Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
if you approach a ledge fakie and fakie ollie into a front tailslide, is that a fakie switch front nose or fakie fs tail?
My brain broke
If you approach the ledge with your back in fakie stance, it would be a fakie ollie to sw bs noseslide. but I think it is easier to just say fakie front tail.
I’ve been told that one cannot change his stance after popping, if you are popping from fakie you have to land on some sort of fakie trick…. Think of fakie 5-0, it’s not fakie ollie to ss nosegrind right? Altho I agree, terminology is what it is and we just have to deal with it.
Yeah you're correct. It would be a fakie tailslide not a fakie ollie to switch noseslide
What if you turned your shoulders less and your back truck landed crookedly.....and you're grinding! Now what do you call it?
Definitely not a fakie suski.....even if it's right? It's wrong...fakie 5-0? The in is right, but the description of the grind is vague...switch nollie crook? We're not doing that either? The correct answer is fakie ollie switch crook......maybe not the perfect answer...but the best one.
I have never heard anyone call that fakie ollie to switch crooks, just fakie crooks. It’s just one of the tricks where logic doesn’t work, but let’s play this. What if you can’t lock into crooked position and end up on willy position, would that be fakie smith or fakie ollie to switch willy? I know this is fucked but this is how my logic works…
That would be a fakie smith.
Fakie crook is the commonly used name, but it is actually short for fakie ollie to switch crook which is perfectly fine logically, just too much of a mouthful.
The "one cannot change his stance after popping" rule is stupid as fuck. I get the intention, but there's so many exceptions to this rule and any 180 in trick requires it by default so why even bother having this limitation.
You could call a fakie 5-0 a fakie ollie to switch nosegrind, a fakie nosegrind a fakie ollie into a switch 5-0... wouldn't be technically incorrect and makes sense logically too.
Though in these two cases fakie 5-0 and fakie nosegrind are easy and intuitive enough that there's no need to use the "fakie to switch ___" approach which only makes it unnecessarily weird and complicated.
Technically, calling the pinchy version a 'fakie suski' is correct, but it just feels off on a visceral level, so we call it fakie ollie to switch crook, which has now been shortened to fakie crook.