new thrasher cover

[boyan]

am i the only one who thinks that the photo doesnt do justice to the sheer size of that thing?

no, me too, bad angle I guess
it's really sick

[ctsskate]

I agree with what that one dude said about it being good from a composition standpoint. I think if you wanted the sheer length and massiveness it would have been sick with a long lense shot from the side.

[art hellman]

it's similar to the Transworld cover photo of wenning's switch bs 180 down the love 4......and by 'similar' i mean almost exactly the same

[Claude]

Why did they have to fuck up that cover by putting Chris Lamberts name on it?

[art hellman]

Why did they have to fuck up that cover by putting Chris Lamberts name on it?

worst editorial decision ever.

[bentmode]

does this mean odell got his job back?

[89-90pistons]

Expand Quote

Why did they have to fuck up that cover by putting Chris Lamberts name on it?

[close]

worst editorial decision ever.

chris lamberts style gives mexican food the shits.

[mikefork]

the mage came in today and the four looks way bigger on the actual cover than the scan spot put up

[Mackattack]

Awesome photo.... however...it looks like a straight bite from Gee's photo of Wenning down the Love gap.

Not to take anything away from it... it is knarly as fuck.

reynolds aint worrying about no brian wenning

[Warren]

Expand Quote

[close]

it's similar to the Transworld cover photo of wenning's switch bs 180 down the love 4......and by 'similar' i mean almost exactly the same

You make it sound like this is the first time a photo has ever been duplicated. And that is not a new edgy angle or anything.

[stankbox]

dayum!

[art hellman]

Expand Quote

Expand Quote

[close]

it's similar to the Transworld cover photo of wenning's switch bs 180 down the love 4......and by 'similar' i mean almost exactly the same

[close]

You make it sound like this is the first time a photo has ever been duplicated. And that is not a new edgy angle or anything.

yes.  that is exactly what i was saying. this is the first time a photo has ever been duplicated.  ever.

[kev]

Know what would've been awesome?  If Darrell had of had a cover of his ss bs 180 down it, with that exact same angle.  Minus the 500 onlookers.

[Sleazy]

everybody knows the size of the wallenberg 4,  you don't need to make it look gnarly on a picture anymore. this picture is a timeless shot, maybe more a perfekt dokument for next generations. if i think of emb, it's the carroll nosemanual pic. it's could become kinda the same thing

exactly my thoughts. you know it's reynolds, you knows its a bs flip, you know the spot. No need for a fisheye shot from the bottom that shows his face and how big the gap is.

Everyone bitches when thrasher does the same old angle and then bitches when they try something different...

fucking sick cover, can't wait for that ho to come in the mail

[Maple Syrup]

the love park angle was better cause it was more vertical and it didnt really diminish the size of the thing.  yeah i know everyone knows wallenberg and how huge it is, and that is a sick photo and probably a sick issue.

[kraftwerk]

the difference is noticeable between viewing the online scan, and seeing the actual cover. The steps look longer on the mag

[Claude]

Reynolds makes everything look small though, just think of his shit down wilshire 15 he made it look like a 10. Just to compare, Patterson Baby made it look like a 30 stair.