Author Topic: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced  (Read 60071 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

happyskater69

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Rep: 0
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #480 on: July 12, 2024, 11:55:57 PM »
Expand Quote
Bringing this back from the dead. I sort of want to run these on my new deck, but am on the fence about the setup. I don't really want to go down to 52mm wheels.

You guys think I can get away with 53mm Spitfire Conical Fulls on the 8.5" AF1 LOW trucks with an 8.5" deck?

I will probably run the Ace LOW Hard bushings, and I only weigh about 100 lbs right now, MAYBE 125 when in shape, but that wont be for a while.

Or will I just be wheelbiting into oblivion?

Deck wheelbase is 13.75, is it going to be too squirrely to ride?

Should I just go Thunder since my deck wheelbase is so small to start? I do prefer a turny board, but worried I may be going overkill.

The deck is a REAL True Fit 8.5x31.35 (13.75 WB) if anyone is wondering. I wanted a low and wide board setup.
[close]

I’m a buck fifty, I had the lows with ace low hard I rode 54mm, until I went down to 52mm, it’s manageable, the cool thing about aces is they are pretty surfy and even if you do wheelbite the geo doesn’t stop you, this is all relative but yea I never got pitched on them

Thats good to hear. Were you cutting it close/risky with the 54mm wheels or you think they were fine? Which wheels specifically (differing widths)?

I wanted to run 54mm wheels as this was supposed to be a do everything ride everywhere board, but I thought I should at least size down to 53 to try and be safe with the "LOWs".

Esmith5488

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2478
  • Rep: 514
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #481 on: July 13, 2024, 04:38:00 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Bringing this back from the dead. I sort of want to run these on my new deck, but am on the fence about the setup. I don't really want to go down to 52mm wheels.

You guys think I can get away with 53mm Spitfire Conical Fulls on the 8.5" AF1 LOW trucks with an 8.5" deck?

I will probably run the Ace LOW Hard bushings, and I only weigh about 100 lbs right now, MAYBE 125 when in shape, but that wont be for a while.

Or will I just be wheelbiting into oblivion?

Deck wheelbase is 13.75, is it going to be too squirrely to ride?

Should I just go Thunder since my deck wheelbase is so small to start? I do prefer a turny board, but worried I may be going overkill.

The deck is a REAL True Fit 8.5x31.35 (13.75 WB) if anyone is wondering. I wanted a low and wide board setup.
[close]
Before I went back to venture I was running a 53 conical full with the 8.5 lows. 55s?. Used hard bushing and probably rode mine tighter than most ace folks but I never got pitched on wheel bite. You can see marks but those might have been a mix of grind pinches and slight wheel bite.
The wheelbase would worry me though. 14 with ace lows was way too short for me personally
[close]

Very helpful, thanks. So wheelbite is probably not a concern for me then.

When you say 14 wheelbase with Ace LOWs was too short for you, you mean it was too squirrely to ride?

I take it you're normally a Venture trucks guy though?
Took a two or three year break from ventures and rode the AF1 and the AF1 low. Still ride ace 66’s on my other setup but yeah I didn’t like how squirly it felt. I ran 14.25 - 14.3 wheelbases with ace most of the time for comfort. Even the real 8.28 shape with a 14.1 wheelbase felt too small. Want to add im 180-190 pounds so I don’t think you will get pitched if I wasn’t.

Texas_Tone

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3348
  • Rep: 967
  • Get bent
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #482 on: July 13, 2024, 07:04:00 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Bringing this back from the dead. I sort of want to run these on my new deck, but am on the fence about the setup. I don't really want to go down to 52mm wheels.

You guys think I can get away with 53mm Spitfire Conical Fulls on the 8.5" AF1 LOW trucks with an 8.5" deck?

I will probably run the Ace LOW Hard bushings, and I only weigh about 100 lbs right now, MAYBE 125 when in shape, but that wont be for a while.

Or will I just be wheelbiting into oblivion?

Deck wheelbase is 13.75, is it going to be too squirrely to ride?

Should I just go Thunder since my deck wheelbase is so small to start? I do prefer a turny board, but worried I may be going overkill.

