Author Topic: Spitfire formula four  (Read 1060321 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fulfillthedream

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4889
  • Rep: 515
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1620 on: September 29, 2017, 07:16:09 PM »

Funny that spitfire just keeps reviving their older shapes in the formula four urethane (classic slims, lock ins).


they should just make the f4 urethane the standard for all the wheels!
Skateboarding is like jacking-off, it's that good- Jeremy Klein

[

Xen

  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 9539
  • Rep: 722
  • Living in your head rent free! <3
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1621 on: October 02, 2017, 07:52:59 PM »
Just tried the 53mm 101 lock ins last night. They slide really nicely. More controllable than conicals in my opinion.

Funny that spitfire just keeps reviving their older shapes in the formula four urethane (classic slims, lock ins).



...patiently waiting for the return of the AWOL cut...it'll never happen, but one can dream...

Stoeipoes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2382
  • Rep: 53
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1622 on: October 03, 2017, 05:22:34 AM »
At the shop I work we have the hjalte f4 classic shape wheel and the Daan van der Linden f4 radial slim wheel.
Hard to choose!
Bitches call me pussy, the horse filler.

fulfillthedream

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4889
  • Rep: 515
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1623 on: October 03, 2017, 08:26:25 PM »
Expand Quote
Just tried the 53mm 101 lock ins last night. They slide really nicely. More controllable than conicals in my opinion.

Funny that spitfire just keeps reviving their older shapes in the formula four urethane (classic slims, lock ins).


[close]

...patiently waiting for the return of the AWOL cut...it'll never happen, but one can dream...


Skateboarding is like jacking-off, it's that good- Jeremy Klein

[

VCR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1343
  • Rep: 216
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1624 on: October 04, 2017, 11:32:44 AM »
Is there no longer a formula four in a classic full shape?

Roisto

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2774
  • Rep: 486
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1625 on: October 04, 2017, 01:27:52 PM »
Is there no longer a formula four in a classic full shape?

Classic full was discontinued a while ago.

VCR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1343
  • Rep: 216
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1626 on: October 05, 2017, 08:25:44 AM »
Bummer

pizzafliptofakie

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 8414
  • Rep: 1857
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1627 on: November 09, 2017, 03:07:05 PM »
I know it's been discussed a little bit, but what's the deal with the F4 Lock Ins? I get that they're asymmetrical but I'm still not quite following the benefit. 

tzhangdox

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Rep: 783
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1628 on: November 09, 2017, 03:37:23 PM »
I know it's been discussed a little bit, but what's the deal with the F4 Lock Ins? I get that they're asymmetrical but I'm still not quite following the benefit.

Conical on the outside. Completely straight cut on the inside to help you lock into ledges and round rails etc better, less chance of slipping out.

Firebert

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 270
    • Instagram avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1629 on: November 10, 2017, 12:18:16 PM »
Expand Quote
I know it's been discussed a little bit, but what's the deal with the F4 Lock Ins? I get that they're asymmetrical but I'm still not quite following the benefit.
[close]

Conical on the outside. Completely straight cut on the inside to help you lock into ledges and round rails etc better, less chance of slipping out.

Also a greater chance of hanging up on tranny

pizzafliptofakie

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 8414
  • Rep: 1857
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1630 on: November 11, 2017, 01:50:13 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I know it's been discussed a little bit, but what's the deal with the F4 Lock Ins? I get that they're asymmetrical but I'm still not quite following the benefit.
[close]

Conical on the outside. Completely straight cut on the inside to help you lock into ledges and round rails etc better, less chance of slipping out.
[close]

Also a greater chance of hanging up on tranny

I skate much more tranny than I do ledge/rail, so maybe these ain't for me.

j....soy.....

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 20098
  • Rep: 2054
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1631 on: November 11, 2017, 10:19:12 PM »
Something else which is sick about straight cut is.....more truck.

I've noticed though conicals it feels like I don't primo as bad.....

The asymmetrical is sick...except that you can't reverse them....,

Chuck Gender

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1632 on: November 11, 2017, 11:29:48 PM »

The asymmetrical is sick...except that you can't reverse them....,

That's the reason I wouldn't buy them. Plus, radial slims are just fine.

Xen

  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 9539
  • Rep: 722
  • Living in your head rent free! <3
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1633 on: November 13, 2017, 08:22:28 PM »
Something else which is sick about straight cut is.....more truck.

I've noticed though conicals it feels like I don't primo as bad.....

The asymmetrical is sick...except that you can't reverse them....,

That's why I love straight cut (thinnish) wheels; Radial Slims, V2s, etc. Still can't find any good tablet shapes these days, everyones trending to wiiiiiide wheels, even Ricta, whom you could count on to have atleast one thinish/tablet wheel around.

j....soy.....

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 20098
  • Rep: 2054
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1634 on: November 13, 2017, 11:12:03 PM »
Yah....isn't what bones make mostly thin?

Xen

  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 9539
  • Rep: 722
  • Living in your head rent free! <3
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1635 on: November 14, 2017, 08:31:35 AM »
Yah....isn't what bones make mostly thin?

They seem pretty split, V2/V3 are thinnest - V1, V4, V5 are widest (not riding surface for all of them but actual wheel width). They also scale better (as does Spit for the most part) where as the wheel gets taller it gets wider and vice versa.

