Author Topic: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted? (Read 66324 times)

pointandclick · « **Reply #60 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:50:10 AM »

Quote from: bo bice on July 10, 2019, 10:48:21 AM

Quote from: Style Police on July 10, 2019, 10:17:37 AM
Expand Quote
Jaime Thomas of business?
[close]

thrill of it all?

dying to live?

rlang · « **Reply #61 on:** July 10, 2019, 11:06:15 AM »

Quote from: graypubes on July 10, 2019, 10:16:48 AM

Quote from: rlang on July 10, 2019, 08:48:16 AM
Expand Quote
All you have to do is go to the California Secretary of state website and do an entity search, it takes 2 minutes. I did like 3 yesterday in the Caribbean. Billed a whole 6 minutes.
[close]

Don't lie, you billed an hour

shhhhhh....

rlang · « **Reply #62 on:** July 10, 2019, 11:12:39 AM »

yeah, I just checked....watched the clock it took one minute. Crossroads Movement is suspended / forfeited, so it's not offering protection. Doesn't say since when...but that's not a good thing for Jamie.

200931410118 CROSSROADS MOVEMENT, LLC

Registration Date: 11/10/2009
Jurisdiction: CALIFORNIA
Entity Type: DOMESTIC
Status: SOS/FTB SUSPENDED
Agent for Service of Process: JAMES M THOMAS
2777 LOKER AVE W STE A
CARLSBAD CA 92010
Entity Address: 2777 LOKER AVE W STE A
CARLSBAD CA 92010
Entity Mailing Address: *
LLC Management: One Manager

rlang · « **Reply #63 on:** July 10, 2019, 11:38:02 AM »

Quote from: rlang on July 10, 2019, 08:44:21 AM

That's not at all what it means. He'd just amend the caption to Isuck, dba... Garage Days, whatever... but it exposes him to personal liability, which could be very bad for him. You can also get in trouble for passing yourself off as an LLC or INC when you're not, but I'm not sure what the penalty is for that. Florida dude should have discovered all this in his due diligence before he started buying a business entity that doesn't exist.

About that. It's FRCP 17(a)(3): Joinder of the Real Party in Interest. The court may not dismiss an action for failure to prosecute in the name of the real party in interest until, after an objection, a reasonable time has been allowed for the real party in interest to ratify, join, or be substituted into the action. After ratification, joinder, or substitution, the action proceeds as if it had been originally commenced by the real party in interest.

fang · « **Reply #64 on:** July 10, 2019, 01:21:54 PM »

Quote from: tortfeasor on July 08, 2019, 07:45:09 PM

Quote from: Ayanami on July 08, 2019, 07:16:44 PM
Expand Quote
I don’t know if I’d delete a thread for a zero board and some Straye’s.
[close]

Would you do it for a mystery board from Australia signed by Chris Cole and some word art?

tension · « **Reply #65 on:** July 10, 2019, 01:26:20 PM »

way too much tiny print, what is going on?

andocom · « **Reply #66 on:** July 10, 2019, 09:15:43 PM »

Quote from: tension on July 10, 2019, 01:26:20 PM

way too much tiny print, what is going on?

yeah was hoping someone (tortfeasor) would summarise proceedings.

My read was Jamie was going to sell his Garage Days vintage decks etc business & a few other things to Florida dude, Florida dude paid up a fair bit ($50K+), then the relationship broke down and Jamie isn't giving the money back, both are now sueing each other.

From what Florida dudes docs claim it isn't looking good for Jamie, didn't spend much time on the counter suit.

Is that about right?

Rascalness · « **Reply #67 on:** July 10, 2019, 09:29:51 PM »

Have other documents been filed?

winecrab · « **Reply #68 on:** July 10, 2019, 09:38:42 PM »

Can someone please go on Instagram and ask JT what's up like a man? He's dealt with a lot of legal shit before. I don't think he's dumb enough to try to scam a lawyer out of 50k and ruin his reputation. We need to hear the whole story from no one.

links, pics, and quotes · « **Reply #69 on:** July 10, 2019, 09:41:18 PM »

links, pics, and quotes · « **Reply #70 on:** July 10, 2019, 09:42:47 PM »

links, pics, and quotes · « **Reply #71 on:** July 10, 2019, 09:46:22 PM »

Gray Imp Sausage Metal · « **Reply #72 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:04:22 PM »

life hammers!

winecrab · « **Reply #73 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:06:09 PM »

Thanks for the screenshots. This is juicy as fuck. I want more.

Chavo · « **Reply #74 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:06:31 PM »

Keep posting the pleadings, but doesn't leaking potentially inadmissible evidence violate attorney ethics?

winecrab · « **Reply #75 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:10:35 PM »

You're talking about the Chief here. It's a god damn cold war, ain't no ethics.

