Author Topic: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread  (Read 126640 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

antiseptic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
  • Rep: -28
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #300 on: January 20, 2026, 10:07:47 PM »

How appropriate

grandma logged into his insta again

« Last Edit: January 20, 2026, 10:57:08 PM by antiseptic »

Mallie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
  • Rep: 228
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #301 on: January 21, 2026, 02:15:09 AM »
Chi vive in baracca, chi suda il salario,
Chi ruba pensioni, chi ha scarsa memoria,
Chi ha crisi interiori, chi scava nei cuori,
Chi legge la mano, chi regna sovrano,
Chi suda, chi lotta, chi mangia una volta,
Chi gli manca la casa, chi vive da solo,
Chi trova scontato, chi come ha trovato...

Shtonk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1736
  • Rep: -2056
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #302 on: January 21, 2026, 02:42:29 AM »
Dane of Zero





What the fuck is this gibberish??

PsychOut

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Rep: -35
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #303 on: January 21, 2026, 02:52:58 AM »
Expand Quote
Dane of Zero




[close]

What the fuck is this gibberish??

Professional way of saying he’s a pedo and wants to be attracted to girls his own age and and in search of wanting to not be into children, keep him away from skye brown

Mr. Jax Taylor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
  • Rep: 69
  • The no. 1 guy on this messageboard
    • Mr. Jax Taylor avatar image
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #304 on: January 21, 2026, 03:58:17 AM »
Say what you want about no one but getting Chris Hansen to give Dane and Jamie a shout out is fucking hilarious
Its Unbecoming, Is This A Serious Issue Or A Laughing Matter? Is It Seriously Okay To Meme About Child Sexual Abuse?
"Dark Waters" on Amazon.


Abyss1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4917
  • Rep: 409
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #305 on: January 21, 2026, 06:29:42 AM »
So what is bronks blog that Dane is talking about


Theme For A Jackal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2311
  • Rep: 206
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #306 on: January 21, 2026, 06:40:50 AM »
So what is bronks blog that Dane is talking about

Scroll back one page and you'll see the link

Fred or Die

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Rep: -8
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #307 on: January 21, 2026, 07:01:29 AM »

Abyss1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4917
  • Rep: 409
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #308 on: January 21, 2026, 07:10:37 AM »
Expand Quote
So what is bronks blog that Dane is talking about
[close]

Scroll back one page and you'll see the link

Wow bronk had receipts

MikeCyclopsfromNASA

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Rep: -15
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #309 on: January 21, 2026, 07:41:00 AM »
I feel like it’s been like a decade now that accusations against Dane like this started popping up, crazy something finally happened about it.

Was also not expecting a Neckface allegation at the end.

FulfilTheDream

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Rep: -3
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #310 on: January 21, 2026, 08:30:52 AM »
damn NECKFACE is a PEDO too! some reason im not surprised

fulfillthedream

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4888
  • Rep: 515
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #311 on: January 21, 2026, 08:40:38 AM »
damn NECKFACE is a PEDO too! some reason im not surprised


nice username haha -

but damn, didn;t think he was on some shit like that.. a fake ID is on some next level shit...
Skateboarding is like jacking-off, it's that good- Jeremy Klein

[

cum

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
  • Rep: -144
  • The no. 69 guy on this messageboard
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #312 on: January 21, 2026, 08:44:35 AM »
see ya spermin burman

idontlikeyouinthatway

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Rep: -33
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #313 on: January 21, 2026, 09:01:35 AM »
broadly speaking I can understand not wanting to fire a long-time employee just because someone accuses someone of something.  I feel like that's what SLAP wants in the instance of every single accusation (if its people they don't like).

that being said, holy fck Dane is total creep bc wtf. it's also clear and obvious Jamie did absolutely the opposite of what should of been done if he wanted credibility.  I personally dont think Jamie is predator, i do think he's made every completely wrong move in this situation in every way and has clearly prioritized 1. money 2. being a cool bro over responsible leadership. 

Sunlight is the best disinfectant and it's pretty obvious instead of being forthright and like "hey, these are serious accusations, im going to look into them the best that i possibly can and publicly address what i find" he just looked the other way bc he didnt want anything to disrupt the money machine.

additionally, the Cody Davis thing, you want to be the business guru and corporate leader?  well then youre not some teenage shit head in the back of the van, and dont act like it.  doesnt matter if your weird creepy jokes dont land, that's just weird and unbecoming of someone at the helm. 

