Author Topic: Spitfire formula four  (Read 1059559 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

swongolianbbq

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1191
  • Rep: 416
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7920 on: October 29, 2025, 06:51:27 PM »
I think you're right about the formula fours always having that same shape

Yeah that 37 measurement was what I was talking about!

I saw the measurements in the new catalog and was like uhhh and dug up that pic of my f4's from earlier this year

They for sure wear into a great shape, which is why I'm psyched on the 93a 60s cause they'll get there that much faster! Really though I'm gonna get the 56s and wear em down to about 50

Hqjdncm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
  • Rep: 41
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7921 on: October 30, 2025, 02:58:01 PM »
So wanted to share that I got those 53mm classic fulls and my crooks are doing much better. I honestly don’t feel like I’m falling out of grinds either. I haven’t skated a classic wheel shape is like 10 years. Have only ridden conical shapes. And I gotta say I think I bought into a trend that did not help me at all. And my treflips are coming back.

swongolianbbq

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1191
  • Rep: 416
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7922 on: October 30, 2025, 03:14:04 PM »
So wanted to share that I got those 53mm classic fulls and my crooks are doing much better. I honestly don’t feel like I’m falling out of grinds either. I haven’t skated a classic wheel shape is like 10 years. Have only ridden conical shapes. And I gotta say I think I bought into a trend that did not help me at all. And my treflips are coming back.

Similar experience all around for me. The benefits outweigh the drawbacks for me on a ~53mm classic/bighead

If I have to keep a wheel around to "unlock" a fucked up spot, it'll be 56mm classic 93a

When the radials wear in the edge is just too sharp for me. The classics wear down and still skate similar enough/the change is slow enough to get used to

rawbertson.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 11155
  • Rep: 1108
  • yo yo, yo yo yo yo
    • my youtube avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7923 on: October 31, 2025, 06:41:29 AM »
classics are just the best for doing the largest variety of tricks in general imo, the wide shapes are only good for a smaller set of specific tricks i would say. like if you are just 5050ing a rail it really doesnt even matter, so you can just ride whatever complete square shape. the overarching benefit of those type of wheels imo is you handle the terrain on the roll up a little better so your feet dont vibrate out of place as easily. its more of a nice toward" absolute street" or "advanced user" wheel in that sense. if you are just skating at perfect spots / plaza skateparks all the time, then you should 100% be riding classics. i think maybe some park skaters use the fatter tread wheels, i actually now am really curious what gear Tom Schaar, Jimmy Wilkins, Cory Juneau, Pedro Barros etc. use

FrAnKenFrEd

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7924 on: October 31, 2025, 08:47:48 AM »
I'm on some Radial Full 56s right now and I won't get them again. For a 99 they smash through rough terrain with ease, they feel great locking into curbs and coping but they are just too bulky and I am someone who typically likes bulky equipment. I have not done a satisfactory flip trick in weeks (I suck though).  I am also old, heavy and like loose trucks and there is too much contact patch for my brand of sloppy landing wheelbite. I'll probably stick to Radials, Classics, OG classics and the mythical Classic Full (when we are grand with the occasional drop).

DarkPools

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2083
  • Rep: 605
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7925 on: November 01, 2025, 08:27:47 PM »
classics are just the best for doing the largest variety of tricks in general imo, the wide shapes are only good for a smaller set of specific tricks i would say. like if you are just 5050ing a rail it really doesnt even matter, so you can just ride whatever complete square shape. the overarching benefit of those type of wheels imo is you handle the terrain on the roll up a little better so your feet dont vibrate out of place as easily. its more of a nice toward" absolute street" or "advanced user" wheel in that sense. if you are just skating at perfect spots / plaza skateparks all the time, then you should 100% be riding classics. i think maybe some park skaters use the fatter tread wheels, i actually now am really curious what gear Tom Schaar, Jimmy Wilkins, Cory Juneau, Pedro Barros etc. use

Even on smooth, perfect plaza skate parks stuff,  classics kinda suck (to me) because if something is too waxed, you just slip out of every grind you try to lock in on. The squarer shaped wheels offset that noticeably and lock in better.

