for a start i was not comparing him to picasso, i was only talking about what baconeggsandcheese was saying where he referenced picasso and was saying how just because he used to be technically good what he did later was easier... which it wasn't.
Expand Quote
IT MAY LOOK EASY BUT THAT DON'T MEAN IS.
No, it's actually easy.
If we're going to compare Pops to an artist, I think he'd be one of those guys who painted a small red triangle in the middle of a huge white canvas, & then had a bunch of people raving about how "important" it was...
Duchamp is probably the most important artist of the last century and all he did was turn a urinal upside down... and yes it was fucking important.
Basically i was trying to say how sometimes doing something that seems simple isn't always how it seems. Like this sequence of popps, it may look simple but it may be filled with little problems that you can't see.
sorry for the rant i think my post was seen as i was trying to compare Popps to one of the greatest most influencial artists of our time, to which i am not.
KrewKruxklan said it best.