Dane needs to go to austalia bc we dont want him here.  Disgusting.
RIP shoelaces

Noble Experiment

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 545
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #314 on: January 21, 2026, 09:10:17 AM »
I personally dont think Jamie is predator
Nah, but he sure loves having em on the payroll.

Noble Experiment

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 545
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #315 on: January 21, 2026, 09:20:27 AM »
Let's be real though you either hate Jamie for being a Christian or just cause it's the thing to do on slap, nothing more nothing less
Are you sure those are the only two things? What about the, you know, knowingly having creeps on his team and choosing not to address it thing?

bo bice

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 971
  • Rep: 131
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #316 on: January 21, 2026, 09:26:01 AM »
of course fucking Neckbeard is a creep, what a shocker.

glimmerati

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • Rep: 14
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #317 on: January 21, 2026, 09:46:39 AM »
Let's be real though you either hate Jamie for being a Christian or just cause it's the thing to do on slap, nothing more nothing less

The fact you are saying this after what's been posted says so much about you and nothing else. You fucking goon.

bo bice

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 971
  • Rep: 131
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #318 on: January 21, 2026, 09:53:13 AM »
Came back to say if it’s true Jamie and Dane are roommates that’s fucking hilarious. Talk about Fallen.

r.g.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Rep: -2
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #319 on: January 21, 2026, 10:03:54 AM »
I can only imagine how awful that conversation must have been between jt and vermin with chiefs kids being right around that age where you really want to keep them away from guys like cole and dane.

Can't wait to see the plumosa/cult bikes "it's not technically illegal, but it is disgusting" tour

Kielwasser

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
  • Rep: -447
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #320 on: January 21, 2026, 10:26:00 AM »
broadly speaking I can understand not wanting to fire a long-time employee just because someone accuses someone of something.  I feel like that's what SLAP wants in the instance of every single accusation (if its people they don't like).


Yeah exctly like in the Shane O Neill thread. Such an astute observation of you thank god there are people like you who don't let their judgement be clouded by the way they'd like things to be. Imbecile.

Taffy Lee Fubbins

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
  • Rep: 345
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #321 on: January 21, 2026, 10:39:19 AM »


This is a great sentiment but unfortunately does not apply until there has been valid transformation and acknowledgement of wrongdoing. Dane addressing the “matters dating back to 2012” is deliberately vague and lets the world know that he is not ready to own up to his wrongdoing.

Jamie and Dane want to be absolved from guilt rather than making amends to their victims. The person who you are now is built on the actions of who you were in the past. Declaring that you are no longer doing what you did when you were younger (i.e. asking children for nude photos) is not owning up to those crimes and is yet another insult to the victims that you hurt. Don’t see people for who they are intending to become, that hasn’t happened yet. See people for who they are, and what I see is a humiliated sexual predator (Dane Burman) and embarrassed enabler (Jamie Thomas).

r.g.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Rep: -2
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #322 on: January 21, 2026, 11:14:56 AM »


This is a great sentiment but unfortunately does not apply until there has been valid transformation and acknowledgement of wrongdoing. Dane addressing the “matters dating back to 2012” is deliberately vague and lets the world know that he is not ready to own up to his wrongdoing.

Jamie and Dane want to be absolved from guilt rather than making amends to their victims. The person who you are now is built on the actions of who you were in the past. Declaring that you are no longer doing what you did when you were younger (i.e. asking children for nude photos) is not owning up to those crimes and is yet another insult to the victims that you hurt. Don’t see people for who they are intending to become, that hasn’t happened yet. See people for who they are, and what I see is a humiliated sexual predator (Dane Burman) and embarrassed enabler (Jamie Thomas).

I don't think it's fair to put that on company owners, otherwise Rocco, Rick & Mike, Templeton, Reynolds etc would all be in that spot being overly responsible for their employees.