Classics seem like they're only good if you only do flip tricks and simple Slappies. If you do any ATV kind of skating, Classics begin to under perform in all those areas, imo. At the larger sizes 54 + I'd say they suck less.

Granted, I'm kind of a Classic shape hater from all brands  that offer this shape because they just look.... wrong. They've also never felt reliable to me in the past when skating them
IN
THAT
ORDER

Super Champion Fun Zone
Circa 'It's Time'

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7594
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7926 on: November 01, 2025, 09:08:04 PM »
Expand Quote
classics are just the best for doing the largest variety of tricks in general imo, the wide shapes are only good for a smaller set of specific tricks i would say. like if you are just 5050ing a rail it really doesnt even matter, so you can just ride whatever complete square shape. the overarching benefit of those type of wheels imo is you handle the terrain on the roll up a little better so your feet dont vibrate out of place as easily. its more of a nice toward" absolute street" or "advanced user" wheel in that sense. if you are just skating at perfect spots / plaza skateparks all the time, then you should 100% be riding classics. i think maybe some park skaters use the fatter tread wheels, i actually now am really curious what gear Tom Schaar, Jimmy Wilkins, Cory Juneau, Pedro Barros etc. use
[close]

Even on smooth, perfect plaza skate parks stuff,  classics kinda suck (to me) because if something is too waxed, you just slip out of every grind you try to lock in on. The squarer shaped wheels offset that noticeably and lock in better.

Classics seem like they're only good if you only do flip tricks and simple Slappies. If you do any ATV kind of skating, Classics begin to under perform in all those areas, imo. At the larger sizes 54 + I'd say they suck less.

Granted, I'm kind of a Classic shape hater from all brands  that offer this shape because they just look.... wrong. They've also never felt reliable to me in the past when skating them



It is a funny thing, but I had some almost brand new OG Classics that someone tried and didn't want, so I put them on a board and had a session today.  They just felt too skinny, too sharp on the edge and nothing seemed to work for me.

I put back on some older Conical Full wheels I had rounded off quite a bit and they just felt like home, as did some Classics that I had taken down a few mm, which I tried after that.  Both wider and had a good surface area to sit on, but also still had some nicely rounded edges on them, compared to the OG Classics.

Then tried some new Classics, untouched and they felt pretty good but as you said, they were just a little slippery feeling and sometimes were almost too quick getting on and off things, so it is interesting to try all those different options in one session on the same stuff and see how different they all felt.

These were all 55 mm in (original) size too, so I don't know if that also changes how things will feel or go.  I had previously tested almost all the shapes in 52 mm sizes, from new or at least in the same original size and shape, even if they were not new, with much the same results - a wider and semi round wheel skated way better for me than an asymmetrical wheel, a sharp edge wheel or a very round wheel.

From new (and unchanged) it was Radial all day for me, then everything else after that.  It is just one of those things - some people love Classics and nothing else, others ride Tablets, others ride Conical, etc.  Some will be a little more open to everything, or not really have one shape they will always stick with.

I would be rounding down Classics into slightly smaller, wider and still round profile wheels more than anything else though, at least 55 mm on 8.38 boards, but also 56 mm feel pretty good to me on 8.5 sized boards, then bigger again on larger boards, as I like wheels that match the size of the boards.


* This could probably also go in the Madness thread, but I think there is enough going on in there right now.

Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

Llewellyn Moss

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 432
  • Rep: 75
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7927 on: November 02, 2025, 06:26:55 AM »
Now I'm questioning what I thought was a good compromise, going from my current 54mm CFs to 52mm, to try to axe the ghost pop I'm getting, and opting for OG Classics for the new wheels. Based on sizing and all the reviews I've watched, people like OGs even if they aren't a super popular wheel. And because the OGs seem to be more similar to CFs than any other shape.

But the two were really that much different in your experience?

