Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
This is what I don't understand.. Did ANYONE seriously think Joslin (or any other pro for that matter) should be a source for understanding medical science?
And yes. Peer reviewed science, and western medicine in general is the "establishment". You'll always find people that don't trust them.
TMFK certainly seems to have thought Joslin's disavowal of medicine supports his risky decisions, which is rather scary.
Ok, so reviewed science and medicine are part of "the establishment." This leaves me with a few follow up questions.
1) Who else is part of the establishment? Or, is just just science and medicine?
2) What is the goal of the "establishment"? What is the establishment working towards?
3) Where do those who see through the establishment go for medical treatment? Who can I get the truth from?
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Lol. Okay doc, please enlighten us - which vaccines should I give my kids and which should I avoid?
A quick search on PubMed of "vaccination efficacy and risk" gave me 4070 results. I'd love to know which studies you are referring to. Please be specific.
Lol, do research. It's there for anyone to read
I'm not your family practitioner
"I know this is right!"
"Ok, can you show me how you came to this conclusion, so I can understand as well?"
"Nope. You need to find evidence to support my claim or you just need to believe me."
Do you think I fuckin saved the research incase a debate broke out on slap 6 years later?
Holy fuckin balls your something special
I'm not here to change your mind. Make YOUR own fuckin decision
Lazy ass motherfucker
Please prove to me that you know what you're talking about.
You can't. Because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.
Really? And you do? Hypocrite
Well, I am still just a student, so no, I'm most definitely not an expert. But I am training to be a general practitioner, and this is largely what my education is about. It's hard to argue with you because you're speaking so broadly, I don't even know where to start.
You said "the science isn't clear".....but then you say..... "a few vaccines are very good and should definitely be taken, but I'm also not going to say you HAVE TO use them." So again, my first question to you would be which ones are good? MMR? TDAP? Or are those ones bad? If you think they're bad, why? Because my research tells me that those two vaccines, for example, are effective and rarely have adverse side effects (since you're so caught up on adverse reactions, I just want to again remind you that ALL MEDICATIONS HAVE RISKS OF ADVERSE REACTIONS). I'd be happy to link you to the thousands of articles that say so.
The burden of proof is on you; you said you have done the research, so I would like some guidance. You can't expect me to sift through thousands and thousands of articles on various databases to find the couple of obscure article that disputes consensus of the entire scientific community. If you have truly done your due diligence, it shouldn't be so hard to find the research to back up your claims.
A couple other things:
It is the dose that make things toxic; H2O can be toxic if you drink enough water.
Opiods act on neurotransmitters receptors in your brain, vaccines do not. Vaccines stimulate your bodies immune response. I'm not sure what brain "alterations" you're talking about that make opiods are "easier to study" as opposed to vaccines.
Pamphlets for drugs are twelve pages thick because there a lot of potential risks associated with giving vaccines to patients that are immunocompromised or have comorbidities. But that shit has to be laid out in writing, just like your iTunes or Gmail terms of agreement.