Expand Quote
Hey gravel pitch, did you intentionally ignore my explaination of how it absolutely is possible for it to be first degree murder out of ignorance, or would you prefer not to address the obvious fact that it could be based on what I am saying? He didn't have to know anything about Oscar Grant for it to be premeditated. If a guy goes out to a public square armed to the teeth and starts massacring people, its 1st degree- even f he had no idea who his victims were. He planned on going to that square and kill whoever was there, so its premeditated. Its very possible this cop wante to work in the ghetto so he could wear a badge and kill whoever he wanted? You don't know shit about this situation, but you defend the murderer. And why are you defending a cop who is obviously either corrupt or incompetent, and either way unfit for the job? Why do you defend a man in a situation you obviously know nothing about, Don't call other people on here stupid, because its willfull ignorance on the behalf of people like you that lets peop;e get away with doing evil. You care more about the cop than the people of Oakland. Sorry, but I am one of the people of Oakland, and the police need to be fixed here.
so your saying he became a cop so he could kill random people without the fear of retribution? and on this specific night he went out thinking he was going to shoot someone? even if this were the case(which is unlikely) it would be hard to prove unless he told someone his intentions beforehand.
Your missed my point entirely.
My point is, you came out all matter-of-factly talking about how there is no way he could be charged with first degree murder, and then actually referenced a TV show (Law and Order) as the place where you get your knowledge of the court system. My point is, there are a thousand different reasons this could have been first degree murder, and to say in such certain terms that it can not be first degree murder is untrue for countless reasons.
I don't see any purpose to come up with all sorts of reasons that a murderer who killed an innocent man shouldn't be arrested and tried.
Oh, and before you come up with "just manslaughter," 99% of the time a person is killed violently they arrest you for 1st degree murder, and in the trial decide your intent.
THIS COP NEEDS TO BE ARRESTED AND TRIEDIn all reality, the police would look a lot better if the guy did get arrested. It would tell everybody that this is not the standard, and this is not acceptable. By not arresting him they virtually say that they don't care- and that is the problem.
If he is innocent as you say, it will come up at the trial. If not, then justice will be served. Either way, there is absolutely nothing to lose by trying him, and a lot to lose if they don't.
Oh, and that was a cute comment about "teaching kids this stuff," its become the standard generic insult to me whenever things get political. Usually I let it go, but this time it is particularly weak. Did you miss the part where I told you that the shooting occured in the community that I teach in? What do I have to teach these kids about police brutality when shit like this happens in their own neighborhood? They are far more frightened and angry than me. Look at the coverage of the riots, its high school kids doing it. Trust me, they teach me far more about what happens in their neighborhood than I could ever teach them.
And to say that believing that there is police overuse of force is equivalent to flouride water conspiracy theories is quite a stretch. You really think that all police are knights in shining armor and that they never abuse power? Police corruption has been something that has existed since police have, and them using excessive force is so common they have a special department called "internal affairs" that is supposed to keep them in line. Since
Please note, that while you only argued about me, calling me stupid and ignorant and paranoid and all that, while basically ignoring every point I had, I stuck to facts, and attacked your arguments, not your mindset.
Rightcoast- was it possible it was at a yellow house at 11th and willow? If so those guys are friends of mine! A couple of them skate. I actually live with one of them, they got evicted from the spot a month ago. They were fucking crazy in that house though, a lot of hallucinogens and art and music and shit. Super fun place to hang out.
And yeah, living in the Ghetto has its positives as well as negatives. On one side, very few people care what you do, on the other side, very few people care what happens to you. Its insane, but awesome too.
I drove down 8th past willow and campbell today, and there are just all sorts of people lurking there by the market, and you did live across from Campbell Village. I think your old house is an open lot or some boarded up abandoned building now.
And with the "disband the bart police" argument, nobody is arguing that police shouldn't be on Bart or in stations, as many people have brought up, some aren't the safest places to be. What people are saying is that local law enforcement that is accountable to the people should be there instead.
Others say to keep bart police, but to reform it so that there is more accountability.