Author Topic: Changes under Trump 2.0  (Read 188630 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

MusclesMarinara

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1349
  • Rep: -175
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #390 on: January 31, 2025, 09:03:01 PM »
another fucking crash wtf?!

Let's see what disrespect Trump will put on the victims and how he's going to blame everyone else....

Plane crash was a medical flight for a little girl who had just completed treatment at a children’s hospital in Philly. You guys trying to pin this or put some type of political spin on it are fucked. A little girl and countless other innocent people just lost their lives. Stop letting Trump live rent free in your fucking heads.
Alex Olson never had the makings of a varsity athlete.

Atiba Applebum

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 20726
  • Rep: 528
  • Slap’s Resident Jeron Wilson!
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #391 on: January 31, 2025, 09:26:36 PM »
Expand Quote
another fucking crash wtf?!

Let's see what disrespect Trump will put on the victims and how he's going to blame everyone else....
[close]

Plane crash was a medical flight for a little girl who had just completed treatment at a children’s hospital in Philly. You guys trying to pin this or put some type of political spin on it are fucked. A little girl and countless other innocent people just lost their lives. Stop letting Trump live rent free in your fucking heads.


Trump was the one who made it political, fuck-o, by suggesting DEI hires within the FAA caused the first flight - and that includes people with physical disabilities like missing limbs or being little person

IWANNABEABIGDOG

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
  • Rep: 60
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #392 on: February 01, 2025, 03:54:37 AM »
I’ve been here for 7 years the medication don’t work I hate this place.

brycickle

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 6415
  • Rep: 285
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #393 on: February 01, 2025, 09:03:51 AM »
Expand Quote
Anyone taking medical advice from RFK needs Jesus.
[close]

Jesus was too woke. Empathy is a sign of weakness

Not GOP Jesus!


 You and the D00D have turned this thread into a horrible head-on-collision between a short bus full of regular kids and a van full of paraplegics.



Plan9Customs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2372
  • Rep: 1186

TastyBurrito

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3199
  • Rep: 951
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #395 on: February 01, 2025, 12:22:38 PM »
Funny that the UAW was for Biden and his fight for unions and all the moron MAGATs who were in the UAW were for Trump. Now they’re going to have to live knowing they voted for a KNOWN union buster.


Rusty Shackleford

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1157
  • Rep: 171
  • you know about goretex?
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #396 on: February 01, 2025, 12:55:17 PM »
https://aflcio.org/press/releases/afl-cio-president-trump-and-musk-are-greedy-bosses-laughing-workers-livestream

we were warned that these two were shitbags
I didn't think alot of the union guys would so readily vote against their own best interests but here we are

L33Tg33k

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5984
  • Rep: 862
  • F.A.P. - Forever Alone Party
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #397 on: February 01, 2025, 01:02:52 PM »
Funny that the UAW was for Biden and his fight for unions and all the moron MAGATs who were in the UAW were for Trump. Now they’re going to have to live knowing they voted for a KNOWN union buster.
They’re not going to blame Trump for union busting. Somehow it’ll be Obama’s fault.
Before you say the music sucked, have you considered shutting the fuck up?

myfeetarekillingme

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
  • Rep: 164
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #398 on: February 01, 2025, 01:57:03 PM »
Expand Quote
Funny that the UAW was for Biden and his fight for unions and all the moron MAGATs who were in the UAW were for Trump. Now they’re going to have to live knowing they voted for a KNOWN union buster.
[close]
They’re not going to blame Trump for union busting. Somehow it’ll be Obama’s fault.