GinosGroceries

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1636 on: November 14, 2017, 09:37:59 PM »
Expand Quote
I know it's been discussed a little bit, but what's the deal with the F4 Lock Ins? I get that they're asymmetrical but I'm still not quite following the benefit.
[close]

Conical on the outside. Completely straight cut on the inside to help you lock into ledges and round rails etc better, less chance of slipping out.

What's the benefit of the conical outside? Less weight? Why not just go tablet shape and have the straight cut on both sides?

Firebert

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 270
    • Instagram avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1637 on: November 15, 2017, 06:53:52 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I know it's been discussed a little bit, but what's the deal with the F4 Lock Ins? I get that they're asymmetrical but I'm still not quite following the benefit.
[close]

Conical on the outside. Completely straight cut on the inside to help you lock into ledges and round rails etc better, less chance of slipping out.
[close]

What's the benefit of the conical outside? Less weight? Why not just go tablet shape and have the straight cut on both sides?

Slappies, wallrides, pool coping is easier to ride over w/out hanging up, less chips on your wheels as well.

j....soy.....

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 20098
  • Rep: 2054
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1638 on: November 15, 2017, 10:26:08 AM »
I mentioned this before but conicals don't primo as bad....

Jud Nestorkins

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1983
  • Rep: -54
  • I was dying of thirst and you fed me salt.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1639 on: November 25, 2017, 08:12:58 PM »
 Back on 52mm 101 classics.


Best street wheel hands down. Feels like a wider wheel but I get the slide of a skinny one. I love them.

Jud Nestorkins

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1983
  • Rep: -54
  • I was dying of thirst and you fed me salt.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1640 on: November 30, 2017, 12:02:03 AM »
Can those of you who like the 99s over the 101s or vice verse tell me why you do?

I just noticed that 99% of pro model Formula Fours are 99s (only ones I  think of of the top of my head that aren’t are those old Silas’) and in this thread one guy who runs/owns/works at a shop said they sell they 99s over 101s five to one so I am wondering if I should switch to the 99s.


I’ve only ever had one set of 99s but that was almost a year ago and the deck got left with a crazy ex who moved and that was only about a week after I got them.

tzhangdox

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Rep: 783
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1641 on: November 30, 2017, 12:14:12 AM »
Can those of you who like the 99s over the 101s or vice verse tell me why you do?

I just noticed that 99% of pro model Formula Fours are 99s (only ones I  think of of the top of my head that aren’t are those old Silas’) and in this thread one guy who runs/owns/works at a shop said they sell they 99s over 101s five to one so I am wondering if I should switch to the 99s.


I’ve only ever had one set of 99s but that was almost a year ago and the deck got left with a crazy ex who moved and that was only about a week after I got them.

99s are a little more forgiving on shitty terrain, and due to them being softer, slow you down more when powersliding. I did a really long powerslide on 101s while bombing a hill once to slow down a little bit and didn't slow down at all. Also 99s seem to make a slightly less high pitched screech when sliding which I prefer.

Gray Imp Sausage Metal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 15954
  • Rep: 611
  • We're just 2 lo(b)s(t)ers sitting behind a screen
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1642 on: November 30, 2017, 12:34:07 AM »
99s are already slippery enough and handle rougher ground a lot better than 101s.

Impish sausage is definitely gonna blow up as a euphemism this year

sharkin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2746
  • Rep: 507
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1643 on: December 01, 2017, 10:28:26 AM »
I like using 101s in parks and 99s on street

144p

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3221
  • Rep: 1492
    • 35th Ave Skates avatar image
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1644 on: December 01, 2017, 01:13:31 PM »
I like using 101s in parks and 99s on street
This.
I can get the 99s to tailslide on parks but they are way more grippy.

Spitfire4life

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
  • Rep: -20
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1645 on: December 22, 2017, 09:30:57 PM »
Not only have I caught truck madness, but now I'm getting wheel madness. I love the classic (as in non Formula Fours), but they can't slide, and I'm horrified of trying too hard and flat spotting them. I'm going to pick up some 101a F4s. That was my first set of F4s I ever tried, so it might be nice to have a reunion. I'll post back soon.
If you take medical advice from this puddle of retards you are going to die.

Spitfire4life

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
  • Rep: -20
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1646 on: December 26, 2017, 10:36:54 PM »
Picked up some 101a's in the classic shape and I am absolutely in love with them. I didn't realize how hard to was to slide Spit classics until I got these.  Even on the more slippy parts of the park they didn't slide out, but if I needed them to, they did. If anyone's considering these, get them!
If you take medical advice from this puddle of retards you are going to die.

Firebert

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3330
  • Rep: 270
    • Instagram avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1647 on: December 27, 2017, 07:12:24 AM »
Got some of the lock ins for xmas -

Just my opinion  - They do help lock in, even more noticeably on transition - awesome wheel

Szechuan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1878
  • Rep: 361
  • www.instagram.com/baddreamsaudio
    • bad dreams audio 😈🎸🥰 avatar image
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1648 on: December 28, 2017, 08:51:48 AM »
99s are already slippery enough and handle rougher ground a lot better than 101s.
This. My 56 F4 99a's are amazing.
I build custom boutique tube amplifiers and effects pedals 😈
www.instagram.com/baddreamsaudio

Kevin Taylor became a spot? Good for him.

micky682

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #1649 on: December 29, 2017, 11:26:59 AM »
Got some of the lock ins for xmas -

Just my opinion  - They do help lock in, even more noticeably on transition - awesome wheel
Please let us know how they look and feel overtime.