Author Topic: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread  (Read 127395 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mallie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 617
  • Rep: 228
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #630 on: February 20, 2026, 06:36:10 AM »
Ah, yes, he didn't pretend to be a victim. Just an acquaintance of a victim. Fair play to ol elongated testicles.
Chi vive in baracca, chi suda il salario,
Chi ruba pensioni, chi ha scarsa memoria,
Chi ha crisi interiori, chi scava nei cuori,
Chi legge la mano, chi regna sovrano,
Chi suda, chi lotta, chi mangia una volta,
Chi gli manca la casa, chi vive da solo,
Chi trova scontato, chi come ha trovato...

Donkey Lips

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 8644
  • Rep: 965
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #631 on: February 20, 2026, 07:44:43 AM »
My friend sent me an this chat with RobertILoveRomanPolanksiBrink

https://streamable.com/g9o41w

He is soooooooo stupid. Joa says in the video that jamie thomas sent him the emails. its mind boggling how dumb this guy is

abusing a communications channel set up for victims by pretending to be a victim. classy and well-adjusted move. seems like the type to lie about having cancer or an illness just so he can get attention from support groups.

Greg Lurkzka

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
  • Rep: 49
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #632 on: February 20, 2026, 09:44:32 AM »
My friend sent me an this chat with RobertILoveRomanPolanksiBrink

https://streamable.com/g9o41w

He is soooooooo stupid. Joa says in the video that jamie thomas sent him the emails. its mind boggling how dumb this guy is

Hahaha

Nope

Nope

Nopw

Mr. Jax Taylor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
  • Rep: 69
  • The no. 1 guy on this messageboard
    • Mr. Jax Taylor avatar image
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #633 on: February 20, 2026, 09:47:26 AM »
In His Defense Rob Is Not Pretending, He 100% Thinks He Is A Victim Of Something
"Dark Waters" on Amazon.


Nanda Zinger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 657
  • Rep: 59
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #634 on: February 20, 2026, 02:25:31 PM »
Has Longballs made any statement or comment after GH's video?
He made a post saying that its been the hardest few days of his life since the GH video dropped, but that he is still going.

Lou Strux

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 6930
  • Rep: 3444
  • The Swede is down at Venice Beach; shove off!
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #635 on: February 20, 2026, 02:59:13 PM »
Expand Quote
Has Longballs made any statement or comment after GH's video?
[close]
He made a post saying that its been the hardest few days of his life since the GH video dropped, but that he is still going.
🎻🎻🎻

I wanna play you in a game of SKATE for the right to continue talking shit on me… You think you got me?

southkook

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Rep: -17
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #636 on: February 20, 2026, 03:45:20 PM »
My friend sent me an this chat with RobertILoveRomanPolanksiBrink

https://streamable.com/g9o41w

He is soooooooo stupid. Joa says in the video that jamie thomas sent him the emails. its mind boggling how dumb this guy is

So Rob admits he sent the emails, but now claims he was “sending them on behalf of a victim”. But in his emails he claimed to be the victim themselves.

Dude was caught in a lie. Clearly Jamie knew that the emails were from rob (and now rob has admitted that they were). So in no way would a reasonable person conclude that Jamie is guilty of breaching the trust of a confidential claim because he himself knew (or had grounds to believe) that claim was falsified - hence any claim of confidentiality would be void(?).

If anything, I (being a foreigner with no real knowledge of US law) would hypothesise that Rob is attempting to bring about some form of legal entrapment because he is using fabricated claims or false representations with the aim of causing someone else to commit a crime or otherwise perceived illegal act.

Even if his claim is true and he is in contact with victims, why is his counsel to them that they should email some shitty skateboard brand’s email inbox instead of contacting local law enforcement? It’s because it’s about pursuing his own interests and attention seeking.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2026, 09:05:41 PM by southkook »

TheWineClub

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1082
  • Rep: -36
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #637 on: February 20, 2026, 04:11:06 PM »
My friend sent me an this chat with RobertILoveRomanPolanksiBrink

https://streamable.com/g9o41w

He is soooooooo stupid. Joa says in the video that jamie thomas sent him the emails. its mind boggling how dumb this guy is

Wow, just wow. So now there's proof of him admitting that he was the one to email Jamie "on behalf of the victims" and when called out on it he's still going on an on about Jamie being the problem all along and we need to focus on him ignoring the allegations with Dane and Cole. For fucking sakes Rob you ignorant narcissistic prick, you want to talk about ignoring? There's a fucking 2 hour video of stuff you are ignoring right now and you have only talked about 2 things from it and in both of those you didn't apologize and gave us a "oh well" ass response. Stop trying to act like you can go back to normal and go on your bullshit crusade, you have a mountain of of topics you need to focus on that YOU are clearly purposely ignoring. Just fucking apologize already holy shit, you would think giving a sincere genuine apology is this guys kryptonite or something.