They’ve been voting against their own interests and blaming democrats/socialism for the outcome for 50 years. Ain’t shit gonna change and in fact it’s only gonna continue getting worse in our post truth society

noxiousPond

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
  • Rep: 34
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #399 on: February 01, 2025, 03:03:49 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Funny that the UAW was for Biden and his fight for unions and all the moron MAGATs who were in the UAW were for Trump. Now they’re going to have to live knowing they voted for a KNOWN union buster.
[close]
They’re not going to blame Trump for union busting. Somehow it’ll be Obama’s fault.
[close]

They’ve been voting against their own interests and blaming democrats/socialism for the outcome for 50 years. Ain’t shit gonna change and in fact it’s only gonna continue getting worse in our post truth society

I always find it so pathetic and hilarious when political people just blame the last president all the time. Yea as if 4 or 8 years really made that much of a difference vs the last 100+ years since the Industrial Revolution where capitalism and greed has slowly been destroying this country. It’s pathetic. It’s always the blame game with them. They wouldn’t k ow accountability if it fucked them in the ass.
quit beers. picked up a board. now I damage the outside of my body

h00man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4429
  • Rep: 259
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #400 on: February 01, 2025, 08:07:24 PM »
Expand Quote
another fucking crash wtf?!

Let's see what disrespect Trump will put on the victims and how he's going to blame everyone else....
[close]

Plane crash was a medical flight for a little girl who had just completed treatment at a children’s hospital in Philly. You guys trying to pin this or put some type of political spin on it are fucked. A little girl and countless other innocent people just lost their lives. Stop letting Trump live rent free in your fucking heads.

maybe keep up with the news, moron.
Being a slap pal is a zero accomplishment

TheLurper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4165
  • Rep: 962
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #401 on: February 02, 2025, 01:28:50 AM »
The tariffs and the counter tariffs begin.

One good idea that Canada had was to tariff Tesla at 100%. They need to do this and drop all BYD tariffs to zero. Musk is afraid of BYD and Canada and Europe dropping tariffs would be a huge threat to Musk.
https://globalnews.ca/news/10992959/donald-trump-tariffs-canada-feb-1/

Europe is next
https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-war-eu-tariffs-mexico-canada/

I imagine Xi and Putin and Ali Khamenei are all rock hard right now. They can't believe the coalition that has kept them in check is falling apart in front of them. This is the biggest gift we could give all the countries that hate us.

I wonder who will get free money this time? Probably none of us.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/14/donald-trump-coronavirus-farmer-bailouts-359932


Air safety also likely to improve. Less air traffic controllers is good, right?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-admin-emails-air-traffic-controllers-quit-your-jobs/
« Last Edit: February 02, 2025, 01:42:30 AM by TheLurper »

Quote from: ChuckRamone
I love when people bring up world hunger. It makes everything meaningless.
"That guy is double parked."
"Who cares? There are people starving to death! Besides, how does that affect you? Does it lessen the joy of parking?

backside_reacharound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 856
  • Rep: -372
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #402 on: February 02, 2025, 02:10:58 AM »
https://www.thenerdreich.com/reboot-project-2025-peter-thiel-and-right-wing-san-francisco-2/

Fuck all of this, it's about time for the real ones amongst us to get brackin' here soon...

botefdunn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4881
  • Rep: 1256
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #403 on: February 02, 2025, 02:57:04 AM »
"In the yeeeear 25-25"

WashingtonNECKTIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2059
  • Rep: 472
  • Precision Posture
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #404 on: February 02, 2025, 12:16:10 PM »
Muskrat now has access to US Treasury payment systems.

Fox is in the henhouse and the farmer was taken behind the shed
Wow sorry, didn't realise I was dealing with a sick cunt here

G raham

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1008
  • Rep: -50
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #405 on: February 02, 2025, 03:16:53 PM »
i believe trump says therell be inflation in the immediate future but whats the science on how tarrifs are for the greater good in the long run? explain it like im, say, a video game addicted 14 year old
Well guys, there's nothing better than getting out there and skateboarding. - Shane O'Neill.

pistachio

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
  • Rep: -12
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #406 on: February 02, 2025, 08:29:54 PM »
i believe trump says therell be inflation in the immediate future but whats the science on how tarrifs are for the greater good in the long run? explain it like im, say, a video game addicted 14 year old

Most economists urged against tariffs from the standpoint of them being a net negative. I’d tend to agree with skilled economists over the failed businessman turned weird politician that panders to the generally uneducated.