The deck is a REAL True Fit 8.5x31.35 (13.75 WB) if anyone is wondering. I wanted a low and wide board setup.
[close]

I’m a buck fifty, I had the lows with ace low hard I rode 54mm, until I went down to 52mm, it’s manageable, the cool thing about aces is they are pretty surfy and even if you do wheelbite the geo doesn’t stop you, this is all relative but yea I never got pitched on them
[close]

Thats good to hear. Were you cutting it close/risky with the 54mm wheels or you think they were fine? Which wheels specifically (differing widths)?

I wanted to run 54mm wheels as this was supposed to be a do everything ride everywhere board, but I thought I should at least size down to 53 to try and be safe with the "LOWs".

I think I was skating loopholes back then, just the classic shape, and nah it wasn’t risky, I think 53mm should be fine, the only reason I went to 52 was because I got like 3 sets of the Frankie Heck F4 when that part dropped cause he’s a friend of a friend, and realized I can skate the crusty shit around me with 52s…. Damn I miss that OG loophole formula though
Quote
Expand Quote
You want some whip its?”
KB to me at make a wish, while handing me a can of computer duster
[close]

j....soy.....

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 20099
  • Rep: 2055
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #483 on: July 13, 2024, 12:40:46 PM »
Despite it sounding mathematically unfeasible, I think it might work.  The way which Aces turn, you don't usually bite until the hanger is totally swivelled around.  Unlike a thunder where once you're at like 15 degrees you dig.

I had the 8.125/8.25 ones, 52's and never ran into any problems. 

AtTheCleaners

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Rep: 3
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #484 on: September 26, 2025, 01:49:33 PM »
Is anyone able to confirm that "Lows" are using a shorter kingpin compared to Standard AF1s?

If so, in theory standard AF1s should could run a low kingpin and low top bushing and be the optimized AF1 without going Inverted.

Is there any drawbacks to using a shorter top bushing? Less responsiveness or bounce back maybe?
« Last Edit: September 26, 2025, 01:59:13 PM by AtTheCleaners »

logjammin

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1016
  • Rep: 524
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #485 on: September 26, 2025, 02:24:28 PM »
I had a couple sets of em when they first came out. I put risers underneath to bring them up to 52mm height and ran them with small wheels. the kingpin clearance is better than standards, but not to the level of slappy's or ventures with their impressive non-inverted clearance. my af1 lows got loose kingpins, though. twice. id say try out slappies instead. I do agree with what you're getting at, I think truck companies could easily not have to offer inverted trucks, just equip them with a short kingpin that fits a standard height bottom but a low top bushing. simple and effective enough that you're not really grinding on the kingpins until you're getting close to the axle.

AtTheCleaners

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Rep: 3
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #486 on: September 26, 2025, 02:45:23 PM »
Exactly my point.

I always wondered why shorter kingpins aren't a thing.

Even better create a 1mm shorter kingpin locknut in combination with the shorter kingpin and get an additional ~3mm of clearance.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7602
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #487 on: September 27, 2025, 03:32:45 AM »
Is anyone able to confirm that "Lows" are using a shorter kingpin compared to Standard AF1s?

If so, in theory standard AF1s should could run a low kingpin and low top bushing and be the optimized AF1 without going Inverted.

Is there any drawbacks to using a shorter top bushing? Less responsiveness or bounce back maybe?


To add to this, mainly more with the shorter top bushing options, which I have extensive experience now.

Overall shorter tops can still perform pretty much the same as any other regular top, but I found I need to have a much flatter or smaller top washer, or at the very least a thinner lip on the washer, as it will tend to bind on the hanger way more easily than a taller top bushing arrangement.  It is that binding that prevents maximum turn on any truck I have skated.

I have low top bushings from the old Indy aftermarket line, as well as the Venture loose bushing kit, but I have also cut down or reshaped a lot more bushings just to see how they work, with surprisingly good results, for the most part.  Yes I have definitely cut some down too much, or made some way too small, but I have still made them fit on trucks that just couldn't take any other bushings with the kingpin and hanger taking so much wear that nothing else would fit.


Overall an inverted kingpin does make things way lower, or allow for more clearance, but it is a combination of a number of things that can allow for a truck that has both clearance, good turn and doesn't bind up, so yes it is still possible on a regular truck as I have done it for years, mainly on Indy, but I have done it to Ace trucks too - trim or reshape the top bushings, trim the top washer or put in thin or even flat washers, then once set up, angle grind off the excess kingpin and I am good to go.