The most disgusting thing i found from this is how little protection children have from predators like Dane in Aus, UK and Alabama. That mf (what I got from reading Bronks article) waited from April to October before he started harassing her, idk if there were more requests, but I think he did that until he could legally avoid facing repercussions 🤮

Noble Experiment

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 545
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #323 on: January 21, 2026, 11:17:58 AM »
I don't think it's fair to put that on company owners, otherwise Rocco, Rick & Mike, Templeton, Reynolds etc would all be in that spot being overly responsible for their employees.
Company owners being responsible for their employees? It's almost as if they'd have to do their jobs! That's a big ask.

r.g.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Rep: -2
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #324 on: January 21, 2026, 11:41:30 AM »
Expand Quote
I don't think it's fair to put that on company owners, otherwise Rocco, Rick & Mike, Templeton, Reynolds etc would all be in that spot being overly responsible for their employees.
[close]
Company owners being responsible for their employees? It's almost as if they'd have to do their jobs! That's a big ask.

So if you're hired as an electrician, your boss can give you shit about your trespassing and damaging property as a skateboarder? Should they get arrested if you do?

TheWineClub

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1082
  • Rep: -36
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #325 on: January 21, 2026, 11:48:20 AM »
Came back to say if it’s true Jamie and Dane are roommates that’s fucking hilarious. Talk about Fallen.

Fall with the Fallen

Also there needs to be more talk on this Neckface issue. The guy always put off creep vibes but those are some serious allegations there that needs more attention, the guy is in his 40s.

Willie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4130
  • Rep: 445
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #326 on: January 21, 2026, 11:53:15 AM »
It’s always the ones you most expect…

arrbee

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2810
  • Rep: 503
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #327 on: January 21, 2026, 11:54:02 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I don't think it's fair to put that on company owners, otherwise Rocco, Rick & Mike, Templeton, Reynolds etc would all be in that spot being overly responsible for their employees.
[close]
Company owners being responsible for their employees? It's almost as if they'd have to do their jobs! That's a big ask.
[close]

So if you're hired as an electrician, your boss can give you shit about your trespassing and damaging property as a skateboarder? Should they get arrested if you do?

Statute of limitations for trespassing and destruction of property is 3 years. Also if part of your employment of being a skateboarder requires you to trespass and destroy property it wouldn't/should't be a fireable offense.

I could be incorrect but I don't believe any professions require you to solicit nude photos from underage kids. And in Chris Coles case abuse your spouse.

Noble Experiment

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 545
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #328 on: January 21, 2026, 12:05:34 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I don't think it's fair to put that on company owners, otherwise Rocco, Rick & Mike, Templeton, Reynolds etc would all be in that spot being overly responsible for their employees.
[close]
Company owners being responsible for their employees? It's almost as if they'd have to do their jobs! That's a big ask.
[close]

So if you're hired as an electrician, your boss can give you shit about your trespassing and damaging property as a skateboarder? Should they get arrested if you do?
If a company owner has an employee who has a public presence (which pro skaters do), and that employee has an obligation to make the company look good (which skaters do), and that employee does something that’s frowned upon to where the company being associated with them starts to look bad just by being associated with them, then it’d probably be in the company owner’s best interest in accepting some sort of responsibility in addressing it, thus making it a part of their job.

r.g.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Rep: -2
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #329 on: January 21, 2026, 12:12:50 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I don't think it's fair to put that on company owners, otherwise Rocco, Rick & Mike, Templeton, Reynolds etc would all be in that spot being overly responsible for their employees.
[close]
Company owners being responsible for their employees? It's almost as if they'd have to do their jobs! That's a big ask.
[close]

So if you're hired as an electrician, your boss can give you shit about your trespassing and damaging property as a skateboarder? Should they get arrested if you do?
[close]
If a company owner has an employee who has a public presence (which pro skaters do), and that skater has an obligation to make the company look good (which skaters do), and that employee does something that’s frowned upon to where the company being associated with them starts to look bad just by being associated with them, then it’d probably be in the company owner’s best interest in accepting some sort of responsibility in addressing it, thus making it a part of their job.

Out of curiosity, when you watch Video Days and there's Guy Mariano as a little kid with a 40 Oz. who is responsible for the legal fallout?

What if we take it out of skate, should Joseph Deangelo's (The Golden State Killer) direct bosses have been arrested and prosecuted next to him?