Boldengullcow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Rep: -15
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #638 on: March 06, 2026, 01:04:50 PM »
Why was Joa’s no one video removed?

Seemed like Joa backed up everything he said about no one.

It pisses me off to see no one gloating about it on his stories when he makes career out of digging up dirt on folks but apparently you can’t expose his past.

doorpanel

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
  • Rep: -140
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #639 on: March 06, 2026, 01:11:46 PM »
It's time to stop this "no one" filter. 

ROB uses SEO against everyone, so why are we letting all this be unsearchable for him on Google?
We're protecting ROB by doing this, and it needs to stop.

Boldengullcow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Rep: -15
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #640 on: March 06, 2026, 01:12:45 PM »
Not sure what that means can you elplain… I’m 48

Abyss1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4919
  • Rep: 410
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #641 on: March 06, 2026, 01:13:35 PM »
It's time to stop this "no one" filter. 

ROB uses SEO against everyone, so why are we letting all this be unsearchable for him on Google?
We're protecting ROB by doing this, and it needs to stop.

nah keep it, i lol at it everytime

r.g.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Rep: -2
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #642 on: March 06, 2026, 02:53:55 PM »
Expand Quote
It's time to stop this "no one" filter. 

ROB uses SEO against everyone, so why are we letting all this be unsearchable for him on Google?
We're protecting ROB by doing this, and it needs to stop.
[close]

nah keep it, i lol at it everytime

A change to longballs or Dick Racy or private browneye would make me chuckle.

GoneWithTheSchwinn

  • OG
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1258
  • Rep: -9974
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #643 on: March 06, 2026, 06:04:56 PM »
Long Balls.


BLACK LIVES MATTER
FUCK 12

"Watch out or the gazpacho police will get you!"

Hqjdncm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
  • Rep: 42
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #644 on: March 06, 2026, 06:35:55 PM »
Why was Joa’s no one video removed?

Seemed like Joa backed up everything he said about no one.

It pisses me off to see no one gloating about it on his stories when he makes career out of digging up dirt on folks but apparently you can’t expose his past.

I have a feeling he was able to get it copyright striked for either the weekend buzz stuff or maybe somehow his own blog stuff

Meathook

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
  • Rep: 136
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #645 on: March 06, 2026, 06:54:47 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Not reading through this to see if it’s been posted, but from my source at Zero, Dane lost his warehouse gig or whatever and his visa was based on being employed to skate. Deadass Chris Cole’s ex wife called ICE on this man.
[close]
Dane Sucks But THis Sucks Too..SO Does no one Calling For His Deportation Unsolicited
[close]

God i really want to believe you are actually Jax Taylor so badly.
[close]
True but we all know the only skated on VPR was tom Schwartz. (I’m married that’s why I know this)
[close]

I'm married too and not ashamed to admit i love the original VPR. I've seen Tom Schwartz kickflip.
[close]
I quote stassi to my wife constantly.

“I am the devil, and don’t you forget it”

Sorry to reply 4 pages back, my worlds really collided with this. 

Sandwich Marty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 925
  • Rep: 202
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #646 on: March 06, 2026, 07:19:33 PM »
Expand Quote
Why was Joa’s no one video removed?

Seemed like Joa backed up everything he said about no one.

It pisses me off to see no one gloating about it on his stories when he makes career out of digging up dirt on folks but apparently you can’t expose his past.
[close]

I have a feeling he was able to get it copyright striked for either the weekend buzz stuff or maybe somehow his own blog stuff

100% this is what happened. Long balls probably contacted someone who had access to the old ride channel YT and they went through the channels to have a copyright strike imposed. If anyone saved the video you should just make some burner YT accounts and upload it. Keep long balls busy chasing copyright claims for years to come while the video keeps circulating.

