Author Topic: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?  (Read 66150 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rlang

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 723
  • Rep: 22
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #240 on: August 28, 2019, 06:55:05 AM »
Civil lawsuits don't move very quickly. Surprised Fl. dude didn't file an emergency TRO / PI to get a preliminary ruling on some of this stuff quick, especially since it looks like Jamie is trying to sell the collection on Ebay right now

dooley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1460
  • Rep: 46
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #241 on: August 28, 2019, 12:59:00 PM »
All those Fallens are hideous. He's lucky a few idiots with money want to buy them based on his name.

SkatetheRipper

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #242 on: September 10, 2019, 01:28:47 PM »
Bump.

Why hasnt the LinkPicsQuotes account posted any document updates?

links, pics, and quotes

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #243 on: September 10, 2019, 10:35:42 PM »







































links, pics, and quotes

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #244 on: September 10, 2019, 11:07:01 PM »











links, pics, and quotes

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #245 on: September 10, 2019, 11:26:13 PM »













































links, pics, and quotes

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #246 on: September 12, 2019, 09:58:05 PM »





















































Gray Imp Sausage Metal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 15962
  • Rep: 613
  • We're just 2 lo(b)s(t)ers sitting behind a screen
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #247 on: September 12, 2019, 10:01:03 PM »
can't you just post the blacked out juicy stuff?
(or at least give us a TL;DR?)

Impish sausage is definitely gonna blow up as a euphemism this year

NORTHBYMIDWEST

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
  • Rep: 19
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #248 on: September 13, 2019, 06:12:01 AM »
This is the weirdest shit ever.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2019, 03:37:13 AM by SKATELYNJENNER »

SHIREFLIP

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #249 on: September 13, 2019, 07:09:19 AM »
Can you imagine going to law school for all those years just to litigate over some of JTs scribbled on decks? I would probably question all of my decisions leading up to that point, just like every young, hotshot doctor who has had to give me a rectal exam.

fakie nollie

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3403
  • Rep: 1358
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #250 on: September 13, 2019, 07:18:26 AM »
Can you imagine going to law school for all those years just to litigate over some of JTs scribbled on decks? I would probably question all of my decisions leading up to that point, just like every young, hotshot doctor who has had to give me a rectal exam.

A paycheck is a paycheck. I'd be more embarrassed to represent the guy who bought the collection.

n0torious

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
  • Rep: 185
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #251 on: September 13, 2019, 07:21:01 AM »
This is absolutely on the low end of lawyer fuckery. The legal market took a nosedive in the recession and never recovered, but law schools continue to churn out JDs to keep the money flowing. Every year, a new crop of clueless, craven goons wander into the world with a credential that carries upper class debt but only provides a middle class income. It's a bloodbath.

This is probably a best case scenario, as these two jerks are only hurting each other.

SkatetheRipper

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #252 on: September 14, 2019, 12:02:38 PM »
This is absolutely on the low end of lawyer fuckery. The legal market took a nosedive in the recession and never recovered, but law schools continue to churn out JDs to keep the money flowing. Every year, a new crop of clueless, craven goons wander into the world with a credential that carries upper class debt but only provides a middle class income. It's a bloodbath.

This is probably a best case scenario, as these two jerks are only hurting each other.

I dont have a dog in this fight so I dont give a moose's shit either way, but even if what you say is true does that give JT an excuse to try and take advantage of one of his fans who happens to be an attorney?

n0torious

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
  • Rep: 185
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #253 on: September 14, 2019, 07:34:37 PM »
I don't have a dog in this fight so I dont give a moose's shit either way, but even if what you say is true does that give JT an excuse to try and take advantage of one of his fans who happens to be an attorney?

Definitely not. Cheef is way out of pocket, but it's nice that the damage is limited to this goober. He should have known better and structured the transaction to protect himself.

whaaaaat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 465
  • Rep: 42
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #254 on: September 14, 2019, 10:03:03 PM »
This is absolutely on the low end of lawyer fuckery. The legal market took a nosedive in the recession and never recovered, but law schools continue to churn out JDs to keep the money flowing. Every year, a new crop of clueless, craven goons wander into the world with a credential that carries upper class debt but only provides a middle class income. It's a bloodbath.

This is probably a best case scenario, as these two jerks are only hurting each other.

