something seems disingenuous here - "A commotion broke out and
Brandon turned back around and the naked man was brutally attacked for unknown reasons."
the video begins here:
both the naked man and brandon head eastbound on the south side of hollywood blvd. initially, brandon is behind the victim; however, since brandon is on a bicycle ("While riding his bike he witnessed a naked man walking down the street"), he quickly overtakes the naked man as they cross schrader blvd:
as brandon "documents" the naked man, brandon calls out "this mother fucker! butt-ass naked on hollywood blvd where there's kids around. put some clothes on you fucking freak!"
the video then cuts and appears to reopen here:
we see the naked man in "a commotion" with another man in front of what appears to be the security trust and savings building on the northeast corner of hollywood blvd and cahuenga blvd. as the naked man appears to get knocked unconscious by the other man, brandon yells "lights out! lights out!" and captions the video with "We Aint With All That" followed by two laughing emojis.
as i first mentioned, girl's apology reads "A commotion broke out and
Brandon turned back around and the naked man was brutally attacked for unknown reasons." similarly, brandon's apology reads "
I turned back around when a commotion broke out..."
in my opinion, this wording makes it seem like just after brandon passed the naked man as they crossed schrader blvd, brandon quickly glanced back over his shoulder to see the naked man in "a commotion."
based on where i believe brandon's video starts and ends, this is how far the naked man and brandon traveled:
at the very least, that is two blocks. and whereas the video begins on the south side of hollywood blvd, the video ends on the north side of hollywood blvd. so both the naked man and brandon would have had to cross hollywood blvd.
does it really seem that brandon just "turned back around"? was brandon following the naked man? and if so, why? to help the naked man? to "document" the naked man?