Dwayne Hoover

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1316
  • Rep: -120
  • Owner of an unusually large penis
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #647 on: March 06, 2026, 07:33:07 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why was Joa’s no one video removed?

Seemed like Joa backed up everything he said about no one.

It pisses me off to see no one gloating about it on his stories when he makes career out of digging up dirt on folks but apparently you can’t expose his past.
[close]

I have a feeling he was able to get it copyright striked for either the weekend buzz stuff or maybe somehow his own blog stuff
[close]

100% this is what happened. Long balls probably contacted someone who had access to the old ride channel YT and they went through the channels to have a copyright strike imposed. If anyone saved the video you should just make some burner YT accounts and upload it. Keep long balls busy chasing copyright claims for years to come while the video keeps circulating.
it says "video down due to a copyright request by robert no one" when you click the link, not ride channel. it was probably the old blog posts, although i think all of those would be protected by the fair use doctrine when push comes to shove

Sandwich Marty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 925
  • Rep: 202
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #648 on: March 06, 2026, 07:43:24 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why was Joa’s no one video removed?

Seemed like Joa backed up everything he said about no one.

It pisses me off to see no one gloating about it on his stories when he makes career out of digging up dirt on folks but apparently you can’t expose his past.
[close]

I have a feeling he was able to get it copyright striked for either the weekend buzz stuff or maybe somehow his own blog stuff
[close]

100% this is what happened. Long balls probably contacted someone who had access to the old ride channel YT and they went through the channels to have a copyright strike imposed. If anyone saved the video you should just make some burner YT accounts and upload it. Keep long balls busy chasing copyright claims for years to come while the video keeps circulating.
[close]
it says "video down due to a copyright request by robert no one" when you click the link, not ride channel. it was probably the old blog posts, although i think all of those would be protected by the fair use doctrine when push comes to shove

He probably has some kind of ownership over the ride clips in that case. I believe It’s harder to get something taken down that’s outside of YouTube but if you even screengrab a corner of a video that already exists on YT and use it without permission you can get a strike.

r.g.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Rep: -2
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #649 on: March 06, 2026, 07:52:30 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why was Joa’s no one video removed?

Seemed like Joa backed up everything he said about no one.

It pisses me off to see no one gloating about it on his stories when he makes career out of digging up dirt on folks but apparently you can’t expose his past.
[close]

I have a feeling he was able to get it copyright striked for either the weekend buzz stuff or maybe somehow his own blog stuff
[close]

100% this is what happened. Long balls probably contacted someone who had access to the old ride channel YT and they went through the channels to have a copyright strike imposed. If anyone saved the video you should just make some burner YT accounts and upload it. Keep long balls busy chasing copyright claims for years to come while the video keeps circulating.
[close]
it says "video down due to a copyright request by robert no one" when you click the link, not ride channel. it was probably the old blog posts, although i think all of those would be protected by the fair use doctrine when push comes to shove
[close]

He probably has some kind of ownership over the ride clips in that case. I believe It’s harder to get something taken down that’s outside of YouTube but if you even screengrab a corner of a video that already exists on YT and use it without permission you can get a strike.

It's probably in respect to the alt email accounts that he was contacting GH from, trying to act like it wasn't him.

Btw, Rob "i should've had Sky Ferraira's parents approve the article" has since deleted that interview from his site.

ice nine

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 8517
  • Rep: -308
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #650 on: March 06, 2026, 11:53:35 PM »
My friend sent me an this chat with RobertILoveRomanPolanksiBrink

https://streamable.com/g9o41w

He is soooooooo stupid. Joa says in the video that jamie thomas sent him the emails. its mind boggling how dumb this guy is

reup?
I;m sure i;m not the only dc/monster/subaru type guy here

Magnolia

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1106
  • Rep: 953
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #651 on: March 07, 2026, 04:33:21 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Why was Joa’s no one video removed?

Seemed like Joa backed up everything he said about no one.