I don’t know anything about ‘lawyer fuckery’ but I do appreciate this take.  Out of curiosity, what in particular are some of the things that come off as ‘low end fuckery’?

n0torious

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
  • Rep: 185
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #255 on: September 17, 2019, 02:45:21 PM »
I don’t know anything about ‘lawyer fuckery’ but I do appreciate this take.  Out of curiosity, what in particular are some of the things that come off as ‘low end fuckery’?

As the economy contracts, so does the legal market, just with a small delay. So as things really hit the skids around 2008, the legal market hit a death spiral around 2009. And while things ticked up a bit, the legal market never fully recovered. I don't think it ever will.

A big part of this is the drift away from billable hours. Enormous firms thrived for decades billing their top clients for as many hours as possible. Young associates served as worker bees, making a generous salary but required to clock tons of time for the client to stay on track. This system meant law school grads could expect to enter a lucrative job after graduation, which, while demanding, put them on pace to pay off their six-figure debts.

The recession changed things. Large firms were wary of taking on young associates for several reasons. First, they worried whether they could afford to keep the bills paid if their billable hours didn't spike back up. Second, many senior attorneys who would've moved on stuck around because of the retirement money they lost in the recession. Third, the large companies who the firms were billing started seeing things differently. They increasingly relied on in-house counsel, and in situations where they needed outside help, were less enthused about billable hours. Why not negotiate a price for the service up front instead of letting a firm run the meter? Finally, technology has changed the value of the work. Many things you could bill for in the past are now easy to accomplish with command+F, or can be done for pennies on the dollar in India.

Things quickly got ugly in the law schools. Firms recruited less so the competition for spots escalated. But the law schools, who wooed professors from firms and high profile government jobs, needed cash to keep the bills paid. So while there were less and less legal jobs, the size of law school classes stayed the same, or grew.

There are creepy people in every profession. But many people go to law school because they have a liberal arts BA and no idea what to do with themselves. And some of them have no interest in the work, but think they'll get rich. So, picture it: a generation of greedy, grasping people, who thought they'd make big racks, wandering into a bad market with upwards of $250,000 in debt. Desperation is sky-high.

We all grew up in a world where law meant you were set for life, and things have changed. For most people, it's a middle class job. So, amid this grim picture, a lawyer suing Jamie Thomas for taking his money and never delivering the collectible (???) skateboards he paid for is very tame.

Thank you for watching my TED Talk.


GAY

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 16489
  • Rep: 4312
  • Those that SLAP, can't.
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #256 on: September 17, 2019, 02:51:59 PM »
Jamie "Redacted" Thomas

Audrey II

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 847
  • Rep: 14639
  • shalom
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #257 on: September 17, 2019, 03:09:46 PM »
This page is harder to scroll through than a circa combat post
You got questions? Ask me like a fucking man. You know my Insta.

palelight

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1007
  • Rep: 166
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #258 on: September 17, 2019, 04:17:15 PM »
Expand Quote
I don’t know anything about ‘lawyer fuckery’ but I do appreciate this take.  Out of curiosity, what in particular are some of the things that come off as ‘low end fuckery’?
[close]

As the economy contracts, so does the legal market, just with a small delay. So as things really hit the skids around 2008, the legal market hit a death spiral around 2009. And while things ticked up a bit, the legal market never fully recovered. I don't think it ever will.

A big part of this is the drift away from billable hours. Enormous firms thrived for decades billing their top clients for as many hours as possible. Young associates served as worker bees, making a generous salary but required to clock tons of time for the client to stay on track. This system meant law school grads could expect to enter a lucrative job after graduation, which, while demanding, put them on pace to pay off their six-figure debts.

The recession changed things. Large firms were wary of taking on young associates for several reasons. First, they worried whether they could afford to keep the bills paid if their billable hours didn't spike back up. Second, many senior attorneys who would've moved on stuck around because of the retirement money they lost in the recession. Third, the large companies who the firms were billing started seeing things differently. They increasingly relied on in-house counsel, and in situations where they needed outside help, were less enthused about billable hours. Why not negotiate a price for the service up front instead of letting a firm run the meter? Finally, technology has changed the value of the work. Many things you could bill for in the past are now easy to accomplish with command+F, or can be done for pennies on the dollar in India.

