Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
the f4 93a wear insanely fast if they are being used in the streets. It is not fun to have your wheels be a different size every other time you step on your board. i lost at least 1mm per week on each set i had, only skating 3-4 days a week. had to quit buying them and switch to bones/powell. i was hoping spitfire had plans to put out the 93s in shapes that have more urethane on them to begin with, but it sounds like that is not happening. best formula otherwise but not worth it.
That's why I got 55s =D I assumed I'd be down 2-3mm pretty quick!
yeah wearing them down to a sweet spot was appealing to me at first, but its like u blink and the sweet spot is gone and ur rattling around on tiny wheels. at least with the 93s on crust. im genuinely bummed to be back on dragons. maybe they will make an x97 omega because that would go. marketing aglorithms give us f4 99a multicolored lockin full, when a 93a lockin full would unlock spots and expand the landscape of street skating. speaks to a lack of vision beyond making money. props to FOS for going for it with the wide boi wheels. I wish snot had the formulas to match the quality of those shapes.
As per post above, I wonder if the reformulated 97s in the Radial Full 58 mm size would work for you.
Worth trying or not?
https://www.35thave.com/shop/Skate/Wheels/Spitfire/p/Spitfire-Formula-Four-Radial-Full-97a-58mm-x66945095.htm
I appreciate your concideration upon reading my post. I am not in the market for "99a lite". I already made that expensive mistake by gambling on the Omega wheels, which are up for grabs if anyone is interested.
Its funny because Spitfire initially released the Radial Full in 99a, after the developement and release of f4 97a in smaller shapes. Spitfire then proceded to drag their feet on applying the 97a durometer to the Radial Full for so long that they were outpaced by the powell/bones releases.
They are doing the same shit all over again. By the time they release 93a "full" shapes, they will have been outpaced by other companies. A repeat of what happened with the initial radial full 97a releases. I switched directly from several sets of 97a Conical Fulls to dragons, and i never even got the opportunity to skate a Radial Full, because Spitfire was so slow to release the 97a version, despite Radial Full+97a being a brain dead obvious combo at the time. Its a shame because Radial Full was an innoviative shape. Spitfire is repeating the same mistakes with 93a, and it is disappointing to watch.
I would love to see Spitfire paving the way. They have the formulas and the shapes, but Spitfire is consitently outpaced by powell/bones due to their hesitance to embrace the potential of their own product. Shit is regressive and not forward thinking. They must be using "predictive" sales algorithms instead of their own noggins.
Imagine Chris Athens, or T-Funk, on 93a Radial Fulls. They would be unstoppable. The spots would be uncharted and disgusting, and the speed would be unmatched. shit would inspire.
Spitfire needs to recognize and embrace the moment. They have the opportunity to lead the way and expand what is possible in street skateboarding.