I believe Trump’s process here was to revert back to a pre-1913 era when income taxes didn’t exist and tariff taxes funded what income tax did. Not only is that absurd to assume that spending would equate to something like tax on all income, but the tariffs are set to begin on the 4th, yet as far as I know, there’s zero plan to prevent paying tax on my income, so it’s imbalanced in the short term and a “putting the cart before the horse” plan. This will likely result in higher prices with less disposable income, and it may negatively affect the job market as a whole.

Additionally, I think he claims that these tariffs will shift production back into the hands of Americans, but the reality there is that warehouses don’t get built overnight and they surely don’t get staffed overnight. Also, Americans aren’t really known for their proclivity towards cheap and fast labor, and with his conjunctive scorched earth policy on immigration, it may just end up with a bunch of empty warehouses and no employees to do the jobs—there’s a reason why Nike doesn’t stock Oregon with a bunch of warehouses and make all of their shoes in their own backyard.

Also, everything I just said only looks at the United States since that’s where these taxes will be paid. Likely, what these tariffs will additionally do is deconstruct a historical trade relationship that America has had with Canada—I haven’t looked into the trade agreements we’ve had with Mexico and China but I don’t think we were on great terms with China, maybe someone else knows better. I expect that Canadian purchasers will actively avoid American made products when they can, if for nothing else than principle, rightfully so. This means that as a country, we’ll probably sell fewer of the goods that we’re known to sell to Canada, further damming our economy. Trudeau has already urged Canadians to be strategic with their dollar and to avoid what’s clearly labeled as American-made, citing things like Florida orange juice and Kentucky bourbon, amongst others. It’ll also probably make the rest of the world view us as entitled little crybabies, again, rightfully so.

The obvious is that exports from Canada, Mexico, and China will now cost us more money, so I think both long and short term, you can expect to pay more for things like Modelo, lumber, steel, various fruits and vegetables, etc. There’s a chance that the companies themselves may shoulder this added cost in the beginning to prevent a loss of sales, but that only lasts for so long and I think as a whole, everyone has a pretty sour taste in their mouth about America and this choice, so I won’t be shocked if that sympathy doesn’t exist for American consumers or the company’s own sales.

In a study across 151 countries from the years 1963-2014, it was found “that tariff increases are associated with an economically and statistically sizeable and persistent decline in output growth. Thus, fears that the ongoing trade war may be costly for the world economy in terms of foregone output growth are justified.” (Here it is: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7255316/#:~:text=The%20findings%20suggest%20that%20tariffs,following%20an%20increase%20in%20protectionism.)

Another possibility that’s based on nothing other than me assuming the worst with the ultra-wealthy is that when the economy does take a shit, those with wealth can buy things up for pennies on the dollar. Think real estate companies buying property during the 2008 housing crash.

Ideally, we don’t need to consider the effects we may or may not have after four years, based on the hope that we don’t replace Trump with someone who’s as big of a megalomaniac or as immune to taking everything into consideration before a decision like he is.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2025, 08:42:52 PM by pistachio »

Atiba Applebum

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 20726
  • Rep: 528
  • Slap’s Resident Jeron Wilson!
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #407 on: February 02, 2025, 08:51:13 PM »
Expand Quote
i believe trump says therell be inflation in the immediate future but whats the science on how tarrifs are for the greater good in the long run? explain it like im, say, a video game addicted 14 year old
[close]

Most economists urged against tariffs from the standpoint of them being a net negative. I’d tend to agree with skilled economists over the failed businessman turned weird politician that panders to the generally uneducated.

