give them ideas for their own project. Vets like Spike and Jonah ain't gonna listen to some rookie like Mikey. Looks at his infantile brand and productions.

Definitely blasting some negativity on him but damn. Good job for putting in the work towards brand and production but kid expects everyone to pat him on the ass and say "atta boy." Dude needs to spend more time outside his friend group.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Idk on April 23, 2021, 11:52:46 AM
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ungzilla on April 23, 2021, 11:54:03 AM
that's it it's time to put him in corny jail
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jean-Ralphio Zaperstein on April 23, 2021, 12:01:01 PM
corny jail
mint this nft bro
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: baaaaaaguette on April 23, 2021, 12:05:05 PM
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: EdLawndale on April 23, 2021, 12:45:58 PM
We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: too fakie on April 23, 2021, 12:58:02 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Hey anyone got any more info on this Jonah Hill/Spike Jonze beef? I can't seem to find any info on either of their wikipedia pages. In fact, Mikey Alfred isn't mentioned on their wikipedias at all?!
[close]

https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2019/10/mid90s-illegal-civ-mikey-alfred-jonah-hill-spike-jonze-not-fans

"That's a long story"

Sounds like some buster shit. I could only listen to this guy talk for, like, two minutes.

Edit: that doritos vid is hilarious. And his use of the word "apex" lol. I still kind of wish I'd never heard of him though.
[close]

Many that's shitty, I knew he was involved in Mid 90's from a production standpoint and definitely assumed Jonah brought him on basically to help him break into the industry (which if i remember correctly his mother works for a major studio and he got an internship at like 16 with one) but what a prick. Not to defend jonah hill but he definitely did not need to do this dude any favors by giving him an opportunity. As if anyone in this movie wouldn't have taken the opportunity without Mikey Alfraud (copyright pending) doing the casting.

Weirdest thing to me about that interview has always been that Big Boy was basically wrapping the whole thing up and Mikey was just like “how about another 5 minutes so I can call some dudes out because they are better than me at what I want to do.”
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 23, 2021, 01:29:10 PM
Expand Quote
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.
[close]

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though

Mid90s made just over $9M.  That’s not super successful.   It was successful only in the sense it gave Jonah a chance to direct his first feature and he made people’s money back.   

Mikey’s mom, if I recall, works in the industry in the sense she was Robert Evans’s housekeeper or assistant or something like that.   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Fred Galls Crack Pipe on April 23, 2021, 01:29:44 PM
Expand Quote
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage
[close]

Minding the Gap was good one as well imo

Lords of dogtown was sick idc
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on April 23, 2021, 01:39:21 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Hey anyone got any more info on this Jonah Hill/Spike Jonze beef? I can't seem to find any info on either of their wikipedia pages. In fact, Mikey Alfred isn't mentioned on their wikipedias at all?!
[close]

https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2019/10/mid90s-illegal-civ-mikey-alfred-jonah-hill-spike-jonze-not-fans

"That's a long story"

Sounds like some buster shit. I could only listen to this guy talk for, like, two minutes.

Edit: that doritos vid is hilarious. And his use of the word "apex" lol. I still kind of wish I'd never heard of him though.
[close]

Many that's shitty, I knew he was involved in Mid 90's from a production standpoint and definitely assumed Jonah brought him on basically to help him break into the industry (which if i remember correctly his mother works for a major studio and he got an internship at like 16 with one) but what a prick. Not to defend jonah hill but he definitely did not need to do this dude any favors by giving him an opportunity. As if anyone in this movie wouldn't have taken the opportunity without Mikey Alfraud (copyright pending) doing the casting.
[close]

Weirdest thing to me about that interview has always been that Big Boy was basically wrapping the whole thing up and Mikey was just like “how about another 5 minutes so I can call some dudes out because they are better than me at what I want to do.”

lmao i saw that, the man's a shoe in for hater of the year
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: BALAKOV on April 23, 2021, 01:43:54 PM
did you not watch the trailer? what were you expecting?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Eric Dolphy on April 23, 2021, 01:58:31 PM
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]

Wow somehow we found a more insufferable human than blodney, impressive.
Lol coming soon: Mikey Alfred ASMR video
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: TwisT on April 23, 2021, 02:03:28 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.
[close]

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though
[close]

Mid90s made just over $9M.  That’s not super successful.   It was successful only in the sense it gave Jonah a chance to direct his first feature and he made people’s money back.   

Mikey’s mom, if I recall, works in the industry in the sense she was Robert Evans’s housekeeper or assistant or something like that.


mid90s made 9mil off a budget of less than 2 million. This was a24 not disney
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on April 23, 2021, 02:19:30 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.
[close]

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though
[close]

Mid90s made just over $9M.  That’s not super successful.   It was successful only in the sense it gave Jonah a chance to direct his first feature and he made people’s money back.   

Mikey’s mom, if I recall, works in the industry in the sense she was Robert Evans’s housekeeper or assistant or something like that.
[close]


mid90s made 9mil off a budget of less than 2 million. This was a24 not disney

A24 isn’t some mom and pop shop.  It was a relationship building move with little risk, but far from being “really successful”.  It’s great it didn’t lose money, but it was a modest niche film that did about what they expected.  Also, A24 is mainly a distribution company.  That’s the key thing North Hollywood didn’t have.  Means they didn’t necessarily put that money into the budget, so there’s no saying who all that money went to and in what order.   Also, Prints and Advertising is going to tack on a significant chunk of money to the budget cost, blah blah
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jagr on April 23, 2021, 04:48:54 PM
that's it it's time to put him in corny jail
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hefe43 on April 23, 2021, 05:48:16 PM
http://youtu.be/eiyfwZVAzGw
Corny about corn chips? Right to jail, right away.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Shrinedescender on April 23, 2021, 08:36:42 PM
Expand Quote
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.
[close]

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though

Mid 90s got me first interested in skateboarding. I'll probably never watch it again, being that I'm so engrossed in the culture now and I wouldn't want to see it butchered. But I can't believe I'm the only one this film had such an effect on. In that sense, regardless of Jonah's true ties to skateboarding or whether or not he can do a kickflip, he might've got some kids into skateboarding and shown mainstream audiences some semblance of what skateboarding in the 90s was like. I can respect him and the film for that; at the very least.

Mikey Alfred's kind of a kook though.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DaleSr on April 23, 2021, 08:38:15 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.
[close]

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though
[close]

Mid 90s got me first interested in skateboarding. I'll probably never watch it again, being that I'm so engrossed in the culture now and I wouldn't want to see it butchered. But I can't believe I'm the only one this film had such an effect on. In that sense, regardless of Jonah's true ties to skateboarding or whether or not he can do a kickflip, he might've got some kids into skateboarding and shown mainstream audiences some semblance of what skateboarding in the 90s was like. I can respect him and the film for that; at the very least.

As someone who's skated for almost 20 years and sucked ass for at least 12 of them, i liked mid 90s
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: EdLawndale on April 23, 2021, 09:24:16 PM
Mikey Alfred's kind of definitely a kook though.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Googan Christmas on April 23, 2021, 09:52:19 PM
You dorks won’t like any skate movies ever.

Skateboarding is your thing and no one understands it the way you do.

Come to think of it, you should make a movie about skateboarding so people can relate and understand.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: camel filters on April 23, 2021, 10:08:08 PM
You dorks won’t like any skate movies ever.

Skateboarding is your thing and no one understands it the way you do.

Come to think of it, you should make a movie about skateboarding so people can relate and understand.
Aaron Sorkin should adapt slap into a movie. Entire movie would be a handful of characters in front of their computers arguing over whether or not Zach Allen deserves to be sponsored and also which trucks have the longest wheelbase.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DaleSr on April 23, 2021, 10:09:46 PM
You dorks won’t like any skate movies ever.

Skateboarding is your thing and no one understands it the way you do.

Come to think of it, you should make a movie about skateboarding so people can relate and understand.

There's two that are already perfect, thrashin and machotaildrop
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: RichardBarkley on April 23, 2021, 11:53:14 PM
Expand Quote
Just going to repost this wonderful gem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrHUzHWJFf0
[close]

Legit thought this was satire until like half way through the video. What an insufferable human being.

This CAN NOT be real?

Nathan Barley vibes.

Oh my god hahahahaha

And honestly.... I'm not a blodney fan really but I wouldn't insult him and compare him to this chump
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: baaaaaaguette on April 24, 2021, 03:15:30 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.
[close]

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though
[close]

Mid90s made just over $9M.  That’s not super successful.   It was successful only in the sense it gave Jonah a chance to direct his first feature and he made people’s money back.   

Mikey’s mom, if I recall, works in the industry in the sense she was Robert Evans’s housekeeper or assistant or something like that.
[close]


mid90s made 9mil off a budget of less than 2 million. This was a24 not disney

Yeah it definitely made bank
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: childhood on May 14, 2021, 07:48:16 AM
https://soap2day.to/MczoyMDoiMTA2OTl8fDY4LjgwLjI1MC4xNzEiOw.html
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fredgallSOTY on May 14, 2021, 08:14:43 AM
SLAP film festival?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 14, 2021, 08:50:31 AM
https://soap2day.to/MczoyMDoiMTA2OTl8fDY4LjgwLjI1MC4xNzEiOw.html

siiiiick thank you.

I'm 20 min in and its not that bad.  some of the dialogue is doo doo tho

Dill as a priest is hilarious

whoever shot this did a great job and the DIT work is really good.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: OrangeVHStapes on May 14, 2021, 11:19:29 AM
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: snowballz on May 14, 2021, 11:22:13 AM
Expand Quote
His mom works in the movie industry. Obviously the only reason Jonah got into the movie industry is because of his mommy but the reason he stayed is because he has talent.
[close]

Slap loves to hate on Jonah but mid 90’s was a really successful movie. I remember me and the crew watching it in theaters and it was packed and stayed there for a good 3 weeks which is rare. We didn’t think much of it but the cinematography was at least decent. Jonah is also a genuinely good actor, his perfomances in war dogs and Maniac are simply brilliant. I also feel like he gets a bad rap for « cashing in » even though he’s been in the culture since he was a little kid so yeah putting whoever the fuck the blodney clone is on jonah’s level is unfair and an insult to Jonah. Still waiting on that kickflip footy though

Regardless of his skating, Jonah is an incredible actor. Superbad is a top 10 comedy movie all time
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Tyrone Slothrop on May 14, 2021, 12:42:53 PM
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 14, 2021, 12:57:44 PM
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.

Well at least you’re self-aware that you’re a close-minded obnoxious freshman film student.   Read and watch everything you can.  You learn just as much, if not more from the failures than you do the successes.   Don’t be the person who turns your nose up at stuff, particularly at your age.  No one likes that guy, no one wants to collaborate with that guy, no one wants to hire that guy. 

Also, try and get a second major or at least a minor in a “real” subject like English literature or history.  Having a wide breadth of knowledge is more vital to your potential career than knowing the rule of thirds or whether you’re crossing the line. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: OldSkater on May 14, 2021, 01:10:08 PM
You mean to tell me that THIS guy made a bad movie about skateboarding?? Color me shocked.

this photo is amazing. i love it
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Tyrone Slothrop on May 14, 2021, 02:58:25 PM
Expand Quote
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.
[close]

Well at least you’re self-aware that you’re a close-minded obnoxious freshman film student.   Read and watch everything you can.  You learn just as much, if not more from the failures than you do the successes.   Don’t be the person who turns your nose up at stuff, particularly at your age.  No one likes that guy, no one wants to collaborate with that guy, no one wants to hire that guy. 

Also, try and get a second major or at least a minor in a “real” subject like English literature or history.  Having a wide breadth of knowledge is more vital to your potential career than knowing the rule of thirds or whether you’re crossing the line.
. I try to watch a wide array of movies and give each a fair shake. I’ll watch Billy Madison one night and “serious” movie the next, and enjoy each for what they are. The idea of watching Mid 90’s just turned me off, man.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: sus on May 14, 2021, 04:32:22 PM
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

This. Imagine a movie about a lazy alcoholic pro skater being loved by the kids but actually being a miserable person. Skate version of hanckock. Much more realistic and much more interesting to see someone after all of the hollywood pro skater imagination. If skaters would love the storyline of street dreams theyd be so hyped to hear jagger eaton talk about his life and i doubt anyone of us wonders how that happened.

