Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Mahatma Gandhi, this man led a non violent MENTAL revolution which encapsulated a country of enormous size possesing a rich culture aged longer than most others (although frequently violent in many actions) that had been for the better part manhandled by western zealots. Where has his influnece gone? possibly into the sea via fiberoptic cables but...... He tried.
He certainly influenced King.Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
yup. He should be a hero to everyone from SF
i also hold Lloyd Kaufman and Vincent Gallo in equal high regard. Gavin McInnes too
Fuck Vincent Gallo. He's a worthless piece of shit. His ego is his biggest export, and all of his major claims to fame are for being near good artists. He never has done anything of his own that is half worth dealing with his pretentious bullshit. Fuck him.
Harvey Milk is cool though.
keep hating. He loves that.
Yeah. I know. He loves hinmself in a pathetic way. He LOVES attention, more than a dog. Its really pathetic. I met him when I was volunteering for a music festival and he just confirmed all of my assumptions about him. He is a pathetic, pathetic, human being. Seriously though, what has he done that is much better than mediocre? Brown Bunny sucked and buffalo 66 was mediocre. His music sucks.
well, for starters, he gave Roger Ebert cancer..........then later put him in remission and became good buddies with him. That is quite a feat. I cant think of anyone else that has done that. That pretty much justifies him being hero-worthy.
Are you talking about how Roger Ebert said one of his movies was worse than cancer and just panned the shit out of it, so your rebellious hero went and changed it so he would be ok with it? NO, thats not heroic, its really pathetic. Either be a cocky artist that won't mess with one of your original works no matter what somebody says about it, or be try to please critics like a little ass kissing bitch. Don't be a little ass kissing bitch who changes his art for the sake of critics but still acts like he is this rebellious badass who doesn't give a fuck. Dude is just the lamest person ever. He "cursed his colon," then buddied up to him after Ebert changed his review after the movie was revised. What a pussy!
the film that screened at Cannes (the screening Ebert and all the other critics who trashed the film attended) was a work-in-progress. It was nowhere near finished. Gallo was contractually obligated to screen the film....even though he didnt want to. The
finished cut - the one that made it to theaters and DVD- is the film Gallo intended for people to see. He didnt re-edit the film to please critics..he re-edited it because the film wasnt even finished...the film was still in post-production when it premiered. Ebert isnt the only person that ended up rewatching and loving the film (a lot of people agreed it was far better than initally reported). And the whole back and forth fewding between Ebert and him was partially a joke (on Gallo's part)
Besides, his sperm is worth a million bucks (not including shipping and handling). My sperm is nowhere near worth as much. That, again, is another reason why he's my hero.