Expand Quote
I tried these on today and the soles are incredibly thin. Like regular Chuck Taylors or Vans.
Again, I don't get it. "We got this crazy new tech [and it's a 3/8" piece of foam midsole with a flat, glued in, 1/8" insole]!"
Well, isn't that the point of having the mid sole in the first place? If you needed more cushion in the insole than it would be redundant. Look at the Puigs. The insole is actual shit but the way it's constructed gives it more cushion and protection than some shitty vulcanized Vans with a thicker insole.
You can have (and I prefer having) both.
A padded insole adds comfort and can absorb light shocks like walking.
A more dense foam midsole will pack out less and absorb higher impacts.
If you have just a dense midsole the shoe can feel hard, unpadded and uncomfortable on your foot.
If you have just a soft insole (Pro Vans, Hyperfeel Nikes, Cons) it can easily compress to the point where it isn't really padding anything anymore and it is more susceptible to "packing out" and not returning to full, like-new, cushioning. As a side note, Lunarlon is pretty much gone in Nike's top shelf running shoes because people complained it packed out faster than regular EVA.
I'm a fat old fuck who needs both a decent midsole and insole because my knees are grinding away to dust but just a short time ago nearly every skate shoe was constructed this way. Yes, break in time could be significant but it's not like people couldn't skate in them. Can't there be a happy medium?