Author Topic: Spitfire formula four  (Read 720993 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

honey island

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2139
  • Rep: 640
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1890 on: April 22, 2019, 03:59:29 PM »
the tablet's can't come out quick enough

arrbee

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2683
  • Rep: 438
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1891 on: April 22, 2019, 05:48:35 PM »
Expand Quote
spitfire really has the formula down..
I buy wheels and two weeks later they put out a new shape I want more


curious to see the measurements vs conicals
[close]

FYI:

Radial slim:  52mm, 30 width, 18.5 riding surface 
Conical: 52mm, 31.5 width, 19.5 riding surface
Conical Full: 52mm, 32.5 width, 21.5 riding surface
Tablet: 52mm, 29mm width, 22.5 riding surface

Tablets will have the widest riding surface and the slimmest profile.  Cannot wait for them

I’m guessing 54mm, 31mm wise, 24 surface or close to that?
Quote from: DaveFuck
youre fucking FRIED if you think im gonna listen to dan corrigan talk about cariuma


rob

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1138
  • Rep: 192
  • Lance Mountain
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1892 on: April 23, 2019, 04:53:34 AM »
Not trying to offend the spitfire fans butttt...

The tablets look exactly like the same shape as a bones v2

Exactly
yes

BMCsteve

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 776
  • Rep: 55
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1893 on: April 23, 2019, 05:08:19 AM »
Not trying to offend the spitfire fans butttt...

The tablets look exactly like the same shape as a bones v2

Exactly

Much wider riding surface on the tablets.  V2 in 52mm has a riding surface of 16mm (same as spit classics)

GasTheHostage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
  • Rep: -23
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1894 on: April 23, 2019, 05:55:58 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Ive been riding f4 radial slims for a while now but recently set up f1 mike Anderson wides and they feel so nice. Since they are kinda hard to find what would be the closest shape to those in f4?

Cheers.
[close]
Conical full maybe?
My radial slims just felt really slow for me even with good bearings.
[close]



Do explain, I was considering stopping on the way home at my local to grab some radial slims.
[close]

Probably has to do with surface area.  With conical fulls, the more surface area or wheels on the ground, the faster you go.  Slims not as much.
Slims have a pretty wide surface area though. Im running them and they really aren't that slow. You sure you were using the right size? The riding area is nearly as big as a conical so I dont see why yours are slow. BTW if you wanna buy slims get them in 99a no 101a

papo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
  • Rep: -191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1895 on: April 23, 2019, 07:49:55 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Ive been riding f4 radial slims for a while now but recently set up f1 mike Anderson wides and they feel so nice. Since they are kinda hard to find what would be the closest shape to those in f4?

Cheers.
[close]
Conical full maybe?
My radial slims just felt really slow for me even with good bearings.
[close]



Do explain, I was considering stopping on the way home at my local to grab some radial slims.
[close]

Probably has to do with surface area.  With conical fulls, the more surface area or wheels on the ground, the faster you go.  Slims not as much.
[close]
Slims have a pretty wide surface area though. Im running them and they really aren't that slow. You sure you were using the right size? The riding area is nearly as big as a conical so I dont see why yours are slow. BTW if you wanna buy slims get them in 99a no 101a

Hey, whats wrong with the 101a? Just curious

Firebert

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3307
  • Rep: 230
    • Instagram avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1896 on: April 23, 2019, 07:53:01 AM »
Not trying to offend the spitfire fans butttt...

The tablets look exactly like the same shape as a bones v2

Exactly

Some of us really love that shape of wheel but prefer spits... so this is exactly what I've been waiting for. Classic fulls and Tablets like the good ol days. :D

GasTheHostage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
  • Rep: -23
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1897 on: April 23, 2019, 10:43:48 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Ive been riding f4 radial slims for a while now but recently set up f1 mike Anderson wides and they feel so nice. Since they are kinda hard to find what would be the closest shape to those in f4?

Cheers.
[close]
Conical full maybe?
My radial slims just felt really slow for me even with good bearings.
[close]



Do explain, I was considering stopping on the way home at my local to grab some radial slims.
[close]

Probably has to do with surface area.  With conical fulls, the more surface area or wheels on the ground, the faster you go.  Slims not as much.
[close]
Slims have a pretty wide surface area though. Im running them and they really aren't that slow. You sure you were using the right size? The riding area is nearly as big as a conical so I dont see why yours are slow. BTW if you wanna buy slims get them in 99a no 101a
[close]

Hey, whats wrong with the 101a? Just curious
Nothings wrong with 101a, its all personal preference. However, most people that I know that have used spitfires (especially radial slims including me) find that 99a slides a little better and has just slightly better rebound. Im not gonna stop you if you want 101a but im just giving you my advice.