This sounds like a biopic about Antwuan Dixon
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hevonen on May 14, 2021, 04:48:27 PM
Forced myself to watch the whole thing, but man this movie is just boring. Plot is as basic as can be and dialogue is mostly awful. All the character relationships are exaggerated (pros act super cool, dad doesn't approve sweater with shorts, friends get all pissy when you hang out with a girl, etc.) to the point where it feels like it should be either a comedy or a children's movie, but it doesn't want to be either of those.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: banksandledges on May 14, 2021, 07:22:36 PM
It’s so bad. So, so bad. Second hand embarrassed for all involved. Holy shit it was so bad.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DaddyReynolds on May 14, 2021, 07:50:41 PM
Alfredo is worse than Blodney. Welcome to cloutchaser the movie. This movie makes me want to stop skating
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: 6000 sux on May 14, 2021, 08:20:51 PM
vince vaughn was the only remotely likable or sympathetic character in the whole movie
pretty cool the mac miller lookin dude from euphoria skates though
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: HORSES on May 14, 2021, 10:03:18 PM
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 14, 2021, 10:11:37 PM
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 14, 2021, 10:14:29 PM
Gotta love the only linked review on its IMDb page is a review a high school junior did for his school paper and in his photo he’s wearing a “euphoria” branded zip up hoodie.   He liked it. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: HORSES on May 14, 2021, 10:20:22 PM
Expand Quote
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
[close]

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?

Out of all the things we could do in the world, we choose to post on a message-board on a daily basis. No one here can talk about wasting time.


Anyways, it's up on YouTube.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: RichardBarkley on May 14, 2021, 11:19:40 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
[close]

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?
[close]

Out of all the things we could do in the world, we choose to post on a message-board on a daily basis. No one here can talk about wasting time.


Anyways, it's up on YouTube.

Lol best take ever
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: urbneathme on May 14, 2021, 11:26:22 PM
i have such a massive crush on gillian jacobs and seeing her in this fucking disaster made me legitimately sad. should we take up a collection for all these former hollywood types? this shit seems desperate as fuck, maybe the vince vaughns of the world need money
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: RichardBarkley on May 14, 2021, 11:27:34 PM
i have such a massive crush on gillian jacobs and seeing her in this fucking disaster made me legitimately sad. should we take up a collection for all these former hollywood types? this shit seems desperate as fuck, maybe the vince vaughns of the world need money

Strange VV is in this.

He must be doing ok financially I would have thought.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: honey island on May 15, 2021, 12:06:32 AM
never forget that mikey alfred paid for a cameo from tony hawk to get him to push this movie after all distributors said "nah, we good"
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: HORSES on May 15, 2021, 12:48:17 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va5_rn3vG3A

That was truly something else. It must be watched to see how bad it actually is. I can't imagine the thoughts going in the distributors minds when they are watching this. I think the funniest bit to me is that they had Sam Muller & Atiba Jefferson on the same session. Atiba is just sitting there, and Sam is taking the photo of Ryder's character doing a trick down the 10 stair. This would never actually happen. Tyshawn skating the Baker Boys park was great.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Billy Bitchcakes on May 15, 2021, 04:42:59 AM
https://soap2day.to/MczoyMDoiMTA2OTl8fDY4LjgwLjI1MC4xNzEiOw.html

"The first ever movie about becoming a pro skater."

Derrick Cabrera would like a word
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 15, 2021, 05:20:57 AM
i have such a massive crush on gillian jacobs and seeing her in this fucking disaster made me legitimately sad. should we take up a collection for all these former hollywood types? this shit seems desperate as fuck, maybe the vince vaughns of the world need money

Is she?  She isn’t listed in the credits.   Just remember, actors want to act and they spend a large percentage of the year not acting, so they’ll take all sorts of jobs that some may consider beneath them.   Gotta keep up that SAG health insurance
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: banksandledges on May 15, 2021, 05:45:34 AM
 http://www.instagram.com/p/CO4H9t9F7WG/?igshid=1rvk2dvawgftc (http://www.instagram.com/p/CO4H9t9F7WG/?igshid=1rvk2dvawgftc)

I’m a completely non violent person to the point where I won’t even harm a bug or spider. Having said that not exactly sure what I would do if given a free punch at this clown.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Kastel TM on May 15, 2021, 06:09:11 AM
Ngl the trailer seemed promising. Was not willing to spend the $19 for an e-viewing so waited till yesterday to hit the 4.99 rental on Apple TV. And wow for all the promotion and hype it was not by any means good. I went into not with high hopes but not expecting what we got.

I’ll say some nice things first. Great camera work, soundtrack, color grading. It does come off very professional, high production. Tyshawns Ss flip up the set at baker boys park.

But wtf is this plot, NOTHING HAPPENS. The entire time every scene is like two lines and 20 seconds and it just keeps jumping around from nothing to nothing. The main character probably calls his dad “pops” one thousand times no joke. Just fucking call him dad or just talk to him, we know he’s your fucking dad we get that. There is no ending, no point, no purpose. He skates, likes a girl, gets into a childish fight with his friends, tries to be cool, gets beat up, goes to church, and then cries over daddy issues and it’s over. For what. Someone help me out here, Mikey goes on and on about how it’s the first movie about going Pro, when he maybe gets on flow? Gets one box? Like what??? Miranda Cosgrove is punching the air right now thinking this is gonna reshape her acting career.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: SharkJohnson on May 15, 2021, 08:34:08 AM
mikey alfreds favorite dorrito flavor must be un-cool ranch.......... score one for the shark man!
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: assvogel on May 15, 2021, 09:51:22 AM
I watched this today, hadn't seen the trailers or anything before hand, so went in with no expectations.

The plot centers around a kid named Mike, a young skateboarder/ex-church altar boy who aspires to become a professional one day and who has an awkward huge crush on Bobby Worrest (but let's be serious, who doesn't!). Unfortunately there's multiple obstacles between him and Bobby: Daddy issues, water polo practices, best friends, a potential girlfriend, college... So he must navigate through these troubles to win a trip to SF with Bobby.

The acting wasn't memorable, maybe Vince Vaughan as dad was above average. But if you take out the skateboarding backdrop and cameos, if you have seen any coming-of-age/young adult films, the story is entirely predictable without shocks or surprises. It wasn't offensively bad film, but you can go on Netflix and watch thousand similar movies. I'd compare this to Moxie! that Amy Poehler directed, which was in many ways comparable movie (on different subject matter) and it even shared an actor (Nico Hiraga) with this one. Just something you can waste hour and a half on before going to bed because you need something on the background when you are browsing Instagram.

Compared to other skatefilms... Cubes weren't cleamed and there wasn't much of Thrashin' either. I think Mid90's was a better film, but that one goes for that 90's nostalgia, so it has that going for it. But at least this was better than Grind or whatever.

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: skatingisntspecialstupid on May 15, 2021, 10:05:11 AM
Is it really about a guy with daddy issues who has a crush on Bobby Worrest? That’s stupid funny if true. Is that where the admiration comes from? Wild. But I guess it makes sense.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: RichardBarkley on May 15, 2021, 10:10:50 AM
Is it really about a guy with daddy issues who has a crush on Bobby Worrest? That’s stupid funny if true. Is that where the admiration comes from? Wild. But I guess it makes sense.

He's gotta be joking. That can't be true
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: CorneliusCardew on May 15, 2021, 10:46:28 AM
Watched it last night, it was relatable gives me hope for the next release. It was like a debut novel. Now that they did this one to learn the craft I foresee good things. One poster made comparisons based on genre and I'm not sure those are really relevant it's the sensibility of the film that really carries it through this is not like any coming of age drama for me at least.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lisa96 on May 15, 2021, 10:58:51 AM
poor character development and structure. Downriver Dill scenes made me wince.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lisa96 on May 15, 2021, 11:03:05 AM
Sunny telling that kid not to pass the blunt to main character made me giggle i guess
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: decoi1 on May 15, 2021, 11:18:41 AM
Yea that was bad
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 15, 2021, 11:45:53 AM
Can you numb nuts stop watching this movie and supporting this idiot?  Ironic views/rentals don’t go in a different category than sincere ones. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 15, 2021, 12:11:23 PM
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...

if you think this is throw-up worthy then you haven't watched very many movies.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: OrangeVHStapes on May 15, 2021, 07:26:07 PM
Expand Quote
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...
[close]

if you think this is throw-up worthy then you haven't watched very many movies.

I have a bfa in film and am a video editor for a living... I have watched a lot of movies.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fortunecattlesteakhouse on May 15, 2021, 07:50:37 PM
I try to watch a wide array of movies and give each a fair shake. I’ll watch Billy Madison one night and “serious” movie the next, and enjoy each for what they are. The idea of watching Mid 90’s just turned me off, man.
just watched it from that site and honestly -jonah jokes aside, it wasnt the worst movie in the world or anything. there might be some cringe here and there but grind cant hold a candle to it and what about sharknado? nak was decent at acting plus the kids single mom is pretty good looking
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 15, 2021, 08:24:44 PM
Expand Quote
I try to watch a wide array of movies and give each a fair shake. I’ll watch Billy Madison one night and “serious” movie the next, and enjoy each for what they are. The idea of watching Mid 90’s just turned me off, man.
[close]
just watched it from that site and honestly -jonah jokes aside, it wasnt the worst movie in the world or anything. there might be some cringe here and there but grind cant hold a candle to it and what about sharknado? nak was decent at acting plus the kids single mom is pretty good looking

Wait, no ones mentioned there’s an attractive woman in this movie!!   Well, I might have to dust off the ol kinetoscope and see the future of the industry firsthand
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: YSL on May 15, 2021, 10:42:59 PM
Just got done watching it.. $3.00 to rent on youtube. As much as I love skating, seeing it in films always kinda takes me out of that immersive viewing experience.. I think thats been the case for me with most movies that involve skating to some capacity. There are some weaknesses, which you'd expect from any first time director, but honestly I thought it was pretty okay... A lot of IC and Golf branding which kinda took me out of it a little but I can't blame him for plugging his own shit. As far as the performances go, Ryder was pretty solid, Vince Vaugn was good, but above all Aramis stood out to me the most. Some of the other performances came across as a little half baked, but not bad enough to bother me too much. I think the dialogue had its weak / cheesy moments, but to viewers outside of skating, I don't think it'l stick out as much. The cinematography was pretty nice, minus the way the skating was filmed. Sorta just filmed like a skate video which I'm not really a fan of when it comes to a feature film.

Overall, I thought it was pretty good. Didn't stick out to me as excellent, but it didn't suck either.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Doom patrol on May 15, 2021, 11:42:25 PM
Someone has thrown in up on YouTube for free and even though it costs nothing I still feel that is somehow more than it's worth.
Flabbergasted by dudes in this thread saying it's ok. I got maybe 30 minutes in and gave up.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Garth Marenghi on May 16, 2021, 02:37:42 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...
[close]

if you think this is throw-up worthy then you haven't watched very many movies.
[close]

I have a bfa in film and am a video editor for a living... I have watched a lot of movies.

Yet you disrespect the dutch angle extravaganza of Battlefield Earth. Curious.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: cherry on May 16, 2021, 04:54:55 AM
I’d rather watch a pin hole camera capture my grandpas barn than this
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Youoverthere on May 16, 2021, 05:30:02 AM
Watched it with the homies. We started yelling at the tv like it was the superbowl when iCarly pulled those crystals out. I’m putting this one somewhere between mid 90’s and hardflip. Ultimately I will end up re-watching because I love a good cringe and it feels like watching The Room.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: layzieyez on May 16, 2021, 06:18:37 AM
I tried to watch it sober. Big mistake.

I'll save it for when I'm drunk and need to laugh at a movie that tries to be better than Wassup Rockers but fails bigger than hardflip if it was directed by the kid curling taped together forks in Gummo.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413466/
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: JANUS on May 16, 2021, 06:20:48 AM
Watched it with the homies. We started yelling at the tv like it was the superbowl when iCarly pulled those crystals out. I’m putting this one somewhere between mid 90’s and hardflip. Ultimately I will end up re-watching because I love a good cringe and it feels like watching The Room.

Aw crap, now I have to watch it.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ChrisSennsGirlfriend on May 16, 2021, 12:23:55 PM
Expand Quote
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.
[close]

Well at least you’re self-aware that you’re a close-minded obnoxious freshman film student.   Read and watch everything you can.  You learn just as much, if not more from the failures than you do the successes.   Don’t be the person who turns your nose up at stuff, particularly at your age.  No one likes that guy, no one wants to collaborate with that guy, no one wants to hire that guy.