Re kingpins, I can't recall if anyone actually said they had the height of the Ace low baseplate kingpins, but the regulars are about 37 mm and AF1 are 38 mm tall, that is the part sticking out of the baseplate.  Most other brands are 35 mm as per Indy, Thunder, Venture, then 33 mm for Slappy trucks and a few others in between all of those.

A set of the old Indy low trucks had around 32 mm kingpins I think, or at least that is what they were when I checked and I have taken my own standard kingpins down about that far in the past, which still worked well enough.


I did a bushing height list as well, which was interesting to then see how tall everything was, but that was also before the Ace inverted trucks with special bushings came out.

Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

AtTheCleaners

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Rep: 3
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #488 on: September 29, 2025, 11:18:14 AM »
@logjammin, @Mbrinson88,
I was able to measure the amount of kingpin sticking out of the Low and Standard AF1 baseplates using calipers.

Low: 34mm
Std: 36.58mm

If Slappy replacement kingpins are actually shorter when installed they would be a great replacement if/when an AF1 needs to be modified.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7602
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #489 on: September 29, 2025, 03:48:26 PM »
@logjammin, @Mbrinson88,
I was able to measure the amount of kingpin sticking out of the Low and Standard AF1 baseplates using calipers.

Low: 34mm
Std: 36.58mm

If Slappy replacement kingpins are actually shorter when installed they would be a great replacement if/when an AF1 needs to be modified.


Thanks!!!

Ace low baseplate = 34 is the new number I will add to my list of kingpin lengths.

Much appreciated.


Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

TheCrimsonShroud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Rep: 184
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #490 on: October 12, 2025, 02:57:20 PM »
Ridiculous, 49mm is for kids. Ace, release the standard Af1 hollows in 8.75.

I feel like the people who want an 8.75 AF1 are gonna be tranny riders who definitely do not want a 49mm ride height lol.
that would be crazy if your skin was made of hammers.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7602
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #491 on: October 13, 2025, 03:17:20 AM »
Expand Quote
Ridiculous, 49mm is for kids. Ace, release the standard Af1 hollows in 8.75.
[close]

I feel like the people who want an 8.75 AF1 are gonna be tranny riders who definitely do not want a 49mm ride height lol.


I guess it is a little funny now looking back at a 2021 thread, as there are definitely hollow AF1 8.75 trucks now, which there were not at the time, as well as low baseplates in the chop shop.

Also just one of those things, that Ace has the different height in baseplates, so anyone can mix and match to make up whatever they want.

I think I saw the other day that the Ace Chop Shop had added hollow hangers to the mix as well, so it seems all things are possible now there, whatever variations anyone could want, eg from looking over that old page, some people wanted a lower wider truck, but any which way, every want or need, especially now with the inverted kingpin option.


https://mesaskatesupply.com/collections/jts-chop-shop


Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

TheCrimsonShroud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
  • Rep: 184
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #492 on: October 13, 2025, 08:33:02 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Ridiculous, 49mm is for kids. Ace, release the standard Af1 hollows in 8.75.
[close]

I feel like the people who want an 8.75 AF1 are gonna be tranny riders who definitely do not want a 49mm ride height lol.
[close]


I guess it is a little funny now looking back at a 2021 thread, as there are definitely hollow AF1 8.75 trucks now, which there were not at the time, as well as low baseplates in the chop shop.

Also just one of those things, that Ace has the different height in baseplates, so anyone can mix and match to make up whatever they want.

I think I saw the other day that the Ace Chop Shop had added hollow hangers to the mix as well, so it seems all things are possible now there, whatever variations anyone could want, eg from looking over that old page, some people wanted a lower wider truck, but any which way, every want or need, especially now with the inverted kingpin option.


https://mesaskatesupply.com/collections/jts-chop-shop

Don't drink and browse, kids.

That's something that made me want to go back to Ace, actually. I could save a lot of money buying components instead of whole trucks. I had a pair of classics I really liked but they were stolen and (to no fault of Ace) it made me sad to consider buying a new pair.
that would be crazy if your skin was made of hammers.

kneebone

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2669
  • Rep: 550
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: New Ace AF1 *Low* announced
« Reply #493 on: October 13, 2025, 01:41:06 PM »
Expand Quote
Ridiculous, 49mm is for kids. Ace, release the standard Af1 hollows in 8.75.
[close]

I feel like the people who want an 8.75 AF1 are gonna be tranny riders who definitely do not want a 49mm ride height lol.
Clocking in as an 8.75 AF1 Low hollow street guy.