Things quickly got ugly in the law schools. Firms recruited less so the competition for spots escalated. But the law schools, who wooed professors from firms and high profile government jobs, needed cash to keep the bills paid. So while there were less and less legal jobs, the size of law school classes stayed the same, or grew.

There are creepy people in every profession. But many people go to law school because they have a liberal arts BA and no idea what to do with themselves. And some of them have no interest in the work, but think they'll get rich. So, picture it: a generation of greedy, grasping people, who thought they'd make big racks, wandering into a bad market with upwards of $250,000 in debt. Desperation is sky-high.

We all grew up in a world where law meant you were set for life, and things have changed. For most people, it's a middle class job. So, amid this grim picture, a lawyer suing Jamie Thomas for taking his money and never delivering the collectible (???) skateboards he paid for is very tame.

Thank you for watching my TED Talk.

10/10, would gnar if I could.

ColinYourAssOut

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
  • Rep: 13
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #259 on: September 17, 2019, 05:28:04 PM »
Expand Quote
I don’t know anything about ‘lawyer fuckery’ but I do appreciate this take.  Out of curiosity, what in particular are some of the things that come off as ‘low end fuckery’?
[close]

As the economy contracts, so does the legal market, just with a small delay. So as things really hit the skids around 2008, the legal market hit a death spiral around 2009. And while things ticked up a bit, the legal market never fully recovered. I don't think it ever will.

A big part of this is the drift away from billable hours. Enormous firms thrived for decades billing their top clients for as many hours as possible. Young associates served as worker bees, making a generous salary but required to clock tons of time for the client to stay on track. This system meant law school grads could expect to enter a lucrative job after graduation, which, while demanding, put them on pace to pay off their six-figure debts.

The recession changed things. Large firms were wary of taking on young associates for several reasons. First, they worried whether they could afford to keep the bills paid if their billable hours didn't spike back up. Second, many senior attorneys who would've moved on stuck around because of the retirement money they lost in the recession. Third, the large companies who the firms were billing started seeing things differently. They increasingly relied on in-house counsel, and in situations where they needed outside help, were less enthused about billable hours. Why not negotiate a price for the service up front instead of letting a firm run the meter? Finally, technology has changed the value of the work. Many things you could bill for in the past are now easy to accomplish with command+F, or can be done for pennies on the dollar in India.

Things quickly got ugly in the law schools. Firms recruited less so the competition for spots escalated. But the law schools, who wooed professors from firms and high profile government jobs, needed cash to keep the bills paid. So while there were less and less legal jobs, the size of law school classes stayed the same, or grew.

There are creepy people in every profession. But many people go to law school because they have a liberal arts BA and no idea what to do with themselves. And some of them have no interest in the work, but think they'll get rich. So, picture it: a generation of greedy, grasping people, who thought they'd make big racks, wandering into a bad market with upwards of $250,000 in debt. Desperation is sky-high.

We all grew up in a world where law meant you were set for life, and things have changed. For most people, it's a middle class job. So, amid this grim picture, a lawyer suing Jamie Thomas for taking his money and never delivering the collectible (???) skateboards he paid for is very tame.

Thank you for watching my TED Talk.

Goddamnit, this really took the wind out of my informative shipping-related posts.  How dare you!
You can't beat cheeks with weak meat.

Monkey_Mcpott

  • Guest
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #260 on: September 17, 2019, 05:43:39 PM »
I'm hoping Wendler shows up at the Damn It All premiere to confront The Chief.

Lowcalcium

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1683
  • Rep: -89
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #261 on: September 17, 2019, 05:44:51 PM »
Expand Quote
I don’t know anything about ‘lawyer fuckery’ but I do appreciate this take.  Out of curiosity, what in particular are some of the things that come off as ‘low end fuckery’?
[close]

As the economy contracts, so does the legal market, just with a small delay. So as things really hit the skids around 2008, the legal market hit a death spiral around 2009. And while things ticked up a bit, the legal market never fully recovered. I don't think it ever will.

A big part of this is the drift away from billable hours. Enormous firms thrived for decades billing their top clients for as many hours as possible. Young associates served as worker bees, making a generous salary but required to clock tons of time for the client to stay on track. This system meant law school grads could expect to enter a lucrative job after graduation, which, while demanding, put them on pace to pay off their six-figure debts.

