Author Topic: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks  (Read 5831 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tracer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
  • Rep: -65308
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
    Silver Topic Start Silver Topic Start : Start a topic with over 5,000 replies.
    Gold Topic Start Gold Topic Start : Start a topic with over 10,000 replies.
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #30 on: May 29, 2016, 10:17:15 PM »
Chucks always looked fukkn regular. If you like to make a statement like "I'm a poor broke rebel" they're fine though

Gray Imp Sausage Metal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 15962
  • Rep: 613
  • We're just 2 lo(b)s(t)ers sitting behind a screen
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #31 on: May 29, 2016, 10:37:30 PM »
Also heard that the earth is round ...

Impish sausage is definitely gonna blow up as a euphemism this year

Chavo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1695
  • Rep: 272
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #32 on: May 30, 2016, 09:21:10 AM »
Expand Quote
Airwalk, Etnies, Vision Shoes, etc. essentially came into being because skaters were destroying their heels and knees skating jump ramps in Chucks and Vans.
[close]

Etnies, yes. Airwalk and Vision, no. Their first shoes were pretty much Vans with ollie reinforcement and / or lace protection (both brands started out with vulcanized models).
It wasn't until the Airwalk Prototype that tech was introduced into skate specific footwear. The Prototype was Airwalk's answer to the Air Jordan.

If you look at the original Vans Sk8-Hi, it didn't have suede in the ollie area. In the 80s, Vans was super slow to adapt to what skaters actually needed and were focusing on boat shoes and casual wear. This is what lead to Airwalk and Vision getting into the game.

What's up with newer Vans Hi variations without the ollie patch? Is Vans again adapting to the marketplace (i.e., non-skaters wearing skate shoes)?

Zimmer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 609
  • Rep: -9
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #33 on: May 30, 2016, 09:11:38 PM »
Also heard that the earth is round ...

But it's not, it's flat!

Gray Imp Sausage Metal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 15962
  • Rep: 613
  • We're just 2 lo(b)s(t)ers sitting behind a screen
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #34 on: May 31, 2016, 04:57:36 PM »
Expand Quote
Also heard that the earth is round ...
[close]

But it's not, it's flat!

Well it is if you're following more than 5 conspiracy theory accounts on insta ;)

Impish sausage is definitely gonna blow up as a euphemism this year

Such

  • Guest
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #35 on: June 01, 2016, 10:06:44 AM »
i rolled my ankle super bad. i have no idea how many ligaments ive torn but im guessing atleast one. im gonna need some serious ankle support when i get back. if you tie chucks as tight as you can is it still possible to roll your ankle?

Roisto

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2774
  • Rep: 486
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #36 on: June 01, 2016, 10:21:12 AM »
Yes. Having two pairs of socks on does not prevent ankle roll.

Zimmer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 609
  • Rep: -9
Re: Chuck Taylors are nothing but glorified socks
« Reply #37 on: June 06, 2016, 06:21:59 PM »
i rolled my ankle super bad. i have no idea how many ligaments ive torn but im guessing atleast one. im gonna need some serious ankle support when i get back. if you tie chucks as tight as you can is it still possible to roll your ankle?

You'll probably want some kind of minimalist ankle support. Those lace up booties with no plastic or metal shanks.