Expand Quote
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
[close]

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?

so which is it: watch everything you can, and excoriate those who don't?  or never watch this movie under any circumstances and excoriate those that do?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 16, 2021, 12:36:53 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.
[close]

Well at least you’re self-aware that you’re a close-minded obnoxious freshman film student.   Read and watch everything you can.  You learn just as much, if not more from the failures than you do the successes.   Don’t be the person who turns your nose up at stuff, particularly at your age.  No one likes that guy, no one wants to collaborate with that guy, no one wants to hire that guy.
[close]

Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
[close]

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?
[close]

so which is it: watch everything you can, and excoriate those who don't?  or never watch this movie under any circumstances and excoriate those that do?

Yeah I was aware I let that seeming inconsistency dangle.   However, there is a difference between Mid90s (an actual theatrically distributed/released movie) and some vanity project made because it’s cheap for anyone to make a movie.   

Obviously there is a quality threshold that should be looked at and it’s not gatekeeping or anything like that.   If you are a film student that is interested in working in the industry, looking at what gets released, who releases them, how it’s received, etc is important to do.   This is someone with an MFA advising someone going for their BFA.  I’m in my 30s and they were presumably still in their teens, so they should be open to cultivating their taste from any which way they can (using common sense to know what that means)

There could be some value gleaning from watching North Hollywood to see why no distributors touched it with a ten-foot pole, but I think you could learn a lot more elsewhere whilst not supporting Mikeys ego.   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hefe43 on May 16, 2021, 12:54:04 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.
[close]

Well at least you’re self-aware that you’re a close-minded obnoxious freshman film student.   Read and watch everything you can.  You learn just as much, if not more from the failures than you do the successes.   Don’t be the person who turns your nose up at stuff, particularly at your age.  No one likes that guy, no one wants to collaborate with that guy, no one wants to hire that guy.
[close]

Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
[close]

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?
[close]

so which is it: watch everything you can, and excoriate those who don't?  or never watch this movie under any circumstances and excoriate those that do?
[close]

Yeah I was aware I let that seeming inconsistency dangle.   However, there is a difference between Mid90s (an actual theatrically distributed/released movie) and some vanity project made because it’s cheap for anyone to make a movie.   

Obviously there is a quality threshold that should be looked at and it’s not gatekeeping or anything like that.   If you are a film student that is interested in working in the industry, looking at what gets released, who releases them, how it’s received, etc is important to do.   This is someone with an MFA advising someone going for their BFA.  I’m in my 30s and they were presumably still in their teens, so they should be open to cultivating their taste from any which way they can (using common sense to know what that means)

There could be some value gleaning from watching North Hollywood to see why no distributors touched it with a ten-foot pole, but I think you could learn a lot more elsewhere whilst not supporting Mikeys ego.   

 ::)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 16, 2021, 02:33:42 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.
[close]

Well at least you’re self-aware that you’re a close-minded obnoxious freshman film student.   Read and watch everything you can.  You learn just as much, if not more from the failures than you do the successes.   Don’t be the person who turns your nose up at stuff, particularly at your age.  No one likes that guy, no one wants to collaborate with that guy, no one wants to hire that guy.
[close]

Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
[close]

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?
[close]

so which is it: watch everything you can, and excoriate those who don't?  or never watch this movie under any circumstances and excoriate those that do?
[close]


Man who spends all his time on a message board, who clearly doesn't skate, tells other people how to spend their time  ::)

Never thought I’d get so much push back advising people to not waste time/money watching a movie we all know is terrible made by a guy that we all know is terrible.   ::) indeed
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: MexicanSpaniard on May 16, 2021, 02:46:03 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I saw the trailer and figured it to be all pretty camera movements, lighting and color and not much else.

On a somewhat related note, as a first year film student, I was snapped at by a senior screenwriting major for being close minded because I wouldn’t go see Mid 90’s because I claimed it would do nothing for me or show me anything new.
[close]

Well at least you’re self-aware that you’re a close-minded obnoxious freshman film student.   Read and watch everything you can.  You learn just as much, if not more from the failures than you do the successes.   Don’t be the person who turns your nose up at stuff, particularly at your age.  No one likes that guy, no one wants to collaborate with that guy, no one wants to hire that guy.
[close]

Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Anyone got a different link? The one posted gives me a privacy error.
[close]

So with all the actual good movies and tv shows that are out there, you want to waste an hour and half on this qualified disaster?
[close]

so which is it: watch everything you can, and excoriate those who don't?  or never watch this movie under any circumstances and excoriate those that do?
[close]


Man who spends all his time on a message board, who clearly doesn't skate, tells other people how to spend their time  ::)
[close]

Never thought I’d get so much push back advising people to not waste time/money watching a movie we all know is terrible made by a guy that we all know is terrible.   ::) indeed

after reading all seven pages I'm going with this^
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: concerned_parent on May 16, 2021, 04:25:04 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...
[close]

if you think this is throw-up worthy then you haven't watched very many movies.
[close]

I have a bfa in film and am a video editor for a living... I have watched a lot of movies.

can confirm he watches a lot of movies.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Reed Richards on May 16, 2021, 04:58:27 PM
Watched it last night, it was relatable gives me hope for the next release. It was like a debut novel. Now that they did this one to learn the craft I foresee good things. One poster made comparisons based on genre and I'm not sure those are really relevant it's the sensibility of the film that really carries it through this is not like any coming of age drama for me at least.
This word salad sucks.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: passtheish on May 16, 2021, 05:23:57 PM
Did anyone get the point of the Walker character, was he just the pile friend? or is mikey trying to make him an allegory for Jonah and Jonez
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on May 16, 2021, 05:31:18 PM
I downloaded this for free of YouTube and still haven't watched it,mostly because a scene Nora shared on IG that looked soooo uncomfortable to film, let alone act in. Definitely not the demographic for this shit and I can't wait for someone to recommend it.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: stephop on May 16, 2021, 06:30:43 PM
Not a good movie.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: winnasoda on May 16, 2021, 08:46:45 PM
Just watch machotaildrop instead
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Youoverthere on May 16, 2021, 09:56:41 PM
I kinda want to see poster’s rankings of all the skate movies they’ve seen.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 16, 2021, 10:06:14 PM
I kinda want to see poster’s rankings of all the skate movies they’ve seen.

Interesting no ones mentioned Minding the Gap.  It got good reviews and a Criterion Collection release.   Have yet to see it as I get a vibe that it’s a “poor kid tries to escape depressing economic and societal realities through skating’ kind of story that really seems like you need to be in the right mood for it.   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: assvogel on May 17, 2021, 12:12:45 AM
Expand Quote
I kinda want to see poster’s rankings of all the skate movies they’ve seen.
[close]

Interesting no ones mentioned Minding the Gap.  It got good reviews and a Criterion Collection release.   Have yet to see it as I get a vibe that it’s a “poor kid tries to escape depressing economic and societal realities through skating’ kind of story that really seems like you need to be in the right mood for it.

I wouldn't really compare that to North Hollywood. It was a very well made documentary, but it has multiple different angles than just skateboarding. Skateboarding is what connects these people, but the documentary goes a lot deeper than just skating. There's large focus on cycle of domestic violence, racism and alcoholism and how the economic class affects all that. It focuses on american youth, but I definitely could see similarities on my own circle of friends growing up.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 17, 2021, 12:21:43 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I kinda want to see poster’s rankings of all the skate movies they’ve seen.
[close]

Interesting no ones mentioned Minding the Gap.  It got good reviews and a Criterion Collection release.   Have yet to see it as I get a vibe that it’s a “poor kid tries to escape depressing economic and societal realities through skating’ kind of story that really seems like you need to be in the right mood for it.
[close]

I wouldn't really compare that to North Hollywood. It was a very well made documentary, but it has multiple different angles than just skateboarding. Skateboarding is what connects these people, but the documentary goes a lot deeper than just skating. There's large focus on cycle of domestic violence, racism and alcoholism and how the economic class affects all that. It focuses on american youth, but I definitely could see similarities on my own circle of friends growing up.

Oh I didn’t realize it was a doc.  Thought it was like an economically depressed Midwestern Skate Kitchen (w/ guys)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Chavo on May 17, 2021, 12:57:43 AM
I liked some things about it. Bright saturated colors is a welcome reprieve from the prevailing trend of washed out and shifted colors. Continuous takes and vignetting also lend to the skate video feel. I couldn't tell if the incongruent pairing of scenes to late '50s/early '60s soul and rock 'n roll was an homage to Kenneth Anger but it must have been deliberate (since skate videos are often so precise with music placement and timing). Plotwise, I'm a little confused. I think he's graduated, but is still playing school sports. Also, I'm pretty sure if a 17/18 year old is just starting to network for prospective sponsors, it's probably not going to happen (is he trying to get on Krooked flow?). I'm a bit out of touch with how it works now, but I think it would be more realistic to establish the character as a man/am trying to get to the next level. Also, the dialog could have improved drastically, especially with the heart to heart with pops (I always called my dad that).
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Youoverthere on May 17, 2021, 06:50:42 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I kinda want to see poster’s rankings of all the skate movies they’ve seen.
[close]

Interesting no ones mentioned Minding the Gap.  It got good reviews and a Criterion Collection release.   Have yet to see it as I get a vibe that it’s a “poor kid tries to escape depressing economic and societal realities through skating’ kind of story that really seems like you need to be in the right mood for it.
[close]

I wouldn't really compare that to North Hollywood. It was a very well made documentary, but it has multiple different angles than just skateboarding. Skateboarding is what connects these people, but the documentary goes a lot deeper than just skating. There's large focus on cycle of domestic violence, racism and alcoholism and how the economic class affects all that. It focuses on american youth, but I definitely could see similarities on my own circle of friends growing up.
[close]

Oh I didn’t realize it was a doc.  Thought it was like an economically depressed Midwestern Skate Kitchen (w/ guys)
I personally couldn’t and haven’t seen mind the gap only because I used to hang with one of them and I just don’t like watching sad shit about people I know.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: HeavyAndExpensive on May 17, 2021, 07:24:49 AM
Mikey Alfred reminds me of a character in GTA that you'd do zany missions for/with, who eventually ends of getting himself killed or something.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: mushroom slice on May 17, 2021, 07:51:33 AM
I liked minding the gap. That is a good film. I’ll watch this eventually too. It’s not like I got anything better going on and I’m ok with wasting time. I used to play video games.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 17, 2021, 08:00:30 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...
[close]

if you think this is throw-up worthy then you haven't watched very many movies.
[close]

I have a bfa in film and am a video editor for a living... I have watched a lot of movies.

lol I have a bfa in film as well and am a video editor for a living... i too have watched a lot of movies.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Madam, I'm Adam on May 17, 2021, 08:15:13 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...
[close]

if you think this is throw-up worthy then you haven't watched very many movies.
[close]

I have a bfa in film and am a video editor for a living... I have watched a lot of movies.
[close]

lol I have a bfa in film as well and am a video editor for a living... i too have watched a lot of movies.

And here I was thinking that I am the only one who has a bfa in film and am also a video editor for a living, as well as someone who has watched a lot of movies.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jehoshaphat Augustus on May 17, 2021, 08:53:15 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/VBMLDKC/Nollywood-edited.jpg) (https://ibb.co/zfPmbk2)

i hear there is a full page ad in newest thrasher with an entire sticker sheet of different 'marital aids' that you can stick to his face however you want!

Marketing, baby! 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 17, 2021, 08:58:01 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I watched 15 minutes of it and almost threw up... Whoever says this isn't a bad movie must think Battlefield Earth is an academy award winner... My god...
[close]

if you think this is throw-up worthy then you haven't watched very many movies.
[close]

I have a bfa in film and am a video editor for a living... I have watched a lot of movies.
[close]

lol I have a bfa in film as well and am a video editor for a living... i too have watched a lot of movies.
[close]

And here I was thinking that I am the only one who has a bfa in film and am also a video editor for a living, as well as someone who has watched a lot of movies.

(https://i.ibb.co/PDFwHwh/ae696b2a5cdfaef7cca93b38def7cb65.jpg)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Youoverthere on May 17, 2021, 09:42:30 AM
Ok I’m kinda realizing that the main character basically doesn’t resolve the conflict with nico or the crew and is running of to be homeless in sf.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mike Oxwelling on May 17, 2021, 10:30:28 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/yQC1JTh/North-Hollylie.jpg)

Starring Josh Brolin........
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on May 17, 2021, 10:49:55 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/yQC1JTh/North-Hollylie.jpg)

Starring Josh Brolin........
Illegal Civ is a memory
...for wimps
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: RichardBarkley on May 17, 2021, 11:06:29 AM
Expand Quote
(https://i.ibb.co/yQC1JTh/North-Hollylie.jpg)

Starring Josh Brolin........
[close]
Illegal Civ is a memory
...for wimps


Lol
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Chana on May 17, 2021, 12:28:30 PM
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: larry sanders on May 17, 2021, 12:42:59 PM

There could be some value gleaning from watching North Hollywood to see why no distributors touched it with a ten-foot pole


I'm interested in this part.