The recession changed things. Large firms were wary of taking on young associates for several reasons. First, they worried whether they could afford to keep the bills paid if their billable hours didn't spike back up. Second, many senior attorneys who would've moved on stuck around because of the retirement money they lost in the recession. Third, the large companies who the firms were billing started seeing things differently. They increasingly relied on in-house counsel, and in situations where they needed outside help, were less enthused about billable hours. Why not negotiate a price for the service up front instead of letting a firm run the meter? Finally, technology has changed the value of the work. Many things you could bill for in the past are now easy to accomplish with command+F, or can be done for pennies on the dollar in India.

Things quickly got ugly in the law schools. Firms recruited less so the competition for spots escalated. But the law schools, who wooed professors from firms and high profile government jobs, needed cash to keep the bills paid. So while there were less and less legal jobs, the size of law school classes stayed the same, or grew.

There are creepy people in every profession. But many people go to law school because they have a liberal arts BA and no idea what to do with themselves. And some of them have no interest in the work, but think they'll get rich. So, picture it: a generation of greedy, grasping people, who thought they'd make big racks, wandering into a bad market with upwards of $250,000 in debt. Desperation is sky-high.

We all grew up in a world where law meant you were set for life, and things have changed. For most people, it's a middle class job. So, amid this grim picture, a lawyer suing Jamie Thomas for taking his money and never delivering the collectible (???) skateboards he paid for is very tame.

Thank you for watching my TED Talk.

« Last Edit: September 17, 2019, 05:46:35 PM by Lowcalcium »

Painted Baby

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5955
  • Rep: 1835
  • They're trying to build a prison
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #262 on: September 17, 2019, 05:48:53 PM »
Excuse me that video should be titled Were Our $420,000 In Student Loans Worth It?!?

And that sentence is awkward af anyway

WastedHippy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1346
  • Rep: 129
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #263 on: September 17, 2019, 06:03:40 PM »
I'm hoping Wendler shows up at the Damn It All premiere to confront The Chief.

lol that'd be hilarious and chief would be so bummed

ice nine

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 8517
  • Rep: -308
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #264 on: September 17, 2019, 06:38:23 PM »
chief gonna swing by wendlers place n take him to taco bell on the way to the premiere
I;m sure i;m not the only dc/monster/subaru type guy here

n0torious

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
  • Rep: 185
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #265 on: September 19, 2019, 11:54:37 AM »
A few things we can all take away from this shitshow:
  • Whatever you do, always get it in writing. Wendler's case is okay, but it would be a lot better if he had something outside of text messages to hold up as a contract
  • Progress payments are your friend, especially for something like this where he didn't have enough liquidity to take down the transaction all at once. If he'd paid for a chunk of the boards at a time and only sent more money once Jamie delivered, none of this happens.
  • Create boundaries - they help things stay professional. I don't know Wendler, but this is the behavior of a superfan, someone who really looked up to Jamie, loved Zero, and wanted to write himself into the story. That's not a good headspace for business. He got manipulated thinking that they had a personal connection. Jamie probably saw him as an easy mark, and he was right.

Bitter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1092
  • Rep: 170
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #266 on: September 19, 2019, 12:15:53 PM »
I'm hoping Wendler shows up at the Damn It All premiere to confront The Chief.

Wendler should buy all the premiere tickets like 50 Cent did at a Ja Rule concert. It'd just be Jamie sitting alone in an empty theatre.


Murge

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3342
  • Rep: 538
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #267 on: September 19, 2019, 12:28:42 PM »
Has it already been covered ( also they people posting laws and seem like they understand lawyer world more than I do I hoping a response from one of you.) how did wendler a lawyer get himself in such a dumb situation shouldn’t he have had more knowledge to avoid this than a normal average person.

Lowcalcium

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1683
  • Rep: -89
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #268 on: September 19, 2019, 12:36:42 PM »
This whole thread still confuses me. The Chief didn't want to send him the stuff because the shipping rate was too high?

Or the Lawyer didn't want to pay to have the stuff shipped to him?

Who is actually at fault here?

winecrab

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
  • Rep: -176
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
Re: Jamie Thomas savage asfffff thread deleted?
« Reply #269 on: September 19, 2019, 05:33:50 PM »
Apparently Jamie held on to some of the stock he was supposed to send him. I don't think he sent him all the boards they had agreed on and sent him some different boards instead.