Firebert

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3307
  • Rep: 230
    • Instagram avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1898 on: April 23, 2019, 01:09:55 PM »

B0udoir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Rep: 1
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1899 on: April 23, 2019, 03:23:05 PM »
I would not say that 99a slide "better", but that they are less slippery and force you to fully commit into your slide, giving you the feeling that you have more control and that it is "better".

rob

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1138
  • Rep: 192
  • Lance Mountain
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1900 on: April 23, 2019, 03:27:49 PM »
Expand Quote
Not trying to offend the spitfire fans butttt...

The tablets look exactly like the same shape as a bones v2

Exactly
[close]

Some of us really love that shape of wheel but prefer spits... so this is exactly what I've been waiting for. Classic fulls and Tablets like the good ol days. :D

I love the shape too, it really does help you lock into 50-50 and 5-0 and I like how they’re almost like classics when they’ve been ridden til they’re square but new
yes

johnes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4168
  • Rep: -238
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1901 on: April 23, 2019, 04:59:29 PM »
Expand Quote
99a slides a little better
[close]
no
Expand Quote
99a has just slightly better rebound
[close]
yes

99s slide the best/easiest for me personally.
I have had at least 7 sets of F4 99s and 3 of the F4 101s.
I have a new set of 101s I’m gonna skate eventually
« Last Edit: April 23, 2019, 05:18:47 PM by johnes »
I’m a fat Siamese cat.

jakeumms

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5381
  • Rep: 1345
  • Runnin through the house with a pickle in my mouth
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1902 on: April 24, 2019, 11:10:13 AM »
Any idea on a release date for the tablets? I need some new wheels and those look nice.
them cats are out getting mashed up to jungle, he's out mashing up jungle cats. it's just not gonna work.

papo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
  • Rep: -191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1903 on: April 24, 2019, 12:15:38 PM »
Expand Quote

[close]

Stoked!

Is there a release date yet? I hope these shits drop soon..I wanted to get the radial slim but these look fuego - while we at it, Can you really feel the difference between 99 and 101 hardness?
« Last Edit: April 24, 2019, 12:26:04 PM by papo »

bigbevev

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
  • Rep: -14
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1904 on: April 24, 2019, 01:04:37 PM »
i feel jipped i bought lock ins

GasTheHostage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
  • Rep: -23
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1905 on: April 25, 2019, 05:50:22 AM »
I would not say that 99a slide "better", but that they are less slippery and force you to fully commit into your slide, giving you the feeling that you have more control and that it is "better".
Yeah im sorry if you misunder stood that i shoulda worded it better. Yeah 99a is less slippery but honestly between that and 101a its not too much of a difference. However, I do have a little more control on 99a wheels and they also have a little better rebound. Sorry about that

LennyDLXSF

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
  • Rep: 78
  • Deluxe Customer Service
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1906 on: April 26, 2019, 01:12:21 PM »
Expand Quote

Is there a release date yet? I hope these shits drop soon..I wanted to get the radial slim but these look fuego - while we at it, Can you really feel the difference between 99 and 101 hardness?

We are currently giving samples to team riders, and affiliates, with general production starting early May!

roba

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2958
  • Rep: 791
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1907 on: April 27, 2019, 01:25:56 AM »

johnes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4168
  • Rep: -238
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1908 on: April 27, 2019, 10:37:30 AM »
The flat side of those and the lock ins look kinda bad/weird to me personally but I’ve tried every F4 shape except lock ins so idk maybe I’ll try those sometime.
I’m a fat Siamese cat.

B0udoir

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
  • Rep: 1
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1909 on: April 27, 2019, 10:45:39 AM »
They look so thin, I wonder if there is enough room to put a spacer between the bearings.

talklessSkateMore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
  • Rep: -40
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1910 on: April 27, 2019, 03:15:22 PM »
They look so thin, I wonder if there is enough room to put a spacer between the bearings.