It pisses me off to see no one gloating about it on his stories when he makes career out of digging up dirt on folks but apparently you can’t expose his past.
[close]

I have a feeling he was able to get it copyright striked for either the weekend buzz stuff or maybe somehow his own blog stuff
[close]

100% this is what happened. Long balls probably contacted someone who had access to the old ride channel YT and they went through the channels to have a copyright strike imposed. If anyone saved the video you should just make some burner YT accounts and upload it. Keep long balls busy chasing copyright claims for years to come while the video keeps circulating.
[close]
it says "video down due to a copyright request by robert no one" when you click the link, not ride channel. it was probably the old blog posts, although i think all of those would be protected by the fair use doctrine when push comes to shove
[close]

He probably has some kind of ownership over the ride clips in that case. I believe It’s harder to get something taken down that’s outside of YouTube but if you even screengrab a corner of a video that already exists on YT and use it without permission you can get a strike.

Youtube's copyright protection system is very vulnerable to false takedowns (even by people who don't hold the copyright) and they make it very difficult to appeal these decisions
what quality posts do you have under your umbrella son of a bitch


Billy Bitchcakes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2543
  • Rep: 713
  • Q U I T E S T Y L I S H
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #652 on: March 09, 2026, 09:42:29 AM »
It's time to stop this "no one" filter. 

ROB uses SEO against everyone, so why are we letting all this be unsearchable for him on Google?
We're protecting ROB by doing this, and it needs to stop.

It started because every time someone would mention his name it would magically summon him to start his 20 page thread derailments like some sort of annoying wizard. I think we're long past that point now but it's still funny

Meathook

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
  • Rep: 136
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #653 on: March 18, 2026, 07:43:03 PM »
So what’s good with the candlestick maker?  He went private on IG.  This thread is on the 3rd page.  I don’t follow him on insta is he still posting?

GH deleted the video from his channel before I could watch it, but I watched the whole rip someone else uploaded.  Anyone know why he deleted it?  Was the lawyer friend thing actually true and pressured GH?  Who snitched on GH to noone

I’m deep in this hole, I need to know more how this plays out in real time.

Dwayne Hoover

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1316
  • Rep: -120
  • Owner of an unusually large penis
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #654 on: March 18, 2026, 07:48:00 PM »
So what’s good with the candlestick maker?  He went private on IG.  This thread is on the 3rd page.  I don’t follow him on insta is he still posting?

GH deleted the video from his channel before I could watch it, but I watched the whole rip someone else uploaded.  Anyone know why he deleted it?  Was the lawyer friend thing actually true and pressured GH?  Who snitched on GH to noone

I’m deep in this hole, I need to know more how this plays out in real time.
rob filed some bogus copyright strikes and got it taken down but not before almost 200k people saw it. he called it "libelous" and seemingly assumed everyone who saw it would develop collective amnesia after the video was removed but all he's done so far is streisand himself. pretty sure GH said he would fight the copyright charges but i can't say for certain what's going on with it

edit: he also took down the articles blog posts he self-published excusing his self-admitted sexual assault and roman polanski fantasies with a literal child

skinnyankles

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
  • Rep: -91
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #655 on: March 18, 2026, 09:38:34 PM »
Fuck you and your lack of accountabity Long Balls.

I hope you read this and remember how whack and disliked you are. Why don't you come off private and open your comments up???

Did you unfollow everyone you think doesn't like you? Looks like you unfollowed tons of people, loser. Here's some news for you. No one likes you. You got more unfollowing to do.

Gray Imp Sausage Metal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 15947
  • Rep: 603
  • We're just 2 lo(b)s(t)ers sitting behind a screen
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #656 on: March 18, 2026, 10:36:30 PM »
*whispers* It's been re-upped to YouTube though

Impish sausage is definitely gonna blow up as a euphemism this year

Noble Experiment

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 545
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #657 on: March 20, 2026, 09:49:40 AM »
If they actually do end up going to court then Joa needs to go wearing an American flag suit, just like Afroman.

Noble Experiment

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 545
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #658 on: March 20, 2026, 09:53:50 AM »
If they actually do end up going to court then Joa needs to go wearing an American flag suit, just like Afroman.

alien porkchop

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1091
  • Rep: 194
Re: The Jamie Thomas & Dane Burman Thread
« Reply #659 on: March 20, 2026, 01:02:49 PM »
if they were to go to court of a youtube copyright removal request that would be outlandish and i would expect it to be televised.
“Oh boy lemme post a link to an IG story that only exists for 24 hours that will likely be deleted 47 seconds after it was posted!”

SCREENSHOTS PEOPLE HOLY FUCK.