It really doesn’t help me that it just makes my blood boil looking at any of those scum bags faces. I wish I could watch that piece of shit Greg getting schooled for 20 minutes (or whatever happened in the video) but I can’t even watch it. Unless it’s him getting a taste of his own medicine I’m not looking at his scumbag face.
I agree that you have to be in an unemotional state to watch this but Dana trapped him many times during the interview and we learned a lot about the evidence they have (mostly by omission) and his view on law enforcement.
Take aways:
-if you are in the vicinity of border patrol/ICE agent you are threatening them and they are the victim.
-the man who was killed was a ‘suspect’. So was the lady who was shoved to the ground.
-carrying a gun at a protest is only acceptable if you are not deemed a threat by an agent.
-Just because his gun was removed doesn’t mean he didn’t have other weapons.
-they CANNOT prove that he went for his gun.
-and…
The main point was that the STATE said that he was ‘brandishing’ a firearm which Dana pointed out is a legal term that she challenged him on multiple times. She read the legal definition of ‘brandishing’ and said point blank that nothing in the video shows him brandishing anything more than a cell phone. At which point HH cosplay scum bag said that is why we need to conduct an investigation’. To which Dana said that the state has already made this claim prior to the investigation.
Also, we found out that the border patrol murders are still on the street just in another location.
This type of shit has been going on in prisons in America since the inception of the penal system. But I have never seen it apart from the civil rights era (in recorded form obviously it happens every day in low income areas) happening on the street.
Edit: if you would rather watch a breakdown of the interview not the entire interview then I think Sam Stein did a good job of highlighting what I attempted to highlight.
https://youtu.be/F_3JoSmciZk?si=6du7ddZqcepxfa5m