I believe Trump’s process here was to revert back to a pre-1913 era when income taxes didn’t exist and tariff taxes funded what income tax did. Not only is that absurd to assume that spending would equate to something like tax on all income, but the tariffs are set to begin on the 4th, yet as far as I know, there’s zero plan to prevent paying tax on my income, so it’s imbalanced in the short term and a “putting the cart before the horse” plan. This will likely result in higher prices with less disposable income, and it may negatively affect the job market as a whole.

Additionally, I think he claims that these tariffs will shift production back into the hands of Americans, but the reality there is that warehouses don’t get built overnight and they surely don’t get staffed overnight. Also, Americans aren’t really known for their proclivity towards cheap and fast labor, and with his conjunctive scorched earth policy on immigration, it may just end up with a bunch of empty warehouses and no employees to do the jobs—there’s a reason why Nike doesn’t stock Oregon with a bunch of warehouses and make all of their shoes in their own backyard.

Also, everything I just said only looks at the United States since that’s where these taxes will be paid. Likely, what these tariffs will additionally do is deconstruct a historical trade relationship that America has had with Canada—I haven’t looked into the trade agreements we’ve had with Mexico and China but I don’t think we were on great terms with China, maybe someone else knows better. I expect that Canadian purchasers will actively avoid American made products when they can, if for nothing else than principle, rightfully so. This means that as a country, we’ll probably sell fewer of the goods that we’re known to sell to Canada, further damming our economy. Trudeau has already urged Canadians to be strategic with their dollar and to avoid what’s clearly labeled as American-made, citing things like Florida orange juice and Kentucky bourbon, amongst others. It’ll also probably make the rest of the world view us as entitled little crybabies, again, rightfully so.

The obvious is that exports from Canada, Mexico, and China will now cost us more money, so I think both long and short term, you can expect to pay more for things like Modelo, lumber, steel, various fruits and vegetables, etc. There’s a chance that the companies themselves may shoulder this added cost in the beginning to prevent a loss of sales, but that only lasts for so long and I think as a whole, everyone has a pretty sour taste in their mouth about America and this choice, so I won’t be shocked if that sympathy doesn’t exist for American consumers or the company’s own sales.

In a study across 151 countries from the years 1963-2014, it was found “that tariff increases are associated with an economically and statistically sizeable and persistent decline in output growth. Thus, fears that the ongoing trade war may be costly for the world economy in terms of foregone output growth are justified.” (Here it is: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7255316/#:~:text=The%20findings%20suggest%20that%20tariffs,following%20an%20increase%20in%20protectionism.)

Another possibility that’s based on nothing other than me assuming the worst with the ultra-wealthy is that when the economy does take a shit, those with wealth can buy things up for pennies on the dollar. Think real estate companies buying property during the 2008 housing crash.

Ideally, we don’t need to consider the effects we may or may not have after four years, based on the hope that we don’t replace Trump with someone who’s as big of a megalomaniac or as immune to taking everything into consideration before a decision like he is.


Term 1 hero: Andrew Jackson
term 2 hero: William McKinley

Too Frank To Fred

  • Guest
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #408 on: February 02, 2025, 09:55:48 PM »
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-trump-column-read.html

If you want to understand the first few weeks of the second Trump administration, you should listen to what Steve Bannon told PBS’s “Frontline” in 2019:

Steve Bannon: The opposition party is the media. And the media can only, because they’re dumb and they’re lazy, they can only focus on one thing at a time. …

All we have to do is flood the zone. Every day we hit them with three things. They’ll bite on one, and we’ll get all of our stuff done. Bang, bang, bang. These guys will never — will never be able to recover. But we’ve got to start with muzzle velocity. So it’s got to start, and it’s got to hammer, and it’s got to —

Michael Kirk: What was the word?

Bannon: Muzzle velocity.
Muzzle velocity. Bannon’s insight here is real. Focus is the fundamental substance of democracy. It is particularly the substance of opposition. People largely learn of what the government is doing through the media — be it mainstream media or social media. If you overwhelm the media — if you give it too many places it needs to look, all at once, if you keep it moving from one thing to the next — no coherent opposition can emerge. It is hard to even think coherently.

