FYI, paridigm is commonly considered a word that people use to sound smart, so I wouldn't recomend using it twice in one post. They even made a joke about it on the simpsons...
That being said you didn't address my point at all. Please answer this simple question:
What is the motive for taking on additional complexity in the 9-11 attacks by adding bombs to the building to ensure that they colapse? Or simply put, why was it so important that they fall and not just be struck?
Also, if you are implying that my thinking is party line a quick search of my post history could put that thought to rest for you.
Motives are speculation. I'm more concerned with the science behind the collapse. But to satisfy you I can name a few possible motives for bringing the towers down, rather than just crashing planes into them:
1. "Paradigm shift" refers to a sudden and complete change in mass consciousness, a willingness to follow the government and relinquish personal liberty. The removal of the twin towers from the NYC skyline accomplished that.
2. WTC was a white elephant, with declining occupancy rates and stuffed with asbestos that had to be removed.
3. Those with foreknowledge would have been able to profit from insider trading on affected companies.
I don't have all the answers. I'm not even trying to convince anyone. I've just seen enough for myself to be convinced that this was a set-up. Maybe if you would turn off The Simpsons and do some research for yourself you might come to similar conclusions.