(As for Classics, can agree they're too skinny and sharp on the edge and too quick in getting on/off things, specifically for grinds on round rails/coping. Not to mention the lack of stability compared to wider shapes.)

moonordie

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7348
  • Rep: 8
  • ɹǝʌǝɹoɟ lloᴚ
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7928 on: November 02, 2025, 10:59:13 AM »
OG classics perform really similar to CF in my experience.
So far my wheel shape quest started with Classics which I loved and not I dislike greatly. From there CF, OG classics, CF again, Radial, radial full which I'm currently on and I love.
Sir, I'm going to politely, but firmly, ask you and your common sense to leave this establishment.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7594
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7929 on: November 02, 2025, 04:09:52 PM »
Now I'm questioning what I thought was a good compromise, going from my current 54mm CFs to 52mm, to try to axe the ghost pop I'm getting, and opting for OG Classics for the new wheels. Based on sizing and all the reviews I've watched, people like OGs even if they aren't a super popular wheel. And because the OGs seem to be more similar to CFs than any other shape.

But the two were really that much different in your experience?

(As for Classics, can agree they're too skinny and sharp on the edge and too quick in getting on/off things, specifically for grinds on round rails/coping. Not to mention the lack of stability compared to wider shapes.)



It really is just personal opinion.

I skated with a couple of guys last week who swear by mid sized OG Classics now - 54, 55 or 56 mm sizes - they like them because they are thinner (and lighter) yet they have a wide enough riding surface for what they want.

Also I was doing my test yesterday on 55 mm wheels, which might not have helped.  Anything in 52 mm is very much more the "standard" size and did make some things way easier in general.  In 52 mm there is not a whole lot of difference, not like the bigger sizes anyway.

For anything flat ground or having to get your board off the ground to get on to whatever obstacle, smaller wheels, easier pop, even tightening trucks just a little as Moonordie said - it all helps, sometimes more than anyone might think.

Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

tangar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2081
  • Rep: 55
  • THINK LESS
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7930 on: November 02, 2025, 08:18:04 PM »
OK fuckers, I tried the new 93s (shout out 144p and 35th). Side by side with old 93s even! right out of the box they felt like 97s. I've skated multiple sets of 97s and thought they were pretty close to the perfect wheel (once I broke in the second set of t-funks and they started to slide). I'm going to try and talk about things that are more objective rather than subjective because DUH.

New set is 93 54 radial fulls. the new 93s started barking super quick, I try not to power slide too much on new wheels but nose slides and sketchy landings to power slide are common for me. new jawns were barking within minutes, while my old set of 93 54 classics still has that flat hiss on powerslides, even trying to put weight into em. I had no issues with new ones sliding and didn't feel a reduction in speed on slappy crooks. I'll try to do some powerslides side by side with 97s and the old 93s next sesh for better comparison.

the new 93s bounced less when just dropping the front of the board down compared to the old 93 classics. the two boards I was skating are very different in concave and stuff, new 93s felt better popping, judging from the bounce test that could mean the older bouncier feeling 93s were popping worse for me. which would make sense. but it also could have been the deck on the older 93s just popping different.

the ground at our main curb spot is rough as fuck. I've definitely noticed 93s and 97s both taking a beating over the last year or whatever. new 93s were no different. but I wonder since they "feel" more like 97s to me, will they wear down a little bit slower?

hopefully that random YouTuber will test the hardness with the second batches of 97 and 93 against 99s, cause that shit was interesting. 



« Last Edit: November 02, 2025, 08:27:09 PM by tangar »
Man the long board truck thing killed indy for me. I was willing to set aside the racism, but long boarding, gtfo... - DH

texasplant

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 472
  • Rep: 134
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7931 on: November 02, 2025, 08:35:14 PM »
OK fuckers, I tried the new 93s (shout out 144p and 35th). Side by side with old 93s even! right out of the box they felt like 97s. I've skated multiple sets of 97s and thought they were pretty close to the perfect wheel (once I broke in the second set of t-funks and they started to slide). I'm going to try and talk about things that are more objective rather than subjective because DUH.

