Expand Quote
It's weird to see from the outside because I feel like they've definitely positioned several Accel re-releases as "no, we swear we got it right this time!"
I've not noticed that in the past few years but I've definitely thrown out the view that hiding away the fact that they've been made puffier 20 years ago and aren't the prime version isn't a great move. It just confuses people.
Someone in here (I think Watson) traced the evolution of the Accel over time in a post in this thread and then pointed out how different Accel reissues were all inspired by different points in the Accel's history and that's what makes it confusing. Because the basic Accel slowly changed over time but it felt consistent and reflected current tastes. And if there were drastic changes, then eS gave them different names (Square One, Square Two, Accel Slim, etc.). Then, when they did reissues, they naming conventions for the reissues messed it up because the names and marketing materials never made it clear at which point in the Acccel's evolution they were actually drawing inspiration from.
So if the OG is based on a 2005 Accel model and the original Accel reissue is based on the 1995 model, it makes sense they'd feel different. But they're not making that clear. And they've never made that clear in any previous reissue.