There will be, 100%

They don't change stuff like that
it said to learn how to tie for a reason.
This is all structured as a trap.
Tied by those who know the fundamentals.

papo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
  • Rep: -191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1911 on: April 29, 2019, 11:51:48 PM »
Dimensions for the F4 Tablet:

52s have 20mm riding surface
53s have 21mm riding surface

I only asked for these two sizes Höhöhö

Update: shipping this week- doesn’t say the duro tho

« Last Edit: April 30, 2019, 03:34:35 PM by papo »

papo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
  • Rep: -191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1912 on: April 30, 2019, 03:35:16 PM »

SadandLonely

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 253
  • Rep: -30
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1913 on: April 30, 2019, 03:37:48 PM »
Can anyone describe the classic formula? I want to skate them or should I just stick with F4?

talklessSkateMore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
  • Rep: -40
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1914 on: April 30, 2019, 05:30:19 PM »
Can anyone describe the classic formula? I want to skate them or should I just stick with F4?

*pretty shitty description but the best thing I can think of is that classics feel less dense and they wear down fast.. Not really thinking about my wheels, just enjoying damaging my tail, shrinking wheels and wearing away at my truck hangers slowly over time.

I liked mine 52mm when they were new for asphalt and sidewalks. Went to the park for a few hours now I'm a dirtbike with flatspots in my 2 toeside wheels.

Imo, go 56mm or bigger classics if you want to rip through them.. Otherwise stick with f4 in your normal size to get your money's worth and stay with the "superior" offering.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2019, 05:39:28 PM by talklessSkateMore »
it said to learn how to tie for a reason.
This is all structured as a trap.
Tied by those who know the fundamentals.

SadandLonely

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 253
  • Rep: -30
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1915 on: April 30, 2019, 05:57:34 PM »
Expand Quote
Can anyone describe the classic formula? I want to skate them or should I just stick with F4?
[close]

*pretty shitty description but the best thing I can think of is that classics feel less dense and they wear down fast.. Not really thinking about my wheels, just enjoying damaging my tail, shrinking wheels and wearing away at my truck hangers slowly over time.

I liked mine 52mm when they were new for asphalt and sidewalks. Went to the park for a few hours now I'm a dirtbike with flatspots in my 2 toeside wheels.

Imo, go 56mm or bigger classics if you want to rip through them.. Otherwise stick with f4 in your normal size to get your money's worth and stay with the "superior" offering.
thank you...

Dad you're embarrassing me

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 670
  • Rep: 66
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1916 on: May 01, 2019, 02:06:02 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Can anyone describe the classic formula? I want to skate them or should I just stick with F4?
[close]

*pretty shitty description but the best thing I can think of is that classics feel less dense and they wear down fast.. Not really thinking about my wheels, just enjoying damaging my tail, shrinking wheels and wearing away at my truck hangers slowly over time.

I liked mine 52mm when they were new for asphalt and sidewalks. Went to the park for a few hours now I'm a dirtbike with flatspots in my 2 toeside wheels.

Imo, go 56mm or bigger classics if you want to rip through them.. Otherwise stick with f4 in your normal size to get your money's worth and stay with the "superior" offering.
[close]
thank you...

I find they break into a slide more gradually/ progressively/ predictably? and this inspires confidence on super slick new parks and doing speed checks on hill bombs. They do wear down fast but there’s always a compromise.

SadandLonely

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 253
  • Rep: -30
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1917 on: May 01, 2019, 08:02:40 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Can anyone describe the classic formula? I want to skate them or should I just stick with F4?
[close]

*pretty shitty description but the best thing I can think of is that classics feel less dense and they wear down fast.. Not really thinking about my wheels, just enjoying damaging my tail, shrinking wheels and wearing away at my truck hangers slowly over time.

I liked mine 52mm when they were new for asphalt and sidewalks. Went to the park for a few hours now I'm a dirtbike with flatspots in my 2 toeside wheels.

Imo, go 56mm or bigger classics if you want to rip through them.. Otherwise stick with f4 in your normal size to get your money's worth and stay with the "superior" offering.
[close]
thank you...
[close]

I find they break into a slide more gradually/ progressively/ predictably? and this inspires confidence on super slick new parks and doing speed checks on hill bombs. They do wear down fast but there’s always a compromise.
yeah they do wear down fast...

Firebert

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3307
  • Rep: 230
    • Instagram avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1918 on: May 01, 2019, 08:31:38 AM »

I really hope they screen this graphic on them.

Rocko

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
  • Rep: 39
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1919 on: May 04, 2019, 08:32:50 PM »


Another good view of the tablets