New set is 93 54 radial fulls. the new 93s started barking super quick, I try not to power slide too much on new wheels but nose slides and sketchy landings to power slide are common for me. new jawns were barking within minutes, while my old set of 93 54 classics still has that flat hiss on powerslides, even trying to put weight into em. I had no issues with new ones sliding and didn't feel a reduction in speed on slappy crooks. I'll try to do some powerslides side by side with 97s and the old 93s next sesh for better comparison.

the new 93s bounced less when just dropping the front of the board down compared to the old 93 classics. the two boards I was skating are very different in concave and stuff, new 93s felt better popping, judging from the bounce test that could mean the older bouncier feeling 93s were popping worse for me. which would make sense. but it also could have been the deck on the older 93s just popping different.

the ground at our main curb spot is rough as fuck. I've definitely noticed 93s and 97s both taking a beating over the last year or whatever. new 93s were no different. but I wonder since they "feel" more like 97s to me, will they wear down a little bit slower?

hopefully that random YouTuber will test the hardness with the second batches of 97 and 93 against 99s, cause that shit was interesting.

Are you referring to the “old” 97s? I haven’t personally owned or skated the “new” version so I’m trying to know what to expect.

FatGuy92

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1754
  • Rep: 677
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7932 on: November 02, 2025, 08:40:10 PM »
OK fuckers, I tried the new 93s (shout out 144p and 35th). Side by side with old 93s even! right out of the box they felt like 97s. I've skated multiple sets of 97s and thought they were pretty close to the perfect wheel (once I broke in the second set of t-funks and they started to slide). I'm going to try and talk about things that are more objective rather than subjective because DUH.

the new 93s bounced less when just dropping the front of the board down compared to a setup I had on old 93 54 classics. New set is 93 54 radial fulls. the new 93s also started barking super quick, I try not to power slide too much on new wheels but nose slides and sketchy landings to power slide are common for me. new jawns were barking within minutes, my old set of classics still has that flat hiss on powerslides, even trying to put weight into em.

the two boards I was skating are very different in concave and stuff, new 93s felt better popping, judging from the bounce test that could mean the older bouncier feeling 93s were popping worse for me. which would make sense. but it also could have been the deck on the older 93s just popping different.

the ground at our main curb spot is rough as fuck. I've definitely noticed 93s and 97s both taking a beating over the last year or whatever. new 93s were no different. but I wonder since they "feel" more like 97s to me, will they wear down a little bit slower?

hopefully that random YouTuber will test the hardness with the second batches of 97 and 93 against 99s, cause that shit was interesting.

I must be pretty far behind.. DLX changed the 93s? Thanks for the review though! I was thinking of switching my wheels up, but I’ll just stick to 99s lol

swongolianbbq

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1191
  • Rep: 416
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7933 on: November 02, 2025, 11:11:57 PM »
If you were testing 93a classics 1 to 1, the review would have more weight but since you're comparing classics to radial fulls, I bet a lot of the differences noticed are due to the shapes

As far as I know they didn't change the 93 formula

rawbertson.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 11155
  • Rep: 1108
  • yo yo, yo yo yo yo
    • my youtube avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7934 on: November 03, 2025, 06:32:47 AM »
There was no "Old" 93 for Formula 4. All there was, was 97, 99, and 101. 93 is a new duro for F4 "Soft Sliders".

I find the new formula more bouncy than anything of the old formula.

After getting used to Old 97a (Also the T funk 60mm red radial full), i actually like it quite a bit. It feels like you can and should go faster, and have more control.

I would say the old formula is better for skateparks / perfect ground than the new formula, so unless you mostly skate bad spots over good, it doesnt make sense to ride it full time for me.

minilogoflow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
  • Rep: 23
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7935 on: November 03, 2025, 07:34:29 AM »
There was no "Old" 93 for Formula 4. All there was, was 97, 99, and 101. 93 is a new duro for F4 "Soft Sliders".

I find the new formula more bouncy than anything of the old formula.