The movie looks very dumb but would have at least some commercial appeal, if it can't get distribution that really says something
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Beeda Weeda on May 17, 2021, 12:53:09 PM
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."

hi  mikey
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Uh Oh on May 17, 2021, 12:55:00 PM
Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."

His lyrics are so profoundly enriching.

(https://www.quotes.net/images/49315.png)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 17, 2021, 01:35:18 PM
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."

Is investing a lot of time and money into an unsuccessful enterprise really considered productive?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 17, 2021, 01:40:30 PM
Expand Quote
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."
[close]

Is investing a lot of time and money into an unsuccessful enterprise really considered productive?

that's...how you become successful.  You fail.  You try again.  You get better. 

like do you not know how filmmaking works? Not everyone's first film is fucking ET. 

not saying the movie is great by any means but it was a pretty great first outing for a young person working with a small budget. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 17, 2021, 01:41:59 PM
Expand Quote
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."
[close]

Is investing a lot of time and money into an unsuccessful enterprise really considered productive?

honestly, this comment is such a slap in the face to anyone who ever tried and failed at ANYTHING. 

how old are you?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: RichardBarkley on May 17, 2021, 01:43:33 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."
[close]

Is investing a lot of time and money into an unsuccessful enterprise really considered productive?
[close]

that's...how you become successful.  You fail.  You try again.  You get better. 

like do you not know how filmmaking works? Not everyone's first film is fucking ET. 

not saying the movie is great by any means but it was a pretty great first outing for a young person working with a small budget.

I think the guys a douche from what I've seen but I mean he can't be faulted for effort. As you say it's a learning process
 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 17, 2021, 01:45:26 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."
[close]

Is investing a lot of time and money into an unsuccessful enterprise really considered productive?
[close]

that's...how you become successful.  You fail.  You try again.  You get better. 

like do you not know how filmmaking works? Not everyone's first film is fucking ET. 

not saying the movie is great by any means but it was a pretty great first outing for a young person working with a small budget.
[close]

I think the guys a douche from what I've seen but I mean he can't be faulted for effort. As you say it's a learning process

totally. Not a fan of any young kid that comes in and talks trash about Spike Jonze.  But to be so callous...god damn
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 17, 2021, 01:58:01 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Mikey Alfred is more productive with his time versus all of us... I thought the film was pretty good and they did it on a budget. Like 50 said, "If they hate, let them hate and watch the money pile up."
[close]

Is investing a lot of time and money into an unsuccessful enterprise really considered productive?
[close]

that's...how you become successful.  You fail.  You try again.  You get better. 

like do you not know how filmmaking works? Not everyone's first film is fucking ET. 

not saying the movie is great by any means but it was a pretty great first outing for a young person working with a small budget.
[close]

I think the guys a douche from what I've seen but I mean he can't be faulted for effort. As you say it's a learning process
[close]

totally. Not a fan of any young kid that comes in and talks trash about Spike Jonze.  But to be so callous...god damn

Wooah easy now.  The contention here is someone saying he’s so much more productive than all of us and I made a flip comment about that.   Not bagging on everyone everywhere for trying anything.   Fuck. 

And aspiring filmmakers tend to cut their teeth making short films first.  No one should just start out on a feature film, but his arrogance and the cheapness of shooting a movie led him to believe he should.   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on May 17, 2021, 02:05:39 PM
Mikey Alfred reminds me of a character in GTA that you'd do zany missions for/with, who eventually ends of getting himself killed or something.

Definitely the type to fall off a building as you're walking away from the mission complete banner
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: mushroom slice on May 17, 2021, 02:19:30 PM
Failing at something is always better then not trying. Maybe his movie sucks. Maybe not. You have to watch it before you can critique it. Even if you use smart words and shit you still sound like popcorn water.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 17, 2021, 02:24:49 PM
Failing at something is always better then not trying. Maybe his movie sucks. Maybe not. You have to watch it before you can critique it. Even if you use smart words and shit you still sound like popcorn water.


Again, no one is criticizing him for trying something, it was that poster’s comment that he’s more productive than us because he made a movie
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Nosferatu on May 17, 2021, 02:42:30 PM
Expand Quote
Failing at something is always better then not trying. Maybe his movie sucks. Maybe not. You have to watch it before you can critique it. Even if you use smart words and shit you still sound like popcorn water.
[close]


Again, no one is criticizing him for trying something, it was that poster’s comment that he’s more productive than us because he made a movie

@Atiba Applebum , stop flooding the boards with bad takes and you will stop getting called on them. It's pretty simple.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 17, 2021, 02:54:21 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Failing at something is always better then not trying. Maybe his movie sucks. Maybe not. You have to watch it before you can critique it. Even if you use smart words and shit you still sound like popcorn water.
[close]


Again, no one is criticizing him for trying something, it was that poster’s comment that he’s more productive than us because he made a movie
[close]

@Atiba Applebum , stop flooding the boards with bad takes and you will stop getting called on them. It's pretty simple.

Yeah I guess if you twist what I said into a condemnation of anyone who’s ever tried something it’s a bad take.  Shades of “you didn’t build it” in the 2012 election.   But fuck it, I’ll disappear from this thread
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: childhood on May 17, 2021, 03:36:19 PM
Go watch Minding the Gap
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: urbneathme on May 17, 2021, 05:03:40 PM
how small can the budget of a movie be if fucking vince vaughn appears in it?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Miller92 on May 17, 2021, 05:51:29 PM
how small can the budget of a movie be if fucking vince vaughn appears in it?

the budget was 1.8 million which is really tiny for shooting in LA. 

Vince probably shot for 5-6 days and did it as a favor for an elevated day rate
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: drewdown on May 17, 2021, 06:18:30 PM
Does those dude skate? Can he do a kick flip?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 17, 2021, 06:35:39 PM
Expand Quote
how small can the budget of a movie be if fucking vince vaughn appears in it?
[close]

the budget was 1.8 million which is really tiny for shooting in LA. 

Vince probably shot for 5-6 days and did it as a favor for an elevated day rate

That’s not tiny for shooting in LA.  That’s tiny for a studio feature, but not for an indie/super indie. Sure it’s under the $5M threshold for SAG, but it’s hardly a micro-budget.  I assumed he shot it for like 300k because it certainly looks cheap.  They shot in LA and in the 30 Mile Zone.   Most budgets tend to get eaten up with above the line talent (director, writer, actors, etc) which this movie didn’t have.  Paying Vince Vaughn his day rate was probably the only big cost run on the film and if it ran over 20-30 days, I’d be shocked.   

To compare, Palm Springs cost $5M because it shot outside of LA which means you have to provide transportation, lodging, per diem, etc, plus it had name talent in it shooting a large percentage of the shooting schedule.    That budget will go up when the distributor acquires it because Prints and Advertising runs (iirc) 50% of what the budget was on top of the budget, but that isn’t reported in public budget costs. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: childhood on May 17, 2021, 07:02:32 PM
You watch Minding the Gap yet?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Youoverthere on May 17, 2021, 08:45:40 PM
Can you numb nuts stop watching this movie and supporting this idiot?  Ironic views/rentals don’t go in a different category than sincere ones.
there was a free hd link posted earlier in this thread. You think we’re paying for this?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: jgonzalez on May 17, 2021, 09:20:31 PM
shout out them garden boys
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Garth Marenghi on May 18, 2021, 12:07:04 AM
Technically it was fine but the writing and pacing wasn't exactly great. Scenes thrown in together, resulting in a superficial narrative.

Not sure who gave the worst performance, Miranda Cosgrove or Bobby Worrest. :D
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: loose_trucks on May 18, 2021, 07:30:38 PM
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.

Please someone make this movie
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 18, 2021, 08:11:13 PM
Expand Quote
Why are all skate movies about the come up? Seems like a movie about a drug addicted company owner who is an amazing skater, but terrible financial planner would be a more interesting story.

Imagine if the main character was a mixed of Jim Greco’s temperament, with Jamie Thomas’ demand of others, with Kareem Campbell’s inability to pay people on time or show up to things...you would have the greatest skate movie ever.
[close]

Please someone make this movie


Movies are about the come-up because protagonists or the main side character are usually the audience surrogate so they learn about the world as the character is initiated.  It’d be too esoteric for the regular person if the world was already established and everyone knew their place.  It’s why the majority of tv pilots are about someone’s first day on the job or in a new place. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Blueabyssofthisss on May 18, 2021, 10:00:58 PM
But are you minding the gap
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 18, 2021, 10:21:55 PM
Yes yes I am il buffone
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on May 19, 2021, 06:45:27 AM
I watched this finally, it's more about what happens when you're in a skate click of virgins, and one of the homies finally meets a girl. Thrashin' did a better job of the going Pro story. All this dude did in the end was catch a free ride to SF in the end. You could make a drinking game out of all the times "Pops" and "Son" is spoken throughout this movie too, it's like they had to remember who was who. This definitely wasn't for my demographic, and I can't wait to see kids pushing all the forced lingo and writing on their Chucks in my area.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: natenola forever on May 19, 2021, 07:45:46 AM
as much as a recycled from every skate movie story it is, I'd much rather watch this than Mid 90s, there was a lot of semi funny concepts that seem like if Mikey Alfred made some sorta skate related short form sketch comedy it would work.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: throwaway187 on May 19, 2021, 08:07:46 AM
$20!! I only paid 4.99 to buy it on Amazon.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Sleazy on May 19, 2021, 08:48:49 AM
i'm getting the impression that mikey alfred isn't on the scorsese, tarantino level and that this video feature lots of pro skaters acting for the first time is most likely not going to get an oscar nod
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on May 19, 2021, 09:04:32 AM
as much as a recycled from every skate movie story it is, I'd much rather watch this than Mid 90s, there was a lot of semi funny concepts that seem like if Mikey Alfred made some sorta skate related short form sketch comedy it would work.
Honestly if he did it as in a serious way it'd still be funny. Just find a way to make Tyshawn say "That's cute" in every short and I'll laugh.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: GoneWithTheSchwinn on May 19, 2021, 09:06:34 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...
[close]


(https://i.ibb.co/55fcMkN/CABC6-E42-D0-CB-4-E2-F-B2-E9-4-D6-D40-BB6666.jpg) (https://ibb.co/55fcMkN)


He's no Frank the Nose
[close]

Machotaildrop = best skate movie
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on May 19, 2021, 09:44:44 AM
Going to assume they got vince vaughn since he's basically ousted from hollywood for being conservative in an otherwise overwhelmingly liberal industry. His day rate was probably very affordable.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Theme For A Jackal on May 19, 2021, 11:48:57 AM
Expand Quote
Going to assume they got vince vaughn since he's basically ousted from hollywood for being conservative in an otherwise overwhelmingly liberal industry. His day rate was probably very affordable.
[close]

vince vaughn has been in as much stuff in recent years as he ever has been. he was in like 3 things in 2020 alone

Yeah, Hollywood smash hits 'Freaky, 'The Binge' and 'Arkansas'

Reading a summary for The Binge and it's just 'The Purge' but with drugs

Vaughn might be 'in a lot of stuff' but it's all low tier garbage
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 19, 2021, 11:53:39 AM
Going to assume they got vince vaughn since he's basically ousted from hollywood for being conservative in an otherwise overwhelmingly liberal industry. His day rate was probably very affordable.

Interrupting my loop of Minding the Gap viewing to add:

You don’t get ousted from Hollywood for being a conservative.  Hell, Sandler and Kevin James are both big Republicans as are most studio heads.  You get ousted for losing money. 

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 19, 2021, 12:02:29 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Going to assume they got vince vaughn since he's basically ousted from hollywood for being conservative in an otherwise overwhelmingly liberal industry. His day rate was probably very affordable.
[close]

vince vaughn has been in as much stuff in recent years as he ever has been. he was in like 3 things in 2020 alone
[close]

Yeah, Hollywood smash hits 'Freaky, 'The Binge' and 'Arkansas'

Reading a summary for The Binge and it's just 'The Purge' but with drugs

Vaughn might be 'in a lot of stuff' but it's all low tier garbage
[close]

That's nothing new. Hes not really an A lister. his career peaked in 2005 and he's only been in garbage or stuff that bombed since then. he also can't act, he can only play Vince Vaughn.

