i saw 'an inconvenient truth' the other day and was pretty impressed. i think it was a bit too much about gore, rather than his arguments, but of course that is the director's artistic license, and it didnt detract from the overall argument.
one thing that kept nagging at me, however, was that, as many people have pointed out, al gore (and his family's political dynasty-- yes, like bush, he has one too) was for so long the representative for the big pennsylvania coal interests. the same ones that are devastating western pennsylvania today with open-pit mining on an unbelievably large scale-- literally grinding mountains down into nothing to get at the coal, and dumping all the tailings in nearby valleys and such.
now i am not trying to say that gore's argument is somehow wrong just because he (and his dad) shilled for big coal in washingston; i am just curious about the possible relations between his history and the film. what gets left out, etc.
but maybe some of you know more about this than me...