After getting used to Old 97a (Also the T funk 60mm red radial full), i actually like it quite a bit. It feels like you can and should go faster, and have more control.

I would say the old formula is better for skateparks / perfect ground than the new formula, so unless you mostly skate bad spots over good, it doesnt make sense to ride it full time for me.

I think he meant the first run of 93's compared to the most recent drop. Seeing as the last drop was delayed due to DLX having trouble sourcing a material, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that the latest drop might feel different. I just picked up some 60 classic 93's but haven't gotten to skate them yet. I had the 58 radial from the first drop so it'll be fun to see if there's any difference in the formulas.

tangar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2081
  • Rep: 55
  • THINK LESS
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7936 on: November 03, 2025, 01:18:28 PM »
I was referring to first run of 93s as old (I had a couple sets of classics) and the new being the Simon Bannerot 93s. I don’t think the bounce or sounds of the slide would change just based on the shape. I kept it vague on the 97s, but here’s why, I first had a set of Tfunks that would not slide. Pretty sure I read here that the Delfinos were an “updated” 97, so I got some. Those slid great right out of the box. I bought another pair of t-funks (not sure if they did a second run, or if I just took more time to break those in) but they also started to slide just fine after a few sessions.
Man the long board truck thing killed indy for me. I was willing to set aside the racism, but long boarding, gtfo... - DH

FrAnKenFrEd

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7937 on: November 03, 2025, 01:36:59 PM »
I would not be surprised if the latest batch were slightly different to the OG batch of 93s.

rikki

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1649
  • Rep: 825
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7938 on: November 03, 2025, 11:59:21 PM »
If they just full-on unleashed the new duro 97 over all shapes and sizes, my world would be in harmony.

rawbertson.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 11155
  • Rep: 1108
  • yo yo, yo yo yo yo
    • my youtube avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7939 on: November 04, 2025, 01:37:28 PM »
I was referring to first run of 93s as old (I had a couple sets of classics) and the new being the Simon Bannerot 93s. I don’t think the bounce or sounds of the slide would change just based on the shape. I kept it vague on the 97s, but here’s why, I first had a set of Tfunks that would not slide. Pretty sure I read here that the Delfinos were an “updated” 97, so I got some. Those slid great right out of the box. I bought another pair of t-funks (not sure if they did a second run, or if I just took more time to break those in) but they also started to slide just fine after a few sessions.

ahhhh ok my bad, im with you now

i had first batch of 93 + the delfino 97 and skated them both for months
they are great wheels and work all around,
but on the flip side, i am using the t funk wheel right now and its working really well for me. i am just listening back to the audio on my clip and it sounds so much better and i am not having any issues getting stuck on grinds or anything.

Hqjdncm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
  • Rep: 41
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7940 on: November 04, 2025, 06:24:44 PM »
I am watching this thread daily for any more info of classic fulls dropping as I don’t have ig so I can’t see if they post anything about them. I am counting on u guys to keep my updated

Slave IV

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 712
  • Rep: 142
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7941 on: November 04, 2025, 06:51:03 PM »
I am watching this thread daily for any more info of classic fulls dropping as I don’t have ig so I can’t see if they post anything about them. I am counting on u guys to keep my updated
Don’t worry, I’ll let you know because they’ll probably drop as soon as I give up waiting for them and buying regular Classics.

gsosa

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3463
  • Rep: 393
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7942 on: November 04, 2025, 06:59:53 PM »
Expand Quote
Can anyone help me out? I'v been riding OG Classics for the past year and a half (and was riding Conicals before that). My local skateshop just got a new shipment of new wheels and there a few Radial Fulls grabbing my attention. (Just seen the photos haven't seent them physically) Can anyone compare the Radial Fulls (or radials) to OG Classics and/or Conical Fulls?

I barely flip my board so the effect on that is not that much of a concern, I really want to know what is the difference for locking in/pinching grinds. I skate a lot of tranny, and ledges so my main concern is there a huge difference when it comes to locking in/pinching grinds between a Radial/Radial Full and a Conical/Conical Full//Og classic shape?
[close]


What size wheels have you had and what size are you looking at?