Assault in Cell Block 99 is very fucking good though.   Beats up a car Street Fighter style
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: skatingisntspecialstupid on May 19, 2021, 12:06:46 PM
I guess it’s technically better than Street Dreams, but less entertaining

I wonder if kids outside of LA will really feel this and think it’s cool

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on May 19, 2021, 12:10:22 PM
I guess it’s technically better than Street Dreams, but less entertaining

I wonder if kids outside of LA will really feel this and think it’s cool

They'll feel it's cool if they already think IC and golfwang are cool.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on May 19, 2021, 12:12:10 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Going to assume they got vince vaughn since he's basically ousted from hollywood for being conservative in an otherwise overwhelmingly liberal industry. His day rate was probably very affordable.
[close]

vince vaughn has been in as much stuff in recent years as he ever has been. he was in like 3 things in 2020 alone
[close]

Yeah, Hollywood smash hits 'Freaky, 'The Binge' and 'Arkansas'

Reading a summary for The Binge and it's just 'The Purge' but with drugs

Vaughn might be 'in a lot of stuff' but it's all low tier garbage
[close]

That's nothing new. Hes not really an A lister. his career peaked in 2005 and he's only been in garbage or stuff that bombed since then. he also can't act, he can only play Vince Vaughn.
[close]

Assault in Cell Block 99 is very fucking good though.   Beats up a car Street Fighter style
[close]

I never heard of that but looked it up , lmao looks absurd. good reviews though, ill have to check it out

Hah glad you found it because i wrote the title wrong.  It’s Brawl in Cell Block 99.  Must have mixed it up with Assault on Precinct 13. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on May 19, 2021, 12:31:25 PM
If anything I am glad at least this thread brought "Machotaildrop" to my attention! What a brilliant film :)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Dracula on May 21, 2021, 08:38:10 PM
I could see this being directed by Tommy wiseau if he skated
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: IpathCats on June 08, 2021, 05:16:30 AM
Couldn't find this thread earlier, but GOD DAMN did that movie suck. That whole movie felt forced and strange. The plot jumped all around, people's reactions and conversations were so weird and unnatural, idk what I just got done watching. I know the bar for skate movies is low, but holy shit, at least grind was funny in a corny, fart joke kinda way. Final rating, 10/10 because Bobby was in it.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: IpathCats on June 08, 2021, 06:35:20 AM
I could see this being directed by Tommy wiseau if he skated

This definitely felt as disjointed as his films do. The interactions between the characters felt so fake and unhuman, like aliens pretending to be humans.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 08, 2021, 06:48:13 AM
Expand Quote
I could see this being directed by Tommy wiseau if he skated
[close]

This definitely felt as disjointed as his films do. The interactions between the characters felt so fake and unhuman, like aliens pretending to be humans.

Bad dialogue + bad actors + bad directing
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: IpathCats on June 08, 2021, 06:51:26 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I could see this being directed by Tommy wiseau if he skated
[close]

This definitely felt as disjointed as his films do. The interactions between the characters felt so fake and unhuman, like aliens pretending to be humans.
[close]

Bad dialogue + bad actors + bad directing

= North Hollywood
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Beeda Weeda on June 08, 2021, 06:57:55 AM
Mikey Alfred is a genius, ya'll are just haters who can't accept his greatness.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fs180 on June 08, 2021, 07:12:03 AM
the plot isn't really thick and never gets to the point of building up excitement.
its kind of like once upon a time in Hollywood romanticizing with the Hollywood of the 60s 70s but far less good and interesting and accurate.
also I dont even know what time this plays since they dont use mobile phones but other modern technology.
i dont like how the camera picture has vignettes. the one shot in the beginning has unnatural speed to thinks you would do like smoking for 2 sec just to cough and the way the camera goes plus the walls dont look like its been made in a good way.
this goes through out the movie. some whacky shots and it just doesn't look like a movie.

nico is a talented actor who I could see in a few horrible but still good college movies. ararmis and the main character were just exchangeable if it wasn't about skating and had 5min of skating in it.
vince vaughn did his thing and was one of the only believable characters.

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: IpathCats on June 08, 2021, 07:12:55 AM
Mikey Alfred is a genius, ya'll are just haters who can't accept his greatness.

.....Nah
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 08, 2021, 07:22:07 AM
the plot isn't really thick and never gets to the point of building up excitement.
its kind of like once upon a time in Hollywood romanticizing with the Hollywood of the 60s 70s but far less good and interesting and accurate.
also I dont even know what time this plays since they dont use mobile phones but other modern technology.
i dont like how the camera picture has vignettes. the one shot in the beginning has unnatural speed to thinks you would do like smoking for 2 sec just to cough and the way the camera goes plus the walls dont look like its been made in a good way.
this goes through out the movie. some whacky shots and it just doesn't look like a movie.

nico is a talented actor who I could see in a few horrible but still good college movies. ararmis and the main character were just exchangeable if it wasn't about skating and had 5min of skating in it.
vince vaughn did his thing and was one of the only believable characters.

Wow NH is less accurate than a movie that ends with the Manson family not murdering anyone.   Woof
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fs180 on June 08, 2021, 07:39:59 AM
Expand Quote
the plot isn't really thick and never gets to the point of building up excitement.
its kind of like once upon a time in Hollywood romanticizing with the Hollywood of the 60s 70s but far less good and interesting and accurate.
also I dont even know what time this plays since they dont use mobile phones but other modern technology.
i dont like how the camera picture has vignettes. the one shot in the beginning has unnatural speed to thinks you would do like smoking for 2 sec just to cough and the way the camera goes plus the walls dont look like its been made in a good way.
this goes through out the movie. some whacky shots and it just doesn't look like a movie.

nico is a talented actor who I could see in a few horrible but still good college movies. ararmis and the main character were just exchangeable if it wasn't about skating and had 5min of skating in it.
vince vaughn did his thing and was one of the only believable characters.
[close]

Wow NH is less accurate than a movie that ends with the Manson family not murdering anyone.   Woof

im talking about framing the time it plays. once upon a time in Hollywood is only about showing people how the 60s and 70s were. the plot ends beeing not accurate to what happened in real life but it shows real life in the 60s and 70s in Hollywood.

NH plays with being "vintage" like going to a diner drinking a milkshake in converse and your college jacket.
it romanticizes with older times by not including phone calls from your mobile phone or instagram or any type of modern technology.
but also it misses to make it logical by including other modern things.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 08, 2021, 07:46:47 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
the plot isn't really thick and never gets to the point of building up excitement.
its kind of like once upon a time in Hollywood romanticizing with the Hollywood of the 60s 70s but far less good and interesting and accurate.
also I dont even know what time this plays since they dont use mobile phones but other modern technology.
i dont like how the camera picture has vignettes. the one shot in the beginning has unnatural speed to thinks you would do like smoking for 2 sec just to cough and the way the camera goes plus the walls dont look like its been made in a good way.
this goes through out the movie. some whacky shots and it just doesn't look like a movie.

nico is a talented actor who I could see in a few horrible but still good college movies. ararmis and the main character were just exchangeable if it wasn't about skating and had 5min of skating in it.
vince vaughn did his thing and was one of the only believable characters.
[close]

Wow NH is less accurate than a movie that ends with the Manson family not murdering anyone.   Woof
[close]

im talking about framing the time it plays. once upon a time in Hollywood is only about showing people how the 60s and 70s were. the plot ends beeing not accurate to what happened in real life but it shows real life in the 60s and 70s in Hollywood.

NH plays with being "vintage" like going to a diner drinking a milkshake in converse and your college jacket.
it romanticizes with older times by not including phone calls from your mobile phone or instagram or any type of modern technology.
but also it misses to make it logical by including other modern things.

I don’t know what you’re babbling about.  Once Upon a time also takes place in 69 and at no part is in the 70s
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fs180 on June 08, 2021, 08:00:49 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
the plot isn't really thick and never gets to the point of building up excitement.
its kind of like once upon a time in Hollywood romanticizing with the Hollywood of the 60s 70s but far less good and interesting and accurate.
also I dont even know what time this plays since they dont use mobile phones but other modern technology.
i dont like how the camera picture has vignettes. the one shot in the beginning has unnatural speed to thinks you would do like smoking for 2 sec just to cough and the way the camera goes plus the walls dont look like its been made in a good way.
this goes through out the movie. some whacky shots and it just doesn't look like a movie.

nico is a talented actor who I could see in a few horrible but still good college movies. ararmis and the main character were just exchangeable if it wasn't about skating and had 5min of skating in it.
vince vaughn did his thing and was one of the only believable characters.
[close]

Wow NH is less accurate than a movie that ends with the Manson family not murdering anyone.   Woof
[close]

im talking about framing the time it plays. once upon a time in Hollywood is only about showing people how the 60s and 70s were. the plot ends beeing not accurate to what happened in real life but it shows real life in the 60s and 70s in Hollywood.

NH plays with being "vintage" like going to a diner drinking a milkshake in converse and your college jacket.
it romanticizes with older times by not including phone calls from your mobile phone or instagram or any type of modern technology.
but also it misses to make it logical by including other modern things.
[close]

I don’t know what you’re babbling about.  Once Upon a time also takes place in 69 and at no part is in the 70s

you dont seem to bright up there
what makes most movies fucking great is how they frame the world that the movie plays in.
once upon a time in h is great example for not only not having a classical tension arc but perfectly framing the end of the 60s and the years to come (70s). it has so many details that you feel like living in that era.

Wes anderson for example creates alternative worlds full of saturated colors and beautiful shot pictures that somehow make sense in its own.

North Hollywood doesn't define the time it plays in but wants you to love the vintage aspect in it. it has saturated colors (f.e. the swimming pool scene) but ugly shots. it want to create its own world but it doesn't work.



Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: layzieyez on June 08, 2021, 08:03:08 AM
Mikey Alfred is a genius, ya'll are just haters who can't accept his greatness.
He's an idiot savant without the savant.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 08, 2021, 08:12:48 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
the plot isn't really thick and never gets to the point of building up excitement.
its kind of like once upon a time in Hollywood romanticizing with the Hollywood of the 60s 70s but far less good and interesting and accurate.
also I dont even know what time this plays since they dont use mobile phones but other modern technology.
i dont like how the camera picture has vignettes. the one shot in the beginning has unnatural speed to thinks you would do like smoking for 2 sec just to cough and the way the camera goes plus the walls dont look like its been made in a good way.
this goes through out the movie. some whacky shots and it just doesn't look like a movie.

nico is a talented actor who I could see in a few horrible but still good college movies. ararmis and the main character were just exchangeable if it wasn't about skating and had 5min of skating in it.
vince vaughn did his thing and was one of the only believable characters.
[close]

Wow NH is less accurate than a movie that ends with the Manson family not murdering anyone.   Woof
[close]

im talking about framing the time it plays. once upon a time in Hollywood is only about showing people how the 60s and 70s were. the plot ends beeing not accurate to what happened in real life but it shows real life in the 60s and 70s in Hollywood.

NH plays with being "vintage" like going to a diner drinking a milkshake in converse and your college jacket.
it romanticizes with older times by not including phone calls from your mobile phone or instagram or any type of modern technology.
but also it misses to make it logical by including other modern things.
[close]

I don’t know what you’re babbling about.  Once Upon a time also takes place in 69 and at no part is in the 70s
[close]

you dont seem to bright up there
what makes most movies fucking great is how they frame the world that the movie plays in.
once upon a time in h is great example for not only not having a classical tension arc but perfectly framing the end of the 60s and the years to come (70s). it has so many details that you feel like living in that era.

Wes anderson for example creates alternative worlds full of saturated colors and beautiful shot pictures that somehow make sense in its own.

North Hollywood doesn't define the time it plays in but wants you to love the vintage aspect in it. it has saturated colors (f.e. the swimming pool scene) but ugly shots. it want to create its own world but it doesn't work.

What’s a classical tension arc?   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Deputy Wendell on June 08, 2021, 08:14:34 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
the plot isn't really thick and never gets to the point of building up excitement.
its kind of like once upon a time in Hollywood romanticizing with the Hollywood of the 60s 70s but far less good and interesting and accurate.
also I dont even know what time this plays since they dont use mobile phones but other modern technology.
i dont like how the camera picture has vignettes. the one shot in the beginning has unnatural speed to thinks you would do like smoking for 2 sec just to cough and the way the camera goes plus the walls dont look like its been made in a good way.
this goes through out the movie. some whacky shots and it just doesn't look like a movie.

nico is a talented actor who I could see in a few horrible but still good college movies. ararmis and the main character were just exchangeable if it wasn't about skating and had 5min of skating in it.
vince vaughn did his thing and was one of the only believable characters.
[close]

Wow NH is less accurate than a movie that ends with the Manson family not murdering anyone.   Woof
[close]

im talking about framing the time it plays. once upon a time in Hollywood is only about showing people how the 60s and 70s were. the plot ends beeing not accurate to what happened in real life but it shows real life in the 60s and 70s in Hollywood.

