Author Topic: Should this community hold itself to the same standards it judges pros against?  (Read 2549 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SR ACF

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
  • Rep: -291
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
It's 2022 and this little corner of the Internet can proudly look back on ending a few dirtbag's pro careers for mistreating women. Isn't it time we agreed that unabashedly pornographic and objectifying signatures or profile pics should disappear from the forum?
« Last Edit: January 25, 2022, 05:50:20 AM by SR ACF »

thisguyslaps

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Rep: -7
I think there's a huge difference between using a porno as your profile picture than looking to convict a person that is guilty of sexual assault. The woman in porn agreed and got paid to do what they did.

If you can't see that you're fucking brainwashed and the reason the whole western world is going down the tubes. For real you sound fucking regular.

RoaryMcTwang

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4705
  • Rep: 410
I'm under the impression that you're preaching to the converted, there's hardly any - actually, I believe none? - of the porn sigs left that used to be common even a few years back. Unless you consider OK Boomer's sigs pornographic.

somefucker

  • Guest
hell no. this thread is fried and you're reaching.

dannyprovolone

  • Guest
What kind of mikey taylor logic is this?

Prostate Exam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1518
  • Rep: 484
  • registered SLAP offender
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
I wanna see some chicks pissing

SR ACF

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
  • Rep: -291
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
Yeah because the objectification of women's bodies in society and the crimes done against them are not related in any way, shape or matter and I'm fried for even mentioning the two in the same paragraph.

SneakySecrets

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7222
  • Rep: 1240
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
You win 100,000 woke points.  Everyone acknowledge SR ACF and applaud please.
When nothing in society deserves respect, we should fashion for ourselves in solitude new silent loyalties.

cherry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1826
  • Rep: 56
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Impossible seeing as how anyone can start an account and be random.

The “pro” industry is literally an advertisement for children so probably shouldn’t have a bunch of fucking diddlers running around Woodward….

backside_frontside

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1195
  • Rep: -291
Okay so now we need to cancel random people on the internet because of a pretty vanilla porno gif. GTFO. Isn’t there an ignore user function if you are offended by someone’s sig?

chris

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
  • Rep: 402
I think there's a huge difference between using a porno as your profile picture than looking to convict a person that is guilty of sexual assault. The woman in porn agreed and got paid to do what they did.

If you can't see that you're fucking brainwashed and the reason the whole western world is going down the tubes. For real you sound fucking regular.




While I agree about the porn/consent point to some limited degree, saying OP’s (perfectly rational… whether you precisely agree with it or not) larger point about the connection between a culture of everyday misogyny being connected to assault/abuse is no less valid (and way less histrionic/reactionary) than you drawing a direct line from “wokeness” to the collapse of western civilization.   If you’re going to be that dismissive, try not practice what you’re condemning in the same post. 


ok boomer

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4838
  • Rep: 1027
  • Gnar Kook
It's 2022 and this little corner of the Internet can proudly look back on ending a few dirtbag's pro careers for mistreating women. Isn't it time we agreed that unabashedly pornographic and objectifying signatures or profile pics should disappear from the forum?


Kombuch-A-Holic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1098
  • Rep: 122
I this the same dude that wanted to focus the weenier wallet thread? Maybe this places isn't for you. If the porn gets banned we also need to ban those scary movie gifs. Not gonna lie ..I get scared sometimes when I see them and have to scroll real fast but you don't see be bitching about it.