Donald Trump’s first two weeks in the White House have followed Bannon’s strategy like a script. The flood is the point. The overwhelm is the point. The message wasn’t in any one executive order or announcement. It was in the cumulative effect of all of them. The sense that this is Trump’s country now. This is his government now. It follows his will. It does what he wants. If Trump tells the state to stop spending money, the money stops. If he says that birthright citizenship is over, it’s over.

Or so he wants you to think. In Trump’s first term, we were told: Don’t normalize him. In his second, the task is different: Don’t believe him.
ADVERTISEMENT
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Trump knows the power of marketing. If you make people believe something is true, you make it likelier that it becomes true. Trump clawed his way back to great wealth by playing a fearsome billionaire on TV; he remade himself as a winner by refusing to admit he had ever lost. The American presidency is a limited office. But Trump has never wanted to be president, at least not as defined in Article II of the U.S. Constitution. He has always wanted to be king. His plan this time is to first play king on TV. If we believe he is already king, we will be likelier to let him govern as a king.

Don’t believe him. Trump has real powers — but they are the powers of the presidency. The pardon power is vast and unrestricted, and so he could pardon the Jan. 6 rioters. Federal security protection is under the discretion of the executive branch, and so he could remove it from Anthony Fauci and Mike Pompeo and John Bolton and Mark Milley and even Brian Hook, a largely unknown former State Department official under threat from Iran who donated time to Trump’s transition team. It was an act of astonishing cruelty and callousness from a man who nearly died by an assassin’s bullet — as much as anything ever has been, this, to me, was an X-ray of the smallness of Trump’s soul — but it was an act that was within his power.

But the president cannot rewrite the Constitution. Within days, the birthright citizenship order was frozen by a judge — a Reagan appointee — who told Trump’s lawyers, “I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar would state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order. It just boggles my mind.” A judge froze the spending freeze before it was even scheduled to go into effect, and shortly thereafter, the Trump administration rescinded the order, in part to avoid the court case.

Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter  Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
What Bannon wanted — what the Trump administration wants — is to keep everything moving fast. Muzzle velocity, remember. If you’re always consumed by the next outrage, you can’t look closely at the last one. The impression of Trump’s power remains; the fact that he keeps stepping on rakes is missed. The projection of strength obscures the reality of weakness. Don’t believe him.

You could see this a few ways: Is Trump playing a part, making a bet or triggering a crisis? Those are the options. I am not certain he knows the answer. Trump has always been an improviser. But if you take it as calculated, here is the calculation: Perhaps this Supreme Court, stocked with his appointees, gives him powers no peacetime president has ever possessed. Perhaps all of this becomes legal now that he has asserted its legality. It is not impossible to imagine that bet paying off.
Editors’ Picks


I Love You. Please Find Someone Else.


‘A Well-Dressed Man Sitting Across From Me Was Drawing With a Pencil’

Americans Feel Isolated. Imani Perry Wants to Help Them Connect.
ADVERTISEMENT
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

But Trump’s odds are bad. So what if the bet fails and his arrogations of power are soundly rejected by the courts? Then comes the question of constitutional crisis: Does he ignore the court’s ruling? To do that would be to attempt a coup. I wonder if they have the stomach for it. The withdrawal of the Office of Management and Budget’s order to freeze spending suggests they don’t. Bravado aside, Trump’s political capital is thin. Both in his first and second terms, he has entered office with approval ratings below that of any president in the modern era. Gallup has Trump’s approval rating at 47 percent — about 10 points beneath Joe Biden’s in January 2021.

