The "score" they assign to tricks/runs is such an arbitrary thing to start with. If skating was in the Olympics 20+ years ago, they'd be scoring a straightforward Heath lipside as a perfect 10. This is, I assume, the same for all other "judged" sports. As the universe of what's possible expands, the score assigned to certain "tricks", or whatever they're called in other sports (Jumps? Maneuvers? Routines?), changes as well.
Further, what's the point of separating events by male and female if they're all to be measured by the same stick? The scoring system is flat-out offensive, as if women are to be reminded "if men were involved, you'd be in 15th place and not first". That is, why should the benchmark for scoring incorporate the abilities of people.(i.e. men) who are not a part of this specific competition and never will be? If we're going to separate men and women in competition to acknowledge that a) men and women have different bodies and, on average, for better or worse, are capable of different physical feats; and b) that women haven't had, until fairly recently, the same access to, or encouragement to participate in, competitive sport, then why not have the scoring mechanism reflect that as well? I just checked the 2016 Olympics results for men and women for the gymnastic floor routine, and the scores are nearly identical. I can't imagine they were doing exactly the same shit. So it seems like other sports have, appropriately, figured this out.
I didn't watch any Olympic skating, and on the whole I think it's all very theatrical and generally meaningless. Local skate scenes are infinitely more important. With that, I may have misinterpreted this post, but it sounds like men win with a "95" and women win with a "65", which is offensive and dumb.