MusclesMarinara

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1172
  • Rep: 100
OP consistently has the worst takes on this website
Alex Olson never had the makings of a varsity athlete.

urbneathme

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1670
  • Rep: 281
i’m so glad those women have such a big strong man defending them like you! god forbid they’re celebrated for the jobs they choose to do. pornography is soooo bad, i’m so glad such a morally upstanding man like you will tell those girls they’re living the wrong way

Lou Strux

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5752
  • Rep: 2151
  • The Swede is down at Venice Beach, shove off!
I am trying to walk my mind over to OP’s position, but I keep getting stuck on this one point: whereas it is right & good that people be held accountable for their actions, ESPECIALLY when they are paid professionals whose likeness & persona are used to endorse/promote a brand, AND said person is potentially influential to other members of the same “community,” but how does their responsibility in the aforementioned role compare to that of an anonymous poster on an outdated forum in the dark, cobweb strewn corners of the internet?
I get why we don’t want influencers to behave in distasteful ways, and further why we don’t want the companies that support them financially to continue to do so when they transgress certain civil/social/legal boundaries, but how is this in anyway the same as what Boomer is doing with their sigs?
Explain, because I’m a dummy.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2022, 06:50:38 AM by Lou Strux »

I wanna play you in a game of SKATE for the right to continue talking shit on me.  You think you got me?

DaleSr

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4255
  • Rep: 1443
Uh oh the horny police are here

Lou Strux

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5752
  • Rep: 2151
  • The Swede is down at Venice Beach, shove off!
AHCAB

I wanna play you in a game of SKATE for the right to continue talking shit on me.  You think you got me?

coyote2425

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2269
  • Rep: 128
Uh oh the horny police are here

Scatter!

ok boomer

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4838
  • Rep: 1027
  • Gnar Kook

Freelancevagrant

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2649
  • Rep: 1555
Defend @ok boomer

Also, @SR ACF youre a fucking bozo and dismissing the ACTUAL WORK that goes into sex work. It’s a fucking job shit for brains.

Let’s put it like this, if someone made gifs of your goofy ass doing whatever job you have (which I’m willing to bet is unskilled office work. No shade to my office homies though, just this fucking dolt.) Would you feel objectified? Probably not, I’m sure you’re also ogling the hr lady you fucking chode. 
Well I have like 9 Andy Anderson dated flight decks.

straight

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4045
  • Rep: 979
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
What kind of mikey taylor logic is this?

just found my sig .. thx
What kind of mikey taylor logic is this?

pro club blanks

  • Guest
Oh this goes far beyond Eugene and rusty

cky enthusiast

  • Guest

Lou Strux

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5752
  • Rep: 2151
  • The Swede is down at Venice Beach, shove off!
I hereby move that “as a community” we collectively force boomer to change their username to ok banger.
Whereas that creates problematic suggestions in & of itself (word on the streets is the homey is a FANTASTIC banger, not just “ok”) at least we will all know what an insensitive, sexist, not at all woke, scum fuck they really are. ;)
I wonder if OP is aware of the “turn off signatures” function in the settings menu?
Maybe look into it, SR ACF. A handy feature for those of us who are more easily “put of.”

I wanna play you in a game of SKATE for the right to continue talking shit on me.  You think you got me?

Lenny the Fatface

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2183
  • Rep: 331
It's 2022 and this little corner of the Internet can proudly look back on ending a few dirtbag's pro careers for mistreating women. Isn't it time we agreed that unabashedly pornographic and objectifying signatures or profile pics should disappear from the forum?

The pornagraphic images I’ve seen here for the most part has been sex positive. If the sigs were depicting rape or pedo shit I would agree with you.

svenfuck cowboy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
  • Rep: -2
i think the ok boomer guy is weird, but the only real solution is by balancing things out with some big juicy cocks as signature gifs.

skate_or_dingus

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1121
  • Rep: 265

Theme For A Jackal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1868
  • Rep: 96
It's 2022 and this little corner of the Internet can proudly look back on ending a few dirtbag's pro careers for mistreating women. Isn't it time we agreed that unabashedly pornographic and objectifying signatures or profile pics should disappear from the forum?

Tell me you don't understand consent without telling me you don't understand consent

Mouth

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3111
  • Rep: -297
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
Always knew 'Slap' was a reference to slappin' the salami.
'No Mouth, you have a negative rep because you are a fan of growing your wealth off of the backs of low paid workers and brag about having bodyguards. You literally kook people for doing charity in South East Asia. Don't deny it.'