I can chime in a little bit here as Mushman had given me this similar advice when he was working through it, and I did my own sort of tests. After his findings, I ran with it and did a bit of experimenting with my HPX / Opteka set up with various macro filters to determine what I liked the best.
I experimented through +1,+2, and +4 macro filters, with a 10mm Spacer ring, with no zoom, and zoom and scaling in post. The attached video shows a couple comparisons stationary, which I'll admit are a pretty poor example, and a couple moving shots with a +4 macro filter. At the time I thought this was the route to go but I've since went back to a +2 macro filter (footage to follow)
I've since determined that I like the +2 macro filter best, with some zoom in camera, and a bit of scaling in post. Shortly after this I upgraded from the HPX to the AC160, so I'm not sure the exact zoom/scaling combo as i didn't run it very long, but this edit has used that method. I believe the zoom would have been somewhere in the z10 range, with some scaling, but I can't be certain. No other Lens distortion was added in post.
After upgrading to the AC160, I've been running the same setup, +2 macro filter, Opteka 0.3x with a 10mm spacer, Filming at z20-24, and scaling in to about 104 (dependent on in camera zoom) to be able to center the Vig. For some reason on this cam the vig is not completely centered, and drives me nuts. I've also began adding my own vig in post to account of the soft blue edges of the vig, which also drove me nuts. I've just added a circle, color matched to the real vig, and softened a bit to make it look more realistic. First clip and boarding clip has it added, second clip does not. (Ignore my voice, this was never meant to go public

)
After experimenting a bit with that set up, I've come to find what I like best (+2, 10mm, z21, 104 scaling in post) and can be seen in this edit. As you can see it's still not an Extreme, and has a bit of softness around the edges, but significantly better than just the opteka on its own, so shoutout Mushman for figuring this out. I think the next step would be to play around with some lens distortion to getting it as close to an extreme as possible. I've only recently remembered that that was an option of revisiting some old threads here, so that will probably be the next experiment.