50mm · « **Reply #76 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:27:26 PM »

Nobody looks good in this shit.

Szechuan · « **Reply #77 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:27:53 PM »

Quote from: Chavo on July 10, 2019, 10:06:31 PM

Keep posting the pleadings, but doesn't leaking potentially inadmissible evidence violate attorney ethics?

If that's the case Wendler really is the dumbest lawyer i can recall of late. He must be a Cooley alumni.

Rascalness · « **Reply #78 on:** July 10, 2019, 10:31:30 PM »

Is Wendler actually an attorney, though, as to the California case? The notice says he’s pro se.

silhouette · « **Reply #79 on:** July 10, 2019, 11:22:17 PM »

Wait - just realized I've actually argued with that Wendler guy on the Carpet IG before. He sounded very knowledgeable about the legal status of many things Zero, to the point where I couldn't help but feel like he had some kind of personal interest in the company. Weird.

It was in the comments on this post, somewhere:

Cool Ceith · « **Reply #80 on:** July 10, 2019, 11:37:02 PM »

I find it hilarious that he named it "Crossroads" as in the legend of Robert Johnson selling his soul to the devil. Oops.

ice nine · « **Reply #81 on:** July 11, 2019, 01:21:15 AM »

what's this dudes slap screenname

links, pics, and quotes · « **Reply #82 on:** July 11, 2019, 05:03:23 AM »

Quote from: silhouette on July 10, 2019, 11:22:17 PM

Wait - just realized I've actually argued with that Wendler guy on the Carpet IG before. He sounded very knowledgeable about the legal status of many things Zero, to the point where I couldn't help but feel like he had some kind of personal interest in the company. Weird.

Francis Xavier · « **Reply #83 on:** July 11, 2019, 05:06:26 AM »

classic case of Kook vs. Kook

Donkey Lips · « **Reply #84 on:** July 11, 2019, 06:18:58 AM »

Quote from: Cool Ceith on July 10, 2019, 11:37:02 PM

I find it hilarious that he named it "Crossroads" as in the legend of Robert Johnson selling his soul to the devil. Oops.

Am I giving chief too much credit thinking he was a Bone Thugs fan

Madam, I'm Adam · « **Reply #85 on:** July 11, 2019, 06:30:43 AM »

So he defended Jamie and Zero from Carpet's "clowns" and then Jamie and Zero bite him right in the ass later on. That's weak.

Takeaway: Carpet Company is good.

Cool Ceith · « **Reply #86 on:** July 11, 2019, 06:37:40 AM »

Quote from: Adam Abbas on July 11, 2019, 06:30:43 AM

So he defended Jamie and Zero from Carpet's "clowns" and then Jamie and Zero bite him right in the ass later on. That's weak.

Takeaway: Carpet Company is good.

Carpet munched those comments.

rlang · « **Reply #87 on:** July 11, 2019, 06:52:26 AM »

Quote from: Szechuan on July 10, 2019, 10:27:53 PM

Quote from: Chavo on July 10, 2019, 10:06:31 PM
Expand Quote
Keep posting the pleadings, but doesn't leaking potentially inadmissible evidence violate attorney ethics?
[close]
If that's the case Wendler really is the dumbest lawyer i can recall of late. He must be a Cooley alumni.

No. You can do whatever you want pretty much. You'd have to argue they're trying to taint a potential jury pool or something, which isn't an issue here, on this case, on this scale, it's not even close. That's generally a crim thing anyway, I've never even see that come up in a civil trial. Admissibility doesn't have anything to do with anything until you're trying to testify or publish something to a jury.

He's pro se in California because he's not licensed to practice law in California. Everyone is entitled to represent themselves though. You can only practice in states where you're licensed / have taken the bar exam. Federal Court is easier because it's fairly uniform...exactly the same with respect to civil procedure.

Isucks' dec is weird in that it appears Crossroads is a forfeited entity...so it runs to him....but, it sounds like he wasn't individually served, so Florida dude is still going to have to do that. Still think this winds up in SoCal.

slobplant · « **Reply #88 on:** July 11, 2019, 07:44:50 AM »

hahahhaa I made it

SkatetheRipper · « **Reply #89 on:** July 11, 2019, 08:06:28 AM »

Long time lurker here...

Jesus Christ - what a roller coaster ride of a thread. As a long time fan of JT's work it's pretty shitty to read all of this. Looking forward to updates.

Author Topic: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted? (Read 66324 times)

links, pics, and quotes

links, pics, and quotes

links, pics, and quotes

links, pics, and quotes

SkatetheRipper

Cookie Preferences