Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Can you try and be more succinct when typing? Your walls of text are off putting and you often don’t seem to have a point.
ouch, but point taken. I'll sum up my response to iKobrakai in 4 lines.
If "rationality" is all the matters it is time for everyone to quit skateboarding because it is (economically) irrational practice.
Deciding what is rational based on results rather than practice is a poor idea and creates the opportunity to create ideologically satisfying stories about how the results came to be.
Arguing that sponsored skater = corporate shill doesn't sound right. There is a difference.
Arguing pros should act like Bam, Roy, Dyrdek is probably a bad idea.
I'm gonna risk another wall of text buttfuck it:
I signed a contract to work in corporate, he signed a contract to work for Cons (Nike). Difference?
They throw a cheque and a couple of Chucks on Robbie and expect him to risk his life, probably without insurance, benefits or pension.
Cons (Nike) =/= Target, McDonalds, Mountain Dew, Mtv, Street League, Olympics, Zumiez, etc.
Saying all sponsorship and all brands are equal is disingenuous. They do not contribute to scene at equal levels and do not do equal damage to the scene.
My dude... A guy working for Trader Joes, or something, will be better off in the long run than a lot pros. Pretty much no other industry could get away with having their employees breaking bones as part of the daily operations, without providing an adequate compensation.
I know people working as welders on oil rigs and those dudes are banking hard. Hard, risky work but at least they have something to show for it.
Just because skateboarding companies sponsor a contest a couple of times a year, the pros are not really taken care off. Again, they expect dumb kids to sign a shitty contract and risk serious injuries with no safety net.
So you're right, not all brands are equal.