Expand Quote
Or eveyone in this thread could just man-up and use Linux. It's pretty much impossible to get a virus on Linux, but it's also extremely easy to ruin your installation if you're regular - however, it's free and easy to re-install and back-up.
You know about the concept of backin' stuff up, right?
its not impossible, its improbable because no one gives a big enough shit about Linux to bother writing viruses for it. Or do you actually think think Linux is harder to write a virus on? That line of thinking is so funny to me. Like its really some how harder to write a program or script that does harm on apple or Linux. Windows get more viruses because they are the big fish and get attacked more.
"Pretty much impossible" is a loose way of saying improbable, in common language sir. However, you're dead wrong that it's just as easy to write viruses for Linux as for Windows - Linux is an inherently much more secure operating system than Windows is. There is a system of checks and what is called permissions in Linux that limit the kind of operations a given process can do. A process can't just read and write or execute any file it wants to, unlike in Windows, without having been given explicit permission to do so by the root user - which if you aren't always logged in as - it won't get.
And scripts ain't viruses, a script is something that has to be manually executed by the the user. If you're dumb enough to run a script without looking at what it does, then you probably shouldn't use any operating system.
Also, given that Linux is open-source, and anyone can look for potential security holes, any exploit that is found is patched far quicker than the closed-source competetors.
Part of the Mac OS X is built on BSD, which is very similar to Linux, and so Macs inheret some of these security features, making them more secure than Windows as well.