There is a reason Trump is doing all of this through executive orders rather than submitting these same directives as legislation to pass through Congress. A more powerful executive could persuade Congress to eliminate the spending he opposes or reform the civil service to give himself the powers of hiring and firing that he seeks. To write these changes into legislation would make them more durable and allow him to argue their merits in a more strategic way. Even if Trump’s aim is to bring the civil service to heel — to rid it of his opponents and turn it to his own ends — he would be better off arguing that he is simply trying to bring the high-performance management culture of Silicon Valley to the federal government. You never want a power grab to look like a power grab.

But Republicans have a three-seat edge in the House and a 53-seat majority in the Senate. Trump has done nothing to reach out to Democrats. If Trump tried to pass this agenda as legislation, it would most likely fail in the House, and it would certainly die before the filibuster in the Senate. And that would make Trump look weak. Trump does not want to look weak. He remembers John McCain humiliating him in his first term by casting the deciding vote against Obamacare repeal.

That is the tension at the heart of Trump’s whole strategy: Trump is acting like a king because he is too weak to govern like a president. He is trying to substitute perception for reality. He is hoping that perception then becomes reality. That can only happen if we believe him.

The flurry of activity is meant to suggest the existence of a plan. The Trump team wants it known that they’re ready this time. They will control events rather than be controlled by them. The closer you look, the less true that seems. They are scrambling and flailing already. They are leaking against one another already. We’ve learned, already, that the O.M.B. directive was drafted, reportedly, without the input or oversight of key Trump officials — “it didn’t go through the proper approval process,” an administration official told The Washington Post. For this to be the process and product of a signature initiative in the second week of a president’s second term is embarrassing.
ADVERTISEMENT
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

But it’s not just the O.M.B. directive. The Trump administration is waging an immediate war on the bureaucracy, trying to replace the “deep state” it believes hampered it in the first term. A big part of this project seems to have been outsourced to Elon Musk, who is bringing the tactics he used at Twitter to the federal government. He has longtime aides at the Office of Personnel Management, and the email sent to nearly all federal employees even reused the subject line of the email he sent to Twitter employees: “Fork in the Road.” Musk wants you to know it was him.

The email offers millions of civil servants a backdoor buyout: Agree to resign and in theory, at least, you can collect your paycheck and benefits until the end of September without doing any work. The Department of Government Efficiency account on X described it this way: “Take the vacation you always wanted, or just watch movies and chill, while receiving your full government pay and benefits.” The Washington Post reported that the email “blindsided” many in the Trump administration who would normally have consulted on a notice like that.

I suspect Musk thinks of the federal work force as a huge mass of woke ideologues. But most federal workers have very little to do with politics. About 16 percent of the federal work force is in health care. These are, for instance, nurses and doctors who work for the Veterans Affairs department. How many of them does Musk want to lose? What plans does the V.A. have for attracting and training their replacements? How quickly can he do it?

The Social Security Administration has more than 59,000 employees. Does Musk know which ones are essential to operations and unusually difficult to replace? One likely outcome of this scheme is that a lot of talented people who work in nonpolitical jobs and could make more elsewhere take the lengthy vacation and leave government services in tatters. Twitter worked poorly after Musk’s takeover, with more frequent outages and bugs, but its outages are not a national scandal. When V.A. health care degrades, it is. To have sprung this attack on the civil service so loudly and publicly and brazenly is to be assured of the blame if anything goes wrong.

What Trump wants you to see in all this activity is command. What is really in all this activity is chaos. They do not have some secret reservoir of focus and attention the rest of us do not. They have convinced themselves that speed and force is a strategy unto itself — that it is, in a sense, a replacement for a real strategy. Don’t believe them.
ADVERTISEMENT
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

I had a conversation a couple months ago with someone who knows how the federal government works about as well as anyone alive. I asked him what would worry him most if he saw Trump doing it. What he told me is that he would worry most if Trump went slowly. If he began his term by doing things that made him more popular and made his opposition weaker and more confused. If he tried to build strength for the midterms while slowly expanding his powers and chipping away at the deep state where it was weakest.

But he didn’t. And so the opposition to Trump, which seemed so listless after the election, is beginning to rouse itself.