NH plays with being "vintage" like going to a diner drinking a milkshake in converse and your college jacket.
it romanticizes with older times by not including phone calls from your mobile phone or instagram or any type of modern technology.
but also it misses to make it logical by including other modern things.
[close]

I don’t know what you’re babbling about.  Once Upon a time also takes place in 69 and at no part is in the 70s
[close]

you dont seem to bright up there
what makes most movies fucking great is how they frame the world that the movie plays in.
once upon a time in h is great example for not only not having a classical tension arc but perfectly framing the end of the 60s and the years to come (70s). it has so many details that you feel like living in that era.

Wes anderson for example creates alternative worlds full of saturated colors and beautiful shot pictures that somehow make sense in its own.

North Hollywood doesn't define the time it plays in but wants you to love the vintage aspect in it. it has saturated colors (f.e. the swimming pool scene) but ugly shots. it want to create its own world but it doesn't work.

this is a fun conversation to watch unfold, and i feel like it would benefit from these film-studies terms...i'll be lazy and just include the definitions from Wikipedia:

diegetic (or diegesis)-- "in the cinema, typically refers to the internal world created by the story that the characters themselves experience and encounter: the narrative 'space' that includes all the parts of the story, both those that are and those that are not actually shown on the screen (such as events that have led up to the present action; people who are being talked about; or events that are presumed to have happened elsewhere or at a different time)"

non-diegetic -- "Thus, elements of a film can be 'diegetic' or 'non-diegetic'. These terms are most commonly used in reference to sound in a film, but can apply to other elements. For example, an insert shot that depicts something that is neither taking place in the world of the film, nor is seen, imagined, or thought by a character, is a non-diegetic insert. Titles, subtitles, and voice-over narration (with some exceptions) are also non-diegetic..."

edit: i meant to mention that nothing about this film seemed interesting...has it been on Netflix?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fs180 on June 08, 2021, 08:21:50 AM
start plot plot building up plot building up plot building up plot at his climax the resolution for the plot end(https://i.ibb.co/Tkmct31/main-qimg-6e9dfc7137d2dad3d6931c955011a555.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Tkmct31)


there's no building up tension in once upon a time in Hollywood. most old movies from the time the movie plays dont have this formula and it was refreshing to see it being used again. some would say boring but it gives you the unexpected at any time even if nothing happens at all.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 08, 2021, 08:29:16 AM
start plot plot building up plot building up plot building up plot at his climax the resolution for the plot end(https://i.ibb.co/Tkmct31/main-qimg-6e9dfc7137d2dad3d6931c955011a555.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Tkmct31)


there's no building up tension in once upon a time in Hollywood. most old movies dont have this formula and it was refreshing. some would say boring but it gives you the unexpected at any time even if nothing happens at all.

So you don’t think there’s any tension in a movie that takes place on the day of the Manson murders where one of the main characters is Sharon Tate (not to mention, if you know anything about the murders, a stuntman - which was Brad Pitt’s character’s occupation- did die at Spahn ranch earlier that day)?   There’s definitely a build up of tension and catharsis when you see that history doesn’t play out as it actually happened. 
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jagr on June 08, 2021, 08:34:15 AM
What the hell does the first teen movie studio mean?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Deputy Wendell on June 08, 2021, 08:35:00 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
new illegal civ movie was bad? i thought skaters were notorious for being great actors...
[close]


(https://i.ibb.co/55fcMkN/CABC6-E42-D0-CB-4-E2-F-B2-E9-4-D6-D40-BB6666.jpg) (https://ibb.co/55fcMkN)


He's no Frank the Nose
[close]

Machotaildrop = best skate movie

(https://media.giphy.com/media/UShNwLfAoNeMt0JMRk/giphy.gif)

"You don't understand! I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I could've been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am, let's face it."
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: AfterBlackEnderEnder on June 08, 2021, 08:36:34 AM
start plot plot building up plot building up plot building up plot at his climax the resolution for the plot end(https://i.ibb.co/Tkmct31/main-qimg-6e9dfc7137d2dad3d6931c955011a555.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Tkmct31)


there's no building up tension in once upon a time in Hollywood. most old movies from the time the movie plays dont have this formula and it was refreshing to see it being used again. some would say boring but it gives you the unexpected at any time even if nothing happens at all.

Damn dude you sound like a true aficionado. Is your favorite movie The Godfather? Just like your visionary filmmaker, Sir Mikey Alfred?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on June 08, 2021, 08:40:33 AM
Macho Taildrop was so good. Did not know of it's existance til I visited this thread a couple weeks ago. 10/10 might be my favorite movie of all time. The part with Frank with the horses just felt super emotional to me for some reason, it just made me super happy. This movie is super meta i think it is supposed to actually be a critique of pro skateboarding actually while also making a mockery of it without being corny. The music and the setting of the movie is amazing too and just the way its shot and stuff.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: mushroom slice on June 08, 2021, 08:46:21 AM
Other then Police Academy 4 or Most Vertical Primate 2 (the two best skateboard movies of all time)this  movie was no better or worse then any other skateboard movie. I’d throw back to the future in there as well but at this point I consider that movie to be more of a warning or prophecy then entertainment.
Everyone looked like happy days bringing me to a lost memory of the time I meet Henry Winkler in an elevator and I said Heeeeey in my best Fonz impression and he scowled at me and we rode the rest of the way in silence. He was short.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Abyss1 on June 08, 2021, 08:50:11 AM
cringe... a movie about a sponsor me video
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Brguy on June 08, 2021, 09:52:11 AM
You guys don't realize that skate movies are simply a way to idolize dumb young people behavior and see your favorite pros skating? Leave the good story arches to actual movies. Didn't even know there was a link already, will watch it later.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: fs180 on June 08, 2021, 10:07:28 AM
Expand Quote
start plot plot building up plot building up plot building up plot at his climax the resolution for the plot end(https://i.ibb.co/Tkmct31/main-qimg-6e9dfc7137d2dad3d6931c955011a555.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Tkmct31)


there's no building up tension in once upon a time in Hollywood. most old movies dont have this formula and it was refreshing. some would say boring but it gives you the unexpected at any time even if nothing happens at all.
[close]

So you don’t think there’s any tension in a movie that takes place on the day of the Manson murders where one of the main characters is Sharon Tate (not to mention, if you know anything about the murders, a stuntman - which was Brad Pitt’s character’s occupation- did die at Spahn ranch earlier that day)?   There’s definitely a build up of tension and catharsis when you see that history doesn’t play out as it actually happened.

there is tension in the movie but it doesn't build up in a classical way. the masons arent the opponents or the resolution for any problems. other movies build up some sort of tension. 3/4 into once upon a time and you still dont know what the movie could end with.

North Hollywood has a classic story line. it tries not to have one but at the end its the same old I just want to be accepted dad dont be a fake friend and put your dreams over friendship type story like almost any teenage movie ever.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Anti waxxer on June 08, 2021, 10:32:52 AM
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: pro club blanks on June 08, 2021, 10:58:29 AM
Heard it started out as a play by David Loy Webber
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mike Oxwelling on June 08, 2021, 11:26:59 AM
See what you get when you fuck with illegal civ!

(https://i.ibb.co/2cybzHr/illegal-civilization-doritos-collaboration-ntwrk-10.png)

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DCLOVE on June 08, 2021, 11:33:10 AM
can you watch this for free yet? this looks pretty bad, but I love bad movies. if they are free

Check your pms
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: sexualhelon on June 08, 2021, 12:05:47 PM
Well, definitely wasn't great. One thing I remember that how at a certain point in the movie the main character would  just randomly tell one of his friends they were embarrassing or a piece of shit for seemingly no reason.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on June 08, 2021, 12:36:54 PM
Well, definitely wasn't great. One thing I remember that how at a certain point in the movie the main character would  just randomly tell one of his friends they were embarrassing or a piece of shit for seemingly no reason.
That's what you're supposed to do once you get your dream girl and lose your virginity.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: goldenbullcow on June 08, 2021, 01:17:42 PM
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage

That was a documentary you silly goose
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: camel filters on June 08, 2021, 01:40:23 PM
cringe... a movie about a sponsor me video
I wish. Dude barely films in the movie and just complains about how much he hates his friends the entire time. I would much rather watch a movie about somebody stacking clips.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: mushroom slice on June 08, 2021, 04:34:22 PM
does every one in this movie besides Vince von actually skate ? That’s not a bad thing. That’s actually pretty sick. It wasn’t always like that. Some creeps that didn’t never push on a bird ever made the movies for ya. You guys all act like it’s cool to be all inclusive but still findA way to hate on anyone doing some shit that dosnt jive with you. You are all haters. It’s ok. Everyone hates. It feels
Good to hate. It feels better to LOVE
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on June 08, 2021, 04:59:43 PM
does every one in this movie besides Vince von actually skate ? That’s not a bad thing. That’s actually pretty sick. It wasn’t always like that. Some creeps that didn’t never push on a bird ever made the movies for ya. You guys all act like it’s cool to be all inclusive but still findA way to hate on anyone doing some shit that dosnt jive with you. You are all haters. It’s ok. Everyone hates. It feels
Good to hate. It feels better to LOVE
We don't have to love every single thing though
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 08, 2021, 05:31:32 PM
does every one in this movie besides Vince von actually skate ? That’s not a bad thing. That’s actually pretty sick. It wasn’t always like that. Some creeps that didn’t never push on a bird ever made the movies for ya. You guys all act like it’s cool to be all inclusive but still findA way to hate on anyone doing some shit that dosnt jive with you. You are all haters. It’s ok. Everyone hates. It feels
Good to hate. It feels better to LOVE
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: mushroom slice on June 08, 2021, 05:39:10 PM
Hi spell check
High
Thank you for correcting how I speled
A famous persins name.
Mfa
Most forgotten assholes
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: IpathCats on June 08, 2021, 08:36:12 PM
does every one in this movie besides Vince von actually skate ? That’s not a bad thing. That’s actually pretty sick. It wasn’t always like that. Some creeps that didn’t never push on a bird ever made the movies for ya. You guys all act like it’s cool to be all inclusive but still findA way to hate on anyone doing some shit that dosnt jive with you. You are all haters. It’s ok. Everyone hates. It feels
Good to hate. It feels better to LOVE

I'm a huge hater, and I'll be the first to admit it. Fuck this movie, fuck  Mikey Alfred and his corny ass fits, fuck Vince Vaughn, and fuck putting shrooms on pizza instead of PB&j. I wake up angry every God damn day, east coast.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: radcunt on June 08, 2021, 09:26:10 PM
It’s cool talentless rich dipshits get to make everything they have no idea about now
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DCLOVE on June 08, 2021, 09:32:36 PM
What the hell does the first teen movie studio mean?

I think about this often. And I’ve come to the conclusion it means Mikey Alfred wants to be the next Dan Schneider.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 08, 2021, 09:42:27 PM
Expand Quote
What the hell does the first teen movie studio mean?
[close]

I think about this often. And I’ve come to the conclusion it means Mikey Alfred wants to be the next Dan Schneider.

Miranda Cosgrove just can’t escape. 

Hopefully Mikey isn’t having kids write IC on their feet and posting a pic of it
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: KRKD1 on June 08, 2021, 09:44:00 PM
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage

(https://marcfusioncom.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/theskateboardkid.jpg)

Wrong. The skateboard kid is not only the best one. If is unironically the truest representation of skateboarding out of all of em.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: dallou on June 10, 2021, 01:27:15 AM
Random thoughts : looked like a youtube movie or direct to dvd movie.
- The main character was so unlikable. Beeing a dick to everyone for no reason. Also he is nowhere near flow level
- why does every one acts like pro skaters are making a lot of money ?
- so annoyed at the main character discourse about money and working. Just trashing his dad’s career and hustle. Little piece of shit brat.
- I had a friend who started to lie all the time after he met a girl we did not really got along with. So that was funny .
- seems like nothing happens in the movie.
- the pros seem sooo boring and dumb aha. This movie really does not make you want to be a pro skater.
- the sound design thing when he wrestle his dad or something is so overused and tacky.
- laught at the idea of him doing water polo with that body.
- the relation with the girl is useless and seems soo forced. There is no chemistry. For the most part it feels they are forced to hang out. We never see actual moments of first love flirt happening and we never hear one of their conversation.
- all the pros are bad at acting. Nico is okay as a comic relief, second or third character type. I could see him in more professional Stuff.
- crazy that a movie about wanting to be pro does not make me want to skate or hang out with the homies.
- also we believe in their friendship just because they state multiple time in the movie that are childhood friends but again we barely see any genuine moments of hanging out. At least mid90 did that right

A very uninteresting and forgettable movie. And I am a sucker for teen movies.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Massivecunt on June 18, 2021, 04:38:46 AM
Five minutes into this. Absolute dogshit.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: PatrickSkateman on June 18, 2021, 05:52:33 AM
Expand Quote
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage
[close]

(https://marcfusioncom.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/theskateboardkid.jpg)

Wrong. The skateboard kid is not only the best one. If is unironically the truest representation of skateboarding out of all of em.

