Expand Quote
also, the ps3 is harder to develop for and most of the time gets buggier/inferior ports of multi-platform games.
that is true but it's why PS3 will eventually stomp XBox from the perfomance side of things. mircosoft has great dev tools and all that but really it's the game enginees that matter and the reason that PS3 game enginees were difficult is because the architecture is brand new and the game geeks haven't figured out how to maximizes it's power yet. eventually they will, i'd assume that they already did with the last unreal engine but if not then they will and then it'll stop being a contest on the power front.
Expand Quote
Sleazy, you sound like a used car salesman trying to sell a sports car to the dude who just wants to go point a to b.
well i did quite a bit of research before i brought my system and why not share
and i'm not pushing PS3 over xbox, it's really just preference but i did want to clear up the "pretty much the same" arguement because they definitely aren't.
I don't want to turn this into a fanboy fight, but i'll go ahead...
so, the ps3 will eventually stomp the xbox because it has almost no loyal developers and it basically sucks for making games on? People say buy the console for exclusive games, but the xbox is even better for games like call of duty, because they are actually designed for the xbox, then ported to the ps3, which makes the ps3 versions buggier and shittier. And it has waaaaay more exclusives.
Bluray games don't mean jack shit. So far not a single company has made a game that couldn't fit on a regular dvd which is what is used in the xbox.
AND, saying that more processors = better is really misguided. The processors of both systems operate better in certain conditions, and overall the ps3 clocks in just slightly higher than the 360.
In terms of graphics cards, the xbox 360 and the ps3 are very similar.
Online, go xbox.
Xbox hardware problems are fixed. I don't know why this is still part of the argument.
360 rulez, n00bz