Expand Quote
So hey, anyone been skating the Accel 95's already? Kinda wanting to get a pair as it was my fave shoe in the 90's, but I've got too many NB#'s on ice and yeah I dunno.
Anyone with the insight to compare the 95 with some current NB# models? My caveat is that the 95 would feel drastically too different to what I'm used to skating these days (mostly the 440 and 600).
But man do they look good as ever.
Accels were my first skate shoes ever so I am also tempted by them, but based on Ben D’s reviews I’d temper my expectations or at least try not to compare them to modern skate shoes from the big brands. He has a mostly positive review of them but said that they feel very much like what they are (a shoe designed in the 90s) both for better and for worse
The Accel 95 shape feels far more contoured to your foot than the "boxy" Accel OG we've had prior to 2024+ releases, which are a diet Accel OG compared to 2023 and before releases.
The Accel 95 toe box looks more pointy in comparison, so it fits your foot better, though you may need to 0.5 up from your usual size, kinda like the OGs.
I haven't skated my leather pair, but I'm looking forward to it. The 600 is close, but I reckon the Accel fits better than the 600. Less heel-toe drop in Accel over the 600. The 440 would be closer to a beefed up Accel Slim, so the Accel '95 would be somewhere in between a 440 and 1010 tech-wise and fit wise, but closer to a 480 shape, but with more padding. They're also a softer insole/outsole feeling, whereas NB# rubber feels pretty hard and plasticy on the 440/480 models.
This is my opinion and not fact, so keep that in mind if you choose to try them out. Also, you can swap an insole in the Accel, just like 440 and 600 to add more comfort/cushion if needed. I'd also recommend the suede colors
@rikki