There is a subreddit for federal employees where  one of the top posts reads: “This non ‘buyout’ really seems to have backfired. I’ll be honest, before that email went out, I was looking for any way to get out of this fresh hell. But now I am fired up to make these goons as frustrated as possible.” As I write this, it’s been upvoted more than 39,000 times and civil servant after civil servant is echoing the initial sentiment.

In Iowa this week, Democrats flipped a State Senate seat in a district that Trump won easily in 2024. The attempted spending freeze gave Democrats their voice back, as they zeroed in on the popular programs Trump had imperiled. Trump isn’t building support; he’s losing it. Trump isn’t fracturing his opposition; he’s uniting it.

This is the weakness of the strategy that Bannon proposed and Trump is following. It is a strategy that forces you into overreach. To keep the zone flooded, you have to keep acting, keep moving, keep creating new cycles of outrage or fear. You overwhelm yourself. And there’s only so much you can do through executive orders. Soon enough, you have to go beyond what you can actually do. And when you do that, you either trigger a constitutional crisis or you reveal your own weakness.
ADVERTISEMENT
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Trump may not see his own fork in the road coming. He may believe he has the power he is claiming. That would be a mistake on his part — a self-deception that could doom his presidency. But the real threat is if he persuades the rest of us to believe he has power he does not have.

The first two weeks of Trump’s presidency have not shown his strength. He is trying to overwhelm you. He is trying to keep you off-balance. He is trying to persuade you of something that isn’t true. Don’t believe him.

Gnarfunkell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Rep: 224
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #409 on: February 03, 2025, 06:23:52 AM »
Just sitting here hoping I don't lose my job that I thoroughly enjoy especially because it helps regular people (federal aid grant peer review is what I do).

Some of the networks we need were taken down without warning and so now we're sort of just waiting in limbo.

Shit sucks.

Jim and Dan

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3301
  • Rep: 953
  • Twenty-six Conversions in A.D. 46
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #410 on: February 03, 2025, 07:06:59 AM »
"In the yeeeear 25-25"

You're pretty good lookin'!

But in all seriousness, none of this is lookin' good...
Roll for Rusty, Frip, Dapple and Tate

"My boiz better take my body, and boardslide me down the fucking bridge, in San Francisco"

Sincerity

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Rep: 43
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #411 on: February 03, 2025, 08:32:24 AM »
Thank you for posting that transcript, Too Frank to Fred. It's a good reminder that chaos is their strategy. I've been feeling overwhelmed, which is what they want. I need to resolve not to be their victim.

JoseCansnake0

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
  • Rep: -105
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #412 on: February 03, 2025, 10:00:00 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
another fucking crash wtf?!

Let's see what disrespect Trump will put on the victims and how he's going to blame everyone else....
[close]

Plane crash was a medical flight for a little girl who had just completed treatment at a children’s hospital in Philly. You guys trying to pin this or put some type of political spin on it are fucked. A little girl and countless other innocent people just lost their lives. Stop letting Trump live rent free in your fucking heads.
[close]

maybe keep up with the news, moron.

You are a such a tool. I think you need to stop watching the news, it's poising your head.

Also,
You all getting spoon fed a comfortable place.

h00man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4429
  • Rep: 259
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #413 on: February 03, 2025, 12:06:40 PM »
I’ve been lurking through this thread here and there. Is there anybody in this whole thread that’s pro trump?

I’m definitely not but I’m a little surprised it seems there is no one here riding trumps dick.

Yeah, this guy


You are a such a tool. I think you need to stop watching the news, it's poising your head.

Also,

I forgot you exist.


Being a slap pal is a zero accomplishment

JoseCansnake0

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
  • Rep: -105
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #414 on: February 03, 2025, 12:13:39 PM »
Expand Quote
I’ve been lurking through this thread here and there. Is there anybody in this whole thread that’s pro trump?

