Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
^Tons of Americans die right now because they don't maintain their hygiene
The boredom would be one of the hardest things. When did people start getting depressed? It's bad enough in modern times but you'd have to assume just knowing your life is wake up, walk to field, work all die, walk home, eat some water soup, pray and repeat knowing nothing good or interesting will ever happen to you would have to be pretty hard to deal with.
I've felt this way travelling in poor agrarian places, looking out a train window at lives that seem hopeless cause they have no options/mobility. But I think modern mental health issues are very tied to alienation. In preindustrial society it seems like communities were very tight and people must have had pretty rich social lives. Working alongside your friends and neighbours, being involved with your family throughout your life, sharing meals and gossiping in the market, everyone going to the same occasional dance or fair... in some ways less depressing than chatting with people ill never meet across little screens.
I agree, I see those as massive upsides. Like massive massive. But I understand the point about others have made about scientific/health advances. I’d have died in 5th grade from health-related issues if I lived in the Middle Ages.
Expand Quote
A more interesting question might be happier now or pre-civilization (before domestication/ agriculture/ religion, hierarchy/ mass society etc.) ?
The Middle Ages were probably among the darkest times for many. but there were certainly come blissed out nomadic Gatherer-Hunters in Northern Tanzania (and many many other places where humans were not stupid enough to settle permanently) jamming with the universe in the most wonderful way.
As for post-civilization (ie the last 10,000 years- a mere blip in our existence), some people now say those of us privileged enough to live a certain lifestyle in certain countries lived 'peak civilization,' which was arguably from when the Berlin Wall went down until recently....
and we are now on the downward curve...
so hold that thought....
Yes, pre-agrarian would also be a great thought experiment. I honestly don’t think our imaginations are good enough to draw an accurate picture of what life was/is like for those people. Their entire worldview has got to be so fundamentally different than ours. From the scattered, casual research I’ve done on those kinds of societies, they appear to be outrageously happy and carefree compared to your typical citizen of an advanced western society.
Like do you think depression and suicide are/were a big problem facing these people? Going to go out on a limb and say no. Maybe I’m wrong on that and someone can correct me.
It’s funny that none of us will ever be able to know what that lifestyle is like since our brains have been so irreparably cattle-branded by the modern world.
Also, I added a poll to this just for funsies. Should have included it from the start.
Lots of literature out there on this. Many anthropologists, writers, scientists and eco-activist types of taken it upon themselves to try to get into the pre-agiriculture mindset, pre-symbollic thought even. Here are a few,
Damn dog, thank you. Two of those caught my eye.
I can’t even begin to imagine living without symbols, haha. Does that include language? (Without having read any of the books), I’d easily group language in with symbols.
I actually tried to run down a list of different things to suggest as non-symbolic (painting, music, etc), then realized you can find a gazillion symbols in them at a cursory glance.
I guess one way to look at it is that everything we know has been polluted by symbols except for raw nature itself. 🤯
Yes, language is symbolic.
Definition of Language
Language is a complex and dynamic system of conventional symbols that is used in various modes for thought and communication.
Contemporary views of human language hold that:
language evolves within specific historical, social, and cultural contexts;
language, as rule-governed behavior, is described by at least five parameters—phonologic, morphologic, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic;
language learning and use are determined by the interaction of biological, cognitive, psychosocial, and environmental factors;
effective use of language for communication requires a broad understanding of human interaction including such associated factors as nonverbal cues, motivation, and sociocultural roles.
Source:
https://www.asha.org/policy/rp1982-00125/