Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
No figgy in the summer catalogue, they really wanna kill of the G6 cup huh?
The figgy g6 and wino cup g6 are easily some of their best shoes and yet they prefer to sell the reynolds rip off’s and claim it’s one of their best selling shoes…unreal
They just said it's too expensive so they're not forcing it out but if they're not making money on it, they can't keep it around.
Are they making money anyway, they seemed to have a sale on every other week the end of last year.
And to kill their best innovation in years over cost, but still drag out shitty shoes that won’t sell, the new model and dakotas model both didn’t need to exist
They would be making money if they quit producing all the junk shoes and just kept those as their main line. Also charging $90+ for slip ons is crazy especially when they go on sale for half that price a month later.
The slip cups cost $90 because of the G6 cupsole. So should they keep it in their mainline and charge what they need to or not?
Tough call because current prices across the board are beyond what we all would like to pay, so paying for the tech WAS reasonable pre covid & global conflict inflation prices.
At $90, a slip on doesn't seem worth it, cupsole or vulc, regardless of tech. It's why so many of us wait for sales. We'd wait for sales on the bigger companies' premium shoes, too if possible. I'd still rather buy the G6, but it would be less frequent with these increased prices. Which, would prompt emerica to drop or scale them back because fewer purchases.
Regardless, you raise an important question that rose colored glasses wearers may forget