I have skated most of the Radial Full shapes, but currently riding the 54 mm Radial Full, which I find works well on my 8.75 and up boards, but that is also because I do still like a good amount of truck width to grind and sit on for transition and other things.  I also have Conical Full 54 mm wheels on my 8.38 boards on 149s, or 56 mm Conical Full wheels on other 8.75 boards, 58 mm Conical Full and Radial Full wheels on 9.0 boards, for reference.

OG Classics are a pretty skinny wheel in all sizes, Conical Full about mid in medium sizes and wide in bigger sizes, but Radial Full are wider again than anything else.  It could be a bit too wide, or you could find that it is really good and you don't mind the wider wheels, like a few other people I know who do ride wider wheels on smaller boards and still make them work.

Compare:

54 mm
32.3 OG Classic
34 Conical Full
38 Radial Full

56 mm
33.6 OG Classic
36 Conical Full
39 Radial Full

58 mm
34.8 OG Classic
37 Conical Full
41 Radial Full
I was looking for 54 or 55mm. I visited a shop on the way of some errands and they had the Radial Fulls. I held them in my hand and they definitely didn't seem as wide as I was expecting them to be. I felt relieved to see that they looked wide but not as monstrous as I was expecting. I was stoked that it looked like a shape I could get and I got the Thrasher x Spitfire Radial Full 54mm.

Honestly I'm gonna ride the set of OG Classics 55mm (now around 50mm) til the end of the year but honestly the collab is what got me so determined to get that shape haha.



FrAnKenFrEd

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7943 on: November 04, 2025, 07:46:29 PM »
I am watching this thread daily for any more info of classic fulls dropping as I don’t have ig so I can’t see if they post anything about them. I am counting on u guys to keep my updated


Slave IV

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 712
  • Rep: 142
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7944 on: November 04, 2025, 09:01:13 PM »
Expand Quote
I am watching this thread daily for any more info of classic fulls dropping as I don’t have ig so I can’t see if they post anything about them. I am counting on u guys to keep my updated
[close]
Those aren’t current. Are they?…



FrAnKenFrEd

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7945 on: November 04, 2025, 09:13:12 PM »
Next drop. Very soon.

swongolianbbq

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1191
  • Rep: 416
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7946 on: November 04, 2025, 11:19:11 PM »
Hell yeah those are dope

Ok

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5751
  • Rep: 1317
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7947 on: November 05, 2025, 07:39:04 AM »
I'm on some Radial Full 56s right now and I won't get them again. For a 99 they smash through rough terrain with ease, they feel great locking into curbs and coping but they are just too bulky and I am someone who typically likes bulky equipment. I have not done a satisfactory flip trick in weeks (I suck though).  I am also old, heavy and like loose trucks and there is too much contact patch for my brand of sloppy landing wheelbite. I'll probably stick to Radials, Classics, OG classics and the mythical Classic Full (when we are grand with the occasional drop).

i bought these almost 2 years ago getting hyped on watching kader clips on big wheels, gx stuff.

i love the wheel for feeling like a wheel, and smashing over stuff. some straight tricks still work (with too much effort) rotational stuff sucks.
i cannot do the weight.
i did my best in tiny boards and tiny wheels, but then ee3 and we all could ollie better on an 8 with 60s. so yeah, i wish it made be able to switch wallie

FrAnKenFrEd

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7948 on: November 05, 2025, 08:16:58 AM »
[switch wallie

Out run that goddamn street sweeper. chill out and have a fuckin' bagel, guy.

Hqjdncm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
  • Rep: 41
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #7949 on: November 05, 2025, 05:22:13 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I am watching this thread daily for any more info of classic fulls dropping as I don’t have ig so I can’t see if they post anything about them. I am counting on u guys to keep my updated
[close]
Those aren’t current. Are they?…


[close]

The second they drop I’m buying the 56s

And where did u get that pic??? It’s not on the spit site. Their ig??