I’m definitely not but I’m a little surprised it seems there is no one here riding trumps dick.
[close]

Yeah, this guy

Expand Quote


You are a such a tool. I think you need to stop watching the news, it's poising your head.

Also,
[close]


I forgot you exist.

What makes this even more gratifying, is that you're dead wrong. i'm not a supporter in any way. i just think you're a kook and you need to be reminded of that on a skateboard forum

« Last Edit: February 03, 2025, 12:26:26 PM by JoseCansnake0 »
You all getting spoon fed a comfortable place.

h00man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4429
  • Rep: 259
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #415 on: February 03, 2025, 12:54:18 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’ve been lurking through this thread here and there. Is there anybody in this whole thread that’s pro trump?

I’m definitely not but I’m a little surprised it seems there is no one here riding trumps dick.
[close]

Yeah, this guy

Expand Quote


You are a such a tool. I think you need to stop watching the news, it's poising your head.

Also,
[close]


I forgot you exist.
[close]

What makes this even more gratifying, is that you're dead wrong. i'm not a supporter in any way. i just think you're a kook and you need to be reminded of that on a skateboard forum

whatever you say, Mr. Trump supporter.
Being a slap pal is a zero accomplishment

Monolithic Flick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
  • Rep: 58
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #416 on: February 03, 2025, 03:30:38 PM »

augustmoon

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4576
  • Rep: 889
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #417 on: February 03, 2025, 04:52:19 PM »
Just sitting here hoping I don't lose my job that I thoroughly enjoy especially because it helps regular people (federal aid grant peer review is what I do).

Some of the networks we need were taken down without warning and so now we're sort of just waiting in limbo.

Shit sucks.

In a similar boat.  “Resign” emails are increasing daily and getting more threatening.  Management has their heads up their asses as usual.  Half expecting to see our parking garage blocked by cops when I get to work every morning.  Friday should be interesting. 

Fun times
Quote
Fuck brandon biebel... The lemon thrower

TheLurper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4165
  • Rep: 962
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #418 on: February 03, 2025, 05:13:59 PM »
Expand Quote
Just sitting here hoping I don't lose my job that I thoroughly enjoy especially because it helps regular people (federal aid grant peer review is what I do).

Some of the networks we need were taken down without warning and so now we're sort of just waiting in limbo.

Shit sucks.
[close]

In a similar boat.  “Resign” emails are increasing daily and getting more threatening.  Management has their heads up their asses as usual.  Half expecting to see our parking garage blocked by cops when I get to work every morning.  Friday should be interesting. 

Fun times

I'm sorry you both have to deal with this shit. Government jobs often pay so little compared to private jobs, the trade is supposed to be a sense of accomplishment/of helping society and a bit of job security.

It sucks that Peter Thiels child demon's are out there trying to cut people's jobs.

Quote from: ChuckRamone
I love when people bring up world hunger. It makes everything meaningless.
"That guy is double parked."
"Who cares? There are people starving to death! Besides, how does that affect you? Does it lessen the joy of parking?

Gnarfunkell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Rep: 224
Re: Changes under Trump 2.0
« Reply #419 on: February 03, 2025, 05:29:50 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Just sitting here hoping I don't lose my job that I thoroughly enjoy especially because it helps regular people (federal aid grant peer review is what I do).

Some of the networks we need were taken down without warning and so now we're sort of just waiting in limbo.

Shit sucks.
[close]

In a similar boat.  “Resign” emails are increasing daily and getting more threatening.  Management has their heads up their asses as usual.  Half expecting to see our parking garage blocked by cops when I get to work every morning.  Friday should be interesting. 

Fun times
[close]

I'm sorry you both have to deal with this shit. Government jobs often pay so little compared to private jobs, the trade is supposed to be a sense of accomplishment/of helping society and a bit of job security.

It sucks that Peter Thiels child demon's are out there trying to cut people's jobs.

It's a mess really. Hoping some adults step to the table soon.