I’m reminded of Bowling for Columbine, and an interview i saw with Michael Moore afterwards. And he said something that kind of took me by surprise, since the whole film focused on lack of gun control.
Basically that gun control by itself is not really the point. He went on to explain, but ill put out my own thoughts here.
I think we know the point, and we think gun control is a path towards it. Just like many of us feel that Universal Healthcare is not an end, in itself, but a step towards a goal.
The goal being a saner, less violent society.
I used to think the US was more ‘Leave it to Beaver’ than ‘Rambo’, but I don’t feel that way anymore. It is a society that mythologizes violence, its revolutions, its Wild West justice, the only way to deal with tyranny is through war, its endless military incursions since the turn of the century its founding.
It’s cartoons, its comic books, its TV, popular music (since we’re talking about Lil Wayne), everything is dripping with violence. And gun ownership, and the logic that gives birth to it is all found in this culture where violence is taken for granted.
So i think we all intuitively understand this, and gun control has the emotional appeal that we can legislate a more peaceful society. Just like universal healthcare feels like a step towards institutionalizing human caring over selfishness.
Which, i think is true. What is allowed and permissible shapes and is shaped by the culture at large. Canadians are generally gentler Americans, because the cultural myths of violence are not as much a part of our cultural identity. Even though we have similar levels of gun ownership, they are almost largely hunting, not defense.
So Gun Control will not work on its own, and an end unto itself. The cultural identification with the right to use deadly violence to settle problems is so ingrained that any attempt to soften it is met with a backlash. It has to be backed up with other challenges to the dominant narrative of violence. Especially the military and its part of the American mythos.
It’s important that the social and emotional NEED for guns is reduced when reducing the actual guns.