I always thought it was Kids.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on June 18, 2021, 09:22:25 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
The best movie about skateboarding is The Man Who Souled the World. The rest is garbage
[close]

(https://marcfusioncom.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/theskateboardkid.jpg)

Wrong. The skateboard kid is not only the best one. If is unironically the truest representation of skateboarding out of all of em.
[close]

I always thought it was Kids.

i probably shouldnt have watched that movie wen i was like 10
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on June 18, 2021, 09:24:50 AM
wait... how the hell did this movie get 4/5 stars on rotten tomatoes? wtf?
is the only way to watch it still on amazon to rent for $3.99? might watch it tonight i just dont know if i wanna give that fool money... if someone has a link plz dm
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: PrettyRicki on June 18, 2021, 10:13:45 AM
I watched North Hollywood and I don't think it was awful but I probably won't watch it again unless I'm with someone who really wants to see it. I mainly wanted to see the character that Vince Vaughn played in it. Skaters have always been so quick to hate on something that its a bit of a bummer.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on June 18, 2021, 11:58:03 AM
Random thoughts : looked like a youtube movie or direct to dvd movie.
- The main character was so unlikable. Beeing a dick to everyone for no reason. Also he is nowhere near flow level
- why does every one acts like pro skaters are making a lot of money ?
- so annoyed at the main character discourse about money and working. Just trashing his dad’s career and hustle. Little piece of shit brat.
- I had a friend who started to lie all the time after he met a girl we did not really got along with. So that was funny .
- seems like nothing happens in the movie.
- the pros seem sooo boring and dumb aha. This movie really does not make you want to be a pro skater.
- the sound design thing when he wrestle his dad or something is so overused and tacky.
- laught at the idea of him doing water polo with that body.
- the relation with the girl is useless and seems soo forced. There is no chemistry. For the most part it feels they are forced to hang out. We never see actual moments of first love flirt happening and we never hear one of their conversation.
- all the pros are bad at acting. Nico is okay as a comic relief, second or third character type. I could see him in more professional Stuff.
- crazy that a movie about wanting to be pro does not make me want to skate or hang out with the homies.
- also we believe in their friendship just because they state multiple time in the movie that are childhood friends but again we barely see any genuine moments of hanging out. At least mid90 did that right

A very uninteresting and forgettable movie. And I am a sucker for teen movies.

Good breakdown, the fact that a movie like grind made me want to skate with my friends when we were in highschool says something because we knew that movie sucked, if this as an earnest movie "by skaters" doesn't make you want to it speaks volumes.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lisa96 on June 18, 2021, 12:11:33 PM
who does mikey alfred have sex with?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: skate_or_dingus on June 18, 2021, 12:34:09 PM
who does mikey alfred have sex with?

 Mikey Alfred
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: EdLawndale on June 18, 2021, 12:42:00 PM
I haven't seen all the skateboarding-related movies, but of what I have seen, "Kids," "Gleaming the Cube," "Ken Park," "Mid-90s" and "Paranoid Park" seem like the most legit and engaging ones.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lisa96 on June 18, 2021, 12:43:16 PM
thought he'd aim for someone younger but i don't know the guy
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Brguy on June 18, 2021, 01:13:17 PM
does every one in this movie besides Vince von actually skate ? That’s not a bad thing. That’s actually pretty sick. It wasn’t always like that. Some creeps that didn’t never push on a bird ever made the movies for ya. You guys all act like it’s cool to be all inclusive but still findA way to hate on anyone doing some shit that dosnt jive with you. You are all haters. It’s ok. Everyone hates. It feels
Good to hate. It feels better to LOVE
Gotta be inclusive, hate on everything except fred gall.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on June 30, 2021, 04:14:36 AM
finally got around to watching this shit
as others said the 50's aesthetic they are going for gets totally blown up by tossing in current cultural references like nora and ishod. and notice tj and bobby dont dress in that wack outfit either they obviously said they werent down for it lmao.

seems to me like there is some low key racism / ignorance going on. the scene where he wont eat at ish's house was weird and unnecessary. the way black people are represented in the film seems like that are 2nd class like notice the girl's friend is also black to match with white boy's black best friend and asian 3rd friend. the guy whos real who has to have the heart to heart with him to bring him back to reality lel. notice there were hardly any women in that movie. they had such weak roles too the few that were in there were so pathetic. also that scene with the bashing female skaters was weird and seemed un necessary. lmao then they end the movie with a vince vaughn heart to heart after black hammer

when he steals the board from the mall then hides it, i odnt see the point in including that. it didnt really make sense they showed the japanese guy fighting the security guards with a board same with ish but thne they all meet up underground seems like they got away but then theres just 1 sole security guard and they are cooked with no evidence... if they were going to include that scene they should have had sunny sneak back in later or some shit

so many missed opportunities wit hthis movies. like his dad was a concrete guy, they should have segway'd that into him building sick DIY spots or hell take easier road and build skate parks with his dad or some shit. instead went the pure cheeseball route!

guy 3 flips the tiniest ten stair after going back like 70 times to get it as if they would be like hell yeah ur comin to SF bruh. probably so ABD its not even funny thats why you never see that spot on any video its just too tiny. FUCK YOU MIKEY ALFRED
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: cherry on June 30, 2021, 04:25:42 AM
“It’s gunna be hamlet with skateboards” Mikey Alfred said as loudly as socially acceptable at a party
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: coldbrew on June 30, 2021, 07:08:39 AM
Expand Quote
who does mikey alfred have sex with?
[close]

 Mikey Alfred

Thank you for the morning laugh.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: OldSkater on June 30, 2021, 07:51:33 AM
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?

because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 30, 2021, 08:00:58 AM
Expand Quote
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
[close]

because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.

His mom was an assistant to a has-been Hollywood producer.  There’s about as much of a chance that she had trust fund money as there is you understand what a trust fund is
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: OldSkater on June 30, 2021, 08:11:08 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
[close]


because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.
[close]

His mom was an assistant to a has-been Hollywood producer.  There’s about as much of a chance that she had trust fund money as there is you understand what a trust fund is
you are really telling me this guy doesn't have a trust fund. in the nine club episode he mentions living in a gated neighborhood, and rapper the game is a family friend. dude's family has MONEY haha

(https://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_fill,dpr_auto,f_auto,q_auto,w_1400/fl_lossy,pg_1/amd9el5tjjwvgmc9fz64/mikey-alfred-dominic-miller?fimg-ssr-default)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on June 30, 2021, 08:14:21 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
[close]


because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.
[close]

His mom was an assistant to a has-been Hollywood producer.  There’s about as much of a chance that she had trust fund money as there is you understand what a trust fund is
[close]
you are really telling me this guy doesn't have a trust fund. in the nine club episode he mentions living in a gated neighborhood, and rapper the game is a family friend. dude's family has MONEY haha

(https://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_fill,dpr_auto,f_auto,q_auto,w_1400/fl_lossy,pg_1/amd9el5tjjwvgmc9fz64/mikey-alfred-dominic-miller?fimg-ssr-default)
He probably grew up in an apartment, which in LA are typically gated neighborhoods.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: OldSkater on June 30, 2021, 08:15:43 AM
also, he talks about going to private school. the average cost of private school in LA is 15k a year. if you think he doesn't have a trust fund, you are a moron.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Deputy Wendell on June 30, 2021, 08:19:49 AM
i'm not interested in North Hollywood, although i may inevitably give it a chance if it makes it to Netflix.

this on the other hand, was mentioned above i think, and i watched it this past weekend, and as skeptical as my old jaded ass wanted to be about it at first, it knocked me on my ass a bit and was honestly quite beautiful

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5Fn99wmFCQ

Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Cool Ceith on June 30, 2021, 08:26:32 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
who does mikey alfred have sex with?
[close]

 Mikey Alfred
[close]

Thank you for the morning laugh.
same. the timing was perfect on that  ;D
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: VarialDisease on June 30, 2021, 09:40:33 AM
Michael Alfred = Bourgeois capitalist turd.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on June 30, 2021, 09:45:21 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
[close]


because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.
[close]

His mom was an assistant to a has-been Hollywood producer.  There’s about as much of a chance that she had trust fund money as there is you understand what a trust fund is
[close]
you are really telling me this guy doesn't have a trust fund. in the nine club episode he mentions living in a gated neighborhood, and rapper the game is a family friend. dude's family has MONEY haha

(https://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_fill,dpr_auto,f_auto,q_auto,w_1400/fl_lossy,pg_1/amd9el5tjjwvgmc9fz64/mikey-alfred-dominic-miller?fimg-ssr-default)
[close]
He probably grew up in an apartment, which in LA are typically gated neighborhoods.

All I know is that his mom worked in some capacity for former producer Robert Evans.   Robert Evans also hasn’t done dick (before he recently passed) in the past 30 years that would enable his employee to be rich enough to have a trust fund.   There is a huge difference between having a parent that has money and having a trust fund.  I believe they lived in Evans’s guest house or something like that, which explains the gated community.   
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mike Oxwelling on June 30, 2021, 09:58:45 AM
So his duechiness came from osmosis.   Trust in science.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: jakeumms on June 30, 2021, 11:52:06 AM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
[close]


because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.
[close]

His mom was an assistant to a has-been Hollywood producer.  There’s about as much of a chance that she had trust fund money as there is you understand what a trust fund is
[close]
you are really telling me this guy doesn't have a trust fund. in the nine club episode he mentions living in a gated neighborhood, and rapper the game is a family friend. dude's family has MONEY haha

(https://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_fill,dpr_auto,f_auto,q_auto,w_1400/fl_lossy,pg_1/amd9el5tjjwvgmc9fz64/mikey-alfred-dominic-miller?fimg-ssr-default)
[close]
He probably grew up in an apartment, which in LA are typically gated neighborhoods.
[close]

All I know is that his mom worked in some capacity for former producer Robert Evans.   Robert Evans also hasn’t done dick (before he recently passed) in the past 30 years that would enable his employee to be rich enough to have a trust fund.   There is a huge difference between having a parent that has money and having a trust fund.  I believe they lived in Evans’s guest house or something like that, which explains the gated community.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLatU-2Hu_E

The Kid Stays in the Guest House
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on June 30, 2021, 12:52:22 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
[close]


because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.
[close]

His mom was an assistant to a has-been Hollywood producer.  There’s about as much of a chance that she had trust fund money as there is you understand what a trust fund is
[close]
you are really telling me this guy doesn't have a trust fund. in the nine club episode he mentions living in a gated neighborhood, and rapper the game is a family friend. dude's family has MONEY haha

(https://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_fill,dpr_auto,f_auto,q_auto,w_1400/fl_lossy,pg_1/amd9el5tjjwvgmc9fz64/mikey-alfred-dominic-miller?fimg-ssr-default)
[close]
He probably grew up in an apartment, which in LA are typically gated neighborhoods.
[close]

All I know is that his mom worked in some capacity for former producer Robert Evans.   Robert Evans also hasn’t done dick (before he recently passed) in the past 30 years that would enable his employee to be rich enough to have a trust fund.   There is a huge difference between having a parent that has money and having a trust fund.  I believe they lived in Evans’s guest house or something like that, which explains the gated community.
[close]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLatU-2Hu_E

The Kid Stays in the Guest House
Thank you for this haha
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: bluntfullofmid on June 30, 2021, 01:35:27 PM
still trying to figure out why they would name a character Adolf
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: OldSkater on June 30, 2021, 07:00:07 PM
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’m yet to read through all 10 pages of this thread. Saw an ad for it scrolling on Instagram last night and it was one of the worst things I’ve ever fucking seen and it was only like 30 seconds long. I thought that Mikey Alfred was a kook when he suggested decks should cost $120 bucks on the 9 club but the ad for that movie made him unfathomably more kookier to me.

How do pros tolerate that dude? Why hasn’t he been kooked to infinity and beyond?
[close]


because he has money and connections, so people tolerate him. most skaters are incredibly shallow and dont mind one bit shmoozing up to a trust fund kid.
[close]

His mom was an assistant to a has-been Hollywood producer.  There’s about as much of a chance that she had trust fund money as there is you understand what a trust fund is
[close]
you are really telling me this guy doesn't have a trust fund. in the nine club episode he mentions living in a gated neighborhood, and rapper the game is a family friend. dude's family has MONEY haha

(https://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_fill,dpr_auto,f_auto,q_auto,w_1400/fl_lossy,pg_1/amd9el5tjjwvgmc9fz64/mikey-alfred-dominic-miller?fimg-ssr-default)
[close]
He probably grew up in an apartment, which in LA are typically gated neighborhoods.
[close]

All I know is that his mom worked in some capacity for former producer Robert Evans.   Robert Evans also hasn’t done dick (before he recently passed) in the past 30 years that would enable his employee to be rich enough to have a trust fund.   There is a huge difference between having a parent that has money and having a trust fund.  I believe they lived in Evans’s guest house or something like that, which explains the gated community.

ok if he isn't rich, he really does ACT like a entitled rich douchebag for some reason
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: zahed on July 06, 2021, 07:10:50 AM
i cant believe i just spent $4.99 and wasted 90 minutes.

that. was. terrible.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: BobbyPshew on July 06, 2021, 11:30:55 AM
I was a combination of bored and curious as just how bad, bad is, now.
I couldn't even finish that trash, it was possibly up there with Street Dreams. Or down there.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: figureitout on July 06, 2021, 11:47:55 AM
i'm not interested in North Hollywood, although i may inevitably give it a chance if it makes it to Netflix.

this on the other hand, was mentioned above i think, and i watched it this past weekend, and as skeptical as my old jaded ass wanted to be about it at first, it knocked me on my ass a bit and was honestly quite beautiful

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5Fn99wmFCQ

North Hollywood was absolute excrement, however that looks like a beautiful story/film like you said. I'm gonna watch it with my lady this week.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hinna on July 06, 2021, 07:38:39 PM
i cant believe i just spent $4.99 and wasted 90 minutes.

that. was. terrible.
there was a free link a page or 2+ back somewhere
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on July 07, 2021, 07:03:09 AM
yo that section about the waterfall the water bottle or whatever was so weird? like youre kissin her anyway wtf you wont share the same water bottle though? fuckin WEIRD ass main , clown ass bitch
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on July 07, 2021, 07:19:36 AM
yo that section about the waterfall the water bottle or whatever was so weird? like youre kissin her anyway wtf you wont share the same water bottle though? fuckin WEIRD ass main , clown ass bitch
They tried way to hard to re-phrase shit that has been in motion since the dawn of man.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: goingapelikenigo on July 07, 2021, 10:23:37 AM
watched this with my girl and we laughed all the way through cause of how corny it was, she also pointed out that the co director is some wack netflix actor that everyone makes fun of cause of how corny he is too.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: alex on July 08, 2021, 10:39:10 AM
I just looked up the imdb, is one of the characters really named adolf?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on July 08, 2021, 12:00:25 PM
I just looked up the imdb, is one of the characters really named adolf?
yeah its aramis hudson he is one of those illegal civ guys

def seems like there is some low key white male supremism in this movie to me maybe i am looking into it too much. the non white man characters all feel weak / inferior in comparison.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Francis Xavier on July 08, 2021, 12:29:32 PM
I feel you @rawbertson. I got the same vibe
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hinna on July 08, 2021, 12:30:44 PM
kader got 2highz again
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: IpathCats on July 08, 2021, 03:29:08 PM
yo that section about the waterfall the water bottle or whatever was so weird? like youre kissin her anyway wtf you wont share the same water bottle though? fuckin WEIRD ass main , clown ass bitch

The amount of off-putting behavior in this movie was astounding. It's like they don't even know how to be human.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Atiba Applebum on July 08, 2021, 03:31:17 PM
Expand Quote
yo that section about the waterfall the water bottle or whatever was so weird? like youre kissin her anyway wtf you wont share the same water bottle though? fuckin WEIRD ass main , clown ass bitch
[close]

The amount of off-putting behavior in this movie was astounding. It's like they don't even know how to be human.

Hasn’t every IC video proven that?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: rawbertson. on July 28, 2021, 08:41:35 AM
I have an important question;

Has anyone here ACTUALLY seen an illegal Civ  board in the wild before??
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jehoshaphat Augustus on July 28, 2021, 08:44:16 AM
I have an important question;

Has anyone here ACTUALLY seen an illegal Civ  board in the wild before??

https://youtu.be/K6DXj_7ae0Y
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Mike Oxwelling on July 28, 2021, 08:50:09 AM
I was going to say jumping to conclusions about a character with name Adolf  might be unreasonable.   Then I checked out the team page.

(https://i.ibb.co/sQfG5ft/IC-team-photo.png) (https://ibb.co/ftg58gQ)


Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: HORSES on July 28, 2021, 08:58:49 AM
I have an important question;

Has anyone here ACTUALLY seen an illegal Civ  board in the wild before??


Never. But also it's not really a skateboard company. I think they only sell exclusively through their website as well.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Jean-Ralphio Zaperstein on July 28, 2021, 09:04:09 AM
I was going to say jumping to conclusions about a character with name Adolf  might be unreasonable.   Then I checked out the team page.

(https://i.ibb.co/sQfG5ft/IC-team-photo.png) (https://ibb.co/ftg58gQ)

wow haha wtf
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Lou Strux on July 28, 2021, 10:38:48 AM
i'm not interested in North Hollywood, although i may inevitably give it a chance if it makes it to Netflix.

this on the other hand, was mentioned above i think, and i watched it this past weekend, and as skeptical as my old jaded ass wanted to be about it at first, it knocked me on my ass a bit and was honestly quite beautiful

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5Fn99wmFCQ
I recommend this film.
But be aware that even THIS is not without a dose of scandal as well.
Read here and be bummed/informed.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgx4qa/netflix-film-tribal-skater-girl-controversy-india (https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgx4qa/netflix-film-tribal-skater-girl-controversy-india)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: everythingisgreat on July 28, 2021, 05:35:43 PM
As corny as this film could occasionally be it had heart. There wasn’t much for character development but there was enough to get the message across. The beginning sequences and introduction to main characters was rushed. This film really came together halfway through the second act into the third. The music for the most part was terrible, it didn’t match the time or place. And Vince Vaughn carried his scenes. However, Mikey Alfred’s portrayal of skateboarding and the lifestyle was accurate, although it could’ve been portrayed much better. No matter where he comes from or what his experiences were, he was able to identify throughout the film the internal struggle that most, if not all people who skateboard feel, dream and do. At best, he highlighted the generational struggle between parents and child that we all know. At worst, there  was a lot of lack of conflict resolution and character development, however , I suppose when making a movie it’s always hard to tie together all those loose ends and maintain the message.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: wilk on July 28, 2021, 06:39:24 PM
I'm not gonna lie, and I mean this wholeheartedly...."Brink!" was a better skateboarding film. Jokes aside, North Hollywood got better towards the end but not enough to make it a good movie. It was terrible.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Trashcon on July 28, 2021, 07:17:42 PM
I have an important question;

Has anyone here ACTUALLY seen an illegal Civ  board in the wild before??

Good question, solid, no. I don't think there's a following for it in my area (Southern California desert).
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: DaleSr on July 28, 2021, 07:47:13 PM
Expand Quote
I have an important question;

Has anyone here ACTUALLY seen an illegal Civ  board in the wild before??
[close]

Good question, solid, no. I don't think there's a following for it in my area (Southern California desert).

Haven't seen any in my area (socal coast)
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: CorneliusCardew on July 28, 2021, 09:02:46 PM
Expand Quote
Watched it last night, it was relatable gives me hope for the next release. It was like a debut novel. Now that they did this one to learn the craft I foresee good things. One poster made comparisons based on genre and I'm not sure those are really relevant it's the sensibility of the film that really carries it through this is not like any coming of age drama for me at least.
[close]

This word salad sucks.


Thank you for quoting me. I'm not sure why you feel that way about what I said. If you have any questions I'd be glad to answer them. Or you can just talk stupid s*** and go f*** yourself.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: everythingisgreat on July 28, 2021, 09:20:50 PM
I'm not gonna lie, and I mean this wholeheartedly...."Brink!" was a better skateboarding film. Jokes aside, North Hollywood got better towards the end but not enough to make it a good movie. It was terrible.

Love Brink

“Gabby, take the outside!”

“You never take the outside on a turn”

“Did you really dump a Vanilla shake on Val?”

“... chocolate”
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: deadmilkman on July 28, 2021, 11:34:22 PM
Expand Quote
I'm not gonna lie, and I mean this wholeheartedly...."Brink!" was a better skateboarding film. Jokes aside, North Hollywood got better towards the end but not enough to make it a good movie. It was terrible.
[close]

Love Brink

“Gabby, take the outside!”

“You never take the outside on a turn”

“Did you really dump a Vanilla shake on Val?”

“... chocolate”

https://youtu.be/HWynp4Wkoa0

Agreed. Brink is a classic. North Hollywood is garbage.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: RichardBarkley on July 31, 2021, 01:50:13 AM
I'm sure this has already been posted but this is the funniest thing I've seen in awhile

https://youtu.be/OEWW1VicN7I
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hinna on July 31, 2021, 04:49:28 AM
gotta have that preemptive hater callout ready due to its bafflingly cringe nature. i stopped clicking on things like that even for research purposes because theyll get paid and alfredo pennies add up like the scam in office space
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Brguy on July 31, 2021, 07:33:53 AM
I was a combination of bored and curious as just how bad, bad is, now.
I couldn't even finish that trash, it was possibly up there with Street Dreams. Or down there.
Street Dreams is a masterpiece, what are you talking about?
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Buck Bundy on July 31, 2021, 09:07:24 AM
I don’t understand the people saying they had to pay for this suck fest. Go to target. Get a fire stick for $40. Go home and type in adding kodi or cinema hd app to fire stick. Follow the simple instructions for 12 mins. Boom. All tv shows and movies are available and free. #freecontent!
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Hinna on August 01, 2021, 05:36:32 AM
hows it free if it costs 40 bucks
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: dallou on August 01, 2021, 06:19:54 AM
just use torrent
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Buck Bundy on August 01, 2021, 10:29:12 AM
hows it free if it costs 40 bucks

You’re right. I should’ve wrote it out stating that for a 1 time fee of $40, you can watch any movie or tv show going forward, for free. Im not a computer expert by any means and I was able to do it first try. I recommend everyone go get a fire stick and follow the instructions on any of the hundred YouTube videos explaining how to download the app. I was able to get rid of cable and only have internet. Sure, I miss some live sport events cause I don’t know what app to use for that, but being able to watch any movie, especially ones like North Hollywood, and turn it off 20 mins into, feels great. Just offering some info for those that might not know this is an option.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: coyote2425 on January 30, 2022, 04:38:44 PM
Sorry to bump this thread.

This was on Showtime today and I tried for a bit. It was, in fact, objectively terrible. The cameos were cool/funny for about five minutes. Parts seemed like a setup for a Euphoria crossover episode, which would’ve been much better.

Mostly just felt bad for Vince Vaughn.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: ungzilla on January 30, 2022, 04:44:47 PM
never feel bad for vince vaughn
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Reed Richards on January 30, 2022, 05:11:21 PM
I saw it recently and it was cheeks.  This script was trash. Like I see what they were trying to do but they did it with the least likable character possible. The acting was mostly trash too. Aramis or Nico should've been the lead, acting-wise. They had some pieces there but you can only call in but so many favors from your skate industry friends and even then it can't save a paper thin plot.
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Abyss1 on January 31, 2022, 07:19:32 AM
just use torrent

It’ll probably end up on YouTube or vimeo eventually
Title: Re: North Hollywood was an objectively terrible movie
Post by: Murge on January 31, 2022, 09:02:11 AM
I don’t understand the people saying they had to pay for this suck fest. Go to target. Get a fire stick for $40. Go home and type in adding kodi or cinema hd app to fire stick. Follow the simple instructions for 12 mins. Boom. All tv shows and movies are available and free. #freecontent!


Yooo you got a good link for the instructions for the cinema app? I had it and it don’t work and now I can’t find a working link with instructions. I’m trying find season 3 of bluey for my son. Ha. I think it’s out in Australia already